: Optimization of machining processes is essential for achieving higher productivity and high-quality products in order to remain competitive. The objective of this study is to optimize the process parameter of extrusion blow molding process of high density polyethylene (HDPE). In this paper three process parameters namely barrel temperature, Mandrel Position, Screw Rotation. Taguchi Method is a statistical method to improve the process parameters and improve the quality of components that are manufactured. ANOVA has been carried out to identify importance of the operating parameters on the performance characteristics considered. Further the verification experiment has been carried out to confirm the performance of optimum parameters. The results from this study will be useful for selecting appropriate set of process parameters to epoxy coating has been selected. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) has been used to determine effect of each parameter on wear rate so Finally, the confirmation test has been carried out to compare the predicted value of wear rate with the experimental value.
Introduction
I. INTRODUCTION
The modern manufacturing industry makes significant use of plastic in a variety of applications. Plastic products may be manufactured using a wide variety of techniques, some of which include blow molding, casting, compression molding, extrusion, fabrication, foaming, injection molding, rotational molding, and thermoforming. Injection molding is a manufacturing method that may be used to make plastic injection molds from both thermoplastic and thermosetting plastic materials. The molds are then injected into the plastic. The injection molding manufacturing technique allows for excellent dimensional units and has a high rate of production. As a result, the method of injection molding is the one that is utilized the most frequently in the plastics sector. In addition to that, injection molding machines have the capability of producing intricate components and forms. Design of experiments, often known as DOE, is a strategy that is both practical and methodical, and it is used to limit the mistake that is associated with finding the link between the factors of the process and the quality of the result. The optimization of the process setup is something that may be done with the assistance of DOE.
The objective of today's industry is to produce goods that are of excellent quality at a cheap cost and in a relatively short amount of time.In order to achieve this goal, automated production systems, in conjunction with PLC control, are utilized.Extrusion blow molding machines that are capable of obtaining high precision while simultaneously reducing the amount of time required for processing. The production of high density polyethylene (HDPE) containers is most frequently accomplished through the process of blowing. In addition, in order to manufacture any product with the shape and dimensions that are desired.
II. MATERIAL AND METHODS
A. Methodology of Experiment
Based on the present molding process followed, some of the problems were identified such as Parameters like as barrel temperature, mandrel position and screw rotation etc. play an important role in maximum ultimate load so as to overcome the existing problem, few optimization technique has to be incorporated.
To get the perfect result of the molding process by using the blow molding we need to find the correct parameter setting. Until now, so, it is important to find the best parameter setting before start the machining process in order to achieve the maximum result in its ultimate load. In this work, HDPE material is to be used as the specimen material. There are many processes which are studied to optimize the molding of HDPE material by using injection molding machine. The main focus in this work is to optimize the ultimate load while molding HDPE material.
The optimal input parameters were Barrel temp 175oC (level 1), Mandrel position above (level 1) and Screw rotation 20Hz (level 3). The graph graphically shows the effect of the control factors on HDPE material. The configuration of the process parameters with the highest ratio always provides the optimum quality with a minimum variation. The graph shows the relationship change when the control factor configuration was changed from one level to another.
C. ANOVA Result
The analysis of variance was carried out at 95% confidence level. The main purpose of ANOVA is to investigate the influence of the designed process parameters on Tensile strength by indicating that, which parameter is significantly affected the response. This is accomplished by separating the total variability of the S/N Ratios, which is measured by the sum of squared deviations from the total mean of the S/N ratio, into contributions by each welding process parameter and the error. The percentage contribution by each of the welding process parameters in the total sum of the squared deviations can be used to evaluate the importance of the process parameter change on the quality characteristic. Degrees of freedom (DOF) for OA should be greater than or at least equal to those for the parameters. In this study, Table 5 shows results obtained from analysis of variance
Conclusion
This paper investigates the implementation of Taguchi design in the estimation of optimum ultimate load of HDPE material and different working parameters. It had been concluded that Taguchi design prepare a useful methodology for the setup and optimization of ultimate load with minimum numbers of trials in comparison to other experimental design
This study covers the observations about the ultimate load over HDPE material by the process of blow molding for the different input parameters to thoroughly study over the effect of molding process on the HDPE material. Throughout the experimentation I got some results as under.
1) The optimal solution obtained for ultimate load based on the molding parameters and their levels is (i.e. barrel temperature 175oC at level 1, Mandrel position above 3mm at level 1 and screw rotation 20Hz at level 3. The time more significant Parameters than screw rotation and barrel temperature
2) Barrel temperature 175oC (level 1), Mandrel position above (level 1) and screw rotation 20Hz (level 3).
3) ANOVA results indicate that screw rotation plays prominent role in determining the ultimate load the contribution of barrel temperature, Mandrel position, screw rotation to the quality characteristics ultimate load is 25.78%, 18.46% and 52.09 % respectively.
4) The optimal process parameters are determined using Taguchi methods match with the experimental values by minimum errors i.e 4.53 % .
5) Through the developed mathematical models, any experimental results of ultimate load with any combination of blow molding parameters can be estimated.
References
[1] Collard, F.; Gilbert, B.; Eppe, G.; Parmentier, E.; Das, K. Detection of anthropogenic particles in fish stomachs: An isolation method adapted to identification by Raman spectroscopy. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 69, 331–339.
[2] Sulyman, M.; Haponiuk, J.; Formela, K. Utilization of recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in engineering materials: A review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2016, 7, 100.
[3] Stevens, E.; Goldstein, N. How green are green plastics? Biocycle 2002, 43, 42–45. 4. Chen, C.P.; Chuang, M.T.; Hsiao, Y.H.; Yang, Y.K.; Tsai, C.H. Simulation and experimental study in determining injection molding process parameters for thin-shell plastic parts via design of experiments analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 10752–10759.
[4] Hassan, H.; Regnier, N.; Lebot, C.; Pujos, C.; Defaye, G. Effect of cooling system on the polymer temperature and solidification during injection molding. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2009, 29, 1786–1791.
[5] Fu, J.; Ma, Y. A method to predict early-ejected plastic part air-cooling behavior towards quality mold design and less molding cycle time. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2019, 56, 66–74.
[6] Yeh, D.-Y.; Cheng, C.-H.; Hsiao, S.-C. Classification knowledge discovery in mold tooling test using decision tree algorithm. J. Intell. Manuf. 2011, 22, 585–595.
[7] Oliaei, E.; Heidari, B.S.; Davachi, S.M.; Bahrami, M.; Davoodi, S.; Hejazi, I.; Seyfi, J. Warpage and shrinkage optimization of injection-molded plastic spoon parts for biodegradable polymers using Taguchi, ANOVA and artificial neural network methods. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2016, 32, 710–720.
[8] Heidari, B.S.; Oliaei, E.; Shayesteh, H.; Davachi, S.M.; Hejazi, I.; Seyfi, J.; Bahrami, M.; Rashedi, H. Simulation of mechanical behavior and optimization of simulated injection molding process for PLA based antibacterial composite and nanocomposite bone screws using central composite design. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 65, 160–176.
[9] Solanki, B.S.; Singh, H.; Sheorey, T. Modeling and analysis of cavity modification effect on quality of injection molded polymer gear. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2022, 16, 1–18.
[10] Ozcelik, B.; Erzurumlu, T. Comparison of the warpage optimization in the plastic injection molding using ANOVA, neural network model and genetic algorithm. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2006, 171, 437–445. 12. Gao, Y.; Wang, X. An effective warpage optimization method in injection molding based on the Kriging model. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2008, 37, 953–960.
[11] tanek, M.; Manas, D.; Manas, M.; Suba, O. Optimization of injection molding process by MPX. In Proceedings of the 13th WSEAS International Conference on Automatic Control, Modelling & Simulation, Catania, Italy, 29–31 May 2011.
[12] Rahman, W.A.W.A.; Sin, L.T.; Rahmat, A.R. Injection moulding simulation analysis of natural fiber composite window frame. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 197, 22–30.
[13] V. Agrawal, J. Vimal, V. Chaturvedi. Optimisation of extrusion blow molding process parameters using grey relational analysis and taguchi, IJREAS. 2012; 2(2): 407–17p.
[14] S.S. Subramanian, S. Durga, K.R. Loshni, V.D. Kumar. A review on control of plastic extrusion process, Int J Adv Res Electr Electr Instrum Eng. 2016; 5(1): 167–71p.
[15] M.J. Barot, T.B. Mehta, C.E.V. Parekh. Review on finite element analysis and optimization of PVC window profile, Int J Eng Technol Sci Res. 2015; 2(1): 1–6p.