Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Prof. R. S. Vaidya, Ujwal Jagtap, Pramit Wagh, Priyanshu Upadhyay, Pranay Dedge
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.58722
Certificate: View Certificate
Driver fatigue, a major contributor to road accidents, poses a significant challenge to road safety. Numerous fatal collisions could be prevented by promptly alerting drivers experiencing drowsiness. Several drowsiness detection methods have been developed to monitor driver alertness while driving and issue warnings when attention lapses. These systems employ various techniques to assess drowsiness levels, including extracting key features from facial expressions such as yawning, eye closure, and head movements. Evaluating both the driver\'s physiological state and vehicle behavior is crucial for identifying signs of drowsiness. This research delves into a comprehensive evaluation of prevalent classification methodologies and a thorough examination of contemporary driver drowsiness detection technologies. The study initially categorizes existing techniques into three broad groups: physiological, vehicular, and behavioral parameter-based approaches. It then provides an extensive review of recognized supervised learning algorithms employed for drowsiness detection. Furthermore, the examination conducts a comparative analysis of the advantages and limitations of various methods.
I. INTRODUCTION
Driving while fatigued represents a significant and often underestimated issue that carries grave consequences. Such incidents are not confined to any particular time of day, although they tend to occur more frequently during late-night and early morning hours when drivers are typically more susceptible to drowsiness. The causes of driver fatigue are multifaceted, encompassing factors such as insufficient sleep, untreated sleep disorders, the influence of drowsiness-inducing substances, and prolonged journeys devoid of adequate rest breaks. The ramifications of weariness on drivers are profound, manifesting as compromised reaction times, impaired judgment, and reduced situational awareness. Consequently, drowsy drivers pose a substantial risk to themselves and others, as they may veer out of their lanes, overlook traffic signals, or even succumb to slumber at the wheel.
However, technological advancements in the realm of computer vision and machine learning offer a promising avenue for the detection and prevention of driver drowsiness. These technologies are capable of scrutinizing facial and ocular movements to identify signs of driver fatigue. Leveraging extensive datasets of driving behaviors, machine learning algorithms can be trained to discern discernible patterns indicative of weariness. For example, the system can acquire the ability to recognize lethargic eyelid movements or subtle shifts in head posture, early harbingers of a driver drifting into slumber. Present methodologies that employ computer vision and machine learning to avert drowsy driving include the deployment of driver-facing cameras and in-vehicle sensors. These cameras and sensors continuously monitor the driver's facial and ocular movements and promptly notify the driver upon detecting indicators of drowsiness. Some systems even offer real-time feedback mechanisms, such as steering wheel vibrations or audible alarms, to rouse and sustain driver alertness.
Nevertheless, notwithstanding these challenges, the utilization of computer vision and machine learning to combat driver drowsiness holds the potential to significantly enhance road safety. As these technologies continue to evolve, they may find broader integration within vehicles, contributing to a reduction in accidents precipitated by driver weariness. The endeavor to define precise criteria for the detection of critical moments of driver engagement, while simultaneously accommodating input variability, stands as an indispensable challenge. In the context of vehicle-based assessments, these pivotal moments may encompass instances of unassisted steering movements and subsequent substantial deviations, both of which may serve as potential indicators of driver fatigue. Furthermore, there is an emerging recognition that the identification of muscular alterations within facial regions, such as the mouth, eyes, or the overall facial structure, holds promise for discerning signs of weariness within behavioral observations. An additional layer of complexity lies in determining the optimal time window for characterizing a driver's state of fatigue while swiftly recognizing primary events. This necessitates a delicate balance between the speed and precision of predictions. On one hand, employing a narrow time window may result in the identification of "noise," leading to an excess of false positives. Conversely, an excessively long duration may render the system overly lenient, thereby compromising its effectiveness.
The research at hand introduces an innovative drowsiness detection method, which addresses a multitude of challenges by integrating sensor technology, parameter refinement, selection, and system performance. It is imperative to underscore that one of the foremost contributors to vehicular accidents is drowsy driving, a perilous behavior exacerbated by the limited efficacy of conventional warning systems. The human eyes serve as a pivotal means of gauging a driver's level of fatigue while operating a vehicle. Recognizing the potential of continuous eye monitoring and the analysis of eye-closure patterns, this study endeavors to develop a robust methodology for detecting drowsiness. The fundamental challenge underlying this pursuit lies in the dynamic nature of the task—identifying and tracking the driver's eyes within a perpetually shifting environment. Consequently, the initial step in our algorithm involves the comprehensive detection of the driver's facial structure as a whole, followed by the precise isolation of the eyes from this composite image. This distinction is non-trivial, as it necessitates the ability to locate and isolate the eyes effectively within a dynamic context, where the object of interest is in constant motion. Hence, the development of an algorithm that can reliably and swiftly identify drowsiness-related eye behaviors becomes an imperative and exciting venture within the realm of driver safety research.
II. METHODOLOGY
2. Binary Classification Neural Network: In detecting driver fatigue, the use of binary classification neural networks combined with effective data has become a way to increase accuracy and be powerful. Binary classification neural networks are one of the neural networks designed to distinguish between binary values (in this case, between the driver's alert state and the fatigue state). These neural networks use deep learning techniques to learn complex patterns and representations from many inputs, from eye movements to faces. However, the process of creating appropriate information to demonstrate the effectiveness of these networks plays an important role.
Data standardization is important to reduce the impact of changes and inconsistencies in data entry. In the context of driver fatigue detection, the standardization process aims to standardize the range and classification of features obtained from various sensors and facial recognition systems. By converting data into a single metric, normalization helps binary classification neural networks converge during training, thus improving their ability to generalize to information that is not available. The data normalization process is mean averaging and scaling, the mean of each feature is subtracted from the data points and the result is divided by the standard deviation.
This process ensures that the features have a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one, effectively turning them into a standard distribution. Additionally, min-max scaling can be used to scale features within a specific range (usually between 0 and 1), thus preserving the relationship between data points. In summary, the combination of binary classification neural networks and data normalization techniques represents an important and promising way to improve driver fatigue detection. Using the power of deep learning and making data consistent through design, this method has the ability to increase the accuracy and efficiency of the fatigue detection method, ultimately increasing road safety and improving the health of the driver.
3. Eyes And Mouth Landmark: This new technology involves accurately identifying and tracking facial features related to the eyes and mouth, resulting in an overall examination of the driver's face and movements. Eye and mouth Landmark technology, thanks to a combination of computer vision and deep learning, can capture fine details such as closed eyes, blinks and mouth movements, all signs that the driver is tired. Technology that tracks facial expressions in real time and in detail provides rich data for fatigue assessment. A key benefit of Eye and Mouth Landmark technology is the ability to bypass differences in a person's face and adapt to drivers with different facial features (including small eyes or a different face). Additionally, the technology offers effective and flexible solutions that can monitor various aspects of driving, from a slight loss of eye angle to visual yawning. This versatility ensures fatigue resistance in many riding conditions and situations. Integrating eye and mouth Landmark technology into a driver fatigue detection system can improve the accuracy and reliability of the system. Using information obtained from the analysis of facial expressions, the system can quickly identify signs of sleepiness and send a timely alert to reduce the layer of the condition that has formed. Additionally, current technology allows for immediate responses such as alerts or haptic feedback so the driver can take timely action. In summary, Eye and Mouth Landmark technology represents a pioneering approach to detecting driver fatigue. Its ability to detect subtle changes in the face and adapt to different facial expressions make it a powerful tool in improving road safety.
III. LITERATURE SURVEY
SR. NO. |
PAPER NAME |
|
AUTHOR |
ADVANTAGE |
DISADVANTAGE |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
1. |
Early Identification and |
Ayman Altameem, |
Uses |
facial |
expression |
Hybrid |
machine |
|||||
|
Detection |
of |
Driver |
Ankit Kumar |
to |
create |
SVM |
learning can cause high |
||||
|
Drowsiness by Hybrid |
|
algorithm. |
|
|
time complexities |
|
|||||
|
Machine |
Learning |
|
(83% |
|
|
accuracy |
|
|
|
||
|
(IEEE 2021) |
|
|
achieved) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
2. |
Driver |
Drowsiness |
Yeresime Suresh,Rashi |
Divides eye into small |
Doesn’t consider |
other |
||||||
|
Detection |
using |
Deep |
Khandelwal |
frames to detect eye is |
facial features. |
|
|||||
|
Learning(IEEE 2021) |
|
open or closed |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
3. |
Driver |
Drowsiness |
Elena Magan, M. Paz |
Achieved |
|
65% |
Need to achieve |
more |
||||
|
Detection by |
|
Sesmero |
accuracy over train and |
accuracy |
|
|
|||||
|
Applying |
|
Deep |
|
60% accuracy over test |
|
|
|
||||
|
Learning Techniques to |
|
data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Sequences |
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Images(2022) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
4. |
Perception-Free |
|
Cheng Ming, |
Uses |
|
Mediapipe |
This technology is still |
|||||
|
Calibration |
of |
Eye |
Yan Yunbing |
Facemesh |
to |
detect |
new |
|
|
||
|
Opening and Closing |
|
Facial Feature Points |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Threshold |
for |
Driver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fatigue |
Monitoring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
(IEEE 2022) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
5. |
Detecting |
Human |
Monagi H. Alkinani, |
Studies |
aggressive |
Doesn’t consider |
other |
|||||
|
Driver Inattentive and |
Wazir Zada Khan |
driving behaviour in |
factors |
like |
facial |
||||||
|
Aggressive |
Driving |
|
detail |
|
|
|
features |
|
|
||
|
Behaviour |
using |
Deep |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning. (IEEE 2019) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
6. |
A |
Survey |
on State of |
Muhammad |
Uses |
digital |
image |
Some |
results |
are |
||
|
the |
Art |
Drowsiness |
Ramzan,Hikmat Ullah |
processing and SVM |
difficult to interpret by |
||||||
|
Detection |
Techniques |
Khan |
|
|
|
|
humans |
|
|
||
|
(IEEE 2019) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future research may be directed towards the development of more personalized DAS algorithms that take into account individual differences in driving behavior, posture, and reactions to traffic. Customizing the system to account for these changes not only increases accuracy but also helps create more user-friendly and comprehensive solutions. The combination of various technologies, including advanced biometric devices and other media, creates another exciting trend. This holistic approach provides a better understanding of the driver\'s condition, paving the way for more reliable fatigue and prevention strategies. Overall, the future of DAS research promises to be more accurate, personalized and integrated with new technologies, ultimately contributing to the overall goal of creating a safe path for everyone. In summary, our study is a contribution to the study of fatigue and lays the foundation for more comprehensive and effective methods in the future. As we continue to develop and expand our approach, we hope that it will develop into an important tool to prevent driving impairment and ultimately help improve the safety and consumption health of all road users.
[1] Drowsy Driving Prevention. (2019). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). [Online]. Available: https://www.nhtsa.gov/riskydriving/drowsy-driving [2] Zhang, Y., Wang, C., & Liu, J. (2020). Real-time Driver Fatigue Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems. DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2020.1833287 [3] Li, X., Chen, J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Sensor Fusion for Driver Fatigue Detection: A Comprehensive Review. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(5), 1781-1796. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2018.2851663 [4] Wang, H., Li, M., & Jiang, B. (2016). Facial Expression-Based Fatigue Detection for In-Vehicle Drivers. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 46(1), 35- 45. DOI: 10.1109/THMS.2015.2497260 [5] Zhao, S., Liu, X., & Wang, L. (2018). Real-time Driver Fatigue Detection System with Adaptive Alert Mechanism. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. DOI: 10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569998 [6] Road Safety Authority. (2021). Driver Fatigue: Facts and Countermeasures. [Online]. Available: https://www.rsa.ie/en/RSA/Road-Safety/OurResearch/International-Research/Driver-Fatigue/ [7] IEEE Computer Society. (2018). IEEE Standard for Information Technology— Biometrics Format for Anti-Spoofing and Liveness Detection (IEEE Std 2410- 2017). DOI: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2018.830234 [8] Zhang, L., Song, Z., & Li,P.(2022). Advances in Deep Learning for Driver Fatigue Detection: A Comprehensive Survey, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 7(1), 33-46. DOI: 10.1109/TIV.2021.3050320 [9] A. Altameem, A. Kumar, R. C. Poonia, S. Kumar and A. K. J. Saudagar, \"Early Identification and Detection of Driver Drowsiness by Hybrid Machine Learning,\" in IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 162805-162819, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3131601 [10] Y. Suresh, R. Khandelwal, M. Nikitha, M. Fayaz and V. Soudhri, \"Driver Drowsiness Detection using Deep Learning,\" 2021 2nd International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC), Trichy, India, 2021, pp. 1526-1531, doi: 10.1109/ICOSEC51865.2021.9591957. [11] C. Ming and Y. Yunbing, \"Perception-Free Calibration of Eye Opening and Closing Threshold for Driver Fatigue Monitoring,\" in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 125469-125476, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3225453. [12] M. H. Alkinani, W. Z. Khan and Q. Arshad, \"Detecting Human Driver Inattentive and Aggressive Driving Behavior Using Deep Learning: Recent Advances, Requirements and Open Challenges,\" in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 105008-105030, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999829 [13] M. Ramzan, H. U. Khan, S. M. Awan, A. Ismail, M. Ilyas and A. Mahmood, \"A Survey on State-of-the-Art Drowsiness Detection Techniques,\" in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 61904-61919, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2914373
Copyright © 2024 Prof. R. S. Vaidya, Ujwal Jagtap, Pramit Wagh, Priyanshu Upadhyay, Pranay Dedge. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET58722
Publish Date : 2024-03-01
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here