Design and Analysis of Composite Materials for High-Pressure Environments

Abstract

Composite materials have proved to be a critical application in high pressure application fields owing to their mechanical characteristics, light weight and flexibility. The current work is aimed at the design and investigation of sophisticated composite materials for high pressure applications and to overcome the drawbacks of metals and alloys. The study also discusses fibers such as carbon fibers or glass fibers, and matrices, with the focus on the best lay-up configurations and size-dependent anisotropic behavior. Several techniques like mechanical testing techniques, and finite element analysis techniques to estimate the mechanical properties like tensile strength, fatigue life and failure modes etc.. The study again stresses the comparative advantage of hybrid composite materials when it comes to stress strength, damage invulnerability, and stability. Suggestions for further studies include the investigation of bio based composites and optimization of the fabrication methodology for sustainability aspect. These outcomes prove useful for aerospace, marine and energy industries firms where high pressure resilience is paramount.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Background

Composites have proven to be invaluable in high pressure applications because of their equal light weight, superior strength and durability. Such environments of applications are typical for oil and gas, aerospace and marine industry, where materials must be resistant to high pressures and temperatures, and corrosive effects at the same time. Materials like metals and alloys, which have long been used in structural applications, are serviceable but do not satisfy the increasingly exacting demands of specific weight to strength ratio, durability and resistance to degradation in harsh operating conditions in such environments.

Figure-1: A Multiscale Study of CFRP Based on Asymptotic Homogenization with Application to Mechanical Analysis of Composite Pressure Vessels

On the other hand, the composites entail solutions derived from the integration of two or more constituent materials with dissimilar characteristics. Composite materials, which include carbon, glass, or aramid fibers when reinforced in polymers, ceramics, or metals offer a unique opportunity to be tailored to design and performance requirements. Due to their anisotropic characteristics, they can be tailored to both strength and stiffness to favor specific dominating directions helping to overcome the problems caused by pressure-induced stresses.

However, the massive incorporation of these composites in high-pressure applications has not been without its problems. This brings challenges such as problems of delamination, matrix cracking, and the inability to accurately ascertain its performance beyond a given time and under severe conditions. This research addresses the challenges in the design, analysis, and optimization of composite materials to serve high-pressure applications and fill the existing gaps in materials currently on the market.

B. Problem Statement

Metals and alloys have remained traditional materials used in high pressure environment; however, they possess some drawbacks as are; high density, severe corrosion, and reduced efficiency when exposed to pressurized environment for rather long durations. Such disadvantages result in the lowering of performance in vital application areas such as marine structures, including offshore drilling and subsea pipelines, oil and gas infrastructure, and aerospace components and structures due to the need for the materials to perform at high pressures, with depth, and for long durations without failure.

However, there are problems inherent in composite materials such as; delamination that is the separation of layers in the laminate structure, unsystematic failure modes and behavior, and inadequacy of long-term performance tests under high- pressure stresses. This gives credence to higher composite designs suited for such environment. Overcoming these limitations facilitates the production of light, strong and efficient materials that are required for high pressure applications guaranteeing safety and reliability of performances.

C. Research Objectives

The study aims to achieve the following objectives:

1. To examine the performance of composite materials by applying pressures on them and consequently evaluate characteristics like strength and stiffness and the likelihood of the failure mechanisms encompassing delamination and matrix cracking.
2. To identify matrice and fiber orientations and Hybrids and develop a composite design for improved performance.
3. To investigate the behavior of composites for practical applications and Failure Analysis of composites for predicting their performance by Experimental Techniques and FEA.
4. To compare organically made composite materials with the standard inorganically made ones to find out potential enhancement in the weightlessness of material, hardness, and efficiency of the design outcome.
5. To give suggestions regarding the functional use of composite material in industries where optimum pressure is expected.

D. Scope of the Study

This research is concerned with the characterization and evaluation of fiber reinforced composite materials; carbon, glass, and hybrid composites for high pressure application. In this, the author discusses the considerations of fiber orientation, the nature of the matrix, and fiber/matrix hybridization in order to optimize the mechanical properties of the composites. The stress, strain and failure characteristics, as well as the future performances of the structure are assessed by experimental testing and computational simulations. The applications are demonstrated in industries such as aerospace and oils and gas industries thereby focusing on parts which are under huge pressure and working in severe conditions. As such, the study’s objectives are to examine delamination, matrix cracking, and durability under cyclical loading with the aim of identifying useful guidance on enhancing material reliability and effectiveness. These results are meant to inform the synthesis of new materials that are lightweight and more resistant to high pressure working parts.

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

A. Overview of Composite Materials

Composite materials consist of two or more distinct phases, reinforcing material and a matrix in the composite materials production steps [1]. The reinforcement phase entails strength, stiffness, and Load bearing capacity, while the matrix phase, connects the reinforcements, distributes loads between them and imparts the final shape and dimensional stability.

1) Reinforcements

Carbon fibers glass fibers and aramid fibers however are among popular reinforcements for composite materials. Of all carbon fibers their specific, mechanical and thermal properties namely their high strength to weight ratio, stiffness and low coefficient of thermal expansion make these fibers well suited for high pressure applications in aerospace and automotive engineering. The glass fibers although cheaper and having good tensile strength are appropriately suited for applications where the cost factor is highly significant, for example marine and oil and gas. Aramid Fibres offers tensile strength, impact strength is employed largely in military and protective ensembles.

2) Matrix Types

In all composites, the matrix is commonly a polymer, ceramic or a metal. Polymer matrices such as epoxy, polyester are most preferred because of low density and ease of shaping [2]. Ceramic matrices have high-temperature coefficient and finds application in high end aerospace and energy industries. Metals with reinforcement fibre as a matrix material include Aluminum or Titanium known as metal matrix composites (MMCs) that offer improved levels of strength, wear and high temperature resistance ideal for operational high pressure.

3) Hybrid Composites

Composites of a single type of reinforcement or matrix material can be improved with hybrids where one part of the system is replaced by another to achieve stronger and tougher material with longer fatigue life. As these composites above, these are versatile and suitable for special high pressure uses at reasonable cost and well formulated.

Such reinforcements, matrix types as well as hybrid configurations also helps design in the way to fulfill the composite material required for high pressure region [3].

B. High-Pressure Environments

High pressure environment can be defined as an environment where pressure exerted is much higher than normal atmospheric pressure, or much higher stress pressure. Such conditions are characteristic of the aerospace industry, deep water drilling, oil and gas extraction, and nuclear power [4]. For example, equipment and constructions installed underwater and submarines as well as deep sea exploration vehicles exert pressures at 720 times that of the atmospheric pressure, while aerospace parts and structures apply high pressure force during flight and in space re-entry.

Figure-2: End-of-Life of Composite Materials in the Framework of the Circular Economy

To effectively perform and conduct its functions in these environments, materials have to meet a number of requirements. Five key properties of materials make them ideal to handle the high pressures without buckling or fracturing; strength and stiffness. Another important characteristic is also the endurance of the materials because they may endure cyclic loading and develop cracks or fractures in case of loading cycles [5]. In addition, high corrosion resistance is required especially for material using a chemical or saltwater operation that tend to corrode metals and polymers at a very fast pace. These materials are chosen because of their lightweight, high strength to weight ratios which make composites perfect for lowering the weight of parts which are exposed to high pressure. However, pressures of delamination, matrix cracking and thermal expansion have to be given considerations when designing composites. Proper selections and designs of these composite materials for high pressure require proper calculations of the pressure stresses, material choices, and long service life in pressure applications [6].

C. Mechanical Properties of Composites

Composites also possess individual characteristics mechanically and make them ideal for high-pressure applications [7]. Their capacity to integrate the performance characteristics of reinforcement fibers and matrices allows for a predictive management of stress and strain which makes them extremely useful in performance based applications.

Table-1: Mechanical Properties of Composites Materials

1) Stress-Strain Behavior

Composites show coupled stress-strain relationship; these composites display mechanical character which depends on the orientation of loads put on them. The reinforcements which are usually of fibers have a high influence of the stiffness and strength of the composite in given directions, enabling designs for specific applications with known stresses.

2) Strength and Toughness

The content of the load-bearing fibers and the effectiveness of the load-carrying matrix dictates the composite strength [8]. Carbon fiber reinforced composite, for instance, has high tensile and compressive strength: The above properties are critical when supporting the massive pressure experienced in conditions such as aerospace and underwater use. Toughness, the energy absorption capability of the material up to failure, is usually increased through hybrid lay ups or optimized fiber-matrix interface.

3) Failure Mechanisms

In composites, failure is normally identified in terms of delamination, matrix cracking, fiber pull-out, or fiber ruptures. Because of poor interlaminar adhesion, delamination is a common mode of failure; under high pressur,e this results in complete failure. There is also something like matrix cracking that results from applied stress or repetitious loads being put on the structure. This is true, although fiber breakage is comparatively rare; this occurs where the applied load is much greater than the tensile capacity of the fibers. This knowledge helps in designing and controlling of all these mechanical properties of composites to be serviceable at very high pressures without compromising their structure, durability and overall reliability in specific unfavorable conditions [9].

D. Design Considerations for High-Pressure Applications

To design composites for high pressure, understanding anisotropy and lay-up configurations is important as pressure builds up both in the external and internal component influenced environment [10].

1) Anisotropy

The laminated structure means that mechanical properties can be specified for a given direction of load. In high-pressure applications which include pipes and aerospace parts, the orientation of fibers is normally along the length of the pipe or part to address the tension loads and the hoop stresses.

2) Lay-Up Designs

As demonstrated, lay-up configurations play a massive role in determining the behavior of the composite structure. The most common styles of lay-ups are unidirectional, cross-ply and angle-ply lay-ups can be used. Cross-ply and angle-ply configurations also place loads and inhibit delamination due to multidirectional reinforcement. Fiber hybrid lay-ups which include both types of fibers and improve the measure of both strength, and cyclic loading resistance. Others factors that should also be considered are attaining maximum fiber- matrix interface area, strong fiber- matrix interface and incorporation of protective coatings [11]. Computerized design tools like the finite element analysis are very useful in defining part and assembly performance before prototyping. Appropriate integrated ideas guarantee security, efficiency, and structure in high stress conditions, fulfilling the needful requirements [12].

E. Review of Existing Research

A large volume of work has been published on the behavior of composite materials under elevated pressures regarding their mechanics and failure behavior. The literature review noted that carbon and glass fiber composites have high strength-to-weight ratios and better than metal for corrosion resistance [13]. Studies of hybrid composites reveal that an interleaving of distinct types of fibers can enhance the break and other mechanical characteristics.

Figure-3: Advances in mechanics of hierarchical composite materials

Even so, issues related to the high-cycle fatigue performance under cyclic high-pressure loading are still not well understood as well as the aspects of composite responses at great depth and elevated temperatures [14]. Few studies have been done on the aspects of lay-up designs to optimize for pressure-induced stresses.

These gaps can be opportunities to address the more novel designs, the testing techniques beyond those demonstrated for the composites, and the simulation calculations to improve the dependability and productivity of composites for high-pressure applications [15].

III. MATERIALS AND METHODS

A. Material Selection

Critical performance requirements of composite materials include strength, stiffness, durability and ability to stand pressure, environmental reliability and versatility of fibers as well as matrices in high pressure environments influence the selection of fibers and matrices [16].

1) Fibers

Due to their characteristics such as high tensile strength, high stiffness and low coefficient of thermal expansion carbon fibers are suitable for use in aerospace and deep sea industries. Glass fibers are slightly less stiff than carbon fibers but offer excellent corrosion resistance and cost-effectiveness and are ideal for marine and oil and gas applications. The efficient and cost effective versions are the ones that use both carbon and glass fibers as reinforcements.

2) Matrices

Epoxy resins are widely used to as matrix materials because of their good interaction with fibers, high thermal stability, and resistance to environmental actions. If higher temperature is needed for the application of composites, then thermoplastic or ceramic matrix systems may be more suitable. The fibre to matrix ration is well balanced to guarantee that when heat is applied the composite does not break easily and does not delaminate or crack.

This capability allows materials that will meet the claims of the high-pressure conditions to be selected through the process [17].

B. Composite Design

Selection of lightweight materials for high pressure lay-up configurations incorporates methods and tools in lay-up design.

Figure-4: Application of the Finite Element Method in the Analysis of Composite Materials

1) Lay-Up Configurations

Lay-up is the alignment of fiber layers in a particular sequence in the structure of a composite system. Unidirectional lay-ups are appropriate for applications where strength is necessary only in one direction,while cross-ply and angle-ply lay-ups distribute loads in all directions thus increasing the ability of the material to resist delamination or failure. Composite lay up using two or more types of fiber including the carbon and glass reinforcement fiber lay-ups stiffness-strength-toughness [18]. In high-pressure applications, the stacking sequence and fiber orientations are optimized to withstand hoop stresses, axial loads as well as cyclic pressure fluctuations.

2) Simulation Tools

Pressure analysis of the composite behavior is one of the most useful approaches that can be applied using a finite element analysis also famously known as FEA. Software as ANSYS, Abaqus, COMSOL multiphysics and many more help engineers to predict and analyze how stress is distributed throughout a solid object, or locate where a material may likely fail, or even enhance the design before physical manufacturing. Users get to estimate delamination, matrix crack and fiber failure in order to guarantee optimal performance under severe operating conditions. Applying state-of-the-art lay-up technology combined with powerful simulation tools for composites, high-pressure durability and reliability of these materials can be achieved completely to fulfill the requirements of hi-pressure applications [19].

C. Manufacturing Process

The production process of composite materials for high-pressure environments is a process of choosing the right manufacturing methods and using appropriate quality assurance methods [20].

1) Fabrication Techniques

There are several processes used for the manufacture of composites which include wet lay-up, prepreg lay-up, resin transfer molding – RTM, and filament winding. While wet layup of the fibers by only applying the resin on the dry fibers, prepreg lay up uses fibers with resin, and thus offers better control of the fiber-resin ratio. RTM is a kind of closed mold composite manufacturing technique where the resin is injected into a mold containing dry fibers with higher accuracy and less void content. Technology of filament winding is effectively applied to circular parts where fibers are wrapped on the mandrel, suitable for pressure vessels and pipes. The type of technique that will be used depends on the part, size and performance needs of the particular section under construction.

Table-2: Cost Analysis of Fabrication Techniques

2) Quality Control Measures

This is therefore important to maintain quality to ensure that the composites have high performance. Ultrasonic, X-ray, and visual inspections to identify defects of the type void, delamination or fiber misalignment. Strength and durability tests are performed to determine properties of mechanical tests such as tensile, compression & fatigue tests [21]. In the environmental testing also, the ability of the material to withstand hot or cold temperatures, moist condition and chemical is also checked. Quality assurance measures practiced also guarantee the composites’ efficiency under high pressure to avoid failure while in use.

D. Testing Protocols

High-pressure composite material testing procedures play an important role in evaluating their endurance and serviceability in pressure containing zones.

Table-3: Damage Modes Observed During Testing

1) Experimental Methods

Some of the typical tests that are performed are hydrostatic pressure testing in which composites are put under high-pressure fluid to establish field-like conditions. Burst tests determine the material’s performance factor at the precise moment when it can no longer bear the pressure applied to this during pressure cycling tests, evaluate the product’s ability to withstand fluctuations in pressure loading [22]. Tensile and compression tests are performed in order to measure the material’s behavior under high-pressure load.

Other tests include; fatigue testing which tests the impact of cyclic loading over time, thermal cycling testing which tests the responses of given materials to changes in temperature and pressure.

These experimental protocols assure the structural and functional characteristics of high pressure applications of composites and valuable data is obtained for the performance of these materials and the designing of new ones [23].

E. Simulation Methodology

A significant application of computational modeling is found in the design and analysis of composite materials for high-pressure applications. FEA is used to model the example composites and determine their responses to specific loading configurations. In FEA models, the composite structure is broken down into finer sub-components in order to predict the stresses that are developed across them when high pressure is applied, as well as deformity and failure sites [24]. Various mechanisms that are involved in both mechanical, thermal and fluid forces are simulated in the composite material using multiphysics solutions. These simulation form part of the tool box used to forecast the performance of the material under difficult conditions such as cyclic loads and extreme temperatures. Tighten bolts to squeeze a tough designed shape, separate individual components for easy use, and replace damaged ones, Usually, the simulations are done by using software tools like ANSYS, Abaqus, and COMSOL to predict the behavior of composites in such high-pressure applications before fabricating a real-world scenario [25].

IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. Experimental Results

The implications of the experimental performances of composite material under high pressure environments include some features of the mechanical behavior of these material systems and their failure characteristics. They provide information critical to defining the mechanical and stress response of composites to guarantee their performance in high pressure operations.

Table-4: Experimental Testing Results Under High Pressure

1) Mechanical Properties

The tensile strength test indicated high strength in composite materials, especially those containing carbon fibers higher than that of conventional materials like metals. Carbon fiber composites possess high strength to width ratio, which enable the material to withstand tensile stresses far much better than other composite materials; this makes the carbon fiber composites used extensively in aircraft industries and deep-sea operations. Glass fiber composites were less stiff than carbon fibers but provided a fair level of resistance to tensile failure, they were particularly interesting in applications where corrosion resistance dominated such as in Marine applications. Cyclic stress tests showed that composites and in particular balanced fiber lay-up results exhibited low fatigue damage. Carbon/glass fiber hybrid composites proved longer durability and strength with higher tolerance towards crack development and fatigue failure than for the individual fibers. Nevertheless, adhesive interface imperfections that lead to weak fiber-matrix interaction adversely affected high-pressure fatigue performance and caused fatigue failure at the early stages of the test.

2) Failure Modes

High-pressure testing produced delamination as the predominant failure mode, especially in multi-ply composites. Stress concentrations foster separation of layers in conditions of high pressure as a result of the confining phase in the fiber reinforced composite material. This was also found that the composites with unidirectional fiber lay up exhibited higher delamination compared to cross – ply or angle – ply composites. The latter configurations offered improved load-carrying capacity and resistance to the shear stress that was less likely to cause delamination.

Figure-5: MD calculations of thermal expansion is superposed with experimentally measured dilatometric curves

Cohesive cracking was also reported particularly in matrix-dominated composites with thermoset matrices. When subjected to high pressure, the matrix material started to fail in terms of fracturing that affected the structural layout of the composite. Among all the possibilities, the use of thermoplastic matrices offered better fracture resistance as well as crack resistance because of their higher toughness level and capability to accept stress. Furthermore, some hybrid composites including both epoxy and thermoplastic matrices exhibited better results in the high-pressure tests with fewer cracks and better overall mechanical properties.

The obtained experimental results reveal the need for further improvement of the fiber-matrix interfacial bonding, lay-up schemes, and matrix system to improve the capabilities and service life of composite materials under high pressure. They also highlight the current research direction in the fabrication and processing of composites and the need to optimize the processing of the matrices and reinforcements to reduce defective structures and enhance the efficiency of the composites in special applications.

B. Simulation Results

Displacement, pressure, stress and strain values of the composite material specimens were calculated using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) computer models. These simulations give a better feel of the material properties and help in relating the results obtained experimentally for improved estimations of the behavior under practical applications.

Table-5: Finite Element Simulation Results

1) Stress and Strain Analysis

The FEA simulations also illustrated high stress concentrations at critical areas of composite structures in which edge and matrix fiber areas are prominent. Higher pressure yielded higher stress due to both direct and shearing forces with the maximum tensile stress normalized along the fibers in unidirectional – composite systems. However, the cross-ply or angle-ply lay-ups provided more evenly distributed stress thereby improving its resistance to failure at local regions. These results conformed with experimental findings since cross-ply configurations provided better overall performance when operating under high pressure.

Strain distribution analysis revealed that the composites constituted of greater fiber volume fractions had comparatively low strain values implying that the composites had good bearing to resist deformation when pressured. Nevertheless, the composites with lower fiber-volume fractions carried higher strain concentrations which may cause material failure at cyclic loading or under high pressures. This also found that the matrix material is crucial in determining the strain distribution mechanism in the composites and designated that thermoplastic matrices offer more enhanced stress control and much better distribution of strain as opposed to thermoset matrices.

2) Correlation with Experimental Findings

With experimental data checked, the simulation results showed a fairly good fit of the predicted and observed behaviors. For instance the regions predicted to have high tensile stress are indeed corresponding with regions of the laminate where delamination and matrix crack were observed in the experimentation. Realizations that in simulations had higher stress concentrations for composites with unidirectional fiber orientation, did experience more of delamination and fiber-matrix failure in experimental conditions. In the same manner, the different simulations that revealed enhanced performance of angle-ply composites also indicated increased fatigue limit and reduced damage during physical testing. In addition, load distribution seems to be improved and failure rates to be reduced in hybrid composites containing both carbon and glass fibers as this was indicated by the simulations. This was confirmed experimentally by the observation that the hybrid composites displayed better tensile strength and fatigue characteristics than the single fiber composites. In general, the FEA simulations were useful in supporting the conclusions made from the pressure conventional experiments, and more importantly, the FEA simulations can serve as a predictive means for the engineering design of composites when used under high-pressure applications. These results confirm to support the previous studies on the efficacy of simulation to supplement experimental testing for the extensive advance composite material.

C. Comparative Analysis

The various high-pressure differences exhibited between carbon fiber and glass fiber composites influence the choice of the material to be used in a specific area.

Table-6: Comparative Analysis of Composites

1) Carbon Fiber Composites

CFRP also has very high tensile strength and is very lightweight. These composites exhibited high strength as would be expected under high pressures for further uses in aerospace and other high performance areas. They also demonstrated improved fatigue properties, where the material’s ability to resist breakdown under cyclic loading was superior. But CFRP more sensitive to delamination and matrix cracking particularly in unidirectional lay-up under high pressure that restricts their applicability in environments with damage tolerance.

2) Glass Fiber Composites

Significantly lower tensile strength of the glass fiber composites than carbon fibers was compensated with superior damage tolerance and protection against degradative environments. This was found that except their high crystalline nature, both materials exhibit good performance in pressurized systems with cyclic loading, and the failure was not as sudden as in the case of carbon fiber composites. These composites were proved to have less delamination and matrix cracking hence can be used in marine and industries where the material undergoes many reasons that affect the outer surfaces.

3) Hybrid Composites

Carbon, glass and hybrid composites were studiied, where hybrid composites which incorporated both these reinforcements were found to have improved properties by combining both of these reinforcements. They showed enhanced features of damage tolerance, fatigue strength and strength and thus suitable for high pressure form applications where the aim is getting the best of both characteristics.

Finally, the decision as to which material should be used, carbon fiber, glass fiber or hybrid composites, depends with the need of a particular application with regard to its strength, durability and performance in various environments.

D. Discussion

The results of the work illustrate the need to review the performance characteristics of a range of composite materials under high pressure conditions and how the material selection and design should be optimized.

Carbon fiber composites possess excellent tensile strength and fatigues, these makes composites to be ideal for situations that need high level of structural strength such as aviation industry. Nevertheless, they are highly prone to delamination, especially for the unidirectional fiber orientations, which turned to be a limitation at high pressure. The identified failure mode indicates that more work has to be done in terms of fiber lay-up, resin system selection, as well as multi-layered composites to improve their characteristics at high operating pressures.

CFRP instead of glass fiber composites possessed slightly lower tensile strength; however, the former was more damage tolerant in the present work. These properties make them particularly useful in high pressure applications where other matrix systems tend to crack or delaminate, applications such as in marine and offshore sectors. The weakness, however, is that they are unable to offer as much high pressure, especially in cases where utmost load bearing capability is desired.

Fabrication of carbon and glass fiber hybrids proved to be superior in overall efficiencies because of the advantages offered by both fibers. These composites provided enhanced damage tolerance and fatigue qualities that rendered them most suitable for use in applications requiring both high strength and firmly founded durability. However, a great potential to use them more effectively has to be investigated further by optimizing the fiber ratio and the lay-up design.

An area that is still open to exploration is the long term and dynamic loading test, as what this study focuses on is the static high pressure testing. Nevertheless, some of the environmental conditions such as temperature and humidity should have been considered in the future works so as to make better understanding of behavior of materials in extreme condition environments.

Conclusion

A. Summary of Findings This paper examined the fabrication and characterization of pressure-sensitive composites for high pressure carbon fibers, glass fibers, and both hybrid composites. The results suggest that material choices, and component form and arrangements should be designed to meet the conditions of applications. Carbon fiber composites exhibited very high tensile strength, fatigue endowment and light weight features which enshrine their application in superior performance segment like aerospace and automobile sectors. But being prone to delamination and matrix cracking, especially under high pressure, seeks better fiber angles and improved resin materials. Although the tensile strength was lower than that of steel fiber composites, glass fiber composites proved to be highly damage tolerant and resistant to crack and delamination. These attributes makes them ideal to be used in marine and offshore industries where reliability and cost of the product matter. However, their application is limited at ultra-high working pressures and hence do not find extensive use. Carbon-glass fiber hybrid composites provided the optimum solution for offering improved tensile strength, damage tolerance, and fatigue life. It is promising for the environments that necessary demands structural stability and energy dissipation. More research should be dedicated to how fibers work together, and the best lay up patterns have to be determined. In light of the research results, further attention is drawn to the appropriate use of advanced composite designs to conquer high pressure difficulties and continued study focused on enhancing composite material solutions for various industries. B. Recommendations for Future Research The research needs to continue in improving new composite materials ideal for high pressure conditions. Researching new fiber composites including basalt and aramid can improve the mechanical properties like strength and surface durability and weathercoe efficiency. Likewise, there are opportunities to find new advanced matrix systems like thermoplastics and bio based resins which will create better mechanical properties and eco friendliness. The overall use of hybrid composites has the most left for further enhancement in terms of engineering designs. This is recommended that other works should explore the extent to which variations in fiber type and the arrangement of the composite in the lay-up process optimize strength expectation and assembly cost. Carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoparticles can be utilized in improved mechanical quality in the composite structure, including delamination and matrix cracking. Further work is required to assess performance under cyclic high pressure conditions with loading-capacity repetitions and at high temperatures. Investigations into moisture and ultraviolet radiation impacts will also contribute to the understanding of the stability of materials in their use environments. Finally, the development of more complex computational modeling for the composite is crucial in determining their behavior. Optimized simulation models of finite element for loading conditions can increase the speed of the designing and optimizing steps, and thereby minimize the use of test rigs and prototypes for validation. Such efforts will help foster the new growth, towards realizing composite materials for other high pressure demands. C. Applications and Implications This study’s implications apply to service industries of all types that exist in high-pressure conditions. In the Aerospace industry, applications of carbon fiber composite can improve the durability and reliability of some aircraft parts by attaining high strength to weight rations. In the marine and offshore industry, this concept results in an effective solution for using glass fiber composites in manufacturing pipeline, pressure vessels and reinforcements. These hybrids hold promise for the energy industry, say for wind blades, and for hydrogen and compressed natural gas storage tanks. These materials offer the best features such as high strength, tough and resistant, and long-lasting all through affording favorable prices. Insights also apply to material developments, providing directions to industries on suitable and efficient composites for demanding conditions of use.

References

[1] Balasooriya, W., Clute, C., Schrittesser, B. and Pinter, G., 2022. A review on applicability, limitations, and improvements of polymeric materials in high-pressure hydrogen gas atmospheres. Polymer reviews, 62(1), pp.175-209. [2] Zou, J., Han, N., Yan, J., Feng, Q., Wang, Y., Zhao, Z., Fan, J., Zeng, L., Li, H. and Wang, H., 2020. Electrochemical compression technologies for high-pressure hydrogen: current status, challenges and perspective. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 3, pp.690-729. [3] Radhamani, A.V., Lau, H.C. and Ramakrishna, S., 2020. Nanocomposite coatings on steel for enhancing the corrosion resistance: A review. Journal of Composite Materials, 54(5), pp.681-701. [4] Eswarappa Prameela, S., Pollock, T.M., Raabe, D., Meyers, M.A., Aitkaliyeva, A., Chintersingh, K.L., Cordero, Z.C. and Graham-Brady, L., 2023. Materials for extreme environments. Nature Reviews Materials, 8(2), pp.81-88. [5] Krauklis, A.E., Karl, C.W., Gagani, A.I. and Jørgensen, J.K., 2021. Composite material recycling technology—state-of-the-art and sustainable development for the 2020s. Journal of Composites Science, 5(1), p.28. [6] Xu, Q., Chang, X., Zhu, Z., Xu, L., Chen, X., Luo, L., Liu, X. and Qin, J., 2021. Flexible pressure sensors with high pressure sensitivity and low detection limit using a unique honeycomb-designed polyimide/reduced graphene oxide composite aerogel. RSC advances, 11(19), pp.11760-11770. [7] Meng, M., Frash, L.P., Carey, J.W., Li, W., Welch, N.J. and Zhang, W., 2021. Cement stress and microstructure evolution during curing in semi-rigid high-pressure environments. Cement and Concrete Research, 149, p.106555. [8] Krakowiak, K.J., Nannapaneni, R.G., Moshiri, A., Phatak, T., Stefaniuk, D., Sadowski, L. and Qomi, M.J.A., 2020. Engineering of high specific strength and low thermal conductivity cementitious composites with hollow glass microspheres for high-temperature high-pressure applications. Cement and Concrete Composites, 108, p.103514. [9] Alves, M.P., Gul, W., Cimini Junior, C.A. and Ha, S.K., 2022. A review on industrial perspectives and challenges on material, manufacturing, design and development of compressed hydrogen storage tanks for the transportation sector. Energies, 15(14), p.5152. [10] Laadel, N.E., El Mansori, M., Kang, N., Marlin, S. and Boussant-Roux, Y., 2022. Permeation barriers for hydrogen embrittlement prevention in metals–a review on mechanisms, materials suitability and efficiency. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(76), pp.32707-32731. [11] Moema, D., Makwakwa, T.A., Gebreyohannes, B.E., Dube, S. and Nindi, M.M., 2023. Hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction of fluoroquinolones in chicken livers followed by high pressure liquid chromatography: Greenness assessment using National Environmental Methods Index Label (NEMI), green analytical procedure index (GAPI), Analytical GREEnness metric (AGREE), and Eco Scale. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 117, p.105131. [12] Karpenko, M., Prentkovskis, O. and Šukevi?ius, Š., 2022. Research on high-pressure hose with repairing fitting and influence on energy parameter of the hydraulic drive. Eksploatacja i Niezawodno??, 24(1). [13] Jia, M., Yi, C., Han, Y., Wang, L., Li, X., Xu, G., He, K., Li, N., Hou, Y., Wang, Z. and Zhu, Y., 2022. Hierarchical Network Enabled Flexible Textile Pressure Sensor with Ultrabroad Response Range and High?Temperature Resistance. Advanced Science, 9(14), p.2105738. [14] Panagopoulos, A., 2022. Process simulation and analysis of high?pressure reverse osmosis (HPRO) in the treatment and utilization of desalination brine (saline wastewater). International Journal of Energy Research, 46(15), pp.23083-23094. [15] Karatas, M.A., Gokkaya, H. and Nalbant, M., 2020. Optimization of machining parameters for abrasive water jet drilling of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composite material using Taguchi method. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 92(2), pp.128-138. [16] Rubino, F., Nisticò, A., Tucci, F. and Carlone, P., 2020. Marine application of fiber reinforced composites: a review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(1), p.26. [17] Vijayanandh, R., Senthil Kumar, M., Rahul, S., Thamizhanbu, E. and Durai Isaac Jafferson, M., 2020. Conceptual design and comparative CFD analyses on unmanned amphibious vehicle for crack detection. In Proceedings of UASG 2019: Unmanned Aerial System in Geomatics 1 (pp. 133-149). Springer International Publishing. [18] Gradl, P.R., Teasley, T.W., Protz, C.S., Katsarelis, C. and Chen, P., 2021. Process development and hot-fire testing of additively manufactured NASA HR-1 for liquid rocket engine applications. In AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2021 Forum (p. 3236). [19] Hassan, I.A., Ramadan, H.S., Saleh, M.A. and Hissel, D., 2021. Hydrogen storage technologies for stationary and mobile applications: Review, analysis and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 149, p.111311. [20] Okonkwo, P.C., Belgacem, I.B., Mansir, I.B., Aliyu, M., Emori, W., Uzoma, P.C., Beitelmal, W.H., Akyüz, E., Radwan, A.B. and Shakoor, R.A., 2023. A focused review of the hydrogen storage tank embrittlement mechanism process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(35), pp.12935-12948. [21] Parveez, B., Kittur, M.I., Badruddin, I.A., Kamangar, S., Hussien, M. and Umarfarooq, M.A., 2022. Scientific advancements in composite materials for aircraft applications: a review. Polymers, 14(22), p.5007. [22] Khalid, H.U., Ismail, M.C. and Nosbi, N., 2020. Permeation damage of polymer liner in oil and gas pipelines: A review. Polymers, 12(10), p.2307. [23] Simmons, K.L., Kuang, W., Burton, S.D., Arey, B.W., Shin, Y., Menon, N.C. and Smith, D.B., 2021. H-Mat hydrogen compatibility of polymers and elastomers. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(23), pp.12300-12310. [24] Amaechi, C.V., Chesterton, C., Butler, H.O., Gillet, N., Wang, C., Ja’e, I.A., Reda, A. and Odijie, A.C., 2022. Review of composite marine risers for deep-water applications: Design, development and mechanics. Journal of Composites Science, 6(3), p.96. [25] Szada-Borzyszkowska, M., Kacalak, W., Banaszek, K., Pude, F., Perec, A., Wegener, K. and Królczyk, G., 2024. Assessment of the effectiveness of high-pressure water jet machining generated using self-excited pulsating heads. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 133(9), pp.5029-5051.

Copyright

Copyright © 2024 Darshan C, Varun K S, Swamy S R. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.