Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Gulnaz Akthar, Ashish Kumar
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.64161
Certificate: View Certificate
A new race of development has been launched as quickly as possible in many countries and nations in this modern globe and era of development, but it has been noted that all of them are encountering a variety of issues in reaching their objective. Their development has been reported to be hindered by a lack of resources, and among the issues they encounter are the absence and scarcity of a variety of high-quality, environmentally friendly building materials. The lack of building materials is one of the main issues that these developing countries are dealing with. This review paper goes into great detail about the issue at hand and makes some recommendations based on a number of earlier research findings.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Calcium Aluminate
A special type of substance known as calcium aluminate is essentially created when calcium and alumina are both oxidized together. The calcium aluminate is created when alumina and calcium are joined to undergo simultaneous oxidation, resulting in the formation of several calcium aluminates compounds. This calcium aluminate is rich in cementitious properties and can be used as a fine aggregate substitute without further processing or as an auxiliary to regular Portland cement with the right preparation. This review article delves deeply into a number of studies pertaining to the application of calcium aluminate, drawing various conclusions from the utilization.
Figure1. 1 Calcium Aluminate
B. Ceramic Waste
In essence, ceramic trash is waste that is produced by the ceramic industry itself as well as waste that is left behind after many previously built structures are demolished. According to the research trends report, there is a significant amount of waste produced by the earthenware industry. This is because most ceramic tiles are damaged during the cutting, tiling, and tile transportation processes, which leaves them unsatisfactory for the user and results in waste for the producer, manufacturer, user, and transporter. As a result, there is a significant amount of dumping that occurs nowadays. Dumping is neither environmentally or ecologically sustainable. Several scholars have observed this dumping and provided alternatives. The option was to use this trash mostly in the construction industry as a standby for natural acceptable and coarse aggregates. In this review article, several research works relating to the practice of using ceramic leftover as a spare of the regular fines and the typical coarse aggregate are briefly discussed in this paper.
Figure1. 2 Ceramic waste
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Literature Review on Calcium Aluminate
B. Literature Review on Ceramic Waste
III. MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY
In this research work related to concrete, calcium aluminate cement will be cast-off as a substitute in place of OPC and the ceramic coarse aggregate will be used as an alternative in place of natural coarse aggregate. Calcium aluminate will be used at 5 %, 10 % and 15 %, while the ceramic coarse aggregate will be used at 25 % and 50 %. The particulars connected to the constituents are discussed below.
Table3.1 Material Percentages
A. Compressive Test
A compression test is a mechanical test that measures the maximum amount of compressive load a material can bear before fracturing. The test piece is compressed between the platens of a compression-testing machine by a gradually applied load. Compression testing is a fundamental mechanical test, similar in nature to tensile and bend tests. Compression testing is used to establish the compressive force or crush resistance of a material and the ability of the material to recover after a specified compressive force is applied and even held over a defined period of time.
The formula for calculating the compressive strength of a material is: CS = F ÷ A, where CS is the compressive strength, F is the force or load at point of failure, and A is the initial crosssectional surface area.
Figure3. 1 Compression-testing machine
B. Tensile Strength Test
Tensile testing is a fundamental materials science and engineering test in which a sample is subjected to a controlled tension until failure 1 . The test is used to determine the mechanical properties of materials such as ultimate tensile strength, breaking strength, maximum elongation, reduction in area, Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, and strain-hardening characteristics. The test is commonly used for obtaining the mechanical characteristics of isotropic materials. The preparation of test specimens depends on the purposes of testing and on the governing test method or specification. A tensile specimen usually has a standardized sample cross-section. It has two shoulders and a gauge (section) in between. The shoulders and grip section are generally larger than the gauge section by 33% so they can be easily gripped. The gauge section’s smaller diameter also allows the deformation and failure to occur in this area
The formula for calculating tensile strength is: TS = UF / A where TS is the tensile strength, UF is the ultimate force, and A is the cross-sectional area the force is acting on.
Figure3. 2 Tensile specimen
C. Flexural Test
The flexural test is a mechanical test that measures the force required to bend a material under three-point loading conditions. The test is used to determine the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and flexural strain of a material. The test is commonly performed on relatively flexible materials such as polymers, wood, and composites. The test is conducted using a universal testing machine with a three-point or four-point bend fixture. The sample is placed on two supporting pins a set distance apart. The load is applied at the centre of the specimen by a loading nose. The load is increased until the specimen fractures or yields. The flexural strength represents the highest stress experienced within the material at its moment of yield. The formula for calculating flexural strength is: FS = 3FL / 2bh^2 where FS is the flexural strength, F is the maximum load applied, L is the span length between the supports, b is the width of the specimen, and h is the height of the specimen.
Figure3. 3 Flexural test machine
IV. RESULTS
A. Compressive Strength Test
The examination outcome of the test related to the application of the compressive forces over the concrete showed that the maximum forte was gotten at 15 % practice of the calcium aluminate cement and the 25% practice of the ceramic waste aggregate when practiced in place of the normal cement and the normal aggregate correspondingly. The examination outcomes also conveyed that the most negative results are attained at lower proportion for both the materials. The compressive forces are easily handled by the concrete made with the ceramic waste and the calcium aluminate adhesive.
Table4. 1 Compressive Strength Test for 7 and 28 Days
Figure4. 1Compressive Strength for 7 days
Figure4. 1.1 Compressive Strength for 28 days
B. Flexural Strength Test
The examination outcome of the test connected to the application of the flexural forces over the concrete showed that the maximum forte was gotten at 15 % practice of the calcium aluminate adhesive and the 25% practice of the ceramic waste aggregate when practiced in place of the normal cement and the normal aggregate correspondingly. The examination outcomes also conveyed that the most negative results were attained at lower proportion for both the materials. The flexural forces were easily handled by the concrete made with the ceramic waste and the calcium aluminate adhesive.
Table 4. 2 Flexural Strength Test for 7 and 28 Days
Figure4. 2 Flexural Strength for 7 days
Figure4. 2.1 Flexural Strength for 28 days
C. Tensile Strength
TEST The examination outcome of the test related to the application of the tensile forces over the concrete showed that the maximum forte was gotten at 15 % practice of the calcium aluminate adhesive and the 25% practice of the ceramic waste aggregate when practiced in place of the normal cement and the normal aggregate correspondingly. The examination outcomes also conveyed that the most negative results were attained at lower proportion for both the materials. The tensile forces were easily handled by the concrete made with the ceramic waste and the calcium aluminate adhesive.
Table4.3 Tensile Strength Test for 7 and 28 Days
Figure4. 3 Tensile Strength for 7 days
Figure4.3.1 Tensile Strength for 28 days
D. Water Absorption Test
The examination related to the checking of the total liquid attained by the concrete conveyed that the with the upsurge in the proportion of the calcium aluminate adhesive with respect to the ordinary adhesive and with the upsurge in the proportion of the ceramic left-over aggregate with respect to the ordinary aggregate, the liquid attaining capacity of the concrete made with these materials was rising and the maximum absorption was attained at higher proportion for both the materials that is at 15 % of calcium aluminate adhesive and at 50 % of ceramic aggregate.
Table4. 4 Water Absorption Test 28 Days
Figure 4. 4 Water Absorption for 28days
E. UPV Test
The examination outcome of the test related to the checking of the passage of ultrasonic pulse from the concrete showed that the maximum forte was gotten at 15 % practice of the calcium aluminate adhesive and the 25% practice of the ceramic waste aggregate when practiced in place of the normal cement and the normal aggregate correspondingly. The examination outcomes also conveyed that the most negative results were attained at lower proportion for both the materials. The ultra-sonic pulse was easily handled by the concrete made with the ceramic waste and the calcium aluminate adhesive
Table4. 5 UPV Test 28 Days
Figure4. 5. UPV for 28 days
F. Rebound Hammer Test
The examination outcome of the test related to the application of the compressive forces over the concrete showed that the maximum forte was gotten at 15 % practice of the calcium aluminate adhesive and the 25% practice of the ceramic waste aggregate when practiced in place of the normal cement and the normal aggregate correspondingly. The examination outcomes also conveyed that the most negative results were attained at lower proportion for both the materials. The compressive forces were easily handled by the concrete made with the ceramic waste and the calcium aluminate adhesive
Figure4. 6 Rebound Hammer Test 28 Days
Figure4. 6 Rebound Hammer Test for 28 days
1) The test results concluded that the maximum strength related to the compressive forces was attained at 15 % application of the calcium aluminate-based cement and 25 % application of the ceramic based aggregate when used in mixture with one another. 2) This type of results was attained due to the numerous substantial aspects of both the materials. The combination of both the material that the calcium aluminate-based cement and the ceramic waste aggregate is very much effective from the strength point of concern and heals the concrete in an effective manner. 3) The test results concluded that the supreme strength related to the tension forces and the bending forces was attained at 15 % application of the calcium aluminate-based cement and 25 % application of the ceramic based aggregate when used in mixture with one another. 4) In both the cases of tension forces and the bending forces both the material heals the core microstructure of the tangible and prime to the extreme rise in the strength parameters related to the tension forces and the bending forces. 5) The outcomes of the other examination such as hammer test, UPV test and the liquid retaining test were similar and the progressive results were attained at 15 % practice of the calcium aluminate-based cement and at 25 % usage of the ceramic waste aggregate
Copyright © 2024 Gulnaz Akthar, Ashish Kumar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET64161
Publish Date : 2024-09-05
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here