Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Saurabh Srivastava, Khushi Sinha
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.49990
Certificate: View Certificate
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly popular in recent years and has been used in a range of industries to improve outcomes, streamline processes, and improve decision-making. But there are also moral questions raised by the employment of AI, particularly in light of potential bias and discrimination. In order to promote justice and reduce bias, this paper offers a thorough discussion of ethical issues and mitigation techniques in AI. The evolution of AI and its possible advantages and disadvantages are first covered in the paper. After that, it explores the different ethical issues surrounding AI, such as trust, accountability, fairness, and openness. The study emphasises the effects of bias and discrimination on AI systems as well as the possible outcomes of these problems. The study also discusses the various mitigation measures, such as algorithmic strategies, data pre-processing, and model validation, that have been suggested to mitigate bias and enhance justice in AI. In order to develop the subject of AI ethics, the study analyses the advantages and disadvantages of different frameworks and emphasises the necessity of continued interdisciplinary research and collaboration. The study\'s importance in advancing ethical concerns and fairness in AI is highlighted in the paper\'s conclusion. It offers information about the state of the field at the moment and points out potential directions for further study. Overall, the article is a useful tool for academics, professionals, and decision-makers who want to support ethical and responsible AI development and application.
I. INTRODUCTION
Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging technology that is revolutionising many different industries. Complex tasks can be carried out by AI systems more effectively and precisely than by conventional approaches, opening up possibilities for process improvement, better results, and improved decision-making. Yet, as AI is used more frequently, ethical issues have also emerged, particularly in light of the possibility of bias and discrimination in AI systems.
Biases can be incorporated into AI systems either consciously or unconsciously. The underlying data used to train the system and the methods used to process that data both have the potential to introduce bias. Biased AI systems may have serious repercussions, including mistreatment, discrimination, and even harm to specific people or groups.The potential for bias and discrimination in AI is one of the main worries. The data used to train the system, the methods used to interpret the data, and the environment in which the system is used are just a few of the variables that might cause biases to appear in AI systems. Biased AI systems may treat some people or groups unfairly and discriminatorily, perpetuating current social injustices and diminishing the promised advantages of AI. A rising number of people are interested in creating ethical frameworks and norms for the creation and use of AI in order to solve these issues. With openness, accountability, and justice at the forefront, these standards seek to ensure that AI is developed and deployed in a responsible and ethical manner.AI system development and implementation must abide by moral principles that safeguard people from harm and guarantee openness, responsibility, and justice. The complexity and size of AI systems, however, make it difficult to recognise and address ethical problems. For instance, biases could be challenging to identify and unintentionally reinforced by the system's design.
It's important to recognise and eliminate any potential bias and discrimination in order to ensure the ethical and responsible use of AI. These problems have been addressed using a variety of approaches, such as algorithmic techniques, data pre-processing, and model validation. The effectiveness of these tactics must be continually monitored and evaluated because they have limitations.Also, modern guidelines and standards for ethical AI have arisen, such as the GDPR and the FAT framework, to direct the creation and application of AI systems.
Although these frameworks strive to assure openness, responsibility, and equity in the use of AI, they also have limitations and implementation difficulties. It is vital for AI to take ethics into account given the growing influence of AI systems on people and society. This work seeks to contribute to the expanding body of research on AI ethics by offering a thorough analysis of ethical use of AI.
II. BACKGROUND
The emergence of AI systems can be dated to the middle of the 20th century, when computer scientists started investigating the possibility of building tools that could mimic human intellect. With the creation of the first AI programmes and the founding of the Dartmouth Conference, widely regarded as the birthplace of AI, the field of AI research made major strides in the 1950s and 1960s.
With early work in expert systems and symbolic reasoning, the field of artificial intelligence may be traced back to the 1950s. Unfortunately, advancement was modest until machine learning emerged in the 1980s, allowing computers to gradually improve their performance by learning from data. As a result, tremendous progress was made in fields including robotics, computer vision, and natural language processing.While AI research made advancement over the ensuing decades, it was frequently slow. Significant advances in AI research, especially in the area of deep learning, didn't occur until the 2010s, when they paved the way for the creation of systems capable of performing challenging tasks like speech and image recognition with an accuracy that could compete with that of humans.
Convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks, two examples of deep learning algorithms, have demonstrated impressive performance in recent years on a variety of tasks, including speech and picture recognition, game playing, and language translation. These developments have rekindled interest in artificial intelligence and its potential to revolutionise many facets of society. Although though AI may have certain advantages, there are worries about how it may affect society, especially in terms of bias and discrimination. For instance, it has been discovered that language models reinforce racial and gender prejudices and that facial recognition algorithms are less accurate for people with darker skin tones. These problems may have detrimental effects, such as maintaining current socioeconomic inequities or depriving particular groups of chances.As a result, there is a rising understanding of the necessity of addressing ethical issues in the creation and application of AI systems. This entails making sure AI systems are developed and implemented in a just and transparent manner, with measures in place for accountability and compensation in the event of harm.
III. ETHICAL CONSIDERATION IN AI
The creation and use of AI systems must take ethical considerations into account. It is crucial to make sure that AI technologies are created and deployed in ways that are fair, transparent, and accountable as they become more widespread in our daily lives. This section will examine several ethical issues relating to AI systems and give illustrations of practical uses where these issues are particularly pertinent.Bias is one of the most important ethical issues in AI. Because AI systems can only learn from data that is as neutral as the data itself, biassed data will lead to biassed AI systems. For instance, if an AI system is taught to make decisions using historical data that is biassed against particular groups, it may learn to do so. Serious repercussions may result from this, such as prejudice in lending, hiring, or criminal justice choices. It is crucial to make sure that the data used to train AI systems is varied and reflective of the population it is intended to serve in order to combat bias in AI.In addition, methods like bias testing and algorithmic auditing can be used to find and eliminate the causes of bias in AI systems. Fairness is another essential AI ethical factor. No one or any group shall be subjected to discrimination by AI systems because of their race, gender, ethnicity, or any other protected attribute. It is crucial to take into account how AI systems affect various populations and to keep an eye on their performance for inconsistent effects in order to ensure justice. AI ethics must also take explainability and transparency into account. AI systems frequently function as "black boxes," making it challenging to comprehend how they make judgements.This can raise issues with accountability and bias as well as raise concerns about how to make sure AI systems are working ethically and equitably. Another crucial ethical issue in AI is privacy, especially in light of the growing usage of AI systems to gather and analyse vast amounts of personal data. It is crucial to make sure AI systems are built to respect people's privacy and that they aren't employed to infringe on that right or to continue discriminatory or spying practises. Accountability is an important ethical factor in AI, to sum up.It is crucial to make sure that AI systems are held responsible for their choices and that procedures are in place to look into and correct any possible harm these systems may have caused. The significance of ethical concerns in AI is highlighted by real-world applications of AI, such as face recognition, autonomous vehicles, and predictive policing. For instance, face recognition technology has come under fire for having the potential to support prejudice and discrimination against disadvantaged groups.
Overall, ethical issues must be addressed thoughtfully and deliberately to ensure that AI systems are used for the benefit of society as a whole. Ethical issues are a critical component of the development and implementation of AI systems.
IV. MITIGATION STRATEGIES
AIn order to reduce bias and promote fairness in AI systems, a multifaceted strategy that takes into account different development and deployment phases is necessary. The following techniques can be applied to encourage justice and reduce bias in AI systems:
In conclusion, reducing bias and advancing fairness in AI systems calls for a multifaceted strategy that includes algorithmic transparency, data collection and curation, diversity and inclusion in the AI workforce, routine monitoring and evaluation, ethical design, and collaboration and engagement with stakeholders.
V. CURRENT FREAMEWORKS AND STANDARDS
Many frameworks and standards are now in use to encourage fairness and reduce bias in AI systems. These frameworks and standards are made to address ethical issues including bias, fairness, transparency, explainability, privacy, and accountability that are connected to the creation and application of AI systems.
Each of these frameworks has advantages and disadvantages when it comes to tackling ethical issues with AI. For instance, the IEEE Global Initiative offers a thorough set of principles and guidelines for the ethical creation and use of AI systems, but it might be challenging to put these principles into practise. The ability of the AIA framework to address systemic bias may be constrained, but it offers a collection of tools and techniques for locating potential sources of bias or discrimination in AI systems. The GDPR offers robust private and personal data protections, but it might not handle other ethical issues like fairness and transparency.
Artificial intelligence\'s ethical issues and mitigation techniques, with a focus on addressing bias and encouraging justice in AI systems. This analysis emphasises the intricate character of AI\'s ethical problems, which need for a multidisciplinary strategy and continuous assessment. The AI pipeline\'s various phases, from data collecting and processing to algorithm design and implementation, are susceptible to prejudice and discrimination. As a result, solving these problems calls for an all-encompassing strategy that takes into account the system as a whole and its larger social context. Pre-processing methods, algorithmic approaches, model validation, and interpretability are just a few of the measures for reducing bias and fostering fairness in AI systems. These approaches have potential, but their usefulness depends on the situation and calls for constant review and improvement.The conclusion is that while these frameworks serve as helpful beginning points, constant evaluation and adaptation are necessary to make sure they stay applicable and efficient. In conclusion, the ethical issues and mitigation techniques in artificial intelligence are intricate and varied, necessitating continuous analysis, review, and modification. We can advance the creation of ethical and just AI systems that benefit society as a whole by encouraging a more thorough and diverse approach to AI ethics.
[1] G. Narayanan, A., & Lohia, P. (2020)”On the ethics of AI applications in healthcare. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling”, 60(5), 2140-2147. [2] Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., ... & Gebru, T. (2019). “Model cards for model reporting”.. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 220-229). [3] Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumeé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2018). Datasheets for datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.09010. [4] Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018)”Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification”.In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (pp. 77-91). [5] Sweeney, L. (2013)” Discrimination in online ad delivery. Communications of the ACM”, 56(5), 44-54. [6] Narayanan, A., & Pentland, A. (2017)” A.I. as personhood? How we can think about intelligent machines and moral considerability”. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 3884-3891). AAAI Press. [7] Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017). “Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science”, 356(6334), 183-186. [8] Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016)”The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society”, 3(2), 2053951716679679. [9] Zhang, B. H., Lemoine, B., & Mitchell, M. (2018). “Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning”. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 335-340). ACM. [10] Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). “Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification”. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency (pp. 77-91). [11] Suresh, H., & Guttag, J. V. (2019)” A framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning”.arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10002. [12] European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2018). Handbook on European data protection law. Publications Office of the European Union.
Copyright © 2023 Saurabh Srivastava, Khushi Sinha. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET49990
Publish Date : 2023-03-31
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here