In this study the natural aggregate replaced by recycled aggregate in different percentages (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%). The percentage of recycled aggregate mixed in the definite proportion it improves the property of fresh and hardened concrete like slump test, compressive strength test up to optimum percentage. From the laboratory test results indicates that the compressive strength of these mixtures goes on decreasing, however up to the 20% replacement level, it achieves target mean strength. Hence, for the structural concrete Natural Aggregate can be replaced by the Recycled Aggregate up to 20% range.
Introduction
I. INTRODUCTION
Due to the high amount of concrete produced and the high amount of waste generated by the demolition of old buildings, recycling of concrete has become necessary. New designs, production processes and wear and tear are causing the destruction of concrete structures. It is important to manage this waste in an environmentally friendly way to save space in landfills and storage areas. The recycling process begins with the careful management of recycled materials. Then comes the crushing stage, which can be done in many ways. The most common method is jaw crushers, but cone crushers and large impact crushers are also used. Sometimes the stone may need to be crushed several times to achieve the desired consistency. After crushing, the products are inspected. A coarse screen separates dirt and foreign matter, while a fine screen separates small particles from large ones. Additional cleaning processes such as water flotation, manual separation, air separation and electromagnetic separation help recycle minerals. In addition to waste disposal, wet concrete from precast concrete also poses a disposal problem. Between 700 million and 10 billion cubic meters of concrete are produced worldwide each year, of which approximately 50 million cubic meters are not used on construction sites. To solve this problem, cement manufacturer Mapei created ReCon Zero (short for “zero coverage” for reconstruction). ReCon Zero has the ability to form new aggregates when mixed with wet recycled concrete. Transporting aggregates over long distances causes environmental stress. Using RAC helps preserve these natural resources because many of these resources are located in urban areas, making them extremely valuable and useful. Additionally, many older buildings no longer meet current standards and need to be demolished, increasing the amount of waste rock. By integrating recycled concrete into buildings, we can reduce waste, conserve natural resources, and promote urban growth.
II. MATERIAL USED
Cement: In this research work, OPC conforming to IS: 8112-1989 is used. The properties of cement used are shown in Table 1.
Table1:Properties of cement.
Physical Property
Result
Fineness of cement
9%
Normal Consistency
27%
Initial setting time(minutes)
35
Final setting time (minutes)
370
Specific Gravity
3.14
Sand: Locally existing sand with 4.75 mm maximum dimension is used as FA, having specific gravity, fineness modulus and unit weight as given in Table 2.
Table2:Properties of sand (FS)
Physical Property
Result
Fineness modulus
3.2
Specific Gravity
2.67
Surface Texture
Even
Particle shape
Curved
Natural Aggregate: Crushed stone with 20 mm maximum size having specific gravity, fineness modulus and unit weight as given in Table 3 are used as natural aggregate.
Table3: Properties of Aggregate (FA)
Physical Property
Result
Fineness modulus
7.56
Specific Gravity
2.70
Particle shape
Angular
Recycled Aggregate: The RAC passing through 20mm and retained on 4.75mm size aggregate is used.
III. EXPERIMENTAL WORK & RESULT
A. Testing of Concrete
Compressive Strength: The compressive strength test by Compression Testing machine shows an increasing trend of the compressive strength with age of the concrete specimens. Table-4 below shows the increase of the compressive strength with age recorded during the test.
Table4: Variation of compressive strength with
% of RA
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
7 Days
32.96 MPa
34.16 MPa
32.07MPa
30.81 MPa
30.21MPa
28.81MPa
28 Days
47.18MPa
48.81MPa
45.70MPa
44.81MPa
44.22MPa
43.88MPa
Graph1: Variation in Compressive Strength with increasing % of Recycled Aggregate
B. Flexural Strength
Flexural strength test is performed on 2 beams of each batch mix for 7 days & 28 days. There are 6 batch mixes and each one having 9 beams. Of these 9 beams, 3 beams are tested for 7 days & 28 days each. An average of 3 values as tabulated in table 5, are considered for discussions
Table5: Variation of flexural strength with age?
% of RA
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
7 Days
2.62 MPa
3.33MPa
3.28MPa
2.87MPa
2.69MPa
2.43MPa
28 Days
5.26MPa
5.64MPa
5.10MPa
4.70MPa
4.60MPa
4.48MPa
Graph2: Variation in Flexural Strength with increasing % of Recycled Aggregate
C. Split Tensile Strength
Split Tensile Strength is performed on 3 cylinders of each batch mix for 7 days & 28 days. There are 7 batch mixes and each one having 9 cylinders. Of these 9 cylinders, 3 cylinders are tested for 7 days & 28 days each. An average of 3 values as tabulated in table 6, are considered for discussions
Table6: Variation of Split Tensile strength with age
% of RA
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
7 Days
3.31MPa
3.57 MPa
3.33MPa
3.09MPa
3.06MPa
2.82MPa
28 Days
4.98MPa
5.44MPa
4.82MPa
4.44MPa
4.40MPa
4.23MPa
Graph3: Variation in Tensile Strength with increasing% of Recycled Aggregate
Conclusion
Based on experimental observations, following conclusions can be drawn
1) Optimum compressive strength observed when recycled aggregate replacement is about 20%.
2) Maximum split tensile strength was observed when recycled aggregate replacement is about 20%.
3) Maximum flexural strength was observed when recycled aggregate replacement is about 20%.
4) Before testing, it is observed that there is increase in weight of concrete specimen when it has been cured under water for 7 and 28 days.
References
[1] Limbachiya, M.C., Leelawat, T., & Dhir, R.K. (2000). “Use of Recycled Concrete Aggregate in High-Strength Concrete,” Material and Structure, Vol. 33, pp. 574-580.
[2] Buyle-Bodin, F., & Hadijieva-Zaharieva, R. (2000). “Influence of Industrial Produced Recycled Aggregate on Flow Properties of Concrete,” Material and Structures, Vol. 35, pp. 504-509.
[3] Nelson, & Shing Chai NGO. “High-Strength Structural Concrete with Recycled Aggregate,” viewed 2004.
[4] Limbachiya, M.C., Koulouris, A., Roberts, J.J., & Fried, A.N. (2004). “Performance of Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” RILEM Publications SARL, pp. 127-136.
[5] Fong, F.K. Winston, Yeung, S.K. Jaime, & Poon, C.S. “Hong Kong Experience of Using Recycled Aggregate from Construction and Demolished Materials in Ready Mix Concrete,” viewed 26 Jun 2004.
[6] Micha? Bo?tryk, Dorota Ma?aszkiewicz, & Edyta Pawluczuk. “Basic Technical Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” viewed 2005.
[7] Ismail Abdul Rahman & Hasrudin Hamdam (2009). “Assessment of Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” Modern Applied Science, Vol. 3, No. 10, pp. 47-54.
[8] Yong, P.C., & Teo, D.C. (2009). “Utilisation of Recycled Aggregate as Coarse Aggregate in Concrete,” UNIMAS E-Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 1-6.
[9] Kumutha, R., & Vijai, K. (2010). “Strength of Concrete Incorporating Aggregates Recycled from Demolished Waste,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 64-71.
[10] Jozef Junak & Alena Sicakova (2017). “Effect of Surface Modifications of Recycled Concrete Aggregate on Concrete Properties,” Buildings, 8(2). doi: 10.3390/buildings8010002.
[11] Aref M. al-Swaidani, Tamer al-Hajeh (2017). “Production of Greener Recycled Aggregate Concretes Using Local Supplementary Cementing Materials,” MOJ Civil Eng., 2(1), 12-18.
[12] Bhushan Rasik Kothari & Abhay Shelar. “Experimental Investigation of Recycled Concrete Aggregate,” IJIRST – International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology, Volume 3, Issue 02, July 2016, ISSN (online): 2349-6010.
[13] Manjushree G. Shinde, Prof. M.R. Vyawahare, & Prof. P.O. Modani. “Effect of Physical Properties of Recycled Aggregate on the Strength of Concrete,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), Vol. 2, Issue 4, April 2013, ISSN: 2278-0181.
[14] Kumutha, R., & Vijai, K. (2010). “Strength of Concrete Incorporating Aggregates Recycled from Demolished Waste,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 64-71.
[15] Abdelfatah A., Tabsh S.W., & Yehia S. “Alternative Ways of Making Concrete with Recycled Coarse Aggregate,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Applications of Traditional and High-Performance Materials in Harsh Environments, Institute of Materials Systems, Sharjah, UAE, March 2010.