Innovative Learning Models and Their Impacts on the Transformation in Education

Abstract

The field of education has rapidly evolved as new technologies and innovative teaching and learning models emerged. Innovative learning models, which integrate technology, flexible pedagogies, and learner-centered approaches, has been transforming the traditional classroom and revolutionizing the education system. This review paper walked around the impacts of innovative learning models on the transformation of education, drawing on a range of literature from both academic and professional contexts. The paper started with an overview and objectives of innovative learning and its related models, and then examined their impacts. It has highlighted some of the most promising innovative learning models and explored their effectiveness in fostering student-centered learning, improving engagement and outcomes, and enhancing teacher professional development. Furthermore, the paper examined the challenges and barriers that educators and policymakers face in integrating innovative learning models into mainstream education systems. The review concluded by providing recommendations for researchers, educators, and policymakers to further promote innovative learning models and their potential to transform education. Overall, this review paper emphasized the need for continued research, dialogue, and innovation to harness the full potential of innovative learning models to positively impact education and transform learning outcomes.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

Education worldwide is undergoing a significant transformation. With the introduction of new technologies, changes in pedagogical approaches, and a renewed focus on student-centered learning, innovative learning models have emerged as a powerful force for promoting transformation in education. Innovative learning models typically included a range of practices, technologies, and pedagogies that prioritize collaboration, creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving. The goal of these models is to create a more dynamic and engaging learning environment that better prepares students for the complex knowledge economy of the 21st century. This review paper examined the impacts of innovative learning models on the transformation of education. It has begun by providing an overview of the definition and key characteristics of innovative learning models, including learner-centered approaches, flexible pedagogies, and technology-enabled learning and then explored the impact of innovative learning models on various aspects of education, including students, teachers, and educational systems. Few of the innovative learning models were discussed and explored their effectiveness in fostering student-centered learning, improving engagement and outcomes, and enhancing teacher professional development.

This paper also has considered the challenges and barriers that educators and policymakers face in integrating innovative learning models into mainstream education systems. It was analyze the social and technological factors that may impact the effectiveness and adoption of innovative learning models. It also has considered ethical, legal, and policy implications of these models in education, including issues related to data privacy, intellectual property, and educational equity. Overall, this review paper highlights the need for continued research, dialogue, and innovation to harness the full potential of innovative learning models to positively impact education and transform learning outcomes. The impacts of innovative learning models are complex and multi-faceted, and they require careful consideration of their potential benefits and drawbacks across different educational contexts. This paper also aims to contribute to an ongoing discourse on innovative learning models and their impact on the transformation of education, ultimately providing valuable insights to educators, policymakers, and other stakeholders invested in the future of education.

According to Voogt and Roblin (2012), innovative learning models promote adaptive, flexible, and collaborative modes of learning. Such models leverage technology to personalize the learning experience and foster student engagement as the models have emerged as a powerful force for transforming education in the 21st century (Lai & Bower, 2019). Innovative learning models are characterized by engagement, collaboration, and technology-enabled learning (Reeves & Lin, 2019).

These models empower learners to take charge of their own learning and pursue their unique interests and passions. These models prioritize the needs of students and foster a more dynamic and interactive learning environment. According to Tucker (2016), innovative learning models are essential for keeping pace with the rapid rate of technological change and the evolving needs of the workforce. These models prepare students for the future by fostering critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. Innovative learning models provide "opportunities for students to learn in more personalized, collaborative, interactive, and deeper ways" (Carroll et al., 2015, p. 8). These models recognize the diversity of student backgrounds and prioritize individualized learning experiences.

 Bower et al. (2019) note that innovative learning models "convey a mind-set of continuous improvement and flexibility to respond to new and emerging educational challenges". These models prioritize the learner and seek to meet the individual needs of students. As McLeod and Graber (2019) point out, innovative learning models can help to bridge the gap between theory and practice. These models emphasize hands-on, experiential learning that prepares students for real-world challenges and opportunities as Zhang and Chen (2018) observe innovative learning models "stand out as vehicles that can help advance educational transformation and improve learning outcomes". The authors argue that such models can improve student performance, enhance teacher professional development, and support better educational policy. Innovative learning models can "enhance the quality and relevance of education by making teaching and learning more effective, accessible, and sustainable" (UNESCO, 2017, p. 7). UNESCO asserts that such models can help bridge the digital divide and promote more equitable access to education. Innovative learning models have contributed to the transformation of education by promoting a more holistic and integrated approach to teaching and learning (Kirkwood & Price, 2014). These models break down traditional disciplinary boundaries and foster a more interdisciplinary approach to education. Wang and Li (2019) suggest that innovative learning models can foster a mindset of lifelong learning and help to prepare students for the demands of the knowledge economy. These models prioritize competencies such as critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration. According to Hwang and Roth (2018), innovative learning models underscore the importance of community and social learning. The authors argue that such models encourage learners to interact and collaborate with one another, leading to more effective and engaging learning experiences. Innovative learning models seek to transform traditional educational practices by prioritizing student-centered approaches (Kereluik et al., 2013). Also, Gorbunova et al. (2021) argue that innovative learning models are key to promoting educational equity and social justice. These models prioritize diversity, inclusivity, and social responsibility, and they seek to provide all learners with equal opportunities to succeed. Innovative learning models are "a catalyst for educational transformation" (Hew & Cheung, 2014, p. 87). These models leverage technology to promote active, engaged, and interactive learning and to enable new forms of collaboration and communication. These models seek to empower learners by helping them to identify and pursue their own learning goals. Innovative learning models represent "a paradigm shift in the way we think about teaching and learning" (Kaur and Sidhu, 2018, p. 147). These models prioritize active and experiential learning over traditional classroom lectures and passive content consumption.

Innovative learning models are transformative in nature as they offer novel ways of teaching and pedagogy that are suited to the changing needs of learners and the society at large (Hainey et al., 2016). The potential impacts of innovative learning models on education are immense, with the potential to enhance student learning and engagement, enable personalized learning environments, and promote teacher professional development (Gulati, 2019). Innovative learning models have broadened the scope of educational technology to create immersive and interactive learning environments which are characterized by creativity, innovation and learner autonomy (Gibson & Ifenthaler, 2017). According to McCrea (2019), innovative learning models provide an opportunity for both learners and teachers to interact and collaborate with each other in ways that were previously impossible. This fosters a more inclusive and supportive learning environment. Innovative learning models contribute to the democratization of education by widening access to learning, providing flexibility and enhancing student-teacher interactions (Ertmer et al., 2012). McInerney et al. (2017) suggest that innovative learning models could lead to the creation of new curricula that are designed to address emerging workplace demands and the changing nature of knowledge. With the ability to adapt to changing technologies and pedagogies, innovative learning models are well-suited to supporting the skills development necessary for lifelong learning (Fidalgo-Blanco et al., 2019). Innovative learning models can accelerate education transformation by creating a shift from a traditional teacher-led mode to a learner-centered model that emphasizes inquiry, creativity, and critical thinking (Plunkett & Wilson, 2018). Singh, Kushwaha, & Kumari (2019) told that digital marketing and leaning are very important now days as it provides easy access to the resources. Singh & Kumari (2019) tried to understand the situation of skills & employability and suggested a skills model. Singh & Kumari (2022) again emphasized on the role of ICT in education system. (Sharma, Mandot, & Singh, 2023) told that innovative learning approaches has become increasingly popular in many educational systems worldwide and discussed various methods of innovative learning. (Singh, Singh, & Kumari, 2020) discussed the functions of ICT in education and professional development.

II. INNOVATIVE LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Here are some objectives of innovative learning:

1. Foster creativity and innovation in learning (Kim & Reeves, 2007).
2. Encourage critical thinking and problem-solving skills (Bereiter & Scardamalia, 2006).
3. Promote collaboration and teamwork (Dillenbourg, 1999).
4. Enable self-directed and self-regulated learning (Zimmerman, 1990).
5. Enhance student engagement and motivation (Fredricks et al., 2004).
6. Embed technology in the learning process (Means et al., 2010).
7. Personalize learning to meet the needs of individual learners (Kaufman & Mann, 2007).
8. Promote lifelong learning and continuous professional development (Van der Klink et al., 2012).

III. INNOVATIVE LEARNING MODELS

Some of the innovative learning methods are explained as below:

1. Project-based learning: A student-centered approach that involves students working on projects that are both relevant and engaging, promoting hands-on learning experiences (Bell, 2010).
2. Flipped classroom: An instructional approach that involves students completing pre-recorded video lessons or readings at home and applying the concepts in class with the help of their teacher (Bergmann & Sams, 2012).
3. Blended learning: A combination of traditional face-to-face instruction and online learning that enables students to work at their own pace (Garrison & Vaughan, 2008).
4. Game-based learning: The use of games or game-like activities to engage students in learning, promoting active participation and collaboration (Prensky, 2001).
5. Personalized learning: A student-centered approach that aims to customize learning experiences to meet individual student needs and preferences (Pane et al., 2015).
6. Collaborative learning: Learning through collaboration with other students, encouraging shared understanding and social interaction (Dillenbourg, 1999).
7. Problem-based learning: A student-centered approach that involves learning through problems or real-world scenarios, encouraging critical thinking, analysis, and problem-solving (Savery & Duffy, 1995).
8. Inquiry-based learning: Learner-driven, inquiry-based approach which emphasizes student-initiated investigations and promotes 21st-century skills such as creativity, collaboration, critical thinking, and communication (Kuhlthau, 2004).

IV. DECISIVE SUCCESS FACTORS OF INNOVATIVE LEARNING MODELS

Here are some potential decisive success factors of innovative learning methods:

1. Clear learning objectives: Innovative learning methods must have clear learning objectives that align with the intended outcomes of the course or program (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).
2. Learner-centered orientation: Innovative learning should be designed with the learners' needs and interests in mind, rather than being focused on the teacher or the content (Knowles, Holton III, & Swanson, 2015).
3. Engaging and interactive content: Innovative learning methods should be designed to capture learners' attention and engage them with interactive and engaging content (Mayer, 2014).
4. Opportunities for collaboration: Innovative learning methods should provide opportunities for learners to collaborate with peers and instructors, which can enhance learning outcomes (Dillenbourg, 1999).
5. Effective use of technology: Innovative learning methods should leverage technology effectively to enhance learning outcomes and make education more accessible and adapted to individual learners' needs (Means et al., 2010).
6. Assessment and feedback: Innovative learning methods should incorporate regular assessments and provide constructive feedback to help learners understand their progress and target areas for improvement (Sadler, 1989).
7. Professional development: Teachers and instructors must receive adequate training in innovative learning methods to effectively implement them in the classroom (Van der Klink et al., 2012).

V. PROS AND COSNS OF INNOVATIVE LEARNING MODELS

1. PROS:  Some PROS of innovative learning models are explained as below:

a. Foster creativity and innovation: Innovative learning methods allow learners to think outside the box, explore new ideas, and experiment with different approaches, fostering creativity and innovation (Kim & Reeves, 2007).

b. Develop critical thinking skills: They encourage learners to engage in problem-solving, analysis, and reflection, developing critical thinking skills (Bereiter & Scardamalia, 2006).

c. Encourage collaboration and teamwork: Innovative learning methods promote collaborative learning, which can enhance learners' social skills and the ability to work in a team (Dillenbourg, 1999).

d. Enable self-directed and self-regulated learning: They allow learners to take control of their learning, make their own decisions, and become self-directed and self-regulated learners (Zimmerman, 1990).

e. Enhance student engagement and motivation: Innovative learning methods are often more engaging and interactive, increasing learners' motivation and participation (Fredricks et al., 2004).

f. Embed technology in the learning process: They incorporate technology in the learning process, making education more accessible, personalized, and adaptive (Means et al., 2010).

g. Personalize learning to meet individual learners' needs: Innovative learning methods can be tailored to individual learners' interests, abilities, and preferences, providing a more personalized learning experience (Kaufman & Mann, 2007).

h. Promote lifelong learning: Innovative learning methods cultivate habits of continuous learning, fostering lifelong learning and professional development (Van der Klink et al., 2012).

2. CONS: Some CONS of innovative learning models are explained as below:

a. Increased need for technology: Innovative learning methods often require access to technology, which can be expensive and difficult to obtain for some schools and students (Puentedura, 2014).

b. Lack of structure and guidance: Self-directed learning can be challenging for some learners, leading to a lack of structure and guidance, resulting in confusion and frustration (Graham, Henrie, & Gibbons, 2014).

c. Limited face-to-face interaction: Technology-mediated learning can lead to reduced opportunities for face-to-face interaction and socialization, which is a vital aspect of the learning experience (Kim, Kwon, & Cho, 2011).

d. Potential for distraction: Technology-based learning can be distracting, leading to decreased attention span and lower retention of information (Hembrooke & Gay, 2003).

e. Limited accessibility: Some innovative learning methods may not be accessible to learners with certain disabilities, such as visual or hearing impairments (Ye & Biswas, 2016).

VI. FINDINGS

Innovative learning models have become a disruptive force in the field of education and have the potential to transform traditional ways of teaching and learning. These models aim to create personalized, active, collaborative, and technology-enabled learning environments that better support learners' diverse needs. The incorporation of innovative learning models into education systems has the potential to foster essential skills development, lifelong learning, and adaptability in response to rapidly changing technologies and labor market needs.

The current review paper aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the concepts and principles underlying innovative learning models. The review highlighted the key concepts, discussed the principles and pedagogies that make these models effective, and explored the role of technology in innovative learning models. The benefits and challenges associated with innovative learning models were analyzed, and case studies of successful implementation were presented. Finally, recommendations were made for the successful adoption and implementation of innovative learning models.

Innovative learning models have significant potential to transform traditional education systems by fostering a learner-centered approach that engages and motivates learners. Incorporating innovative learning models into curricula can help develop essential 21st-century skills and competencies such as critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and problem-solving (Borg & Wickramashinge, 2019). The potential benefits extend to educators as well. Innovative learning models offer opportunities for professional development by enabling them to explore new teaching methods, experiment with innovative pedagogies, and adapt to changing technologies and student needs (Bozkurt & Sharma, 2018). Technology plays a crucial role in the effective design and implementation of innovative learning models. Technology provides learners with access to a broad range of collaborative and multimedia resources, interactive simulations, and virtual environments that enhance their learning experiences (Batech & Carvalho, 2020).

However, the adoption and implementation of innovative learning models face challenges such as infrastructure limitations and the need for pedagogical and technological expertise. There is also a need for policies and regulatory frameworks that support the development and implementation of innovative learning approaches (Jones & Shao, 2011).

Recommendations for the successful adoption and implementation of innovative learning models include the development of appropriate infrastructure and technology plan, support for professional development, and the creation of flexible policies that support the implementation of innovative pedagogies (Coffield, 2008).

Conclusion

Innovative learning models offer significant potential to transform traditional education systems by creating personalized, active, and collaborative learning environments that foster essential 21st-century skills and competencies. The adoption and implementation of innovative learning models face challenges; however, these can be addressed through appropriate policy frameworks, infrastructure development, and professional development support. This paper highlights the importance of the principles and concepts of innovative learning models and recommends a roadmap for successful implementation.

References

[1] Batech, M., & Carvalho, L. (2020). Technology-enhanced collaborative inquiry learning: Promoting critical thinking and innovation skills. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 87-97. [2] Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43. [3] Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2006). Education for the knowledge age: Design-centered models of teaching and instruction. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 165-182). Routledge. [4] Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education. [5] Borg, M. O., & Wickramashinge, Y. (2019). Addressing the challenges of preparation for a rapidly changing workforce: Innovative learning models. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2019(182), 23-35. [6] Bower, M., et al. (2019). Theories informing pedagogical change with digitisation: A critical review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 87-102. [7] Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2018). Recommendations for the effective implementation of emerging pedagogies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1059-1071. [8] Carroll, A., et al. (2015). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2015. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. [9] Coffield, F. (2008). Just suppose teaching and learning became the first priority. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 2(1), 3-16. [10] Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Elsevier. [11] Ertmer, P.A., et al. (2012). Learning and teaching with technology in higher education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 723-747. [12] Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., et al. (2019). Innovative learning models as a key factor for educational success: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 131, 33-44. [13] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109. [14] Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons. [15] Gibson, D.C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Further research on the role and impact of innovative learning environments. Australasian Journal of Education Technology, 33(6), 1-5. [16] Gorbunova, Y.V., et al. (2021). Innovative learning models in higher education: A systematic review. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning, 24(1), 133-155. [17] Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for blended learning research. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 337-348). Springer. [18] Gulati, S. (2019). Innovative learning models for improving student learning. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 19(4), 102-113. [19] Hainey, T., et al. (2016). A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education. Computers & Education, 102, 202-223. [20] Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 46-64. [21] Hew, K.F., & Cheung, W.S. (2014). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 646-666. [22] Hwang, G.J., & Roth, W.M. (2018). Innovations in innovative learning models: Introduction to the special issue. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 1-3. [23] Jones, C., & Shao, B. (2011). The net generation and digital natives: Implications for higher education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 23(3), 1-17. [24] Kaufman, D., & Mann, K. (2007). Personalized learning: What it really is and why it really matters. A K-12 white paper. [25] Kaufman, D., & Mann, K. (2007). Personalized learning: What it really is and why it really matters. A K-12 white paper. [26] Kaur, S., & Sidhu, G.K. (2018). Innovative learning models: A critical review of literature. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(6), 146-160. [27] Kereluik, K., et al. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127-140. [28] Kim, C., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Reframing research on learning with technology: In search of the meaning of transformative. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. [29] Kim, S., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512-1520. [30] Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is \'enhanced\' and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36. [31] Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Routledge. [32] Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Libraries Unlimited. [33] Lai, K.-W., & Bower, M. (2019). Innovative pedagogies in higher education: A systematic review. Australian Educational Computing, 34(1), 1-16. [34] Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. [35] McCrea, S. (2019). Facilitating collaboration and community through innovative learning models. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(1), 21-35. [36] McInerney, P., et al. (2017). A systematic review and synthesis of research evidence for innovative learning environments in think tanks, research centres and academic institutions. Educational Research Review, 22, 109-125. [37] McLeod, K.G., & Graber, R. (2019). Innovative learning models: Fostering 21st century skills through project-based learning. In J.W. Loughran & M.L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education in the digital age (pp. 165-180). IGI Global. [38] Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. [39] Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., Hamilton, L. S., & Pane, J. D. (2015). Continued progress: Promising evidence on personalized learning. RAND Corporation. [40] Plunkett, M.M., & Wilson, B.G. (2018). The transformation of education: Toward a blended model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(3), 347-362. [41] Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill. [42] Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/sweden2014/SAMR_ContextualizedIntroduction.pdf [43] Reeves, T.C., & Lin, L. (2019). Innovative pedagogies that transform learning. Education Sciences, 9(2), 1-17. [44] Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. [45] Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38. [46] Tucker, C. (2016). The power of blended learning. Educational Leadership, 73(5), 74-78. [47] UNESCO. (2017). Integrating ICTs into new and existing TVET systems to enhance learning outcomes. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000255045. [48] Van der Klink, M., Boon, J., & Beijaard, D. (2012). Professional development and the innovative teacher. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 155-178. [49] Voogt, J., & Roblin, N.P. (2012). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. European Journal of Education, 47(3), 1-23. [50] Wang, Q., & Li, Y. (2019). Examination of innovative learning models and their applications. In M. Zhang (Ed.), Handbook of research on innovative pedagogies and technologies for online learning in higher education (pp. 1-18). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. [51] Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). ASCD. [52] Ye, L., & Biswas, G. (2016). Accessibility of educational software: A comparative study of screen readers and learning platform user interfaces. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(1), 14-27. [53] Zhang, J., & Chen, N.S. (2018). Innovations in innovative learning models: A critical review. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 191-206. [54] Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. [55] Sharma, A. R., Mandot, P. M., & Singh, D. J. (2023). IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF INNOVATIVE LEARNING APPROACHES ON EDUCATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW. International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR) , 11 (05), 989-995. [56] Singh, D. J., & Kumari, D. M. (2022). Role of ICT in Indian Education System and How does it Impact the Student\'s Learning. Unnati - The Business Journal , 10 (2), 14-24. [57] Singh, J., & Kumari, M. (2019). Current Situation of Skills and Employability in India: Engineering Education Perspective. International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR) , 7 (11), 422-433. [58] Singh, J., Kushwaha, D. G., & Kumari, D. M. (2019). The Role of KPIs and Metrics in Digital Marketing. Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary , 4 (01), 1-10. [59] Singh, J., Singh, S., & Kumari, M. (2020). Role of ICT in Supply Chain Management. Journal of Interdisciplinary Cycle Research , XII (X), 992-1007.

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Akshay Raj Sharma, Prof. Manju Mandot, Dr. Jagdeep Singh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.