Mycoremediation: An Innovative and Sustainable Approach for Environmental Restoration

Abstract

Growing awareness of environmental pollution and its negative impacts on ecosystems and human health has spread around the world in recent decades. Traditional remediation techniques frequently fail to adequately treat the wide range of toxins that affect our soil, water, and air. A revolutionary and ground-breaking technology called mycoremediation uses fungi to repair and clean up polluted areas. An overview of mycoremediation\'s mechanics, uses, and possible advantages is given in this research article. It examines the numerous toxins that can be successfully treated by mycoremediation and talks about the main aspects that contribute to its effectiveness. The paper also discusses upcoming directions, current difficulties, and the possibility of mycoremediation as a long-term approach to environmental restoration.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION TO MYCOREMEDIATION

Ecosystems and public health are seriously threatened by environmental contamination brought on by industrial operations, agricultural practises, and poor waste disposal. The effectiveness, expense, and environmental impact of traditional repair techniques are all constrained. Environmental pollution is a serious problem on a global scale that endangers both human health and ecosystems. The complex issues of environmental contamination are frequently not properly and sustainably addressed by conventional cleanup techniques. Mycoremediation is a promising and creative strategy that has just come to light due to its potential to clean up polluted areas by utilising the special skills of fungi. Using fungus to break down or change pollutants is a promising approach known as mycoremediation. An introduction to mycoremediation and its possible benefits over traditional remediation techniques is given in this section. Mycoremediation, another name for fungus. Mycoremediation typically entails the introduction of particular fungus, also referred to as "bioremediation fungi" or "mycofilters," into the contaminated site. Through a variety of methods, including enzymatic breakdown, bioaccumulation, or conversion into inert forms, these fungi have the capacity to degrade or change the pollutants into less dangerous compounds.

1. Fungal species: Mycorrhizal fungi, oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus), white rot fungus (such Phanerochaete chrysosporium), and other forms of fungi can all be employed in mycoremediation. Every species has unique skills and preferences for various pollutants.
2. Contaminant degradation: Fungi produce enzymes that specifically target and breakdown complex chemical substances, such as hydrocarbons or insecticides, allowing them to be broken down. Some fungi have the capacity to take up and store heavy metals, lowering their levels in the environment.
3. Versatility: Numerous contaminated habitats, including soil, water bodies, and industrial sites, are amenable to Mycoremediation. Fungi are more resilient than other bioremediation techniques and may adapt to a variety of environments.
4. Ecological benefits: Since Mycoremediation employs natural processes rather than harsh chemicals, it is regarded as an environmentally beneficial strategy. Mycorrhizal associations are another type of symbiotic interaction that fungi can form with plants, improving the resilience and general health of ecosystems.
5. Limitations: The type and concentration of pollutants, the surrounding environment, and the particular fungi utilised can all affect how efficient mycoremediation is. The establishment of the fungi and the degradation of the contaminants may take some time, necessitating monitoring and long-term control.

A. Types of Mycoremediation

Depending on the location, mycoremediation can be either in situ or ex situ.

1. In Situ Mycoremediation

It doesn't involve any soil excavation and is carried out at the contaminated site. Since there are no excavation costs, it is an effective and economical technique (Kumar 2017). Physicochemical characteristics of the contaminated site, including

For remediation to be successful, factors like moisture content, electron acceptor status, nutrition availability, pH, and temperature are crucial (Philp and Atlas 2005).

Soil porosity is a significant component that affects the success of in situ mycoremediation projects.

2. Ex Situ Mycoremediation

It entails removing contaminated soil from the polluted area and transporting it to another location for treatment. Ex situ mycoremediation, in contrast to in situ mycoremediation, is expensive and may also result in When pollutants are transported from one place to another, environmental contamination occurs (Kumar 2017). According to Philp and Atlas (2005), these treatments are evaluated based on their cost of treatment, level of pollution, kind of pollutant, degree of pollution, and geographic location of the contaminated site.

II. MECHANISMS OF MYCOREMEDIATION

Fungi are able to digest and change a variety of pollutants because to their special enzymatic skills and metabolic pathways. Enzymatic degradation, biosorption, and metal sequestration are some of the main mechanisms behind mycoremediation that are covered in this section. Additionally, it covers the function of fungal mycelium and how it might improve pollutant bioavailability and speed up cleanup procedures. There are numerous mechanisms that underlie mycoremediation. Enzymatic degradation is a technique that fungi can use. They produce a wide range of enzymes that target particular contaminants and aid in their breakdown into simpler, less hazardous forms. In addition, fungi have the capacity to bioaccumulate or biosorb pollutants, binding them to their cell walls or mycelium (the branching network of fungal threads).

By inhibiting movement and lowering their bioavailability, this mechanism improves the immobilisation and sequestration of contaminants. Mycoremediation has been effective in removing a variety of pollutants. Fungi have demonstrated efficacy in the degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pesticides, herbicides, and other organic contaminants in soil. They have been used to remove heavy metals, extra nutrients, medications, colours, and even oil spills from aquatic ecosystems. By destroying volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and reducing indoor air quality issues brought on by mould and mycotoxins, fungi have also demonstrated potential in the field of air purification. Fungi are useful for this because they possess special qualities that make them special. The mycoremediation process includes the following crucial steps:

1. Fungal selection: Various types of pollutants can be transformed or degraded by specific fungal species. The selection of suitable fungi based on their tolerance to the pollutants present in the environment is the first step in mycoremediation.
2. Contaminant recognition: Fungi may detect environmental pollutants and react accordingly. Fungi that are exposed to pollution create enzymes and other substances that help break down or change the toxins.
3. Contaminant uptake: A mycelium network, which is a sizable web of linked hyphae, is present in fungi. These hyphae can penetrate polluted soil or water, where they can then take up the contaminants and incorporate them into the fungal biomass.
4. Enzymatic degradation: The pollutants are exposed to enzymatic breakdown once they have reached the fungal biomass. Numerous enzymes, including lignin peroxidases, laccases, and cytochrome P450 enzymes, are produced by fungi and can convert complicated chemical molecules into less harmful ones.
5. Bioaccumulation and transformation: Some pollutants can gather and be stored by fungi in their mycelium. This procedure, referred to as bioaccumulation, aids in the removal of pollutants from the environment. Additionally, some fungi have the capacity to change pollutants via metabolic processes into less harmful or non-toxic forms.
6. Nutrient cycling: In ecosystems, fungi are essential for the cycling of nutrients. They release nutrients into the environment as they break down pollutants, making them available to other creatures. This can encourage the emergence of other advantageous species and assist in restoring the natural balance.
7. Restoration and ecosystem recovery: Mycoremediation can aid in the rehabilitation and restoration of contaminated areas by degrading and transforming pollutants. The fungus contribute to a reduction in the quantity and toxicity of contaminants, hence raising the standard of the environment as a whole.

Table1 : Showing Fungal strains capable of biosorption of heavy metals.

III. APPLICATIONS OF MYCOREMEDIATION

Mycoremediation has been effective in removing a range of contaminants, including heavy metals, pesticides, petroleum hydrocarbons, organic pollutants, and new contaminants. In this section, case studies and illustrations of effective mycoremediation applications in various environmental contexts, including soil, water, and air, are provided. Additionally, it talks about the possibilities for mycoremediation in specialised uses including handling drug residues and textile dyes.

Mycoremediation has a number of benefits over conventional remediation techniques. Fungi are naturally occurring decomposers that have evolved to break down complex chemicals that are frequently hard for other species to break down.

They can adapt to different pH and temperature settings, grow in a variety of environments, and endure high pollution levels. Mycoremediation is frequently economical since it eliminates the need for expensive infrastructure because fungus may be grown on cheap, easily accessible substrates. Mycoremediation is also eco-friendly because it normally generates little waste and doesn't require harmful chemicals.

1. Bioremediation of Soil: Heavy metals, herbicides, and petroleum hydrocarbon-related soil contamination have all been successfully treated via mycoremediation. For their capacity to break down these contaminants and improve soil health, fungi like oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus) and white rot fungi (Phanerochaete chrysosporium) have been the subject of intensive research.
2. Water and Wastewater Treatment: Water bodies and wastewater systems can be treated using fungi. Pharmaceuticals, dyes, and industrial chemicals are all effectively degraded by them. Additionally, some fungus have the capacity to take up heavy metals, cleansing water resources in the process.
3. Remediation of Industrial Sites: Mycoremediation has the ability to turn hazardous industrial sites into secure locations where people can work and thrive. Heavy metals, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and other persistent organic pollutants frequently found in industrial settings can be lessened by the employment of fungi.
4. Oil spill cleanup: The remediation of oil spills has showed promise when using mycoremediation. The hydrocarbons contained in crude oil and petroleum products can be broken down by specific fungal species. These fungi can be used directly on oil-contaminated areas to hasten the process of deterioration and lessen its negative effects on the environment.
5. Biodegradation of wood and timber products: In woods, the natural decay of wood is greatly aided by fungi. By utilising their capabilities, mycoremediation can be used to decompose wood and lumber waste, lowering the amount of garbage sent to landfills and possibly providing useful byproducts like compost or biofuels.
6. Removal of heavy metals: Heavy metals can be gathered and detoxified by fungi from contaminated surroundings. They can remove lead, mercury, cadmium, and copper from soil and water by absorbing these elements.
7. Environmental restoration: The repair of damaged ecosystems can benefit from mycoremediation. Through the breakdown of contaminants, enhancement of soil quality, and stimulation of the growth of other plant species, fungi can be introduced to polluted or damaged areas to aid in the restoration of the natural equilibrium.
8. Nuclear waste remediation: Some fungi have demonstrated the capacity to withstand and collect radioactive substances, making them suitable candidates for the cleanup of nuclear waste-contaminated locations. The potential of fungi in the removal of nuclear waste is still being investigated in this field.

IV. FACTORS INFLUENCING MYCOREMEDIATION SUCCESS

The selection of the fungal species, ambient conditions, substrate amendments, and pollutant properties are some of the variables that affect the effectiveness of mycoremediation. This section investigates these elements and how they affect the effectiveness and efficiency of mycoremediation procedures.

In order to improve fungal performance, it also covers the significance of optimising growth conditions, pH, temperature, and nutrient availability.

Mycoremediation does provide some difficulties, though. Some fungi have sluggish rates of breakdown, which may restrict their use in extensive cleanup initiatives. Mycoremediation is successful when the right fungal species are chosen and the growing environment is optimised.

Additionally, additional research is needed to determine the long-term viability of mycoremediation techniques as well as the potential ecological effects of introducing non-native fungi into ecosystems. Mycoremediation's effectiveness can be affected by a number of variables. Here are some key factors to consider:

1. Fungal Species Selection: For mycoremediation to be successful, the right fungal species must be chosen. The capacity of various fungi to break down particular contaminants varies. Some fungi are better at decomposing hydrocarbons, while others are great at decomposing heavy metals or pesticides. It's critical to recognise and select fungi that are compatible with the pollutants found in the polluted environment.
2. Contaminant Type and Concentration: The kind and quantity of environmental toxins have a big impact on how well mycoremediation works. Fungi can more readily break down some contaminants while other contaminants could need a particular species or extra treatment techniques. High levels of pollutants can make it difficult for the fungi to grow and survive, which can have an effect on the remediation procedure.
3. Environmental Conditions: The environment at the mycoremediation site can have a big impact on how well it works. Temperature, pH, moisture content, oxygen availability, and other variables can have an impact on the growth and activity of fungi. It is crucial to develop an environment that supports the proliferation and metabolic activities of each fungus species since each has ideal conditions for growth and breakdown.
4. Nutrient Availability: To flourish and efficiently carry out the mycoremediation process, fungi need a variety of nutrients. These nutrients may contain trace minerals, carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus. To make sure the fungi have the resources they need for growth and pollutant destruction, it is crucial to evaluate the availability and balance of these nutrients at the polluted site.
5. Co-cultivation and Synergistic Relationships: The co-cultivation of various fungal species or the development of synergistic connections with other microbes can both be advantageous for mycoremediation. Some fungus collaborate symbiotically with bacteria or other fungi to increase their capacity to break down contaminants. Mycoremediation can be more effective if these linkages are recognised and used.
6. Duration and Monitoring: Depending on the type and level of contamination, mycoremediation might take a variety of times. In order to gauge the success of the remediation process and its development, it is crucial to set reasonable expectations and carry out routine monitoring. To achieve the best results, modifications can be performed, such as adding extra fungi or changing the atmosphere.
7. Site-specific Factors: Every contaminated site has distinct qualities that can affect the outcome of mycoremediation. It is important to consider elements including soil composition, vegetation, past land use patterns, and the presence of rival microbes. The accessibility of contaminants to fungus, the capacity of fungi to colonise the site, and the remediation process' overall efficacy can all be impacted by site-specific conditions.

V. CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS

Mycoremediation has a lot of potential, but it also has issues and restrictions that need to be resolved. The slow rates of deterioration, the lack of standardised protocols, the incomplete knowledge of the interactions between fungi and plants, and potential ecological concerns are all covered in this section. The use of genetic engineering, bioaugmentation, and field-scale application are all considered as possible solutions to these problems. Mycoremediation has a lot of potential, but there are a few obstacles that need to be overcome before it can be widely used. Further study is needed on issues such the choice of fungus species, ideal environmental conditions, and process scalability. To encourage the acceptance and deployment of mycoremediation as a practical remediation technique, regulatory frameworks and public awareness campaigns need also be created. Mycoremediation, like many technologies, has drawbacks and difficulties. Here are a few examples:

Fungal specificity: The capacity of certain fungi to break down particular kinds of contaminants varies. While certain fungi are more adept at breaking down specific chemicals, others could be less so. It can be difficult to match the appropriate fungal species to the desired contaminant.

1. Slow process: In comparison to traditional remediation techniques, mycoremediation often takes longer. In contaminated regions, fungi need time to colonise and establish themselves. Numerous variables, including temperature, nutrient availability, and the kind and quantity of contaminants present, might affect the rate of fungus development.
2. Limited range of contaminants: The efficiency of fungi in the treatment of heavy metals and other inorganic pollutants is limited, despite the fact that they may degrade a wide variety of organic contaminants, including hydrocarbons, insecticides, and solvents. Typically, fungi lack adequate detoxification or removal processes for metals.
3. Lack of control and predictability: Fungi are living creatures that are susceptible to the effects of their surroundings. In complex and dynamic ecosystems, it can be hard to manage and anticipate their behaviour. The effectiveness of mycoremediation can be impacted by variables like temperature, pH, moisture, and competition with other microbes.
4. Site-specific considerations: For mycoremediation to be successful, each contaminated site has specific characteristics that must be taken into consideration. The effectiveness of the remediation process can be influenced by elements like soil type, pH, the availability of nutrients, and the existence of local fungi. It is frequently necessary to use customised strategies and site-specific assessments.
5. Regulatory and public acceptance: The technology of mycoremediation is still rather new and developing. various locations and jurisdictions may have various regulatory structures and levels of popular support. To win widespread acceptance and regulatory approval, mycoremediation techniques must demonstrate their safety, effectiveness, and long-term viability.
6. Scale-up challenges:While expanding mycoremediation to more contaminated locations can create logistical and technological hurdles, the technique has demonstrated potential in laboratory and small-scale field testing. At a wider scale, regulating the repair process' overall cost-effectiveness, fungal dispersion uniformity, and favourable growing conditions can be challenging.

VI. FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND POTENTIAL

Mycoremediation has more uses than what it is used for now. The utilisation of genetically modified fungi, the creation of hybrid systems combining plants and fungi, and the incorporation of mycoremediation with other sustainable technologies are some of the potential prospects that are explored in this section. Additionally, it emphasises how crucial interdisciplinary research, community involvement, and policy support are to maximising the benefits of mycoremediation. Future prospects for mycoremediation appear bright. Modern genetic engineering techniques might make it possible to modify fungi to increase their capacity for degradation and boost their resistance to harsh environmental conditions. Synergistic effects and more thorough remediation procedures may result from integration with other environmentally friendly remediation methods, such as phytoremediation and bioremediation. For mycoremediation to be implemented safely and effectively on a larger scale, norms and regulations must be developed through collaboration between scientists, engineers, legislators, and stakeholders. There are a number of potential future paths and developments that could strengthen mycoremediation's position as an effective method of environmental restoration. To name a few:

Strain Selection and Genetic Engineering: Researchers are currently investigating several fungal species and strains to find those with improved pollution breakdown abilities. This procedure entails sorting and choosing fungi that may efficiently eliminate particular pollutants. In the future, genetic engineering methods could be used to improve the metabolic pathways of fungus, enabling them to more effectively target and digest a larger variety of contaminants.

Understanding Fungal-Microbe Interactions: In intricate ecosystems, fungi coexist with bacteria and other microbes. The creation of microbial consortia for mycoremediation can be facilitated by an understanding of these interactions and synergies between fungus and bacteria. We can design systems for pollution degradation that are more effective and reliable by combining the strengths of various microorganisms.

1. Scaling up and Field Application: Mycoremediation has produced encouraging results in lab and small-scale investigations, but there are presently few real-world applications for it. Maintaining fungal viability, assuring consistent performance, and creating favourable circumstances for fungal growth are among the obstacles of scaling up the procedure to treat bigger contaminated locations. Future studies should concentrate on formulating plans to get over these difficulties and improve mycoremediation methods for use in the field.
2. Bioaugmentation and Biofilm Formation: In order to improve the ability of contaminated places to be remedied, certain fungal strains or microbial communities are introduced. Additionally, encouraging the development of fungal biofilms can produce enduring communities that can steadily destroy contaminants over time. Future research should examine the potential for biofilm formation and bioaugmentation in mycoremediation and create the necessary methods for their effective application.
3. Integration with Other Remediation Technologies: In order to achieve synergistic results, mycoremediation can be used in conjunction and conjunction with other remediation procedures, such as phytoremediation (using plants) and bioremediation (using microorganisms). A wider spectrum of contaminants can be the focus of combined strategies, which also increase cleanup effectiveness overall. For the field to grow in the future, investigating such integrated tactics and their compatibility will be crucial.

Conclusion

A promising and sustainable strategy for environmental restoration is mycoremediation. Mycoremediation has attracted interest as a cutting-edge technology due to its capacity to address a wide range of pollutants and its potential for economical and environmentally benign cleanup. Fungi provide a viable approach for remediating contaminated settings in a long-lasting, economical, and environmentally benign way by utilising their distinct enzymatic and biosorption capacities. Unlocking the full potential of mycoremediation and promoting a cleaner, healthier planet depend on ongoing study, technical development, and interdisciplinary cooperation. Mycoremediation can be a useful instrument for combating environmental pollution and promoting a greener future by comprehending its mechanics, optimising crucial elements, and addressing current difficulties.

References

[1] Asiriuwa, O.; Ikhuoria, J.; Ilor, E. Myco-remediation potential of heavy metals from contaminated soil. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2013, 2, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [2] Hamba, Y.; Tamiru, M. Mycoremediation of heavy metals and hydrocarbons contaminated environment. Asian J. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2016, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [3] Gisbert, C.; Ros, R.; De Haro, A.; Walker, D.J.; Bernal, M.P.; Serrano, R.; Navarro-Aviñó, J. A plant genetically modified that accumulates Pb is especially promising for phytoremediation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 303, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [4] Stephen Okiemute Akpasi; Ifeanyi Michael Smarte Anekwe ;Mycoremediation as a Potentially Promising Technology: Current Status and Prospects—A Review ;Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(8), 4978; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084978 [5] Sen, R, Chakrabarti, S, (2009), Biotechnology-applications to environmental remediation in resource exploitation; Curr Sci. Vol-97, pg768-775 [6] Prasad, M.N.V, Freitas, H, Fraenzle, S, Wuenschmann, S, Markert, B, (2010), Knowledge explosion in phytotechnologies for environmental solutions; Environ Pollutant. Vol-158, pg18-23 [7] Masindi V., Osman M.S., Tekere M. Water Pollution and Remediation: Heavy Metals. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2021. Mechanisms and Approaches for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Acid Mine Drainage and Other Industrial Effluents; pp. 513–537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [8] Briffa J., Sinagra E., Blundell R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon. 2020;6:e04691. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04691. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [9] Rebello S., Sivaprasad M.S., Anoopkumar A.N., Jayakrishnan L., Aneesh E.M. Cleaner technologies to combat heavy metal toxicity. J. Environ. Manag. 2021;296:113231. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113231. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [10] Tripathi M., Singh D.N., Prasad N., Gaur R. Advanced Bioremediation Strategies for Mitigation of Chromium and Organics Pollution in Tannery. In: Kumar V., Prasad R., Kumar M., editors. Rhizobiont in Bioremediation of Hazardous Waste. Springer; Singapore: 2021. pp. 195–215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [11] Tripathi M., Gaur R. Bioactivity of soil microorganisms for agriculture development. In: Singh J.S., Tiwari S., Singh C., Singh A.K., editors. Microbes in Land Use Change Management. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2021. pp. 197–220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [12] Alaira S., Padilla C., Alcantara E., Aggangan N. Social Acceptability of the Bioremediation Technology for the Rehabilita-tion of an Abandoned Mined-Out Area in Mogpog, Marinduque, Philippines. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2021:24. doi: 10.47125/jesam/2021_1/08. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [13] Krzmarzick M.J., Taylor D.K., Fu X., McCutchan A.L. Diversity and niche of archaea in bioremediation. Archaea. 2018;2018:3194108. doi: 10.1155/2018/3194108. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [14] Kour D., Kaur T., Devi R., Yadav A., Singh M., Joshi D. Beneficial microbiomes for bioremediation of diverse contaminated environments for environmental sustainability: Present status and future challenges. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021;28:24917–24939. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13252- [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [15] Sharma P., Pandey A.K., Kim S.H., Singh S.P., Chaturvedi P., Varjani S. Critical review on microbial community during in-situ bioremediation of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021;24:101826. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101826. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [16] Tripathi M., Vikram S., Jain R.K., Garg S.K. Isolation and growth characteristics of chromium (VI) and penta-chlorophenol tolerant bacterial isolate from treated tannery effluent for its possible use in simultaneous bioremediation. Indian J. Microbiol. 2011;51:61–69. doi: 10.1007/s12088-011-0089-2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [17] Tripathi M., Garg S.K. Dechlorination of chloroorganics, decolorization and simultaneous bioremediation of Cr6+ from real tannery effluent employing indigenous Bacillus cereus isolate. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014;21:5227–5241. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-2479-y. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [18] Sonawane J.M., Rai A.K., Sharma M., Tripathi M., Prasad R. Microbial biofilms: Recent advances and progress in envi-ronmental bioremediation. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;824:153843. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153843. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [19] Adenipekun, C.O. and Lawal, R. (2012). Uses of mushrooms in bioremediation: A review. Biotec. Molecu. Biol. Rev., 7 (3): 62-68. [20] Bennet, J.W., Connick, W.J., Daigle, D. and Wunch, K. (2001). Formulation of fungi for in situ bioremediation. In: Fungi in bioremediation, ed. Gadd, G.M. pp. 97 – 108. USA: Cambridge University Press. [21] Boopathy, R. (2005). Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Biores.Technol., 74 (1) : 63-67. [22] Cotter, T. (2014) Introduction to mycoremediation In: Organic Mushroom Farming and mycoremediation, Chelsea Green Publishing, Vermont, pp. 291-292. [23] D?Annibale, A., Rosetto, F., Leonardi, V., Federici, F.and Petruccioli, M. (2006). Role of autochthonous filamentous fungi in bioremediation of a soil historically contaminated with aromatic hydrocarbons. American Soc. Microbiol., 72 (1): 28–36. [24] Hauke, H., Schlosser, D. and Wick, L.Y. (2011). Untapped potential: exploiting fungi in bioremediation of hazardous chemicals. Nature Rev. Microbiol., 9 (3): 177-192. www.images from net

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Musaib Ul Zaman, Dr. B.A Pandit, Dr. Rohitashw Kumar, Dr. T A Sofi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.