Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Praveen Kumar Singh, Dharamveer Singh, Ashok Kumar Yadav
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.47135
Certificate: View Certificate
The present study covers the utilization of a gaseous alternative fuel, raw biogas, in a diesel engine. Biogas alone cannot run a diesel engine, because gaseous fuel cannot burn by compression. It can be supplied to the CI engines in dual fuel mode by using an air-biogas mixer device. In this work, it is aimed to investigate the performance and emission characteristics of a biogas-biodiesel/diesel dual fuel mode diesel engine by employing a venturi gas mixer device for providing a homogeneous mixture.The performance and emission characteristics of the engine operated by dual-fuel mode were experimentally investigated, and compared to diesel. The results indicated that biogas inducted at a flow rate of 1L/min was found to have better performance and lower emission, than that of the other flow rates. On the other hand, dual-fuel mode with a biogas flow rate of BD10 BG@1L/min showed an average reduction in BTE of 9.94% and an average increment of 8.82% in BSFC as compared to diesel. Whereas an increment in CO and HC by 5.18% and 3.01% respectively and an average reduction in NOx emissions by 14.91% as compared to diesel.
I. INTRODUCTION
The objective of this study is to experimentally investigate performance, combustion and emission characteristics in a dual fuel CI engine using a B20 blend of algae biodiesel (AOME), as pilot fuel and to further replace biodiesel with biogas, which is also a renewable fuel. The suffix B with the numerical signature indicates the percentage of algae biodiesel by volume in the biodiesel blend. Experimentation was also conducted using diesel and AOME as fuel to serve as the baseline for comparison. Experiments were conducted at various loads at rated RPM for diesel and biodiesel in single fuel mode, and biodiesel and biogas in dual fuel mode of operation. The engine behavior with respect to combustion, performance, and emission characteristics are compared against a baseline of a standard diesel run.Feasibility studies on the use of different renewable liquid and gaseous fuels have been studied throughout the world. The oils that are extensively studied include Sunflower, Soya bean, Peanut, Rapeseed, Rice bran, Karanji etc.,[1,2]. One of the disadvantages of using these oils in diesel engines is nozzle deposits, which drastically affects the engine performance and emissions. The refining processes of vegetable oil gives better performance compared to crude vegetable oil[3,4,5,6]. Goering et al [7] studied the characteristic properties of eleven vegetable oils to determine which oils would be best suited for use as an alternative fuel source. Of the eleven oils tested, corn, rapeseed, sesame, cottonseed, and soyabean oils had the most favourable fuel properties. There is an improvement in the engine performance when these modified vegetable oils are used instead of base vegetable oils [8, 9, 11, 12]. This improvement in performance is attributed to good atomization of these modified fuels in the injector nozzle and a significant reduction in the viscosity. The performance of the non-edible oils like Rice bran oil [15] and cotton seed oil [14] was found satisfactory. The idea of using vegetable oils as fuel for diesel engines is not a new one. Rudolph Diesel used peanut oil as fuel in his engine at Paris Exposition of 1900.However, despite the technical feasibility, vegetable oil as fuel could not get acceptance, as it was more expensive compared to petroleum fuels. Later the various factors as stated earlier, created renewed interest of researchers in vegetable oil as substitute fuel for diesel engines. The density and viscosities of the blends increased with the increase of biodiesel concentration in the fuel blend. It also reduces the filter clogging and ensures smooth flow of oil. Some of the researchers [10, 13] conducted the experiments on diesel engine using non-edible vegetable oils used as alternate fuels and found maximum Brake thermal efficiency, BSFC and emissions like CO, HC also increased without any engine modification. The uses of biodiesel [16] in conventional diesel engines result in substantial reduction in the emission of unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and particulate. Neat oil is converted into Methyl ester of oil (biodiesel) using trans-esterification process. Methyl and ethyl ester of Karanja oil [17] can also be used as fuel in compression ignition engine without any engine modification.
Higher viscosity is responsible for various undesirable combustion properties of Neat vegetable oils. Four well known techniques are proposed to reduce the viscosity levels of vegetable oil namely dilution, Pyrolysis, Micro emulsion and Trans esterification [18]. It also includes detailed reviews of different journals related to design parameters of a venturi gas mixer device, performance, combustion and emission characteristic of biogas-biodiesel dual fuel mode diesel engine. Attempts have been made in many developed countries of the world on the use of biogas and vegetable oils as diesel engine fuel. In most of the research work vegetable oil has been tried as pure, esterified or blended with diesel. Many researchers, engine manufacturers and users in different countries of the world have performed tests that demonstrated the potential and problems of this fuel source. However, there are several real problems that restrict the introduction of this source in to energy pool. Later in thispaper literature on economic assessment is reviewed. While the performance, combustion, and emission characteristics of a diesel-biogas dual fuel diesel engine mainly depend on two factors as seen from the literature above. These are the mixing device employed and engine operating parameters. As a venturi mixer provides a homogeneous charge into the engine cylinder, complete combustion will take place i.e. there is no chance for heterogeneous combustion. Therefore after go through from the existing literature the part including convergent angle and beta ratio associated with it of a venturi gas mixer is designed, for which differential pressure between the inlet and throat venturi sections is the least. This is part of an area understudied in the current research.
II. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
A. Major Input Requirement
This section describes the equipment’s will be utilize in this research along with detail of its characteristics and measurement capabilities. It also includes the experimental setup and procedure, device calibration and equations and measurements that will be use to obtain the performance and emission data. In any experimental study, instrumentation plays an important role, as it provides the required data for analysis.
Table 1 List of materials and equipment used for experimental test
1 |
CI engine, and |
2 |
Biogas |
3 |
gas mixer |
4 |
Biodiesel |
5 |
measurements apparatus. |
6 |
Exhaust gas analyzer |
7 |
Computer (desktop) |
Table 2Engine Specifications
S.No |
Component |
Specification |
1 |
Engine make |
Kirloskar,Model TV1 |
2 |
Engine type |
1 cylinder, 4stroke, water cooled |
3 |
Rated Power |
5.2 kW (7 BHP) @1500 rpm |
4 |
Cylinder Volume |
661cc |
5 |
Compression Ratio |
18 |
6 |
Injection timing (diesel) |
23° bTDC |
6 |
Dynamometer |
Eddy current, water cooled |
7 |
Piezo Sensors |
Range 5000 PSI |
8 |
Crank Sensor |
Resolution 10, Speed 5500 RPM |
9 |
Load Sensor |
Load cell, type strain gauge, |
10 |
Software |
“Engine soft”, Engine Performance analysis software |
III. MATERIALS AND METHODS
This chapter comprises the computational and experimental analyses to study the effects of mass flow rates of raw biogas on diesel engine performance and emission parameters under certain operating conditions of diesel engine operate with biodiesel-biogas dual fuel mode by employing a gas mixing device. This also includes venturi type gas mixture models that can be use to study the flow characteristics. The numerical analysis for designing a gas mixer will be use for the computational methods that are described with the necessary illustrations. The experimental investigation will be carried out using a single-cylinder, direct-injection four-stroke diesel engine equipped with an eddy current dynamometer for loading the engine. The detailed research methodologies and required materials are explained below in the next sections.
A. Test Fuels
Diesel was purchased from a retail station of Indian Oil Pvt. Ltd, located near the premises of our campus. Besides, biodiesel was produced by the transesterification of algae oil, which was purchased from retail pharmacy shop, located near by the campus. The production of biodiesel from vegetable oil is portrayed in Fig 3. The properties of biodiesel were measured and compared with the standard diesel fuel, presented in Table 3.
B. Biodiesel Production
There are different processes which can be applied to synthesize biodiesel such as direct use and blending, micro emulsion process, thermal cracking process and the most conventional way is
transesterification process.
Table 3 Composition of different feedstock’s raw biogas (Wierzbicki, 2012).
Component |
Composition |
||
agricultural biogas |
treatment plant biogas |
landfill biogas |
|
CH4 |
45–75% |
57–62% |
37–67% |
CO2 |
25–55% |
33–38% |
24–40% |
O2 |
0.01–2.1% |
0–0.5% |
1–5% |
N2 |
0.01–5.0% |
3.4–8.1% |
10–25% |
H2S |
10–30000 ppm |
24–8000 ppm |
15–427 ppm |
C. Transesterification
This occurs in a multiple reaction process including threereversible steps in series, where triglycerides are converted todiglycerides, then diglycerides are converted to monoglycerides,and monoglycerides are converted to esters and glycerol. Thealgae oil obtained after this transesteri?cation process is usuallyreferred to as algae oil methyl ester (AOME). Figureshows the chemical reaction of the transesteri?cation of algaeoil. The algae biodiesel properties are evaluated andtabulated in Table4.
Table 4: Properties of fuels
Property |
Algae Oil |
AOME (Bio Diesel) |
Density at 40 ºC (g/m3) |
0.871 |
0.864 |
Specific Gravity at 40 ºC |
0.916 |
0.894 |
Flash point (°C) |
145 |
130 |
Kinematic Viscosity, 40 ºC(mm2/s) |
5.76 |
5.2 |
Iodine Value (g/100g oil) |
124 |
75 |
Acid Value (mg KOH/ g oil) |
0.46 |
0.374 |
Calorific value (kJ/kg) |
37200 |
|
IV. EXPERIMENTAL PROCESS
A. Methodology
To address the general and specific objectives of this work a well-designed methodology will be followed. There are combinations of procedures that will be use to accomplish this study. These
are design, analysis and then manufacturing of the mixer device, preparing fuels (collecting biogas from digester outlets, producing biodiesel and purchasing diesel fuel), preparing the experimental setup of the test engine for experiment and analysis of experimental results. This thesis work will be based on the following procedures summarized as shown in Figure 5 below.
V. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The experimental work analysis on the performance and emission characteristics of a dual fuel diesel engine are presented in this chapter This chapter also explains the effect of variation of load, and biogas flow rate/ percentage substitution of biogas in biogas-biodiesel dual fuel mode diesel engine performance and emission characteristics.
A. Engine Performance Characteristics
The performance characteristics such brake thermal efficiency and brake specific fuel consumption of a diesel engine when it operated in diesel fuel and diesel with biogas dual fuel mode at different engine loads are discussed in the following sections below.
This affects the burning speed of biogas-air charge and causes a reduction in flame propagation which results lower in brake thermal efficiency of dual-fuel mode is expressed in Fig. 6. A similar trend was reported by (Rosha et al., 2018). On the other hand, in dual-fuel mode operations as biogas flow rate increases BTE decreases. This is due to an increase in the induction of biogas leads to further decreases the flame propagation speed and resulted in lower BTE. Generally, an average BTE reduction of BD10D90 + BG@1L/min, BD20D80 + BG@2L/min, and BD35D75 + BG@4L/min flow rate with respect to diesel mode were obtained 15.94%, 20.04% and 23.58% respectively.
2. Brake Specific Fuel Consumption (BSFC)
Brake specific fuel consumption depends on the heating value of the fuel (Sandalc et al., 2019). Figure 4.5 shows brake specific fuel consumption with respect to engine load for diesel fuel and all the biogas mixtures. Brake specific fuel consumption for both modes was found to be high at a low load of the engine. This is due to lower output power at a lower load. However, it was found to be lesser at high engine load for both modes of operations because of an increase in combustion rate due to high air-fuel ratio and high combustion temperature. Table 7 below shows the numerical value of brake specific fuel consumption for both neat diesel and dual-fuel operations. From Figure 7 it is observed that, supplying biogas leads to higher fuel consumption as compared to diesel mode throughout the load range. This is due to the low energy density of and slow-burning of biogas causes higher BSFC in dual fuel mode operation. Moreover, due to raw biogas contains more percentage of non-combustible components which reduces its fuel quality.
B. Exhaust Gas Emissions
Knowing the exhaust emissions of a specified fuel is an important issue for future controlling its emissions through different options, either searching alternative fuels which results in less emission or optimizing the engine operating parameters. This portion addresses the emissions of pure diesel and biogas-diesel dual fuel mode diesel engine. Now emissions of CO, CO2, HC, O2, and NOx which were measured by using Automobile Exhaust Gas Analyzer SV-50 when the engine run in dual fuel mode at each load with different biogas flow rate are briefly discussed in this section with comparison to neat diesel fuel emissions.
Figure 8 shows the variation of CO emissions with respect to load for diesel fuel and diesel with biogas mixtures. In dual fuel mode operation, higher CO is observed than diesel. This is because of the lower flame speed of biogas due to the presence of CO2, reduction of oxygen caused by the induction of biogas and higher specific heat of biogas, as compared to diesel, requires high combustion temperature to burn completely. The above reasons cause some fuel undergoes incomplete combustion leads to high CO emission. It also increases as an increase in biogas flow rate. This is due to the high biogas flow rate further increases CO2 concentration and decreases the availability of O2 in the combustion chamber. The average CO emission increment of BD10D90 + BG@1L/min, BD20D80 + BG@2L/min, and BD25D75 + BG@4L/min flow rate from diesel mode was 10.18%, 19.91% and 31.86% respectively. Table 4.6 below shows the numerical value of carbon monoxide emissions.
2. Exhaust Emissions of Hydrocarbons (ppm Vol.)
Unburnt hydrocarbon emission for diesel and biogas-diesel fuel with respect to load is shown in Figure 9. The unburnt hydrocarbon (UHC) emission in dual fuel operation is higher than diesel, under all test conditions. The average unburnt HC emission increment of BD10D90 + BG@1L/min, BD20D80 + BG@2L/min, and BD + BG@4L/min flow rate from diesel mode were obtained 6.01%, 19.29% and 30.94% respectively. Table 4.9 below shows the numerical values of HC emissions.
3. Nitrogen Oxide Exhaust Emissions (ppm Vol.)
The formation of NOx emission mainly depends on the availability of oxygen, higher temperature developed during the combustion, and the residence time for which oxygen-nitrogen reactions occurring to a significant completion level (Bouguessa et al., 2020). Variations of NOx emission for both diesel and dual-fuel at all loads are shown in Figure 10 below.
The average NOx emission reduction of BD10D90 + BG@1L/min, BD10D90 + BG@2L/min, and BD25D75 + BG@4L/min flow rate from diesel mode were obtained 19.91%, 27.33% and 39.16% respectively. Table 4.10 below shows the numerical values of NOx emissions.
A. Conclusion Based on the experiments conducted in the biogas-biodiesel dual-fuel mode diesel engine under various load condition with different biogas flow rate at constant engine speed, and thereby from the results obtained, the following conclusions are drawn: As biogas flow rate increases from 1L/min to 4L/min with an increasing of load from 20% to 80%: 1) Relatively reduction in BTE from 15.94% to 23.58% and an increment of BSFC from 11.82% to 20.87%. 2) Increment in emissions like CO by 10.18% to 31.86% and HC by 6.01% to 30.94%. 3) There is a reduction in NOx emission from 19.91% to 39.16% respectively. Generally, among different DF mode operations, due to small percentage of methane in a given biogas, with a biogas flow rate of 1L/min yields relatively same performance and emission characteristics and allows extremely low levels of NOx as compared to diesel fuel operation. B. Scope for Future Work The following points are suggested for future work, for the use of biogas in diesel engines. 1) CFD models can be used to predict the temperature distribution in the combustion chamber and flame propagation dynamics for in-depth analysis of dual fuel combustion reaction. 2) An improvement in the lubricity property of the engine oil for the biogas operated engine needs to be carried out for its long term use. 3) An improvement for the compression and storage stability of biogas can be carried out for its off-site application for heat and power generation.
[1] Abo-Serie, E., Ozgur, M., & Altinsik, K. (2015). Computational analysis of methane-air venturi mixer for optimum design. unpublished, 1-9.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281684556. [2] Aklouche, Z., Loubar, K., Bentebbiche, A., Awad, S., & Tazerout, M. (2017). Experimental investigation of the equivalence ratio influence on combustion, performance and exhaust emissions of a dual fuel diesel engine operating on synthetic biogas fuel. Energy Conversion and Management, 291–299. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.050. [3] Ali, M., & Salih, M. (2013). Factors Affecting Performance of Dual Fuel Compression Ignition Engines. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 217-222. https://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.388.217. [4] Bhuimbar, S., & Kumarappa, S. (2015). Engine Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Single Cylinder Four Stroke CI Engine on Dual Fuel Mode by Using Compressed Biogas as a Fuel. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 3(9), 376-382. https://www.ijraset.com/fileserve.php?FID=3277. [5] Bora, B., Debnath, B., Gupta, N., Saha, U., & Sahoo, N. (2013). Investigation on the flow behaviour of a venturi type gas mixer designed for dual fuel diesel engines. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 202-209. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.414.2833. [6] Bora, J., & Saha, K. (2016). Optimisation of injection timing and compression ratio of a raw biogas powered dual fuel diesel engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, 111–121. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.111. [7] Chintala, V., & Subramanian, K. (2013). A computational fluid dynamics study for optimization of gas injector orientation for performance improvement of a dual-fuel diesel engine. Energy, 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.009. [8] Dahake, M., Patil, S., & Patil, S. ( 2016). Performance and Emission Improvement through Optimization of Venturi Type Gas Mixer for CNG Engines. . International research and Journal of Engineering Technology, 994–999. [9] Danardono, D., Kim, K., Lee, S., & Lee, J. (2011). Optimization the design of venturi gas mixer for syngas engine using three-dimensional CFD modeling. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 25 (9), 2285-2296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0612-8. [10] Abo-Serie, E., Ozgur, M., & Altinsik, K. (2015). Computational analysis of methane-air venturi mixer for optimum design. unpublished, 1-9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281684556. [11] Aklouche, Z., Loubar, K., Bentebbiche, A., Awad, S., & Tazerout, M. (2017). Experimental investigation of the equivalence ratio influence on combustion, performance and exhaust emissions of a dual fuel diesel engine operating on synthetic biogas fuel. Energy Conversion and Management, 291–299. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.050. [12] Ali, M., & Salih, M. (2013). Factors Affecting Performance of Dual Fuel Compression Ignition Engines. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 217-222. https://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.388.217. [13] Ambarita, H. (2017). Performance and emission characteristics of a small diesel engine run in dual-fuel (diesel-biogas) mode. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 179–191. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2017.06.003. [14] Ambarita, H. (2019). Experimental study on diesel engine coupled with a catalytic converter run on dual-fuel mode using biogas produced from agricultural waste. IOP Publishing. Medan 20155, Indonesia. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/523/1/012064. [15] Arali, M., Anil, R., & Gawade, S. (2016). Design and Development of Intake Device for Biogas operated 4-Stroke SI Engine. Energy, 1-7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322634895. [16] Ayade, M., & Latey, A. (2016). performance and emission characteristics of biogas-petrol dual fuel in SI engine. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), 7(2), 45-54. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET_07_02_006.pdf. [17] Barik, D., & Murugan, S. (2014). Investigation of combustion performance and emission characteristics of a DI diesel engine fueled with biogas-diesel in dual fuel mode. Energy, 760 – 771. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.106. [18] Barik, D., & Murugan, S. (2016). Experimental investigation on the behavior of a DI diesel engine fueled with raw biogasediesel dual fuel at different injection timing. Journal of the Energy Institute, 373-388. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2015.03.002. [19] Bharathiraja, B., Sudharsana, T., Jayamuthunagai, J., Praveenkumar, R., Chozhavendhan, S., & Iyyappan, J. (2018). Biogas production – A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 570-582. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v90y2018icp570-582.html. [20] Bhuimbar, S., & Kumarappa, S. (2015). Engine Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Single Cylinder Four Stroke CI Engine on Dual Fuel Mode by Using Compressed Biogas as a Fuel. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 3(9), 376-382. https://www.ijraset.com/fileserve.php?FID=3277. 75 [21] Jagadish, C., & Gumtapure, V. (2019). Experimental investigation of methane-enriched biogas in a single cylinder diesel engine by the dual fuel mode. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1647314. [22] John K. Vennard. (1982). Elementary Fluid Mechanics. Robert L.Street: John Wiley & Sons. [23] Kadirgama, K., Noor, M., Rahim, A., Devarajan, R., Rejab, M., & Zuki, N. (March 8-10, 2008). Design and Simulate Mixing of Compressed Natural Gas with Air in a mixing device. Malaysian Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology. Putra Palace, Perlis, Malaysia http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.414.2833. [24] Bora, J., & Saha, K. (2016). Optimisation of injection timing and compression ratio of a raw biogas powered dual fuel diesel engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, 111–121. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.111. [25] Bora, J., & Saha, K. (June 25-27, 2014). On the attainment of optimum injection timing of pilot fuel in a dual fuel diesel engine run on biogas. Proceedings of the ASME 2014 12th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis (pp. 1-10). Copenhagen, Denmark: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). https://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/. [26] Bora, J., Saha, K., Chatterjee, S., & Veer, V. (2014). Effect of compression ratio on performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a dual fuel diesel engine run on raw biogas. Energy Conversion and Management, 1000–1009. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.080. [27] Bouguessa, R., Tarabet, L., Loubar, K., Belmrabet, T., & Tazerout, M. (2020). Experimental investigation on biogas enrichment with hydrogen for improving the combustion in diesel engine operating under dual fuel mode. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.003. [28] Carpintero Durango, J., Fabregas Villegas, J., Santamaria De La Cruz, H., Perez, S., & Valencia Ochoa, G. (2019). Computational validation of the design of an air-biogas mixer for a turboalimented diesel engine. International Journal of Engineering &Technology, 8(3), 337-342. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i3.29538. [29] Chandekar, C., & Debnath, K. (2018). Computational investigation of air-biogas mixing device for different biogas substitutions and engine load variations. Renewable Energy, 811- 824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.003. [30] Chintala, V., & Subramanian, K. (2013). A computational fluid dynamics study for optimization of gas injector orientation for performance improvement of a dual-fuel diesel engine. Energy, 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.009. [31] Dahake, M., Patil, S., & Patil, S. ( 2016). Performance and Emission Improvement through Optimization of Venturi Type Gas Mixer for CNG Engines. . International research and Journal of Engineering Technology, 994–999. [32] Danardono, D., Kim, K., Lee, S., & Lee, J. (2011). Optimization the design of venturi gas mixer for syngas engine using three-dimensional CFD modeling. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 25 (9), 2285-2296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0612-8. [33] Das, S., Kashyap, D., Kalita, P., Kulkarni, V., & Itaya, Y. (2020). Clean gaseous fuel application in diesel engine: A sustainable option for rural electrification in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109485. 76 [34] Deheri, C., Acharya, K., Thatoi, N., & Mohanty, P. (2020). A review on performance of biogas and hydrogen on diesel engine in dual fuel mode. Fuel, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116337. [35] Feroskhan, M., Ismail, S., Kumar, A., Kumar, V., &Aftab, K. (2016). Investigation of the effects of biogas flow rate and cerium oxide addition on the performance of a dual fuel CI engine. Biofuels, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1215072. [36] Ganesan, V. (2016).Internal combustion engines.fourth ed. ; 2016. New Delhi: McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. [37] Gnanamoorthi, V., &Mohandoss, M. (2018).Combustion, performance and emission analysis of dual fuel engine using tsrb biogas. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1550538. [38] Grabel, W. (2001).Engineering fluid mechanics. New York, NY 10001, U nited States of America: Taylor & Francis. [39] Gurung, D., Rajvanshi, A., &Lalhriatpuia, S. (2018). Performance Analysis of Combined Biogas-Diesel Run Dual-Fuel Engine. Advances in Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, 559-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4286-7_55. [40] Heywood, J. B. (1988). Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. New York :mcgraw-Hill. [41] Hogstrom, R., Vesala, H., &Heinonen, M. (2017).Particulate content of biogas. 18th International Congress of Metrology, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1051/metrology/201708002. [42] IdrissHusen,&MekonnenMaschal. (2018). Methane Gas Emission and its Management Practices from Solid Waste Stream, Case Study: Addis Ababa and its Surrounding Oromia Special Zone Towns. Environment Pollution and Climate Change, 2(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2573-458X.1000160. [43] Dharamveer, Samsher, D. B. Singh, A. K. Singh, N. Kumar, Solar Distiller Unit Loaded withNanofluid- A Short Review. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer, Singapore, (2019) 241-247, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6577-5_24. [44] S Kumar and D. Singh, Energy and exergy analysis of active solar stills using compound parabolic concentrator, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 6 (2019) 12. [45] R. Shanker, D. Singh, D. B. Singh “Performance analysis of C.I. engine using biodiesel fuel by modifying injection timing and injection pressure” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) 6 (2019) 12. [46] A. K. Anup and D. Singh, FEA analysis of refrigerator compartment for optimizing thermal efficiency, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development, 10 (2020) 3, 3951-3972. [47] S Kumar and D. Singh, Optimizing thermal behavior of compact heat exchanger, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development, 10 (2020) 3, 8113-8130. [48] Dharamveer and Samsher, Comparative analyses energy matrices and enviro-economics for active and passive solar still, materialstoday: proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.001 (2020). [49] Dharamveer, Samsher, Anil Kumar,Analytical study of Nth identical photovoltaic thermal (PVT) compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) active double slope solar distiller with helical coiled heat exchanger using CuO Nanoparticles, Desalination and water treatment, 233 (2021) 30-51, https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2021.27526 [50] Dharamveer,Samsher, Anil Kumar,Performance analysis of N-identical PVT-CPC collectors an active single slope solar distiller with a helically coiled heat exchanger using CuO nanoparticles, Water supply, October 2021, SCI-E Index, IWA Publication. I.F 1.275,https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.348 [51] M. Kumar and D. Singh, Comparative analysis of single phase microchannel for heat flow Experimental and using CFD, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science (IJRES), 10 (2022) 03, 44-58. [52] Subrit and D. Singh, performance and thermal analysis of coal and waste cotton oil liquid obtained by pyrolysis fuel in diesel engine, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science (IJRES), 10 (2022) 04, 23-31.
Copyright © 2022 Praveen Kumar Singh, Dharamveer Singh, Ashok Kumar Yadav. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET47135
Publish Date : 2022-10-19
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here