Effect of Bracings on the Behaviour of Industrial Buildings with Different Framing Configuration Subjected to Wind Load

Abstract

Steel structures are the best and smartest choice for industrial building construction, mainly because of their capability of creating large spans at lower costs. Usually, a different frame configuration along with effect of bracings has an effect on the behaviour of industrial buildings under wind load, along with PEB, truss, inclined, flat, curved roof. The methodology followed in PEBs is purely composite not only because of quality in pre-fabrication and pre-designing but also because of light weight outcome and economic sounding factor. In present study, Staad Pro is used for designing different sections such as k bracing, X bracing, Diagonal bracing and V bracing. The most economic truss chord sections are used for the designing of industrial building. So, the industrial buildings are designed for wind analysis with various bracings such as V bracing, X- bracing, k- bracing and diagonal bracing. Therefore, the most optimized structure is further compared to the PEB structure with the same parameters.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

Building structures used by industry to store raw materials or to manufacture industry products are known as industrial buildings. Industrial buildings are classified into ordinary industrial buildings and special industrial buildings. A common type of industrial building is a shed type building with a simple roof structure on an open frame. These buildings are used for workshops, warehouses, etc. These buildings require large, clear areas that are not obstructed by columns. The large floor space provides plenty of flexibility and facilities to change the production layout later without significantly changing the building. Industrial buildings are constructed with sufficient headroom for the use of overhead travelling cranes. A special type of industrial building is a steel mill building used to build heavy equipment, produce electricity, etc. The functionality of an industrial building determines its sophistication.

A. Bracing Structure

The braced structure is strong framing system basically it is constructed in seismic prone areas. The bracing member is commonly manufactured with steel, which is more effective in tension and compression.

1. In bracing structure columns and beams withstand the vertical loads and bracings resist the lateral loads. And also, bracings work in axial stress which introduces stiffness against the horizontal shear.
2. There are different types of bracings used in construction, in this study we have considered bracings is as follows

• X bracing at all the face of the structure
  • X bracing only at the corners of the    structure
• Chevron bracing ( inverted V ) all the face of the structure
• Chevron bracing ( inverted V ) only at the corners of the structure
• Diagonal bracings at all the face of the structure  
• Diagonal bracings only at the end of the structure

II. METHODOLOGIES

We are considering types of configuration & types of structures industrial building with dimension 30mts span, 10 mts baying space ,height 10mts.here find economical, passing ratio, displacement for different types configuration without bracing & different types configuration with different types  bracing  by using staad pro analysis.

A.  Structure Modelling

This table explains about structural span and dimensions

C. Different types of bracing

They are

1. X-Bracing
2. Diagonal Bracing
3. V-Bracing
4. K-Bracing

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ANDCOMPARISON

A. Economical Analysis

Bracings are those structural elements which functions under stress loads. The way lateral loads act on it and bring it to foundation depends upon the types of bracing we choose and their implementations are subjected to requirements about functionality as well as economical parameter .Keeping the deflection limits IS800-2007, the deflection when optimized the weight of the structure is noted to find the economical analysis.Foreconomicalanalysisthetotalweightofthestructurewitheach configuration was considered

B.  Wind Load Analysis Different Types Of Configurations Without Bracings

Conclusion

After economic and technical analysis of the PEB, truss, inclined, curved, flat roof with span 30m and bay spacing 10m, when carried out wind analysis for the Vishakhapatnam zone. 1) It’s been suggested that PEB with diagonal bracing gives the best suited result based on the economical feasibility. 2) When for a project if PEB is the preferred design then it is found that PEB with K-bracing comes out to be the best suited when economical. 3) The overall economic analysis shows that, PEB comes out to be economically less than truss, inclined, curved, flat roof. 4) Using of PEB instead of truss, inclined, curved, flat roof reduces the steel quantity. 5) The overall maximum displacement shows that, curved with Diagonal & X –Bracing comes out 3.186mm to be higher than truss, inclined, PEB, flat roof.. 6) The overall maximum displacement shows that, curved without bracings come out 3.180mm to be higher than truss, inclined, PEB, flat roof. 7) Passing ratio of one selected beam is maximum 0.504mm for PEB, 0.569mm forCurved,0.504mmfor truss,0.574mmfor flat,0.574mm for inclined is less than 1 . It’s safe . 8) Therefore, from above study we can conclude about the suitable types of industrial structure either PEB, truss, inclined, curved, flat roof when the span is 30m and with bay spacing 10m.

References

[1] Vikas, B.S., 2017. Effect of Variation in Geometrical Parameters on the Roof Trusses. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication. [2] Kumar, E.S., Singh, B. and Singh, E.B. 2016. Optimization of Roof Truss Using STAAD PRO V8i. Optimization,. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication. [3] Hajela, P., Lee, E. and Lin, C.Y., 1993. Genetic algorithms in structural topology optimization. In Topology design of structures. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication. [4] Sagar D Wankhade et al., 2017. Wind load analysis for industrial building with different bracing patterns and its comparison with pre engineered building. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume, 8. [5] Naidu, G.D.R., Rao, K.S.V., Sri, V.D., Navakanth, M. and Rao, R., 2014. Comparative study of analysis and design of pre-engineered buildings and conventional frames. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication. [6] Charkha, S.D. and Sanklecha, L.S., 2014. Economizing steel building using pre-engineered steel sections. International Journal of Research in Civil Engineering, Architecture & Design. [7] Anusha .R, chetan gowda RK,H.M Rajashakar swamy 2020, optimising the design of transmission tower by using diaphragm system , Mtech dissertation, MSRUAS. [8] SK, H. and Pradeep, A.R., 2020. A Study on the Analysis and Design of the Steel Warehouse. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, SSAHE-JIR, p.28. [9] IS : 800 - 2007 :- General Construction In Steel - Code of Practice. [10] IS: 875 (Part 1) - 1987 :- Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures- Dead Loads. [11] IS : 875 (Part 2) - 1987 :- Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) for Buildings And Structures- Live Loads. 76 [12] IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987 :- Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) for Buildings And Structures- Wind Loads

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Gajjala Tagore Panish chandra, Chethan Gowda R K. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.