Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Rahish Kumar Saha, Amit Agrawal
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.58013
Certificate: View Certificate
This study explores the cutting-edge domain of nano refrigerants, aiming to boost the cooling performance of the widely used refrigerant R-134a by integrating a precisely balanced blend of CuO and SiO2 nanoparticles. The primary motivation for this research is the imperative to transform refrigeration systems, making them more energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable. The research methodology involves systematically creating a nano refrigerant by dispersing varying concentrations of CuO and SiO2 nanoparticles in R-134a. Selected for their exceptional thermal conductivity and stability, these nanoparticles have the potential to significantly enhance the heat transfer properties of the refrigerant. Initial stages encompass rigorous assessments of thermal conductivity improvements compared to the base R-134a, laying the groundwork for practical evaluations in a heat exchanger setup. In heat exchanger experiments, crucial parameters such as heat transfer coefficient, pressure drop, and overall heat transfer rate are precisely measured, providing a comprehensive understanding of the nano refrigerant’s real-world performance. The objective is not only to enhance thermal conductivity but also to optimize the nano refrigerant for effective and efficient heat exchange, thereby elevating the cooling capacity of R-134a. Stability studies are integral, ensuring the long-term viability of the nano refrigerant. Scrutinizing compatibility with commonly used refrigeration system materials and monitoring potential degradation over extended periods are essential. Insights from stability studies are crucial for establishing the practicality of implementing this nano refrigerant in diverse refrigeration applications. In addition to experimental work, mathematical models and simulations provide a theoretical foundation for observed phenomena. These models assist in predicting and optimizing the behavior of the nano refrigerant under various operating conditions, offering a valuable tool for refining nanoparticle concentrations for maximum efficiency. Environmental considerations are paramount, addressing concerns related to nanoparticle release and disposal. An eco-conscious approach is essential, ensuring that the benefits of enhanced cooling capacity are not compromised by potential environmental risks associated with nanoparticle usage. Comparative analyses with existing nano-refrigerants in the literature provide a broader context to the study, offering insights into the competitiveness of the CuO-SiO2/R-134a formulation. This comparative perspective is crucial for assessing the novel formulation\'s potential in the broader landscape of nano-refrigeration research.
I. INTRODUCTION
The continual pursuit of energy efficiency and environmental sustainability in refrigeration technology has spurred innovative strategies to enhance the performance of conventional refrigerants. Among these approaches, the incorporation of nanoparticles into refrigerants, known as nano refrigeration, has emerged as a promising frontier. This study focuses on elevating the cooling capacity of R-134a, a widely employed hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant, through the introduction of a combination of CuO (copper oxide) and SiO2 (silicon dioxide) nanoparticles. Refrigeration systems serve as vital components in various industries and households, contributing significantly to global energy consumption. However, their efficiency and environmental impact have come under scrutiny, prompting the exploration of advanced technologies that can mitigate these concerns. Nano refrigeration stands out as a cutting-edge solution, leveraging the distinctive thermal properties of nanoparticles to enhance heat transfer efficiency in refrigerants.
The rationale behind selecting CuO and SiO2 nanoparticles lies in their well-established thermal conductivity and stability. CuO is renowned for its high thermal conductivity, while SiO2 contributes stability to the nanoparticle mixture. The synergistic effect of combining these nanoparticles aims to address the inherent limitations of traditional refrigerants, particularly in terms of their heat transfer capabilities.
In the course of this study, we systematically prepare nano refrigerants by dispersing varying concentrations of CuO and SiO2 nanoparticles in R-134a. The initial focus centers on measuring the thermal conductivity improvements achieved by the nano refrigerant in comparison to pure R-134a. Subsequent investigations extend to practical evaluations in a heat exchanger setup, scrutinizing critical parameters such as heat transfer coefficient, pressure drop, and overall heat transfer rate. These experiments offer invaluable insights into the practical viability of the nano refrigerant within real-world cooling systems.
Stability studies form an integral facet of the research, ensuring the longevity of the nano refrigerant and its compatibility with materials commonly employed in refrigeration systems. Additionally, mathematical models and simulations are employed to optimize nanoparticle concentrations for diverse operating conditions, providing a comprehensive understanding of the nano refrigerant’s behavior.
Environmental considerations are paramount in this study, addressing concerns associated with nanoparticle release and disposal. The overarching goal is to develop a nano refrigerant that not only enhances cooling capacity but also adheres to sustainable and eco-friendly practices.
By the culmination of this research endeavor, our aim is to contribute to the development of greener and more energy-efficient refrigeration systems. The insights gleaned from this study may pave the way for practical applications of CuO and SiO2 nanoparticle-infused R-134a, marking a significant stride toward a sustainable future in refrigeration technology.
II. TYPES OF REFRIGERATION
Refrigeration is a crucial technology used for cooling and preserving perishable goods, creating comfortable living and working environments, and facilitating various industrial processes. There are several types of refrigeration systems, each designed to meet specific needs. Here are some common types of refrigeration:
A. Vapor Compression Refrigeration
This is the most common type of refrigeration used in households and commercial applications. It involves a compressor, condenser, expansion valve, and evaporator. The refrigerant undergoes a cycle of compression, condensation, expansion, and evaporation to absorb and release heat.
E. Thermoelectric Refrigeration
Thermoelectric refrigeration utilizes the Peltier effect, where an electric current is passed through a junction of two different conductors to create a temperature difference. This technology is often used in small cooling applications like portable coolers and electronic devices.
F. Ejector Refrigeration
Ejector refrigeration systems use a jet or ejector device to create a pressure difference in the refrigerant. This type of refrigeration is suitable for applications where a large temperature lift is required.
G. Cryogenic Refrigeration
Cryogenic refrigeration involves the use of extremely low temperatures, typically below -150 degrees Celsius (-238 degrees Fahrenheit). This type of refrigeration is employed in applications such as liquefied natural gas (LNG) production, medical cryogenics, and certain industrial processes.
H. Cascade Refrigeration
Cascade refrigeration systems use two or more refrigeration cycles operating at different temperature levels. These systems are often employed in applications where a single refrigerant cannot cover the required temperature range.
I. Thermal Energy Storage Refrigeration
Thermal energy storage refrigeration systems store thermal energy during off-peak periods and use it during peak demand times. This type of refrigeration helps optimize energy use and reduce overall energy costs.
The choice of refrigeration system depends on factors such as the desired temperature range, application, energy efficiency requirements, and environmental considerations. Each type of refrigeration system has its advantages and limitations, making it suitable for specific applications.
III. APPLICATION OF REFRIGERATION
Refrigeration plays a vital role in various industries, commercial settings, and everyday life. Its applications extend beyond mere cooling; refrigeration is essential for preserving food, facilitating medical procedures, and supporting various industrial processes. Here are some key applications of refrigeration:
A. Food Preservation
B. Medical and Pharmaceutical Storage
C. Industrial Processes
D. Air Conditioning
E. Transportation
F. HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning)
G. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Production
H. Beverage Industry
I. Ice Production
J. Research and Laboratories
K. Cold Storage Warehousing
L. Dairy Industry
IV. REFRIGERATION OF NANO FLUIDS
The application of nanofluids in refrigeration represents an innovative approach to enhance the heat transfer characteristics of traditional refrigerants. Nanofluids are engineered colloidal suspensions of nanoparticles in a base fluid, often water or another conventional coolant. The addition of nanoparticles, such as metal oxides or carbon-based materials, to refrigerants can significantly improve thermal conductivity, leading to more efficient heat transfer and enhanced refrigeration performance. Here are key aspects of refrigeration using nanofluids:
V. MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Material properties play a crucial role in determining the behaviour, performance, and suitability of materials for various applications. Here are some key material properties and their significance:
A. Mechanical Properties
B. Thermal Properties
C. Electrical Properties
D. Optical Properties
E. Chemical Properties
F. Magnetic Properties
G. Density
H. Hardness
I. Acoustic Properties
J. Biocompatibility
Understanding and optimizing these material properties are fundamental in material science and engineering. The selection of materials for specific applications depends on a careful consideration of these properties to meet the desired performance criteria.
VI. R134A REFRIGERANT
R-134a is a hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerant widely used in various cooling and air conditioning applications. It is a non-ozone-depleting substance and has become a common replacement for chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) refrigerants due to its relatively lower environmental impact. Here are some key characteristics and applications of R-134a.
A. Properties of R-134a
B. Characteristics and Applications
While R-134a has been widely used for several decades, there is ongoing research and development in the refrigeration and air conditioning industry to identify and implement alternatives with even lower global warming potential in response to environmental concerns. Transitioning to refrigerants with lower GWP is part of global efforts to address climate change and reduce the environmental impact of cooling systems.
C. CuO Nano-particles
Copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles, with a size range between 1 and 100 nanometers, exhibit unique properties due to their high surface area and quantum effects. These nanoparticles are known for their catalytic, electrical, and antimicrobial properties. CuO nanoparticles find applications in diverse fields, including catalysis for gas sensors, solar cells, lithium-ion batteries, and antimicrobial agents in healthcare. Their small size and distinctive characteristics make CuO nanoparticles an area of active research for advancing technologies in nanoelectronics, nanomedicine, and environmental remediation. The controlled synthesis and utilization of CuO nanoparticles contribute to the development of innovative materials with enhanced functionalities.
D. SiO2 Nano-particles
Silicon dioxide (SiO2) nanoparticles, ranging from 1 to 100 nanometers, find diverse applications owing to their unique properties. Widely used in industries, SiO2 nanoparticles serve as reinforcement agents in polymers, enhancing mechanical strength. In biomedical fields, their biocompatibility makes them valuable for drug delivery systems and imaging. As catalyst supports, SiO2 nanoparticles improve catalytic processes. They contribute to advanced insulation materials with superior thermal and electrical characteristics and play a role in environmental applications, such as water purification. SiO2 nanoparticles also feature in nanoelectronics, coatings, and films, showcasing their versatility in influencing material properties across various domains.
The experimental setup for this study involves a meticulously designed system to assess the cooling capacity enhancement of refrigerant R-134a with CuO and SiO2 mixture nanoparticles. A controlled environment is established with a precision cooling chamber, ensuring stable conditions for experiments. The setup includes a nanofluid preparation unit, allowing the systematic mixing of CuO and SiO2 nanoparticles with R-134a in varying concentrations. This nano refrigerant is then introduced into a specially designed heat exchanger unit, which facilitates the practical evaluation of heat transfer characteristics. Temperature and pressure sensors are strategically placed to monitor key parameters in real-time. Additionally, the experimental setup incorporates a stability testing apparatus for long-term assessments. The entire system is integrated with data acquisition systems and controls, ensuring accuracy and repeatability throughout the experimental process. This carefully constructed experimental setup enables a comprehensive investigation into the performance of the CuO-SiO2/R-134a nano refrigerant.
VII. RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Atmospheric Temperature = 20°C |
Refrigerant R134a = 100 gm |
|||||||||
T1 (ºC) |
T2 (ºC) |
Condenser Temperature Drop(T1-T2) |
T3 (ºC) |
T4 (ºC) |
P1 (psi) |
P2 (psi) |
Power consumed by Compressor |
Power consumed by Evaporator |
Time (min) |
|
41.5 |
27.1 |
14.8 |
-2.1 |
25 |
205 |
11 |
3.30 |
3.20 |
00 |
|
42.1 |
27.2 |
14.9 |
-2.3 |
25 |
210 |
11 |
3.19 |
3.23 |
25 |
|
44.3 |
27.6 |
14.6 |
-2.4 |
25 |
215 |
14 |
3.44 |
3.35 |
50 |
|
44.9 |
28.3 |
15.4 |
-2.3 |
25 |
220 |
15 |
3.46 |
3.39 |
75 |
|
45.6 |
28.7 |
16.7 |
-2.5 |
25 |
225 |
11 |
3.52 |
3.45 |
100 |
|
45.9 |
29.1 |
17.2 |
-3.1 |
25 |
230 |
12 |
3.57 |
3.47 |
125 |
|
46.1 |
29.4 |
17.4 |
-2.4 |
25 |
235 |
10 |
3.61 |
3.53 |
150 |
|
46.5 |
30.6 |
16.4 |
-3.5 |
25 |
230 |
11 |
3.55 |
3.57 |
175 |
|
Difference in final and initial power consumption |
3.55-3.30= 0.25 |
3.57-3.20= 0.37 |
|
|||||||
COP = Heat Consumed by Evaporator ? Power consumed by Compressor
= 0.37/ 0.25= 1.48
Atmospheric Temperature = 20.5°C |
Refrigerant R134a = 101gm |
|||||||||
T1 (ºC) |
T2 (ºC) |
Condenser Temperature Drop(T1-T2) |
T3 (ºC) |
T4 (ºC) |
P1 (psi) |
P2 (psi) |
Power consumed by Compressor |
Power consumed by Evaporator |
Time (min) |
|
43.1 |
32.5 |
15.4 |
-2.1 |
25 |
210 |
12 |
4.14 |
3.37 |
00 |
|
43.9 |
32.2 |
16.7 |
-2.4 |
25 |
215 |
10 |
4.17 |
3.47 |
25 |
|
45.8 |
30.9 |
16.9 |
-2.2 |
25 |
220 |
12 |
4.20 |
3.57 |
50 |
|
45.4 |
30.4 |
17.0 |
-2.1 |
25 |
225 |
10 |
4.25 |
3.66 |
75 |
|
46.5 |
29.0 |
18.5 |
-2.5 |
25 |
230 |
10 |
4.27 |
3.68 |
100 |
|
46.9 |
28.8 |
18.3 |
-3.3 |
25 |
220 |
10 |
4.33 |
3.73 |
125 |
|
45.4 |
30.4 |
17.0 |
-2.1 |
25 |
215 |
10 |
4.31 |
3.74 |
150 |
|
47.7 |
28.9 |
17.7 |
-3.3 |
25 |
225 |
10 |
4.39 |
3.77 |
175 |
|
Difference in final and initial power consumption |
4.39-4.14= 0.25 |
3.77-3.37= 0.40 |
|
|||||||
COP = Heat Consumed by Evaporator ? Power consumed by Compressor
= 0.40/ 0.25= 1.60
Atmospheric Temperature = 20.8°C |
SiO2+Refrigerant R134a = 102 gm |
|||||||||
T1 (ºC) |
T2 (ºC) |
Condenser Temperature Drop(T1- T2) |
T3 (ºC) |
T4 (ºC) |
P1 (psi) |
P2 (psi) |
Power consumed by Compressor |
Power consumed by Evaporator |
Time (min) |
|
45.1 |
30.5 |
16.6 |
-2.3 |
25 |
215 |
11 |
4.13 |
3.56 |
00 |
|
45.9 |
30.2 |
17.4 |
-2.2 |
25 |
220 |
10 |
4.17 |
3.57 |
25 |
|
46.8 |
27.9 |
17.9 |
-2.4 |
25 |
225 |
13 |
4.18 |
3.64 |
50 |
|
47.4 |
27.4 |
18.7 |
-2.6 |
25 |
230 |
10 |
4.21 |
3.66 |
75 |
|
47.1 |
29.0 |
18.3 |
-2.7 |
25 |
235 |
10 |
4.24 |
3.77 |
100 |
|
46.9 |
29.8 |
17.1 |
-3.1 |
25 |
240 |
11 |
4.27 |
3.80 |
125 |
|
46.4 |
32.4 |
17.0 |
-2.6 |
25 |
245 |
10 |
4.33 |
3.86 |
150 |
|
45.1 |
29.9 |
18.8 |
-3.2 |
25 |
250 |
12 |
4.38 |
3.98 |
175 |
|
Difference in final and initial power consumption |
4.38-4.13= 0.25 |
3.98-3.56= 0.42 |
|
|||||||
COP = Heat Consumed by Evaporator ? Power consumed by Compressor
= 0.42/ 0.25= 1.68
Atmospheric Temperature = 22.2°C |
Refrigerant R134a = 102gm |
||||||||
T1 (ºC) |
T2 (ºC) |
Condenser Temperature Drop(T1- T2) |
T3 (ºC) |
T4 (ºC) |
P1 (psi) |
P2 (psi) |
Power consumed by Compress or |
Power consumed by Evaporato r |
Time (min) |
47.2 |
29.6 |
17.6 |
-1.7 |
25 |
220 |
13 |
5.07 |
4.31 |
00 |
48.7 |
29.2 |
19.5 |
-2.2 |
25 |
225 |
15 |
5.09 |
4.57 |
25 |
48.9 |
29.5 |
19.4 |
-1.9 |
25 |
230 |
16 |
5.11 |
4.58 |
50 |
49.1 |
29.6 |
19.6 |
-1.8 |
25 |
235 |
17 |
5.17 |
4.64 |
75 |
49.2 |
29.5 |
19.7 |
-2.3 |
25 |
240 |
18 |
5.23 |
4.66 |
100 |
48.7 |
28.9 |
19.8 |
-2.4 |
25 |
245 |
14 |
5.27 |
4.71 |
125 |
47.3 |
29.7 |
17.6 |
-2.3 |
25 |
250 |
13 |
5.30 |
4.73 |
150 |
47.2 |
29.6 |
17.5 |
-2.5 |
25 |
255 |
15 |
5.32 |
4.74 |
175 |
Difference in final and initial power consumption |
5.32-5.07= 0.25 |
4.47-4.31= 0.43 |
|
VIII. FUTURE SCOPES
The investigation into enhancing the cooling capacity of refrigerant R-134a through CuO and SiO2 mixture nanoparticles opens up several future scopes and avenues for research and application. Here are potential directions for future work:
In conclusion, the investigation into the enhancement of cooling capacity in refrigerant R-134a through the addition of CuO and SiO2 mixture nanoparticles presents a promising avenue for advancing refrigeration technologies. The experimental setup, comprising a controlled cooling chamber, nanofluid preparation unit, and specialized heat exchanger, facilitates a systematic exploration of the nano refrigerant’s performance. Key parameters, including thermal conductivity, stability, and practical evaluations, are rigorously assessed. The study\'s interdisciplinary approach integrates materials science, thermodynamics, and environmental considerations. The incorporation of mathematical modeling enhances predictive capabilities, while the comparison with existing nano refrigerants situates the CuO-SiO2/R-134a formulation within the broader context. By addressing research gaps related to long-term stability, practical implementation challenges, and environmental impact, this study contributes to the evolving landscape of energy-efficient and sustainable refrigeration technologies. The outcomes aim to inform future advancements, laying the groundwork for innovative applications and environmental stewardship in refrigeration systems.
[1] Kamal A.R. Ismail a, Fatima A.M. Lino “New potential applications of phase change materials: A review”Journal of Energy Storage Volume 53, September 2022, 105202 [2] S. Arun Prakash a, C. Hariharan b, R. Arivazhagan “Review on numerical algorithms for melting and solidification studies and their implementation in general purpose computational fluid dynamic software”Journal of Energy Storage Volume 36, April 2021, 102341 [3] Lizhong Yang a b, Uver Villalobos a, Bakytzhan Akhmetov“A comprehensive review on sub-zero temperature cold thermal energy storage materials, technologies, and applications: State of the art and recent developmentsApplied Energy” Volume 288, 15 April 2021, 116555 [4] F.S. Javadi, H.S.C. Metselaar, P. Ganesan“Performance improvement of solar thermal systems integrated with phase change materials (PCM), a review”Solar Energy Volume 206, August 2020, Pages 330-352 [5] Mohammed Mumtaz A. Khan a, R. Saidur “A review for phase change materials (PCMs) in solar absorption refrigeration systemsRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews” Volume 76, September 2017, Pages 105-137 [6] Mahmood Mastani Joybari a, Fariborz Haghighat a “Heat and cold storage using phase change materials in domestic refrigeration systems: The state-of-the-art review” Energy and Buildings Volume 106, 1 November 2015, Pages 111-124 [7] Esra Ozcan Doganay, Fazil Erinc Yavuz, “A numerical study on the usage of phase change material (PCM) to prolong compressor off period in a beverage cooler”Energy Conversion and Management Volume 142, 15 June 2017, Pages 95-106 [8] Atayero, AA 2019, ‘Performance of a Domestic Refrigerator infused with Safe Charge of R600a refrigerant and various concentrations of TiO2 nanolubricants’, 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Materials Processing and Manufacturing, vol.35, pp. 1158 – 1164. [9] Aditya Chunekar 2014, ‘Standards and Labeling program for refrigerators: Comparing India with others’, Energy Policy, vol. 65, pp. 626 – 630.
Copyright © 2024 Rahish Kumar Saha, Amit Agrawal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET58013
Publish Date : 2024-01-13
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here