Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Nirmitha A S, Bindya G S, Rashek
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.65282
Certificate: View Certificate
It is becoming increasingly well-known to use remote sensing for regional crop research. One of the hardest things for researchers utilizing remote sensing to do is anticipate and map crop yield at scales other than the field scale. In this project, the effective creation of a scientific model utilizing neural network to forecast crop productivity on a regional level utilizing well-known feed forward and techniques for back-propagation use crop parameters that are received by remote sensing. The Meals In order to design and calibrate the Forward Back Propagating Neural Network (FFBPNN) model, Ground truth data and parameters were acquired by remote sensing in a Mat lab setting. The instance provided reliable and precise outcomes. The performance of the suggested model was statistically tested using the coefficient of determination, root mean squared error; mean absolute error, average ratio of anticipated yield to goal crop production and relative error. This project also looked at how the amount of buried neurons affected the model\'s functionality. Statistical investigation confirmed the applicability of the developed ANN model to parameters for paddy yield estimation based on remote sensing.
I. INTRODUCTION
Agriculture contributes significantly to GDP (gross domestic product) in practically all developing economies. When planning for the population's food security, crop yield prediction at the regional level is essential. This activity holds higher significance for a variety of applications, such as crop planning, water use efficiency, crop losses, and economic calculations, among others. Conventional techniques for estimating crop production that rely on ground observation, such visual inspection and sampling surveys, call for on-going crop parameter monitoring and documentation. Because of their widespread and repeating coverage, remotely sensed pictures have a lot of potential for assessing agricultural output and extent over wide areas Remote sensing imagery's spectral data provides extremely exact characteristics of the crop.
Agronomic models, which are based on experimental or computational methods, can be used to estimate crop yields at the regional level. Mechanical simulations are complicated mathematical procedures that require a large number of input parameters. However, empirical approaches can only be used within the data range for which they were designed, meaning that they are simpler and require less data to be used. Found an empirical correlation between the harvest of crops in-situ and a vegetation index. This discovered association frequently holds solely for the specific crop type and seasonally acquired RS data.
The primary benefit of neural networks is their capacity to leverage previously unanticipated knowledge that hides inside data. "Neural network learning" or "neural network training" refers to the process of "capturing" unknown information. The back propagation (BP) algorithm, a type of supervised training that utilizes the derivatives of the error function to minimize the network's error, is used to train feed-forward networks. The network processes the inputs, compares the final output to the targeted outputs (set as the target), and simultaneously creates the weight coefficients. Calculating errors involves comparing expected and desired outputs The primary crop grown in the research region is the paddy.
Unfortunately, no precise model has been created to forecast paddy yield; instead, conventional approaches are used. In light of the previous explanation, the current study's goal was to create streamlined models for predicting paddy yield using historical yield data and remote sensing factors. The following are some of the specific goals: Examine how well artificial neural network (ANN) models predict yield using crop parameters that are acquired by remote sensing and historical yield data at the regional level. Tracking how model performance varies as model parameters change. Statistical testing of the model's performance
II. LITERATURE SURVEY
III. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to extend our sincere appreciation to the authors of the papers we reviewed in this study. Your research has been invaluable in shaping our understanding of the topic and has greatly contributed to this work. Thank you for your dedication to advancing knowledge in this field.
[1] van Klompenburg, T.; Kassahun, A.; Catal, C. Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 177, 105709. [CrossRef] [2] Zhong, L.; Hu, L.; Zhou, H. Deep learning based multi-temporal crop classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 221, 430–443. [CrossRef] [3] Shrestha, R.; Di, L.; Yu, E.G.; Kang, L.; Shao, Y.; Bai, Y. Regression model to estimate flood impact on corn yield using MODIS NDV and USDA cropland data layer. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 398–407. [CrossRef] [4] Zhou, Q.; Ismaeel, A. Integration of maximum crop response with machine learning regression model to timely estimate crop yield. Geo-Spat. Inf. Sci. [5] Lipper L et al (2014) Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nat Clim Change 4(12):1068–1072. [6] Nishiyama, I. Effects of Temperature on the Vegetative Growth of Rice Plants. In Climate and Rice; International Rice Research Institute: Los Baños, Philippines, 1976; pp. 159–185. [7] M. K. Papademetrious, F. J. Dent, and E. M. Herath, Bridging the Rice Yield Gap in the Asia-Pacific Region, FOA/RAP, Bangkok, *ailand, 2000. [8] Ahmad, I., Saeed, U., Fahad, M., Ullah, A., Habib-ur-Rahman, M., Ahmad, A., Judge, J., 2018. Yield forecasting of spring maize using remote sensing and crop modeling in Faisalabad-Punjab Pakistan. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 46 (10), 1701–1711. [9] Godfray, H.C.J.; Beddington, J.R.; Crute, I.R.; Haddad, L.; Lawrence, D.; Muir, J.F.; Pretty, J.; Robinson, S.; Thomas, S.M.; Toulmin, C. Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People. Science 2010, 327, 812–818. [CrossRef] [10] Aghbashlo, M., Hosseinpour, S., Mujumdar, A.S., 2015. Application of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in drying technology: a comprehensive review. Dry. Technol. 33 (12), 1397–1462. [11] Nations, U. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs: New York, NY, USA, 2015 [12] Hsieh, S.H., Liu, L.W., Chung, W.G., Wang, Y.M., 2019. Sensitivity Analysis on the Rising Relation between Short-Term Rainfall and Groundwater Table Adjacent to an Artificial Recharge Lake. Water 11 (8), 1704 [13] Y.A. Pachepsky, D. Timlin, and G. Várallyay, “Artificial neural networks to estimate soil water retention from easily measurable data”, Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 60(3), pp.727-733, 1996.
Copyright © 2024 Nirmitha A S, Bindya G S, Rashek . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET65282
Publish Date : 2024-11-15
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here