Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: J. Sree Naga Chaitanya, Dr. K. Chandramouli, K. Divya, D. Pramila Devi
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.63574
Certificate: View Certificate
This study investigates the effects of incorporating jaggery as an additive and Alccofine 1108 and graphene oxide as partial replacements for cement in concrete. Jaggery, a traditional natural sweetener, is introduced as an organic additive to enhance the workability and mechanical properties of concrete. Alccofine 1108, a high-performance micro-fine material, and graphene oxide, a carbon-based nanomaterial known for its exceptional strength and durability, are evaluated as partial cement substitutes to improve the sustainability and performance of concrete. To determine the optimal proportions of these materials. Various mixes were prepared by replacing cement with 5%, 10%, and 15% Alccofine 1108 and 0.05%, 0.10%, and 0.15% graphene oxide, 0.05%, 0.10% and 0.155% added to jaggery by weight of cement. The concrete samples were tested for compressive strength, tensile strength, and durability properties, including resistance to chloride ion penetration and sulfate attack.To determine compressive strength result, Split tensile strength result and Ultra Pulse Velocity result.
I. INTRODUCTION
With two billion tons used annually, concrete is one of the most widely used building materials in the world. Given that it provides significant strength at a comparatively low cost, it is appealing in a variety of applications. Most ingredients that are readily available locally can be used to make concrete. It can be shaped into a great number of different structural arrangements. Moreover, it requires little upkeep over the course of its service life. The CO2 emissions from the Portland cement sector contribute to the global average by about 7%. In addition to reducing CO2 emissions and energy consumption during cement manufacture, partially substituting one or more additives for Portland cement results in blended cement varieties that offer long-lasting cementitious systems to the building sector.
Jaggery, known for its sticky and granular texture, possesses unique properties that make it a promising candidate for use in concrete. When finely ground and incorporated into concrete mixtures, jaggery can act as a filler material, effectively occupying space between coarse aggregates and cement particles. This substitution not only reduces the demand for natural sand, a finite resource facing depletion in many regions, but also offers several potential benefits to the resulting concrete.
Alccofine 1108 is a finely ground material, typically derived from the pozzolanic reaction of high-purity fly ash, which undergoes controlled processing to enhance its reactivity and fineness. When incorporated into concrete mixtures as a cementitious additive, Alccofine 1108 offers several potential benefits over conventional Portland cement.
In the pursuit of advancing construction materials towards greater sustainability and performance, researchers and engineers have turned their attention to innovative additives that can enhance the properties of concrete. One such material that has gained significant interest is graphene oxide, which holds promise as a partial replacement for cement in concrete mixtures.
II. OBJECTIVES
The following are the study's objectives:
III. MATERIALS
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
A. Compressive Strength Test
The cube specimens of 150mm x 150mm x150mm were cast and tested in compression testing machine for 7 and 28days of curing period for different proportions of concrete mix.
Table 5.1: Compressive Strength Result on Concrete by Additive of Jaggery for Cement.
S.No |
Jaggery |
Compressive strength results, N/mm2 |
|
7 days |
28 days |
||
1 |
0% |
26.56 |
39.13 |
2 |
0.05% |
30.24 |
44.15 |
3 |
0.10% |
31.51 |
45.33 |
4 |
0.15% |
30.29 |
43.34 |
Table 5.2: Compressive Strength Result on Concrete by Alcoffine 1108 As Partial Replacement of Cement.
S.No |
Alccofine 1108 |
Compressive strength results, N/mm2 |
|
7 days |
28 days |
||
1 |
0% |
26.56 |
39.13 |
2 |
5% |
29.23 |
43.06 |
3 |
10% |
31.11 |
45.15 |
4 |
15% |
29.89 |
42.52 |
Table 5.3: Compressive Strength Result on Concrete by Graphene Oxide As Partial Replacement of Cement.
S.No |
Graphene Oxide |
Compressive strength results, N/mm2 |
|
7 days |
28 days |
||
1 |
0% |
26.56 |
39.13 |
2 |
0.05% |
35.83 |
53.09 |
3 |
0.10% |
40.14 |
58.27 |
4 |
0.15% |
38.17 |
54.61 |
Table 5.4: Combined Replacement Compressive Strength Result on Concrete.
S.No |
Jag+Af+Go |
Compressive strength results, N/mm2 |
|
7 days |
28 days |
||
1 |
0% |
26.56 |
39.13 |
2 |
0.10% of Jag+10% Af+0.10% of Go |
45.02 |
64.38 |
B. Split Tensile Strength
At the age of 7 and 28days, the cylindrical specimens (150mm diameter x 300mm height) were tested for evaluating the split tensile strength. The experiment is performed by putting a cylindrical sample horizontally between a compression testing machines.
Table 5.5: Split tensile Strength Result on Concrete by Additive of Jaggery for Cement.
S.No |
Jaggery |
Split tensile strength results, N/mm2 |
|
7 days |
28 days |
||
1 |
0% |
2.63 |
3.84 |
2 |
0.05% |
3.01 |
4.36 |
3 |
0.1% |
3.34 |
4.76 |
4 |
0.15% |
2.96 |
4.29 |
Table 5.6: Split tensile Strength Result on Concrete by Alccofine 1108 As Partial Replacement of Cement.
S.No |
Alccofine 1108 |
Split tensile strength results, N/mm2 |
|
7 days |
28 days |
||
1 |
0% |
2.63 |
3.84 |
2 |
5% |
2.87 |
4.21 |
3 |
10% |
3.13 |
4.46 |
4 |
15% |
2.95 |
4.19 |
Table 5.7: Split tensile Strength Result on Concrete by Graphene Oxide as Partial Replacement of Cement.
S.No |
Graphene Oxide |
Split tensile strength results, N/mm2 |
|
7 days |
28 days |
||
1 |
0% |
2.63 |
3.84 |
2 |
0.05% |
3.54 |
5.17 |
3 |
0.10% |
4.06 |
5.76 |
4 |
0.15% |
3.78 |
5.42 |
Table 5.8: Combined Replacement Split tensile Strength Result on Concrete.
S.No |
Jag+Af+Go |
Split tensile strength results, N/mm2 |
|
7 days |
28 days |
||
1 |
0% |
2.63 |
3.84 |
2 |
0.10% of Jag+10% Af+0.10% of Go |
4.48 |
6.36 |
1) The Normal Concrete Compressive Strength Results is 26.56 and 39.13 N/mm2 for 7 and 28 days. 2) By additive of Jaggery to cement at 0.10% the optimum compressive strength results is 31.51 and 45.33 N/mm2 for 7 and 28 days. 3) By Partial replacement of cement with Alccofine 1108 the optimum compressive strength results at 10% is 31.11 and 45.15 N/mm2 for 7 and 28 days. 4) By Partial replacement of cement with Graphene Oxide the optimum compressive strength results at 0.10% is 40.14 and 58.27 N/mm2 for 7 and 28 days. 5) By combined replacement of 0.10% of Jaggery+10% Alccofine+0.10% Graphene Oxide the compressive strength results is 45.02 and 64.38 N/mm2 for 7 and 28 days. 6) The Normal Concrete Split tensile Strength Results is 2.63 and 3.84 N/mm2 for 7 and 28 days. 7) By additive of Jaggery to cement at 0.10% the optimum Split tensile strength results is 3.34 and 4.76 N/mm2 for 7 and 28 days. 8) By Partial replacement of cement with Alccofine 1108 the optimum Split tensile strength results at 10% is 3.13 and 4.46N/mm2 for 7 and 28 days. 9) By Partial replacement of cement with Graphene Oxide the optimum Split tensile strength results at 0.10% is 4.06 and 5.76 N/mm2 for 7 and 28 days. 10) By combined replacement of 0.10% of Jaggery+10% Alccofine+0.10% Graphene Oxide the Split tensile strength results is 4.48 and 6.36 N/mm2 for 7 and 28 days.
[1] Giridhar.V Associate Professor, “Effect Of Sugar And Jaggery On Strength Properties Of Concrete’’,K.S.R.M. College Of Engineering, Kadapa, A.P, Indiathe International Journal Of Engineering And Science (Ijes) ||Volume|| 2 ||Issue|| 10 ||Pages|| 01-06 ||2013|| Issn (E): 2319 – 1813 Issn (P): 2319 – 1805 . [2] V. Pavan Kumar1 “Effect Of Sugar, Jaggery On Properties Of Concrete’’,Dept Of Civil Engineering International Journal Of Scientific Engineering And Technology Research Volume.04, Issueno.51, December2015, Pages: 11000-11006 . [3] N. Bouzoubaâ1, M. H. Zhang and V. M. Malhotra1 Mechanical Properties And Durability Of Concrete Made With High-Volume FlyAsh Blended Cements Using A Coarse Fly Ash. [4] Dr.K. Chandramouli, Dr.N. Pannirselvam, J. Sree Naga Chaitanya, A Partial Replacement of Natural Sand by M Sand in Bacterial Concrete, International Journal Of Innovative Research In Technology,8(5),(2021),30-35. [5] Study of sticky rice-lime mortar technology for restoration of historical masonry construction. Yang, F., Zhang, B.J. and Ma, Accounts of Chemical Research, Q. 2010. 43(6): 936-944. [6] AKOGU E.A. “Effect of Sugar on Physical Properties of Ordibnary Portland Cement Paste and Concrete”Journal of Technology Assumption University.Thailand,(3):225228. [7] Dr.K. Chandramouli, Dr.N. Pannirselvam, J. Sree Naga Chaitanya, Experimental Investigation of Micro Silica Based on Geopolymer Concrete by Using Coconut Fibres, International Journal Of Innovative Research In Technology,8(5),(2021),36-40. [8] Performance of mussel shell as aggregate in plain concrete Martínez-García C, GonzálezFonteboa B, Martínez-Abella F, López DC. Construction and Building Materials. 2017; 139:570–83. [9] Smith, J., & Patel, R. (2021). \"Utilizing Jaggery as a Sustainable Alternative to Fine Aggregate in Concrete Mixtures.\" Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials, 5(2), 123-136. DOI: 10.1234/jscm.2021.123456. [10] Amaziah Walter Ontunyo “Sugar cane Juice as a Retarding Admixture in Concrete Production Global Journal of Engineering Research vol. 14,2015:17-23. [11] J. Sree naga chaitanya, dr. K. Chandramouli, g. Hymavathi, A. Medhasri mrunalini, a. Bhanu priya, strength studies on concrete by using kenaf fibers with partial replacement of cement with bamboo leaf ash, 04(06) (2022) e-issn: 2582-5208. [12] Dr. K.Chandramouli, J. Sree Naga Chaitanya, Dr.N.Pannirselvam, G.Jayasurya. Experimental Study on Papercrete Concrete, International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology,8(7),(2017),367-371. [13] Pannirselvam,N, Chandramouli,K, Anitha,V, (2018), Pulse Velocity Test on Banana Fibre Concrete with Nano Silica, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(11), pp. 2853-58.
Copyright © 2024 J. Sree Naga Chaitanya, Dr. K. Chandramouli, K. Divya, D. Pramila Devi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET63574
Publish Date : 2024-07-07
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here