Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Aiyeola S.Y., Mohammed I.N., Alapa F., Adewumi O.D., Oluyombo W., Ibrahim Aminu., Isah S., Ogbe S.S.
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.40715
Certificate: View Certificate
Robust measurements of natural Greenhouse Gases emissions are vital for evaluating regional to global carbon budgets and for assessing climate feedbacks on natural emissions to improve climate models. To capture and analyze the high temporal variability of these fluxes in a well-defined footprint, we designed and developed an inexpensive device. In addition to automatically collect gas samples from footprint for subsequent various analyses in the laboratory, this device also utilizes a low cost carbon dioxide sensor, Temperature and Humidity Sensor, GPS sensor to measure Greenhouse Gases (GHG). Each of the devices modules were equipped with an ESP32 Wi-Fi, NodeMCU and Transceiver module to enable a local radio communication with the ground receiving Station for onward processing to cloud. This study shows the potential of a low cost and low instrument, open source software for devices development as automatic sensor network system to study GHG fluxes. Results obtained from research is shown as follows: CO2 (360 to 455 ppm), Temperature (26.9 OC to 30.9OC) and Humidity (35.5% to 36.5%) which is good for human health. However, this research proves human capacity building and promotion of open data access for research.
I. INTRODUCTION
Atmospheric Greenhouse Gas (GHG) concentrations increases by human activities which result in global warming and climate change (IPCC, 2014). Measuring Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions is of paramount importance to understanding the emissions trends of companies, vehicular movement, facilities and human activities so that targeted and effective mitigation strategies can be developed. However, this prompt research on GHG emissions which is critical to understanding of the consequences of rapidly increasing atmospheric GHG concentrations. This research should be carried out globally, in both developed and developing countries, since both have different sources and sinks of GHGs, different climate-change vulnerabilities, and different capacities for mitigation and adaptation (López-Ballesteros et al., 2018; Ogle et al., 2014), GHG research has not been widely conducted globally especially developing countries. Recently, GHG research adopting appropriate technology and approach (Murphy et al., 2009) has been proposed and carried out. This uses low-cost and low-technology instruments, open source software and data, and participatory approaches, and in many cases has resulted in valuable research results accepted by International Scientific Communities (Choi, 2019; Shames et al., 2016; DeVries et al., 2016; Bastviken et al., 2015). High frequency measurements over long periods with broad spatial coverage of studied areas could reduce this uncertainty and result in more representative gas emission estimates. Some recent studies using low cost CH4 (Eugster and Kling, 2012) and CO2 sensors (Bastviken et al., 2015) could however be coupled to simultaneously study CH4 and CO2 flux across the air-water interface. It is a high sensitivity CH4 gas sensor made for air contaminants and gas leak detection. Eugster and Kling (2012) showed that this sensor has potential to measure CH4 at ambient air concentrations. The sensor has a high sensitivity to relative humidity and temperature, but these responses can be corrected for to yield a realistic CH4 signal. To increase the quality and quantity of observations of GHG emission, we developed a low-cost, simple, robust and portable device with a well-defined footprint for investigating gas flux at with a defined location as reference point. Here, we tested three commercial sensors including: MQ135, DHT 11 and BMP 280. The C02 sensor used here is MQ135, which is low power modules that measures CO2; DHT 11 modules is a temperature and humidity sensor features a temperature sensor complex with a calibrated digital signal output and BMP280 modules measures humidity and pressure.
A. Observation of GHG Fluxes
It was reported in 2000, soil CO2 flux measurements had been conducted at 1815 sites in only 42 countries; this had increased to 6625 sites in 75 countries by 2016 (Jian et al., 2021 and Dung-Gill et al., 2021) ( Fig. 1 and 2). The exponential increases in measurements could be attributed to increased interest in the research area, and quickly-developing, highly advanced instruments using relevant technologies.
In terms of continental scale, measurements in Europe, North America and Asia cover around 90% of the global observations, while Africa and South America remain critically underrepresented (Dung-Gill et al.2021; Jian et al., 2021; Épule, 2015; Kim et al., 2013) compared to their importance in global GHG budgets (Fig. 3).
B. Greenhouse Gas Flux
Low-cost technology has also been adopted in GHG research. Studies have utilized low-cost sensors to monitor atmospheric concentrations of CO2 (Shusterman et al., 2018). Some studies have also demonstrated how to build low-cost gas sampling and analysis instruments (Carbone et al., 2019; Martinsen et al., 2018; Bastviken et al., 2015). For instance, Bastviken et al. (2015) utilized a low-cost CO2 logger to measure CO2 fluxes in terrestrial and aquatic environments. They replaced an expensive and high precision CO2 analyzer and data logging system with a low-cost CO2 logger which was originally produced for industrial uses, and with careful practices, bias and accuracy remain good enough for many carbon-cycle applications.
Antero Ollila (2017) reported the Warming Impacts of Greenhouse Gases in the Clear Sky using Average Global Atmosphere Model, AGA15 atmospheric profile, the absorption values of GHG can be calculated changing the concentration of each GHG starting from zero level in clear sky condition. The warming effects can be then calculated by using equation (1).
T = -274.3249 + 50.7558 * ln(E) …………………………………. ……………………(1)
The relationship between the temperatures (T, °C) and absorption energies (E, Wm-2) is logarithmic. The results are depicted in Fig. 4. And Fig. 5. Represent the absorption band Graphs of GHG in the AGA05 atmosphere. The warming effect of CO2 is highly nonlinear in the present atmosphere but the effect of H2O is practically linear around the average TPW value of 2.6 cm. Also, the concentrations of CH4 and N2O are so low that they are still in the region of Beer-Lambert law, where the absorption is almost linearly dependent on the gas concentration. The warming impacts of CO2 can be fitted with the logarithmic equation:
T = -1.01403+ 0.988487 * ln (CO2)……………………………………… (2)
where T is the temperature impact (°C) and CO2 is the concentration of CO2 (ppm). The coefficient of determination R2 is 0.999, the standard error is 0.02°C. This formula is valid in the concentration range from 200 ppm to 800 ppm. This formula gives the temperature change 0.6°C for the CO2 concentration from 280 ppm to 560 ppm.
II. METHOD
This section, describe the technical details of our device that simultaneously measures CO2 flux, temperature, altitude and equipped with a radio transmitter module as shown in figure 6 for wireless data transfer and monitor. The concept of the Cloud Based System for Greenhouse measurement is to demonstrate proof of concept of a satellite mission by measuring Greenhouses Gases (GHG) at selected altitude from the earth by utilizing greenhouse sensors as stated above and delivering data from such sensors to cloud at real time. This project will use the “ThingSpeak” server platform to output the data to the cloud, and the “ThingShow” mobile App as users’ access terminal. Interested users of the data can download the app, and, with granted access, view the data as shown in figure 7.
Figure 8 above show high level requirements specifications at stage level.
III. RESULT
Result of this research were calculated from the measured data of the cloud computing unit and information about a particular entity is graphically represented.
IV. DISCUSSION
Figure 9 presents the relationship of Carbon dioxide (C02) parts per million with Time, as it can be clearly seen from graphical representation Carbon dioxide (PPM) is within the recommended and accepted level for good health and human activities and in agreement with standard (https://www.CO2.earth >daily – CO2). Carbon dioxide emission largely come from human activities such as burning fossils fuels and deforestation and are primary driver of climate change. Figure 10. Presents the relationship of Temperature (OC) with Time at define footprint and result from graphical representation shown normal Temperature for human. Figure 11 presents the relationship between Humidity and Time, from the graph it shows a level between 35.5% to 36.5% humidity which is typically ideal for keeping home warm and comfortable for human existence.
Measurement and Evaluation of Greenhouse Gases with Cloud Based Logging research has adopted a highly advanced technological with low-cost and low instrument, open source software for development. Results obtained as follows: CO2 (360 to 455 ppm), Temperature (26.9 OC to 230.9OC) and Humidity (35.5% to 36.5%) which is good for human health. However, this research proves human capacity building and promotion of open data access which is crucial for scientific information dissemination and training model for future generation of science community in the developing countries.
[1] Al-Haj, A. N., and Fulweiler, R. W (2020). A synthesis of methane emissions from shallow vegetated coastal ecosystems, Global 530 Change Biol., Vol (26): 2988-3005, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15046. [2] Antero Ollila (2017). Warming Effect Reanalysis of Greenhouse Gases and Clouds. Physical Science International Journal 13(2): 1-13. [3] Bastviken, D., Sundgren, I., Natchimuthu, S., Reyier, H., and Gålfalk, M (2015). Technical Note: Cost-efficient approaches to measure carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and concentrations in terrestrial and aquatic environments using mini loggers, Biogeosci., Vol (12) 3849-3859. [4] Carbone, M. S., Seyednasrollah, B., Rademacher, T. T., Basler, D., Le Moine, J. M., Beals, S., Beasley, J., Greene, A., Kelroy, J., and Richardson, A. D (2019). Flux Puppy–An open-source software application and portable system design for low-cost manual measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes, Agric. For. Met., Vol (274): 1-6. [5] Choi, C. Q (2019). Seven ways scientists handle technology challenges in resource-poor settings, Nature, Vol (569): 147-149. [6] Collier-Oxandale, A., Casey, J. G., Piedrahita, R., Ortega, J., Halliday, H., Johnston, J., and Hannigan, M. P (2018). Assessing a lowcost methane sensor quantification system for use in complex rural and urban environments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., Vol (11).3569- 3594. [7] DeVries, B., Pratihast, A. K., Verbesselt, J., Kooistra, L., and Herold, M (2016). Characterizing forest change using community based monitoring data and Landsat time series, PLOS One, 11, e0147121. [8] Duc, N. T., Silverstein, S., Lundmark, L., Reyier, H., Crill, P., and Bastviken, D (2013). Automated Flux Chamber for Investigating Gas Flux at Water–Air Interfaces, Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol (47): 968-975, 10.1021/es303848x,. https://doi.org./10.5194/hess-2019-83 [9] Dung-Gill, K., Ben, B., Youngreyel, R., Bumsuk, S., Dario, P (2021). Reviews and Synthesis: Enhancing Research and monitoring of land – to – atmosphere gases exchange in developing Countries. Biogeoscience Discussion, pp 1-30.https//doi,org/10.5194/bg-2021-85 [10] Epule, T. E (2015). A new compendium of soil respiration data for Africa, Chall., Vol (6): 88-97. [11] Eugster, W., and Kling, G (2012). Performance of a low-cost methane sensor for ambient concentration measurements in preliminary studies, Atmos. Meas. Tech., Vol (5): 1925-1934. [12] IPCC: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Barros, V.R., C.B. Field, D.J Dokken, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 688, 2014 [13] Jian, J., Vargas, R., Anderson-Teixeira, K., Stell, E., Herrmann, V., Horn, M., Kholod, N., Manzon, J., Marchesi, R., Paredes,D., and Bond-Lamberty, B (2021). restructured and updated global soil respiration database (SRDB-V5), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, Vol (13): 255-267, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-255-2021. [14] Kim, D.-G., Giltrap, D. J., and Hernandez-Ramirez, G (2013). Background nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural and natural lands:a meta-analysis, Plant Soil,Vol (373): 17-30. [15] López-Ballesteros, A., Beck, J., Bombelli, A., Grieco, E., Lorencová, E. K., Merbold, L., Brümmer, C., Hugo, W., Scholes,R., Va?ká?, D., Vermeulen, A., Acosta, M., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Helmschrot, J., Kim, D.-G., Jones, M., Jorch, V., Pavelka, M., Skjelvan, I., and Saunders, M (2018). Towards a feasible and representative pan-African research infrastructure network for GHG observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 085003. [16] Martinsen, K. T., Kragh, T., and Sand-Jensen, K (2018). A simple and cost-efficient automated floating chamber for continuous measurements of carbon dioxide gas flux on lakes, Biogeosci., 15. [17] Murphy, H. M., McBean, E. A., and Farahbakhsh, K (2009). Appropriate technology – A comprehensive approach for water and sanitation in the developing world, Technol. Soc. Vol (31): 158-167. [18] Nguyen, T.D., Samuel, S., Martin, W., Patrick, C., David, B. and Ruth, K.V (2019). Greenhouse Gas Flux Studies: An Automated online System for Gas Emission Measurements. Journal of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussion. Pp 1-18 [19] Ogle, S. M., Olander, L., Wollenberg, L., Rosenstock, T., Tubiello, F., Paustian, K., Buendia, L., Nihart, A., and Smith, P (2014). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting agricultural management for climate change in developing countries: providing the basis for action, Global Change Biol., Vol (20): 1-6. [20] Riddick, S. N., Mauzerall, D. L., Celia, M., Allen, G., Pitt, J., Kang, M., and Riddick, J. C (2020). The calibration and deployment of a low-cost methane sensor, Atmosph. Env., 117440. [21] Shusterman, A. A., Kim, J., Lieschke, K. J., Newman, C., Wooldridge, P. J., and Cohen, R. C (2018). Observing local CO2 sources using low-cost, near-surface urban monitors, Atmos. Chem. Phys, Vol (18): 13773-13785.
Copyright © 2023 Aiyeola S.Y., Mohammed I.N., Alapa F., Adewumi O.D., Oluyombo W., Ibrahim Aminu., Udeh B. N., Egan M.. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET40715
Publish Date : 2022-03-09
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here