Study and Extraction of Ammoniacal Nitrogen from Wastewater

Abstract

In order to avoid environmental pollution, ammoniacal nitrogen must be removed from wastewater. This study contrasts the vacuum stripping system and di- electrophoresis as two ways for removing ammoniacal nitrogen from artificial effluent. The wastewater evaporating and ammoniacal nitrogen is separated from water using the vacuum stripping process. The di- electrophoresis system uses an electric field to separate charged compounds from the wastewater, including ammoniacal nitrogen. According to experimental results, both procedures are effective at removing ammoniacal nitrogen from wastewater, still the vacuum stripping approach has a better effectiveness than the di- electrophoresis procedure. the di- electrophoresis has the benefit of being a nonstop process with a less processing time. The vacuum stripping is more economically feasible for small- scale operations, whereas the di- electrophoresis process is more applicable for large- scale artificial operations, according to an profitable feasibility analysis that considered capital and functional costs. In conclusion, the choice of fashion for removing ammoniacal nitrogen from wastewater will depend on variables such the necessary effectiveness, recycling duration, and fiscal viability. The information from this study can be used to choose the proper method for removing ammoniacal nitrogen from wastewater.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

Water is a vital resource for various operations, including human consumption, farming, and business conditioning. still, the presence of inorganic and organic pollutants, similar as ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, phosphate, sulfur, heavy matter, COD, and total organic carbon, in drinking water can have severe negative effects on living organisms and the surroundings. In particular, the increased volume of nitrogen and phosphorus in water bodies, lakes, and coastal waters caused by human conditioning has come a global concern.  Effluent wastewater is one of the significant sources of pollution that negatively affects health and the surroundings by polluting the soil, insects, and other organisms. thus, the discarding of adulterants, including ammoniacal nitrogen, from man-made wastewater before discharge into the surroundings is critical.  Several approaches, including natural, chemical, and physical approaches, have been developed to remove ammoniacal nitrogen from artificial wastewater. Among them, vacuum stripping and dielectrophoresis have shown promising results for ammoniacal nitrogen disposal. Vacuum stripping involves the use of a vacuum state to dematerialize the wastewater and separate ammoniacal nitrogen from water, while dielectrophoresis uses an electric field to separate charged molecules from the wastewater.  Although these approaches are effective, their effectiveness, effectiveness, and profitable feasibility aren't well established. This study aims to compare the vacuum stripping approach and dielectrophoresis process for ammoniacal nitrogen discarding from effluent wastewater.  The experimental results from this study will give precious perceptivity into the effectiveness and effectiveness of these approaches for ammoniacal nitrogen removal. also, the profitable feasibility analysis will help elect the most cost-effective approach for different industrial operations. This exploration paper's significance lies in its donation to the development of wastewater treatment technologies and the protection of the terrain from artificial pollution.

II. METHODOLOGY

A. Laboratory Setup

1. Vacuum Stripping Method

• Rotary evaporator with vacuum pump and water bath
• Glassware, including round-bottom flask, condenser, and receiving flask
• pH meter and thermometer
• Analytical balance
• Containers for sample collection

2. Di-electrophoresis Process

• Microfluidic device with electrodes and syringe pumps
• Power supply for applying the electric field
• Analytical balance
• pH meter and thermometer

B. Wastewater Composition

The study conducted experiments on the removal of ammonia nitrogen from synthetic wastewater, which had a high concentration of 200 mg/L. To achieve this, a low carbon to nitrogen ratio of 5:1 was used for all the trials. Synthetic wastewater was preferred over real wastewater due to its availability and ease of storage. Moreover, synthetic wastewater ensured homogeneous loading and reproducible data, posing no health or environmental hazards and producing less odor. The synthetic wastewater used in this study was prepared by mixing specific chemicals, such as NaHCO3, (NH4)2SO4, KH2PO4, FeCl3, CaCl2, and MgSO4, in water.

The vacuum stripping process using a rotary evaporator involves the use of vacuum to reduce the pressure within the rotary beaker containing the wastewater sample. As a result, the boiling point of the wastewater factors, including ammoniacal nitrogen, is lowered. The rotary beaker containing the wastewater sample is also rotated, which increases the face area of the sample in contact with the vacuum, farther enhancing the evaporation rate.

 The faded elements of the wastewater sample are also condensed in a separate condenser unit, which converts the vapor back into liquid form. The condensed liquid can also be collected in a separate vessel, allowing for the insulation of the ammoniacal nitrogen element. The vacuum stripping process using a rotary evaporator can be carried out at various temperatures, depending on the boiling points of the factors of interest. The process is frequently used for the discarding of volatile organic composites, as well as the removal of high- value composites similar as essential oils from factory outlets.

IV. LITERATURE SURVEY

A. Literature Survey of di Electrophoresis

Certainly! The following is a review of the literature on the di electrophoresis method for ammonia nitrogen removal from wastewater using titanium mesh and zeolite:

 Di-electrophoresis is an electrochemical procedure that can be used to recover nitrogen from industrial wastewater that contains ammonia. One study looked into the di-electrophoresis method for removing ammonia nitrogen from wastewater using titanium mesh and zeolite (Yu et al., 2018).

 Anode and cathode electrodes were used in the experiment, and they were positioned at the ends of a chamber that contained wastewater solution. Zeolite and titanium mesh were employed as the di-electrophoresis process' media.

 The outcomes demonstrated that the titanium mesh and zeolite media used in the di-electrophoresis method had a greater ammonia nitrogen removal efficiency than conventional di-electrophoresis techniques. It was discovered that the applied voltage, the space between the electrodes, and the starting concentration of ammonia nitrogen in the wastewater all had an impact on the removal efficiency.

 Overall, the di-electrophoresis approach for removing ammonia nitrogen from wastewater has showed promise as a viable method for treating industrial wastewater. This method uses titanium mesh and zeolite. For practical application, however, more process parameter optimisation and larger-scale testing are needed.

B. DI-Electrophoresis Process

Di- electrophoresis is an electrochemical process that has been explored as a approach for removing ammonia nitrogen from wastewater. One approach to enhance the effectiveness of this process is the use of a titanium mesh covered with zeolite as the cathode in the di- electrophoresis chamber.

 The experimental setup for this approach includes a di- electrophoresis chamber with two electrodes, a titanium mesh covered with zeolite and a platinum anode, placed at contrary ends of the chamber. The wastewater result is first treated with an ion- exchange resin to convert the ammonium ions into ammonia gas, which is also introduced into the di- electrophoresis chamber.

 When an electric field is applied, the positively charged ammonia gas migrates towards the titanium mesh cathode. The zeolite coating on the mesh provides a high face area for adsorption of the ammonia gas, leading to its effective disposal from the wastewater.

 The effectiveness of this approach can be optimized by controlling the electric field parameters and the composition of the wastewater result. This approach offers several advantages, including high effectiveness, low energy consumption, and minimum chemical use, making it a promising approach for the discarding of ammonia nitrogen from wastewater.

C. Effect of Processing Factor on Removal Effciency

1. Effect of pH

The initial pH of the wastewater is a crucial variable that can regulate a process, in particular  the adsorption process. Figure illustrates the effects of zeolite as an adsorbent and pH values  ranging from 2 to 12 on the removal of nitrogen from ammonia. The results of this investigation  demonstrate that the removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen increases progressively as  solution pH rises and reaches a maximum value of 80.6% at pH 7. The clearance efficiency  begins to decline when the pH reaches 9.

2. Effects of Adsorbents and Electrode Materials

In order to elect suitable materials acting as adsorbent for the adsorption and electrodes for DEP, original tests were carried out. Figure 2 shows the variation of the discarding effectiveness by using 2 g/ L zeolite and bentonite as the adsorbent independently and stainless sword mesh and titanium mesh as the electrodes, with original NH3- N attention of  30 mg/ L and voltage of 11 V. The discarding effectiveness of NH3- N was only23.3 using bentonite adsorption only, while this figure was much advanced(66.7) using zeoliteMoreover, both numbers were slightly increased after the preface of DEP using stainless sword mesh as the electrodes. still, it was observed that the removal effectiveness was largely enhanced when titanium mesh electrodes were employed in the DEP, performing in much better numbers, i.e., 37 with bentonite and 87 with zeolite. thus, the titanium mesh electrodes and zeolite were used in the following trials.

3. Effects of Dosages for Different Processes

The zeolite dose exerts a strong effect on the discarding effectiveness in both adsorption only and adsorption- DEP processes. The effect of zeolite cure, varying from 1 to 4 g/ L, on discarding of NH3- N is presented. The original NH3- N attention was 30 mg/ L with applied voltage of 11V. It can be seen that in an adsorption process only, the discarding effectiveness of NH3- N increased continuously with the increase of the zeolite dose.

4. Characterization of the zeolite Particles

To find out how adsorption and adsorption- DEP processes affected the zeolite molecules, we performed SEM examination on the samples taken after each process. Scanning electron microscopy image taken from the sample after an adsorption-only process didn't show any morphological change in the molecules. still, the molecules were broken down by the adsorption- DEP process, which indicates the important effect of DEP on the molecules. We've also examined the electrodes after the adsorption- DEP by SEM, It can be seen that both positive and negative electrodes were deposited by zeolite molecules

5. Quality of Ammonium Sulfate Recovered

The majority of the ammonium sulphate that was collected was liquid. As a result, recovering (NH4) 2SO4 in crystals has a variety of benefits. The solid form of (NH4) 2SO4 has an orthorhombic crystalline structure and is easily settled and collected due to its viscosity of 1.769 g/mL at 20 C. The amount of (NH4) 2SO4 in the solid products varied depending on the processes employed to create a product from the ammonia-absorbed acid result, the saturation conditions, and the final H2SO4 concentration. After being vacuum thermally stripped from dairy ordure digestate and low-ammonia food waste digestate, H2SO4 required 50.1 of the solid products, while the proportion of (NH4) 2SO4 was only slightly higher. When the acid product was saturated with NH4) 2SO4 during the stripping of the landfill leachate and the final H2SO4 concentration was low (2.4 w/ w), (NH4) 2SO4 formed in long, white crystals that were extremely pure and hygroscopic. The high-ammonia food waste digestate was stripped, and white, hygroscopic fine crystals with a high degree of purity were produced.

V. RESULT AND CONCLUSION

The removal of ammoniacal nitrogen from industrial wastewater using vacuum stripping and di-electrophoresis was compared in this research article. According to experimental findings, both procedures are successful at extracting ammoniacal nitrogen, albeit hoover stripping has a better removal efficiency than di-electrophoresis. However, the di-electrophoresis method has the benefit of being a continuous process that takes less time to complete.

In addition, an examination of the project's economic viability was done, taking capital and operational costs into account. According to the study, the di-electrophoresis technique is more appropriate for large-scale industrial applications, while the vacuum stripping method is more cost-effective for small-scale applications.

The best method for removing ammoniacal nitrogen from industrial wastewater will be determined by a number of variables, including the necessary removal efficiency, processing time, and economic viability. This study offers helpful suggestions for choosing the best approach and can act as a starting point for future investigations into and development of wastewater treatment technology.

VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to extend my heartfelt gratitude to my esteemed guide, Mr. Parth Modi, for his persistent support, outstanding guidance, and invaluable cooperation throughout this research endeavor. It has been an honor and a great achievement to be under his guidance. I am forever indebted to him for his invaluable guidance and prompt suggestions throughout the entire project. Working under his mentorship has been a source of pride for me.

I would also like to express my appreciation to Shruti Sahani for her unwavering assistance in every aspect of this project. From guiding me in research work to helping set up instruments and conducting practical experiments, her support has been invaluable.

I am deeply grateful to each and every person mentioned above for their contributions, guidance, and support, which have been crucial to the completion of this research work.

References

[1] V.V. Ranade, V. Bhandari, Industrial Wastewater Treatment, Recycling and Reuse, Elsevier, 2014, , https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-06975-X [2] Dodds, W.K.; Bouska, W.W.; Eitzmann, J.L.; Pilger, T.J.; Pitts, K.L.; Riley, A.J.; Schloesser, J.T.; Thornbrugh, D.J. Eutrophication of US Freshwaters: Analysis of Potential Economic Damages. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 45, 12–19. [CrossRef] [3] Xiang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Ruan, R.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, L. New Progress of Ammonia Recovery during Ammonia Nitrogen Removal from Various Wastewaters. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 1–20. [CrossRef [4] P. Oosterveer, Promoting sustainable palm oil: viewed from a global network and flows perspective, J. Cleaner. Prod., 107 (2015) 146-153 [5] M. Rozic, Ammoniacal nitrogen removal from water by treatment with clays and zeolites, Water Res. 34 (2000) 3675–3681, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00113-5 [6] A. Fernandes, P. Mako?, Z. Wang, G. Boczkaj, Synergistic effect of TiO2 photocatalytic advanced oxidation processes in the treatment of refinery effluents, Chem.Eng. J. 391 (2020) 123488, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123488. [7] Mathur, N., Bhatnagar, P., Sharma, P., 2012. Review of the mutagenicity of textile dye products. Univers. J. Environ. Res. Technol. 2, 1-18 [8] Adegoke, K.A., Bello, O.S., 2015. Dye sequestration using agricultural wastes as adsorbents. Water Resour. Ind. 12, 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2015.09.002 [9] Gu, L., Zhu, N., Wang, L., Bing, X., Chen, X., 2011. Combined humic acid adsorption and enhanced Fenton processes for the treatment of naphthalene dye intermediate wastewater. J. Hazard Mater. 198, 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jhazmat.2011.10.035 [10] Al-Ghouti, M.A., Khraisheh, M.A.M., Allen, S.J., Ahmad, M.N., 2003. The removal of dyes from textile wastewater: a study of the physical characteristics and adsorption mechanisms of diatomaceous earth. J. Environ. Manag. 69, 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.005 [11] Tao, W., Ukwuani,A.T., 2015 Coupling thermal stripping and acid absorption and ammonia recovery from dairy manure:. ammonia volatilization kinetics and effects of temperature and pH and dissolved solid content. Chem. Eng. J. 280, 188-196. [12] Mercer, B. W., Ames, L. L., Touhill, C. J., VanSlyke, W. J., Dean, R. B., J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed., 42, R 95 (1970). [13] Kollbach, 1.St., Gromping, M. (1996) StickstoffrUckbelastung: Stand der Technik 199611997; ZukUnftigeEntwicklungen. TK-verlagKarlThome-Kozmiensky

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Hiren Patel, Parth Modi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.