Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Nisha Sawant, Shubham Naik
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.48310
Certificate: View Certificate
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a type of international private business self-regulation that aims to contribute to societal goals of a philanthropic, activist, or charitable nature by engaging in or supporting volunteering or ethically-oriented practices. While once it was possible to describe CSR as an internal organisational policy or a corporate ethic strategy, that time has passed as various international laws have been developed and various organisations have used their authority to push it beyond individual or even industry- wide initiatives. While it has been considered a form of corporate self-regulation for some time, over the last decade or so it has moved considerably from voluntary decisions at the level of individual organizations to mandatory schemes at regional, national, and international levels. Considered at the organisational level, CSR is generally understood as a strategic initiative that contributes to a brand\'s reputation. As such, social responsibility initiatives must coherently align with and be integrated into a business model to be successful. With some models, a firm\'s implementation of CSR goes beyond compliance with regulatory requirements and engages in \"actions that appear to further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is required by law”. Furthermore, businesses may engage in CSR for strategic or ethical purposes. From a strategic perspective, CSR can contribute to firm profits, particularly if brands voluntarily self-report both the positive and negative outcomes of their endeavours. In part, these benefits accrue by increasing positive public relations and high ethical standards to reduce business and legal risk by taking responsibility for corporate actions. CSR strategies encourage the company to make a positive impact on the environment and stakeholders including consumers, employees, investors, communities, and others. From an ethical perspective, some businesses will adopt CSR policies and practices because of ethical beliefs of senior management. For example, a CEO may believe that harming the environment is ethically objectionable.
I. INTRODUCTION
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a self-regulating business model that helps a company be socially accountable—to itself, its stakeholders, and the public. By practicing corporate social responsibility, also called corporate citizenship, companies can be conscious of the kind of impact they are having on all aspects of society, including economic, social, and environmental. To engage in CSR means that, in the ordinary course of business, a company is operating in ways that enhance society and the environment, instead of contributing negatively to them. Corporate social responsibility is a broad concept that can take many forms depending on the company and industry. Through CSR programs, philanthropy, and volunteer efforts, businesses can benefit society while boosting their brands. As important as CSR is for the community, it is equally valuable for a company. CSR activities can help forge a stronger bond between employees and corporations, boost morale and help both employees and employers feel more connected with the world around them. For a company to be socially responsible, it first needs to be accountable to itself and its shareholders. Often, companies that adopt CSR programs have grown their business to the point where they can give back to society. Thus, CSR is primarily a strategy of large corporations. Also, the more visible and successful a corporation is, the more responsibility it has to set standards of ethical behaviour for its peers, competition, and industry.
On April 1, 2014, India became the first country to legally mandate corporate social responsibility. The new rules in Section 135 of India’s Companies Act make it mandatory for companies of a certain turnover and profitability to spend two percent of their average net profit for the past three years on CSR. The law, which stipulates that CSR activities should be undertaken only in “project/program” mode, provides detailed guidelines regarding what kinds of activities are eligible across several categories. This includes hunger and poverty, education, health, gender equality and women empowerment, skills training, environment, social enterprise projects and promotion of rural and national sports. There are conflicting figures regarding the number of companies that fall within the purview of the law but 16,000–17,000 (out of more than 600,000 registered firms in India) is an oft-quoted range. Similarly, estimates of the amount of funds to be spent annually vary widely from 10,000–20,000 crore rupees or between one-and-a-half to three billion USD. It’s been 13 months since the rules came into force and implementation has been slow. As a result, spending estimates have been slashed. Most companies don’t expect to meet their targets. Many large corporations are handling CSR through their foundations while midsize companies are setting up internal teams to supervise projects carried out by implementing partners. Regardless, many companies have grabbed at the easiest solutions for their required spend — investing in the government’s priorities such as building toilets as part of Modi’s “Clean India Mission” (Swachh Bharat Abhiyan), “adopting” local villages or pumping money into the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund. Many NGOs are getting listed on databases set up by government, NGO groups and private players to connect companies with implementing partners.
In particular, the Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs (IICA) is working on launching a CSR Implementing Agency Hub that will: Provide a database of implementation partners with information about their geographical presence, area of work and previous projects executed; Present a database of agencies conducting baseline surveys, impact assessments and social audits; Assist with relevant training and development, convene sectorial events and showcase success stories India is currently home to 3.3 million (33 lakhs) registered NGOs and about one-third are estimated to be fully functional and ready to support implementation of the law.
However, it looks like the small or marginal NGOs are not likely to reap much reward. They don’t have the capacity, systems, governance or transparency that companies require.
II. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PYRAMID
A. Economic Responsibility
The economic responsibility of companies is about producing goods and services that society needs and to make a profit on them. Companies have shareholders who expect and demand a reasonable return on their investments, they have employees who want to do their jobs safely and fairly, and have customers that want quality products for fair prices. That’s the foundation of the pyramid upon which all the other layers rest.
Economic responsibility in CSR is:
B. Legal Responsibility
The legal responsibility of companies is about complying with the minimum rules that have been set. Organisations are expected to operate and function within those rules. The basic rules consist of laws and regulations that represent society’s views of codified ethics. They determine how organisations can conduct their business practices in a fair manner, as defined by legislators on national, regional, and local level.
Legal responsibility in CSR is:
C. Ethical Responsibility
The ethical responsibility of businesses goes beyond society’s normative expectations – laws and regulations. In addition, society expects organisations to conduct and manage their business in an ethical manner. Taking ethical responsibility means that organisations embrace activities, standards, and practices that haven’t necessarily been written down, but are still expected. The difference between legal and ethical expectations can be difficult to determine. Obviously, laws are based on ethical premises, but ethics goes beyond that.
Ethical responsibility in CSR includes:
D. Philanthropic Responsibility or Discretionary Responsibility
The philanthropic responsibility of businesses includes the voluntary or discretionary activities and practices of businesses. Philanthropy isn’t a literal responsibility, but nowadays business are expected by society to take part in such activities. The nature and quantity of these activities are voluntary and are guided by companies’ desire to take part in social activities that are generally not expected from organisations in an ethical sense. Businesses developing philanthropic or discretionary activities give the public the impression that the company wants to give something back to the community.
In order to do so, businesses adopt different types of philanthropy, such as gifts, donations, volunteer work, community development, and all other discretionary contributions to the community or groups of stakeholders that make up that community.
III. TYPES OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
IV. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
A. Advantages
A CSR policy improves company profitability and value. The introduction of energy efficiencies and waste recycling cuts operational costs and benefits the environment. CSR also increases company accountability and its transparency with investment analysts and the media, shareholders and local communities. This in turn enhances its reputation among investors such as mutual funds that integrate CSR into their stock selection. The result is a virtuous circle where the company's stock value increases and its access to investment capital is eased.
2. Better Customer Relations
Companies should be socially responsible. Consumers are drawn to those companies that have a reputation of being a good corporate citizen.
B. Disadvantages
Even for larger companies, the cost of CSR can be an obstacle. Some critics believe that corporate social responsibility can be an exercise in futility.
A company's management has a fiduciary duty to its shareholders, and CSR directly opposes this, since the responsibility of executives to shareholders is to maximize profits. A manager who forsakes profits in favor of some benefits to society may expect to lose his job and be replaced by someone for whom profits are a priority.
2. Consumers are Wise to Greenwashing
Greenwashing is term used to describe corporate practices that appear to be environmentally responsible without actually representing a change in how a company conducts its business. For example, a product may be labelled as "All Natural", even though it is being manufactured just as it always has. Some dry-cleaning services label their operations as "Organic" which sounds similar to "organic food" but really carries no specific meaning. Some customers may react positively to these types of claims, but others are wary of corporate greenwashing.
V. OBJECTIVE OF THE SURVEY
A. To study the impact of CSR activities communicating about a brand.
B. To understand how CSR activities influences the purchase decision for a consumer.
C. To analyze the importance of CSR activities of a brand towards the society.
VI. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SURVEY
A. The study will help the market research analyst to understand the impact of CSR activities influencing the purchase decision of the consumers.
B. The study will help the market research analyst to understand which CSR activities is most favorable to the consumers.
C. The study will give a clear idea about the awareness of CSR activities from the perspective of the consumers.
VII. SCOPE OF THE SURVEY
The study was conducted through a google form where we have prepared a research questionnaire and we have sent the link of the google form to the various people in our contacts so that we can get the response. Respondents were from all around the world. Our questionnaire was designed in such a manner that we have taken all the age groups, gender into consideration and so their designation. We have asked 12 questions in the google form and we have got 75 respondents. Particularly questions were based on CSR activities and how it is impacting the consumer and their purchasing decision. We also received the data about the awareness of CSR activities and its importance from the consumer’s perspective.
VIII. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study is based upon Primary data where we have collected first hand information through the google form. The type of research pattern which was carried out is Survey.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1MWiIHuUhV- ACgUDHgu_diC223l9Rxr98REeGKs47te0/edit#responses
X. OBSERVATION
A. 62% respondents prefer brands that are socially responsible
B. Commitment to environmental impact is the most influencing C.S.R activity that influences the purchasing decision of an individual by 46%
C. 64.3% respondents are skeptical about purchasing from the brands which are not fulfilling C.S.R activities.
D. By 39.4% response we can conclude that conducting C.S.R activities has an impactful over the brands in the society.
In the survey we have seen that maximum respondents were students and they knew about CSR activities happening around them. CSR activities has influenced on their purchasing decision and it plays an important role for the betterment of the society. Respondents were quite skeptical about stoppage of the products and services from the brand who are not fulfilling the CSR activities. They have experienced the CSR activities in the social events followed by colleges, schools and parks. Maximum respondents have rated 5 for the importance of CSR activities for a brand towards society which creates a positive impact in the society as maximum respondents are aware about the CSR activities.
[1] https://bthechange.com/csr-in-india-is-now-a-law-2502aa6d0daa [2] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corp-social-responsibility.asp [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_social_responsibility https://www.toolshero.com/strategy/carroll-csr-pyramid/ https://www.avinashchandra.com/list-of-csr-activities-in-india [4] https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJM-01-2019-0088/full/html [5] https://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-disadvantages-business-ethics-10414.html [6] https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1MWiIHuUhV-ACgUDHgu_diC223l9Rxr98REeGKs47te0/edit#responses
Copyright © 2022 Nisha Sawant, Shubham Naik. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET48310
Publish Date : 2022-12-22
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here