Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Gunjagi Deepak
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.53890
Certificate: View Certificate
Concrete demand has increased to satisfy the need of infrastructural development facilities. Tremendous amount of natural resources and energy is consumed for production of ordinary Portland cement. It also emits substantial quantity of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Therefore, it has been need of the hour to find out alternatives for making eco-friendly concrete. Many siliceous and alumnio-siliceous material are available which possess little or no binding values. But these materials in finely divided forms when come in contact with moisture, they chemically react with calcium hydroxide to form compounds those have binding properties. In the current studies when research was conducted on pozzocrete in laboratory it was well established that when pozzocrete is used in concrete, it increases the strength of concrete. Pozzocrete being finer than cement, gives more specific surface, fills the voids, increases workability of concrete and also reduces the problem of shrinkage in concrete. In the current study, the behavior of pozzocrete with cement concrete is reported. Percentage variation of pozzocrete in cement concrete to replace cement is tested to achieve economy as well as higher strength of RCC structural members. An experimental investigation was carried out on pozzocrete in reinforced cement concrete. Weigh batching method was used for 10% to 30% replacement of cement by pozzocrete in M20 grade concrete. It was found out that 30% replacement of cement with pozzocrete gave most acceptable results in flexural behavior. Workability and ductility of concrete was also found to be increased with increase in flexural strength.
I. INTRODUCTION
One of the most widely used material in construction is plain cement concrete, which has the benefit of casting in any shape required. Concrete has very low tensile strength as compared to its compressive strength which is very high. Achieving concrete with crushing strength more than 40 N/mm2 is not a difficult task, but with replacement of cement with pozzocrete in concrete, about 50% increase in strength of concrete can be achieved.
Combustion of pulverized bituminous or sub-bituminous materials at power stations lead fly ashes. Processing of this fly ash gets high efficiency pozzolanic material called pozzocrete. It is also one of the cheapest available pozzolanic materials with high production capacity and also checked with strict quality control. Much research has been carried out on different types of pozzolanic materials and its properties with various parameters such as water cement ratio, effect on strength parameters of concrete are well established now.
Precast concrete members are used widely to accelerate the construction process and also to maintain proper quality control in concrete production. Casting of these precast concrete members is also a very tedious job which involves difficult and intricate patterns. Pozzocrete mix concrete can help pre-casters solve challenges in many areas of production. Precast members also require accelerated curing to achieve early age concrete strength so that they can bear handling stresses. While the pozzocrete have been too slow for early strength gain characteristics, conditions are changing towards the use of pozzocrete in the applications. Where the high strength concrete mixtures are found to be dry and harsh to use, pozzocrete is used beneficially to increase the workability of concrete. Pozzocrete used in pre-cast concrete products improves the workability, resulting in product with sharp, distinctive corners and edges.
II. OBJECTIVE & METHODOLOGY
A. Objective
Current study is aimed at to Determine
B. Methodology
The current study has been divided into following steps –
III. MATERIALS & MIX PROPORTION
A. Pozzocrete 63
a. Presentation - Finely divided dry powder
b. Color - Light grey
c. Bulk Weight - 1.0 tonne / m3
d. Sp. Density - 2.3
e. Particle Size - <50 micron
f. Particle Shape - Spherical
g. Package - 50kg bags
2. Chemical composition of pozzocrete 63
a. Al2O3 + Fe2O3 - 32.5%
b. SiO2 - 64%
c. MgO - 1.2%
d. SO3 - 1.6%
e. Na2O - 0.7%
f. Surface area > 4,000
B. Cement
C. Sand
D. Coarse Aggregate
Table I: Concrete Mix
Mix I |
Mix II |
Mix III |
Mix IV |
Mix V |
Mix VI |
Mix VII |
M20 Grade Concrete |
Concrete with 10% Reduction in Cement |
Concrete with 20% Reduction in Cement |
Concrete with 30% Reduction in Cement |
Concrete with 10% Replacement of cement with pozzocrete |
Concrete with 20% Replacement of cement with pozzocrete |
Concrete with 30% Replacement of cement with pozzocrete |
The details of mix design for concrete mix I to VII are given in table II and III below:
Table II: For cubes
Ingredient |
Mix I |
Mix II |
Mix III |
Mix IV |
Mix V |
Mix VI |
Mix ViI |
Cement (gms) |
1200 |
1080 |
960 |
840 |
1080 |
960 |
840 |
Pozzocrete (gms) |
|
|
|
|
120 |
240 |
360 |
Sand (gms) |
2304 |
2304 |
2304 |
2304 |
2304 |
2304 |
2304 |
Aggregate (gms) |
4360 |
4360 |
4360 |
4360 |
4360 |
4360 |
4360 |
Water (ml) |
696 |
626 |
556 |
487 |
696 |
696 |
696 |
Table III: For beams
Ingredient |
Mix I |
Mix II |
Mix III |
Mix IV |
Mix V |
Mix VI |
Mix ViI |
Cement (gms) |
8000 |
7200 |
6400 |
5600 |
7200 |
6400 |
5600 |
Pozzocrete (gms) |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
800 |
1600 |
2400 |
Sand (gms) |
15360 |
15360 |
15360 |
15360 |
15360 |
15360 |
15360 |
Aggregate (gms) |
29040 |
29040 |
29040 |
29040 |
29040 |
29040 |
29040 |
Water (ml) |
4640 |
4176 |
3712 |
3248 |
4640 |
4640 |
4640 |
IV. LABORATORY TESTING & CALCULATION
The specimens were tested for compression, flexure & shear tests in laboratory. All the specimens were casted with proportion of 1 : 2 : 3.75 with w/c ratio of 0.575. The cement was replaced with pozzocrete, percentage varied from 0% to 30% with every 10% increase.
A. Compression Test
Compressive strength is performed on casted cubical specimens of size 150 x 150 x 150mm. Most characteristics of hardened concrete are related to its compressive strength hence it is the most common test conducted on concrete. It is also the easiest test to perform on concrete. Compressive strength is the maximum load the concrete cube can bear at failure. Compressive strength is ratio of max load at failure to the cross sectional area of concrete.
B. Flexural Test
Tensile strength of concrete is evaluation by conducting flexural test. Concrete structures need to resist tensile stresses induced due to externally applied loads. It is not possible to measure the tensile strength of concrete by direct means. Beam tests are found to be suitable for measuring the flexural strength of concrete. RCC concrete beams of size 150 x 150 x 1000mm are tested with single point loading at the center. The flexural strength is evaluated from:
V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Table IV: Results of Cube Compression Test for Concrete Mixes 1 to 7
Concrete Mix |
Compressive Strength N/mm2 |
||
3 Days |
7 Days |
28 Days |
|
I |
12.34 |
12.76 |
25.12 |
II |
11.45 |
12.40 |
22.82 |
III |
11.61 |
12.08 |
20.92 |
IV |
7.66 |
9.25 |
18.18 |
V |
9.22 |
13.63 |
20.35 |
VI |
12.92 |
15.75 |
25.14 |
VI |
14.00 |
16.90 |
27.12 |
Change in compressive strength of standard cube for M20 Grade concrete and for percentage replacement of cement with pozzocrete is shown in Figure 1 below -
2) Flexural Strength: Flexural strengths for beams at 3 days, 7 days and 28 days for concrete mixes I to VII are tabulated in Table V below. Comparing the results, it was found that increase in flexural strength of concrete is achieved at 28 days. Pozzocrete in 10% replacement of cement lead to app. 22% increase, 20% replacement lead to app. 9% increase and 30% in replacement of cement lead to app. 38% increase in flexural strength of concrete, when compared to standard M20 grade.
Table V: Results of Flexural Strength for Concrete Mixes 1 to 7
Concrete Mix |
Flexural Strength N/mm2 |
||
3 Days |
7 Days |
28 Days |
|
I |
13.11 |
13.18 |
12.65 |
II |
14.14 |
12.86 |
13.70 |
III |
14.61 |
13.27 |
12.48 |
IV |
13.97 |
13.47 |
13.60 |
V |
14.05 |
12.20 |
14.75 |
VI |
14.80 |
13.72 |
13.74 |
VI |
14.43 |
13.70 |
17.32 |
Changes in flexural strength of beams for M20 Grade concrete and for percentage replacement of cement with pozzocrete are shown in figure 2 below -
3) Shear Strength: Shear strengths for beams at 3 days, 7 days and 28 days for concrete mixes I to VII are tabulated in Table:VI below. Comparing the results, it was found that increase in flexural strength of concrete is achieved at 28 days. Pozzocrete in 10% replacement of cement lead to app. 21% increase, 20% replacement lead to app. 8% increase and 30% in replacement of cement lead to app. 38% increase in shear strength of concrete, when compared to standard M20 grade.
Table VI: Shear Strength of Concrete for Mix I to VI
Concrete Mix |
Flexural Strength N/mm2 |
||
3 Days |
7 Days |
28 Days |
|
I |
1.10 |
1.11 |
1.14 |
II |
1.19 |
1.36 |
1.15 |
III |
1.23 |
1.11 |
0.98 |
IV |
1.17 |
1.13 |
1.14 |
V |
1.18 |
0.96 |
1.28 |
VI |
1.24 |
1.15 |
1.15 |
VI |
1.21 |
1.15 |
1.45 |
Changes in shear strength of beams for M20 Grade concrete and for percentage replacement of cement with pozzocrete are shown in figure 3 below -
The use of pozzolanic materials in concrete increases its fineness which is turn increase workability, reduces shrinkage. The characteristics strength of concrete has found to increase with the increasing percentage of pozzolana in concrete. Following conclusions can be drawn from the experimental investigation that was carried out on concrete with replacement of cement with pozzocrete – 1) Increases in economy upto certain percentage replacement of cement with pozzocrete. 2) Increase in characteristic strength viz., compressive, flexure and shear strength upto 30% replacement of cement with pozzoncrete. 3) Reduction in water demand due to improved workability of concrete. 4) Slower rate of setting, reducing risk of cold joints. 5) Ease in surface finishing.
[1] Gunjagi D. A., Patil N. K., Effect of Replacement of Cement by Pozzocrete on Strength Parameters of Plain and Reinforced Cement Concrete, ISSN : 2454-9150, ICSGUPSTM, 2018. [2] Prakash R. Vora, Urmil V. Dave, Parametric Studies on Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete, Elsevier, Procedia Engineering 51 ( 2013 ) 210 – 219. [3] Izhar Ahmed, Dr S.S.Jamkar, Effects of Fly Ash on Properties of Concrete as Per Is: 10262-2009, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, ISSN: 2278-1684 Volume 4, Issue 2, PP 01-05 [4] S. Saran Raj, Dr. K. Chandrasekhar Reddy, Effect of Fly Ash and GBFS on Strength Parameters of Concrete, International Journal of Science and Research, ISSN (Online): 2319-7064. [5] Abhishek Jain, Nazrul Islam, Use of Flyash as Partial Replacement of Sand in Cement Mortar, IJIRSET, Vol. 2, Issue 5, May 2013.
Copyright © 2023 Gunjagi Deepak. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET53890
Publish Date : 2023-06-09
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here