Autonomous Garbage Collection Robot

Abstract

The robot is designed to collect garbage autonomously, minimizing the need for human labour. It navigates urban areas independently, using sensors and cameras to detect trash. The robot can sort different types of waste, such as recyclables, organic materials, and hazardous items, using image recognition technology. It is equipped with a robotic arm to pick up garbage and store it in separate compartments. The robot is powered by renewable energy sources like solar power or batteries, making waste collection more efficient and reducing overall costs while promoting recycling.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

Waste management remains a critical challenge in urban areas, with increasing demand for efficient and eco-friendly solutions. Autonomous Garbage Collection Robots aim to address these challenges by minimizing human involvement, optimizing waste segregation, and promoting recycling. This paper synthesizes various studies to highlight the integration of robotics, computer vision, and IoT technologies in waste management. The primary goals of autonomous garbage collection systems include: Automating the garbage collection process, employing image recognition to classify and sort waste, ensuring eco-friendly operation through renewable energy, Enhancing efficiency in urban waste management

II. LITERATURE SURVEY

The field of robotics has seen significant advancements in recent years, particularly in the development of autonomous robots for waste management. Numerous research efforts have focused on creating robots capable of operating efficiently in urban environments, addressing challenges such as waste detection, segregation, and collection. This section provides an overview of existing research related to autonomous garbage collection robots, emphasizing their design, control systems, and practical applications.

1. Low-Cost Object Sorting Robotic Arm using Raspberry Pi: Pereira et al. describe a cost-effective robotic arm that uses Raspberry Pi and Arduino for control. The system sorts objects based on color and shape using a camera and open-source software. It emphasizes affordability and adaptability for small-scale and educational applications, though accuracy is affected by lighting conditions.
2. Arduino-Controlled Robotic Arm: Bhargava and Kumar present a 5-DOF robotic arm powered by an Arduino microcontroller. The arm achieves high precision through servos and is designed for low-cost applications. However, it is limited in load capacity and requires complex programming for advanced tasks.
3. Advances in Vision-Based Lane Detection Algorithm: Priyadharshini et al. propose a vision-based lane detection system using image processing techniques. The approach involves edge detection and Hough Transform to identify lane markings. It is cost-effective and energy-efficient but struggles with poorly painted or obstructed lanes.
4. IoT-Based Robotic Arm using Arduino: Agrawal et al. introduce a robotic arm integrated with IoT capabilities for precision and efficiency. The system uses servo motors for multi-directional movement and highlights benefits in industrial automation. Challenges include reliance on continuous power and potential security vulnerabilities
5. Raspberry Pi 4 and Python-Based DC Motor Control: Habil et al. utilize Raspberry Pi and Python for motor control using an L298N driver. The system offers precise speed and direction control through PWM. While cost-effective, it is limited by the need for an external power supply and restricted power handling capabilities..
6. Intelligent Garbage Classification Mechanism Based on Image Recognition: Feng et al. develop a garbage classification system leveraging the ResNet50 neural network. The system achieves 98.67% accuracy and features user-friendly design and low power consumption. However, it is constrained by high initial costs and dataset dependency.

III. MATERIALS AND METHODS

This section outlines the materials, hardware, software, and methodologies employed in the design, development, and testing of the autonomous garbage collection robot. The experimental setup, data collection procedures, and implementation details are elaborated upon.

A. Experimental Setup

1. 1. Hardware Components: Raspberry Pi 4B, L298N Motor Driver, Lenovo Essential FHD Camera, DC Motors, 4-DOF Robotic Arm, Power Source (12V DC supply), Ultrasonic Sensor, Ardiuno Uno .
   2. Software Dependencies: Pyhton, OpenCV, RPi.GPIO, Ardiuno IDE.

B. Data Collection

1. Image and Video Data: The Lenovo FHD camera captured images and videos of the environment for real-time object detection and classification.
2. Sensor Data: Data from sensors, such as ultrasonic sensors, was collected for Dustbin detection and picking it with Robotic Arm.

???????C. Implementation

1. Hardware Implementation:  The components were assembled into a chassis, ensuring stable and secure connections.
2. Motors were controlled using the L298N motor driver, powered by the Raspberry Pi.

???????D. Software Implementation:

Control Firmware: Python scripts handled motor control, Bin detection, and data acquisition.

Integration: The robotic arm and motor driver were interfaced with the Raspberry Pi for seamless operation.

???????E. Integration and Testing:

1. Hardware and Software Integration: All components of Auto navigation were integrated into a single functional system in a single Python file.
2. Functional Testing: The system was tested for motor control, object classification, and Bin detection.
3. Scenario Testing: The robot was evaluated in real-world conditions, including sorting and collecting garbage.

???????F. Goals and Objectives:

1. Automate the garbage collection process.
2. Accurately classify and sort different types of waste.
3. Enhance efficiency in waste collection through real-time decision-making.
4. Promote sustainability by leveraging energy-efficient designs.

IV.  RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

???????A. Dustbin Detection Performance:

The ultrasonic sensors demonstrated reliable performance in detecting garbage bins within a range of up to 2 meters. The sensors efficiently identified bins by measuring distance and providing real-time feedback for navigation. Detection accuracy remained consistent across various lighting and environmental conditions, ensuring robust operation.

???????B. Robot Mobility and Maneuverability:

The robot exhibited excellent mobility across diverse terrains. The DC motors, controlled through the L298N motor driver, ensured stable and precise movement guide by camera input.

???????C. Limitations:

Battery Life: The current battery capacity limited the robot’s operational time, especially during prolonged missions.

1. Environmental Constraints: Ultrasonic sensor performance was occasionally affected by environmental noise, such as wind or nearby moving objects.
2. Payload Capacity: The robotic arm's limited torque restricted its ability to handle heavier items or bins.
3. Navigation in Complex Environments: Manoeuvring through highly dynamic or densely packed areas posed challenges for the robot.

V.  FUTURE PROSPECTIVES

To further enhance the capabilities of the amphibious robot, the following areas can be explored in future research:

1. Enhanced Autonomy: Integrating advanced navigation algorithms, such as SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping), to enable efficient operation in dynamic environments.
2. Improved Sensors: Incorporating additional sensing modalities, such as infrared or LiDAR, to complement ultrasonic sensors for improved bin and obstacle detection.
3. Increased Battery Life: Investigating energy-efficient hardware components and power management strategies to extend the robot's operational time.
4. Increased Battery Life: Adopting energy-efficient components or renewable energy solutions, such as solar panels, to extend operational time.
5. Modular Design: Developing modular components to enable easy upgrades, such as replacing sensors or adding new functionalities.
6. Human-Robot Interaction: Enhancing the user interface for more intuitive and efficient control.
7. Collaborative Robotics: Exploring the potential for multiple robots to work in coordination for large-scale garbage collection tasks.

Conclusion

This paper presented the design, implementation, and testing of an Autonomous Garbage Collection Robot aimed at improving urban waste management. The robot was equipped with a Raspberry Pi 4B for processing, Camera for lane following, Robotic Arm for picking the garbage when detected, Ultrasonic sensor for detecting dustbin. Experimental results demonstrated the robot’s capability to efficiently automate waste collection, with precise sorting of different waste types. However, challenges remain, including high setup costs, limited scalability due to battery and computational power constraints, and the accuracy of classification under varying environmental conditions. This research highlights the potential of autonomous robots in transforming urban waste management systems. By addressing the existing challenges and advancing AI, IoT, and robotics technologies, autonomous garbage collection robots can contribute to more sustainable and efficient waste management solutions, making them a viable option for future urban environments.

References

[1] Pulugurtha Niketha, Priyadharshini P., Sharmila S., Divya R., and SaanthaLakshmi K., “Advances in Vision Based Lane Detection Algorithm Based on Reliable Lane Markings,” in 2019 5th International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India, 2019, pp. 880-885. doi: 10.1109/ICACCS.2019.8728412. [2] V. Pereira, V. A. Fernandes, and J. Sequeira, “Low Cost Object Sorting Robotic Arm using Raspberry Pi,” in 2014 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference - South Asia Satellite (GHTC-SAS), Trivandrum, India, Sep. 2014, pp. 1-6. [3] N. K. Agrawal, V. K. Singh, V. S. Parmar, V. K. Sharma, D. Singh, and M. Agrawal, “Design and Development of IoT based Robotic Arm by using Arduino,” in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Comput. Methodol. Commun. (ICCMC), 2020, pp. 776-780. doi: 10.1109/ICCMC48092.2020.ICCMC-000144. [4] H. J. Habil, M. N. Hawas, Q. A. Al-Jarwany, and M. J. Mnati, “Raspberry Pi 4 and Python Based on Speed and Direction of DC Motor,” in Proc. 4th Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM), Cappadocia, Turkey, 2022, pp. 541-545. DOI: 10.1109/GPECOM55404.2022.9815716. [5] M. Feng, J. He, Y. Liu, Y. Zhou, J. Li, Z. Feng, H. Li, and H. Wang, “Intelligent Garbage Classification Mechanism Based on Image Recognition,” in 2022 11th International Conference of Information and Communication Technology (ICTech), Suzhou, China, 2022, pp. 482-487. doi: 10.1109/ICTech55460.2022.00102. [6] A. Bhargava and A. Kumar, “Arduino Controlled Robotic Arm,” International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), 2017, pp. 376-380. doi: 10.1109/ICECA.2017.8212711.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Vikas Kumar Tiwari, Vishwanath Reddy B, Shashwat Srivastava, Dr. Kinny Garg. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.