Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Srijanee Mitra, Mili Barik, Anwesha Biswas, Santi Ranjan Dey
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.53184
Certificate: View Certificate
The importance of biological diversity in influencing the sustainability of development efforts as well as local and global environmental changes is now more widely recognized. However, only a small number of West Bengal\'s major cities have investigated invertebrates in-depth, particularly butterflies. It can be used as a tool for management and conservation choices involving butterflies. As a result, it is imperative to compile a database or checklist of the variety of butterflies found throughout our country, especially in our state of West Bengal. Institutional campuses with undisturbed natural flora and seasonal flowering plantations provide suitable habitat for butterfly populations since they are frequently free of any development operations and pollutants. In Rammohan College campus 21 species of butterflies belonging to four families, 8 subfamilies were found more or less throughout the year.
I. INTRODUCTION
Among the many different insect societies, butterflies are the most alluring. From tiny jewel-like blues to stunning bird-like wings with a wing spread as much as 8 inches, their sizes range. The eyes are drawn to and mesmerized by their radiant colours and subtle flickering movements. Worldwide, there are 17,200 different species of butterflies (Kunte, 2000). India boasts 1501 species of butterflies, including 107 Papilionids (swallowtails), 109 Pierids (whites and yellows), 521 Nymphalids (brush-footed butterflies), 443 Lycaenids (blues), and 321 Hesperids (skippers), making it one of the richest and most diversified butterfly faunas in the world (Gaonkar, 1996; Kunte, 1997). The climate and geography of the area are two elements that affect species diversity (Collins and Morris, 1985; Boggs, 1986; Dennis, 2000).
Because of their pollination efforts, butterflies are a crucial component of the ecology (Daily, 1997; Scoble, 1992). Additionally, due to their sensitivity to climatic and environmental changes, they are regarded as effective ecological indicators (Lawton, 1998; Venkataramana, 2010). The characteristics that make these species so-called "bio-indicators of the area" include their great sensitivity to environmental changes, the relative ease with which they may be seen and knowledge of their natural history.
According to several studies (Blair and Launer, 1997; Stefanscue et al., 2004; Clark et al., 2007; Pocewicz et al., 2009), the richness, diversity, and abundance of butterfly species decline as urban elements such as roads, buildings and lawns increase. Natural biodiversity suffers as a result of the quantity and quality of natural habitat being reduced as a result of urban development (Malagrino et al., 2008). The replacement or reduction of natural and semi-natural habitats by buildings and other concrete constructions is likely to have a negative effect on butterfly populations. Additionally, it is anticipated that different types of pollution will have a negative impact on the quality of residual habitats (Pollard and Yates, 1993). In addition to habitat degradation, extensive insecticide usage has significantly decreased the quantity of butterflies. One can no longer take for granted the butterfly clouds that used to pass by as one wandered through untamed areas.
Presently it is more widely acknowledged that biological diversity is a crucial factor in determining the sustainability of development efforts as well as local and global environmental changes (Samal, 2021). However, few metropolitan areas in West Bengal have undergone a comprehensive study of invertebrates, particularly butterflies. It is useful as a tool for making decisions related to butterfly management and conservation. As a result, it is crucial to create a zone-by-zone database or checklist of the diversity of butterflies in our nation, particularly in our state of West Bengal (Chowdhury and Das, 2007; Chowdhury and Soren, 2011; Dennis and Williams, 1986).
As they are often free of any development operations and pollution, institutional campuses with undisturbed natural vegetation and seasonal flowering plantations offer potential habitat for butterfly populations (Nair et al., 2014; Tiple, 2012). Between 2016 and 2022, a preliminary assessment and recording of Rammohan College's butterfly variety was done.
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Rammohan College is located in the heart of the city of Kolkata, West Bengal, India. This area is approximately 300 years old and highly urbanized with little or almost no greenery (22.582952?N & 88.370997?E). The college has got a small garden, where butterflies frequently visit and sometimes complete their life cycle. The survey has been carried out for a period of six years (10/12/2016 –13/12/2022), in college working days, October to February, the post monsoon season when maximum greenery is available in the campus. The roads inside the college campus were used as fixed transects. Weekly observations were carried out during morning hours (08:00 hrs to 10:00 hrs) and butterflies were recorded based on direct sighting. Some small butterflies were caught using butterfly net and were observed closely after placing them in clear glass container. Then they were released to the same habitat from where they were captured. Photographs of butterfly species in natural habitats were also taken for further references. Later the butterflies were identified from photographs by using standard literatures (Evans, 1932; Wynter-Blyth, 1957; Roy et al, 2007, Kehmikar, 2008). Butterflies were broadly categorized into four groups namely – abundant, common, uncommon and rare based on their sighting records and relative abundance (Rajasekhar, 1995).
III. RESULT
Table I: Butterflies found in Rammohan College campus are listed below with their predicted population trend calculated from collected sample of six years.
Species |
Common Name |
Population Trend |
|
I. Family: Papilionidae |
|||
a. Sub-family: Papilioninae |
|||
1 |
Graphium agamemnon (Linnaeus) |
Tailed Jay |
Uncommon |
2 |
Papilio polytes Linnaeus |
Common Mormon |
Abundant |
3 |
Atrophaneura aristolochiae (Fabricius) |
Common Rose |
Decreasing |
II. Family: Pieridae |
|||
a. Sub-family: Coliadinae |
|||
4 |
Eurema hecabe (Linnaeus) |
Common Grass Yellow |
Abundant |
5 |
Catopsilia pyranthe (Linnaeus) |
Mottled Emigrant |
Uncommon |
b. Sub-family: Pierinae |
|||
6 |
Cepora nerissa (Fabricius) |
Common Gull |
Common |
7 |
Appias libythea (Fabricius) |
Striped Albatross |
Common |
8 |
Leptosia nina (Fabricius) |
Psyche |
Abundant |
III. Family: Nymphalidae |
|||
a. Sub-family: Danainae |
|||
9 |
Danaus chrysippus (Linnaeus) |
Plain Tiger |
Common |
10 |
Euploea core (Cramer) |
Common Crow |
Decreasing |
b. Sub-family: Satyrinae |
|||
11 |
Melanitis leda (Linnaeus) |
Common Evening Brown |
Decreasing |
12 |
Mycalesis perseus (Fabricius) |
Common Bushbrown |
Uncommon |
13 |
Ypthima huebneri Kirby |
Common Four-ring |
Uncommon |
e. Sub-family: Biblidinae |
|||
14 |
Ariadne ariadne (Linnaeus) |
Angled Castor |
Decreasing |
15 |
Ariadne merione (Cramer) |
Common Castor |
Decreasing |
f. Sub-family: Nymphalinae |
|||
16 |
Junonia atlites (Linnaeus) |
Grey Pansy |
Common |
17 |
Tarucus nara Kollar |
Rounded Pierrot |
Common |
18 |
Zizeeria karsandra (Moore) |
Dark Grass Blue |
Abundant |
19 |
Euchrysops cnejus (Fabricius) |
Gram Blue |
Decreasing |
20 |
Chilades lajus (Stoll) |
Lime Blue |
Uncommon |
IV. Family: Hesperiidae |
|||
a. Sub-family: Hesperiinae |
|||
21 |
Borbo cinnara (Wallace) |
Rice Swift |
Decreasing |
IV. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
We have taken the data from 10/12/16 to 13/12/22 in the campus of Rammohan College. The species are distributed in 4 families viz. Papilionidae contain 3 species, Pieridae contain 5 species, Nymphalidae contain 12 species, and Hesperiidae contain single species (Pie chart-1). Under these 4 families Papilionidae and Hesperiidae contain single sub-family. The family Pieridae contain 2 sub-family (Pie chart-2) and family Nymphalidae contain 4 sub-families (Pie chart-3). We have also compared the comparative species distribution of different sub-families ( Pie chart-4 )
V. DISCUSSION
Recent studies have highlighted the importance of institutional campuses as a preferred habitat for butterflies (Kurve and Pejavar, 2004). Among the insects, butterflies occupy a vital position in the ecosystem and their occurrence and diversity are considered as good indicators of the health of any given terrestrial biotope (Aluri and Rao, 2002; Thomas, 2005). In Rammohan College campus 21 species of butterflies belonging to four families, 8 subfamilies were found more or less throughout the year. Maximum number (17species) were observed in the month of December, 2021. Least number of (4 species) were found in the month of February (2022). Highest number of species (04) were observed under sub-family Nymphalinae of Family Nymphalidae. Longest duration of butterfly was observed in case of Zizeeria karsandra (November to February). Least frequent butterfly is Mycalesis perseus (December only). They reflect a healthy ecosystem patch in the heart of the city. If the landscaping and maintenance of any college campus gardens are carefully planned, the diversity of butterflies may increase in the college campus providing a rich ground for butterfly conservation as well as for research (Dasgupta, 2014). Creating habitats for butterflies would help in conserving not only butterflies but also other insects, birds and small mammals. From the conservation point of view, some butterflies play a very important role as an ecological indicator and vital role of plant propagation as vectors of cross-pollination. Therefore, further research on the biodiversity of butterflies with special reference to their host plants and other factor(s) that contribute to their distribution, diversity and abundance may be investigated in future.
VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study was supported by the Principal, Rammohan College and Head, Department of Zoology for providing necessary facilities for conducting the present research.
[1] Aluri, J.S.R. and Rao,S.P. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.,99(1): 59 .2002 [2] Blair, R.B. and Launer, A.E. Biol. Conserv.,80: 113. 1997. [3] Boggs, C.L. Ecol. Entomol.,11: 7. 1986. [4] Chowdhury, S. and Das,R.P. Bionotes, 9(4): 131. 2007. [5] Chowdhury, S. and Soren, R. Check List,7(6): 700. 2011. [6] Collins, N.M. and Morris, M.G. Threatened Swallowtail Butterflies of the World, The IUCN Red Data Book. 1985. [7] Clark, P.J. et al., Urban Ecosyst.,10: 321 .2007. [8] Daily et al. Ecosystem Services: Benefits Supplied to Human Societies by Natural Ecosystems, Ecological Society of America.1997. [9] Dasgupta,N. and Rao,R.J. Bugs R All,21: 16 .2014. [10] Dennis G. .,Biodivers.Conserv.,9: 343. 2000. [11] Dennis, R.L.H. and Williams,W.R. J. Lepid. Soc.,41: 45 .1986. [12] Evans, W.H. The Identification of Indian Butterflies, Bombay Natural History Society.1932. [13] Gaonkar, H. Butterflies of the Western Ghats, India (including Sri Lanka): A Biodiversity Assessment of a Threatened Mountain System, British Museum (Natural History). 1996. [14] Kehimkar,I. The Book of Indian Butterflies, Bombay Natural History Society. 2008. [15] Kurve,P and Pejavar,M. Insect Environment, 10(3): 104 .2004. [16] Kunte, K. Butterflies of Peninsular India, Universities Press. 2000. [17] Kunte, K.J. J. Biosci.,22:593.1997. [18] Lawton,J.H. Nature, 391:72. 1998. [19] Malagrino, G.G., Lagunas, M.M. and Rubio,A.O. J. Environ. Biol.,29: 79. 2008. [20] Nair,A.V., Mitra, P. and Aditya (Bandyopadhyay), S. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud.,2(4): 129 .2014. [21] Pocewicz, A., Morgan, P. and Eigenbrode, S.D. J. Insect Conserv.,13: 593.2009. [22] Pollard, E and Yates, T.J. Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation, Chapmann and Hall. 1993. [23] Rajasekhar,B. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.,92: 275 .1995. [24] Samal, S. K. Diversity of butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) Diversity of butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. Not. Sci. Bio. 13(4): 11074. 2021. [25] Scoble, M.J. The Lepidoptera: Form, Function and Diversity, Oxford University Press. 1992. [26] Stefanescu, C., Herrando, S. and Paramo,F. J. Biogeop.,31: 905. 2004. [27] Thomas, J.A.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B,360: 339 .2005. [28] Tiple,A.D. J. threat. taxa,4(7): 2713 .2012. [29] Venkataramana, S.P. The Ecoscan, 4(1): 59. 2010. [30] Wynter-Blyth, M.A. Butterflies of the Indian Region, Bombay Natural History Society .1957. [31] Roy, A.B., Das, R.P. and Mukherjee,P. A Pictorial Guide: Common Butterflies of Bengal Plains, Yapanchitra Books .2007.
Copyright © 2023 Srijanee Mitra, Mili Barik, Anwesha Biswas, Santi Ranjan Dey. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET53184
Publish Date : 2023-05-28
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here