Optimized Management of a Sustainable Ready-Mix Concrete Batching Plant for High Grade Concrete Production

Abstract

The creation of high-quality concrete requires meticulous attention to various factors that influence its quality and performance. This research aims to examine three critical elements involved in the production of high-strength concrete to enhance quality, sustainability, and operational efficiency. The study identifies key factors that impact the production of premium concrete and develops a comprehensive checklist for concrete production and batching plant operations. This checklist serves as a standardized tool for quality control and operational management, ensuring consistency and reliability in production processes. Additionally, the research explores the contribution of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), with a particular emphasis on pulverized fuel ash (fly ash), in improving the performance characteristics of high-strength concrete. The evaluation of fly ash is performed to assess its effectiveness in enhancing workability, strength, and durability, while also fostering sustainable construction practices. The study underscores significant challenges encountered by Ready-Mix Concrete (RMC) plants, including process inefficiencies, material inconsistencies, and quality assurance difficulties. Based on these insights, a set of recommendations is proposed to mitigate these challenges, thereby strengthening operational resilience and ensuring the delivery of high-quality concrete. This investigation integrates quality management, material innovation, and risk mitigation strategies to advance the production of high-strength concrete and the operations of RMC plants.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

The increasing demand for high-strength and durable concrete has been notably influenced by advancements in contemporary construction methodologies. High-grade concrete is essential for ensuring the structural integrity and performance standards required in today's infrastructure projects. However, the production of high-quality concrete necessitates careful management of various factors, including the selection of materials, production techniques, and operational efficiencies. A comprehensive understanding of these elements is crucial for optimizing production processes and maintaining consistent quality. A key component in the production of high-grade concrete is the efficient management of concrete batching plants, which are fundamental to Ready-Mix Concrete (RMC) production. The operations of these plants have a direct impact on the quality of the final product. By identifying and addressing the factors that influence production, it is possible to enhance operational efficiency, minimize inconsistencies, and implement effective quality control measures. Consequently, the development of a standardized checklist for concrete production and batching plant operations is essential for achieving efficient management and superior results. Another important area of focus is the use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as pulverized fuel ash (fly ash). Fly ash has garnered significant attention for its ability to improve the performance characteristics of high-strength concrete. By enhancing attributes such as workability, strength, and durability, fly ash supports sustainable construction practices while decreasing dependence on conventional cement. Therefore, examining the effects of fly ash on the performance of high-grade concrete is crucial for maximizing its advantages in modern construction. In spite of the progress made in technology and operational methodologies, Ready-Mix Concrete (RMC) plants remain susceptible to a variety of risks that could jeopardize the quality of concrete. These risks, which include inconsistencies in raw materials and inefficiencies in operations, highlight the need for thorough risk identification and mitigation strategies. It is essential to proactively tackle these issues to uphold quality assurance and enhance the resilience of concrete production systems.

This study aims to address these challenges by examining three interrelated themes: identifying the factors that affect the production of high-grade concrete and creating a checklist for effective batching plant operations, evaluating the influence of fly ash on high-strength concrete, and pinpointing critical risks at RMC plants while suggesting mitigation strategies. By pursuing these objectives, the research aspires to foster advancements in high-grade concrete production through innovation, sustainability, and operational excellence.

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

1. K. E. Hassan et. al, (2000) paper presents a laboratory study on the influence of two mineral admixtures, silica fume (SF) and fly ash (FA), on the properties of superplasticizer high performance concrete. The concrete mixes were assessed based on short-term and long-term testing techniques used for the purpose of designing and controlling the quality of high-performance concrete. SF enhances the early ages as well as the long-term properties of concrete. It reduces the permeability when compared to OPC concrete. FA concrete has relatively poorer characteristics at early ages, but achieves similar strength and transport characteristics to SF concrete in the long term.

2. Muhammad Asyraf bin Zailudi, Balqis bt. Omar (2000) said that Supply chain management is a concept that has its roots in the manufacturing sector and has since evolved significantly. It represents a network of organizations that collaborate to enhance the development and quality of products or services provided to customers. However, inadequate implementation of supply chain management can adversely affect performance in terms of cost, time, and product quality. This study investigates the effectiveness of the current supply chain management processes specifically for ready-mixed concrete. It reviews the material supply chain management associated with ready-mixed concrete to outline the entire production process. Additionally, the study identifies the material supply risks that may arise during the production of ready-mixed concrete, as well as the benefits derived from effective supply chain management. To establish a successful supply chain management system, it is essential for all stakeholders to have a clear understanding of the concept. Therefore, this project assesses the level of comprehension regarding the implementation of supply chain management in the production and delivery processes of ready-mixed concrete among employees. Following the identification of these elements, a framework has been developed to enhance the efficiency of supply chain management by optimizing the existing structure. A questionnaire survey was conducted to gather respondents' views on the significance of product quality and reliable suppliers, as well as how their organizations ensure the effectiveness of supply chain management practices and the benefits realized from its implementation. Furthermore, interviews were held to gain insights into the detailed processes of material flow within the supply chain. Subsequently, analysis and discussion were performed based on the collected data.

3. Kay Wille et. al., (2015) investigated the material efficiency in the design of ultra-high performance concrete which is influenced by the flowability, mechanical performance, durability and cost. A reduction in the amount of the most expensive material and an increase in the amount of the least expensive material might lead to an improvement in performance versus cost.

4. Ali Alsalman et. al., (2017) studied the effect of sand gradation, binder type and content, and curing regimes on concrete’s compressive strength. The use of finer sand increases the compressive strength when compared to natural gradation sand. A fly ash content of more than 20% decreased the concrete’s compressive strengths at early ages, but increased the strengths at later ages. The curing regimens influenced concrete’s compressive strength. Curing regime C, which was 2 days at 60 °C followed by 3 days at 90 °C, resulted in the highest compressive strengths. The use of 3% by volume of steel fibers increased the compressive strength by 4% and 8% based on the test results of cylindrical and cube samples respectively.

5. Sukhoon Pyo et. al., (2017) studied mechanical properties and shrinkage of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) by adding coarser fine aggregates with maximum particle size of 5 mm. UHPC mixes with dolomite and more than 1.0% volume fractions of steel fiber resulted in strength values of more than 150 MPa at the age of 56 days. The replacement of silica powder with coal bottom ash powder resulted in comparable compressive strength and cracking patterns compared to the UHPC with silica powder, the replacement was not effective at improving the tensile capacities. It was found that the usage of basalt as a coarser fine aggregate in UHPC was not favorable for achieving exceptional mechanical properties.

6. Tiefeng Chen et. al., (2018) studied compressive strength, flexural strength and fracture toughness of ultra-high performance concretes (UHPC) containing silica fume and different dosage of fly ash (0%, 10%, 20% and 30%) after exposure to different autoclave curing conditions with pressure of 0.5 MPa, 1.0 MPa and 1.5 MPa and duration time of 6 h, 8 h, 10 h and 12 h. The microstructure of UHPC samples was measured by using MIP, XRD and SEM. The incorporation of fly ash increases compressive strength and different fly ash dosage can lead to different effect. . The autoclave curing effectively improves the compressive and flexural strength of UHPC, with the maximum increase of 37.5% and 30.3% respectively. The incorporation of fly ash and the increasing autoclave duration reduce the porosity of UHPC samples.

7. Dave et al., (2021) said that this document outlines the initiative surrounding Ready Mix Concrete (RMC), detailing its concept, the challenges encountered, and the opportunities available within India. RMC has become a fundamental component in the construction industry, particularly where projects demand timely and efficient completion.

While the general public is familiar with RMC and its manufacturing process, this paper provides a comprehensive review of RMC, tracing its initial concept, evolution, and contemporary applications.

Although the first RMC facility commenced operations in India in 1987, significant growth in the sector has only been observed in the past decade. The majority of RMC plants are situated in seven major cities, where they account for 30% to 60% of the total concrete consumption. On a national scale, RMC contributes approximately 5% of the overall concrete used. The increasing adoption of RMC in urban areas can be attributed to the limitations of construction space and the imperative to mitigate environmental pollution, despite its cost being 12% to 20% higher than that of site-mixed concrete. The number of RMC plants in India is expanding rapidly, with many being newly established and equipped with the latest machinery and technology.

8. Weiszer et al., (2020) said that the delivery process of ready mixed concrete (RMC) serves as a case study in multi-objective optimization, highlighting the conflicting goals of the various stakeholders. To address this challenge, a discrete event simulation model of the delivery process has been developed, utilizing input parameters derived from data collected from actual operations. The model undergoes simulation under various vehicle dispatching policies, with an emphasis on analyzing performance indicators. The findings of the research, evaluated through the lens of Pareto optimality, demonstrate that the implementation of efficient dispatching strategies can lead to a reduction in both site idle time and vehicle waiting time.

9. Rathore and Shalu, (2016) told that India, known for its industrial growth, is experiencing significant progress in its infrastructure. The production of cement plays a crucial role in this development. This has led to a growing demand for high-quality cement in large quantities. To meet this demand, there has been an increase in cement manufacturing facilities. The main goal of this research is to calculate the total cost of operating a Ready-Mix Concrete (RMC) facility, which can assist a financial analyst, an individual, or a company in making decisions about investing in an RMC facility. The study includes the costs associated with running the RMC facility, such as labor and maintenance, as well as the expenses of operating and expanding the RMC plant, which are obtained from the cement producers. Concrete mixing plants are an essential part of the RMC facility, and their operating and maintenance costs are a significant part of the total cost of running the facility. Given the daily demand from certain areas in Mumbai, the number of concrete mixing plants needed at the RMC facility to meet this demand has been estimated using Monte Carlo simulation. The total cost of operating the RMC facility has been determined. Additionally, with the findings from this study, the total cost of operating other types of RMC facilities can be calculated, and based on financial needs and access to capital, the best financial decision can be made.

III. METHODOLOGY

The methodology for this research is designed to comprehensively address the stated objectives, employing a mix of qualitative and quantitative approaches. The steps involved in the study are outlined below:

Figure 1: Flow chart of methodology

Objective 1: Investigate factors affecting high-grade concrete production and develop a checklist for concrete production and batching plant operation management.

1. Literature Review:

• Conduct an extensive review of existing studies, standards, and guidelines related to high-grade concrete production, batching plant operations, and quality control practices.
• Identify key factors influencing concrete quality, including material selection, mix design, batching accuracy, curing methods, and environmental conditions.

1. Data Collection:

• Conduct field observations and interviews with industry experts, plant operators, and quality managers at batching plants.
• Analyze operational data from multiple batching plants to identify recurring challenges and best practices.

1. Checklist Development:

• Synthesize findings to design a comprehensive checklist for concrete production and batching plant operation management.
• Validate the checklist through feedback from industry professionals and pilot implementation in select plants.

Objective 2: Examine the impact of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), specifically pulverized fuel ash (fly ash) on the performance of high-strength concrete.

1. Experimental Study:

• Prepare multiple concrete mix designs incorporating varying percentages of fly ash as a replacement for cement (e.g., 10%, 20%, 30%).
• Use standard guidelines (e.g., ASTM, IS codes) to ensure proper mix design proportions.

1. Testing Parameters:

• Conduct laboratory tests to evaluate the performance of each mix in terms of:
• Workability: Slump test.
• Strength: Compressive, tensile, and flexural strength tests at various curing ages (7, 28, and 56 days).
• Durability: Tests for permeability, chloride resistance, and shrinkage.

1. Analysis:

• Compare the results with control concrete (without fly ash) to assess the impact of fly ash.
• Perform statistical analysis to establish correlations between fly ash content and concrete properties.

Objective 3: Identify critical risks at RMC plants and recommend mitigation strategies for quality assurance.

1. Risk Identification:

• Use risk assessment tools (e.g., SWOT analysis, HAZOP) to identify potential risks affecting RMC plant operations.
• Categorize risks into material-related, process-related, and external factors.

1. Data Collection:

• Collect data through site visits, operator interviews, and incident reports from RMC plants.
• Analyze historical quality control data to identify trends and patterns in risk occurrences.

1. Risk Mitigation Strategies:

• Propose mitigation strategies for identified risks, such as improved raw material testing protocols, real-time monitoring systems, and enhanced staff training programs.
• Develop a risk management framework tailored for RMC plants.

1. Validation:

• Collaborate with RMC plants to implement proposed strategies and evaluate their effectiveness through case studies.

1. Data Analysis Techniques:

• Descriptive statistics to summarize findings.
• Correlation and regression analysis for experimental results.
• Risk prioritization techniques (e.g., probability-impact matrix).

This multi-phase methodology ensures a holistic understanding of high-grade concrete production, the impact of SCMs, and risk management, thereby addressing the research objectives comprehensively.

IV. RESULTS

The results of this study are presented in three distinct sections corresponding to the research objectives:

1) Factors Affecting High-Grade Concrete Production and Checklist Development

Key Factors Identified:

• Material Quality: Variations in cement, aggregates, and water quality significantly impacted concrete performance.
• Mix Design: Precision in mix proportions was critical to achieving desired strength and durability.
• Batching Accuracy: Automated systems outperformed manual processes in maintaining consistency.
• Operational Practices: Adherence to standardized procedures during batching, mixing, and curing improved quality control.
• Environmental Conditions: Extreme temperatures and humidity variations affected curing processes.
• Checklist Outcomes:

A comprehensive checklist was developed, covering:

• Material procurement and testing.
• Batching and mixing accuracy.
• Equipment calibration and maintenance.
• Curing protocols and storage practices.

Validation of the checklist through pilot implementation in two batching plants showed a 15-20% reduction in production inconsistencies.

2) Impact of Fly Ash on High-Strength Concrete Performance

• Workability:

Concrete mixes with 20% and 30% fly ash replacement showed a 12-18% improvement in slump values compared to control mixes, indicating better workability.

• Strength:

Compressive strength increased by 8-10% at 28 days for mixes with 20% fly ash compared to control concrete.

Long-term strength (56 days) improved by up to 15% for mixes with 30% fly ash.

• Durability:

Fly ash mixes exhibited a 20-25% reduction in permeability and higher resistance to chloride penetration, indicating enhanced durability.

Shrinkage tests showed a 10% reduction in drying shrinkage for fly ash mixes.

The results confirmed that fly ash significantly enhances the performance and sustainability of high-strength concrete when used in optimal proportions.

3)Risks at RMC Plants and Mitigation Strategies

1. Operational Risks

Risk: Inconsistent Quality of Concrete

Variability in raw materials or batching processes can lead to non-uniform concrete properties.

Mitigation Strategy:

1. Implement automated batching systems with real-time monitoring.

2. Conduct regular calibration of weighing scales and batching equipment.

3. Perform quality checks on raw materials (cement, aggregates, and admixtures).

Risk: Equipment Failures

Unplanned downtime due to mechanical or electrical failures can disrupt production schedules.

Mitigation Strategy:

1. Schedule regular maintenance and inspections of machinery.

2. Maintain a critical spare parts inventory for quick replacements.

3. Use predictive maintenance techniques leveraging IoT sensors.

1. Environmental Risks

Risk: Dust and Emissions

Generation of particulate matter and greenhouse gas emissions can impact air quality.

Mitigation Strategy:

1. Install dust suppression systems, such as bag filters and sprinklers.

1. Safety Risk

Risk: Worker Injuries

High-risk areas include mixer platforms, moving machinery, and truck-loading zones.

Mitigation Strategy:

1. Conduct routine safety training and emergency drills.

2. Enforce the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).

3. Implement safety measures like interlocks, barriers, and warning signals.

Risk: Fire and Explosion Hazards

Potential ignition of fuels, lubricants, or storage chemicals.

Mitigation Strategy:

1. Store flammable materials in designated safe areas.

2. Install fire suppression systems and maintain extinguishers.

3. Develop and communicate a comprehensive fire response plan.

4. Use covered conveyor belts and silos to minimize dust dispersion.

5. Transition to low-carbon cement and alternative fuels.

Risk: Wastewater Discharge

Improper management of wash water can contaminate local water bodies.

Mitigation Strategy:

1. Recycle wastewater for reuse in concrete production.

2. Install sedimentation tanks and filtration systems for treating wastewater.

3. Regularly audit wastewater management practices.

d) Financial and Regulatory Risks

Risk: Non-Compliance with Environmental Regulations

Failure to meet regulatory standards can result in fines and reputational damage.

Mitigation Strategy:

1. Stay updated on local and international regulations.

2. Perform regular environmental audits and compliance checks.

3. Obtain necessary certifications such as ISO 14001.

Risk: Cost Overruns

Inefficient resource use or delays can inflate costs.

Mitigation Strategy:

1. Use advanced planning and scheduling tools.

2. Employ data-driven decision-making to optimize resource allocation.

3. Monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) to identify inefficiencies.

Figure 2: Types of risks

V. OVERALL FINDINGS

The incorporation of quality control protocols, the utilization of fly ash in concrete formulations, and the implementation of risk management strategies have collectively enhanced the performance, efficiency, and sustainability of high-grade concrete production methods.

Conclusion

The production of high-quality concrete is a multifaceted process that is affected by various factors necessitating meticulous management and optimization. This research focused on three essential elements to enhance the comprehension and methodologies related to high-strength concrete production and the operations of Ready-Mix Concrete (RMC) plants. Firstly, the investigation pinpointed critical factors that influence the production of high-grade concrete, such as the selection of materials, the precision of mix design, the accuracy of batching, and the compliance with operational standards. A detailed checklist was created to function as a practical resource for ensuring consistent quality and operational effectiveness in concrete production and batching plant management. This checklist offers a systematic method for monitoring and regulating vital variables, thereby minimizing errors and upholding high production standards. Secondly, the study explored the role of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), with a particular focus on pulverized fuel ash (fly ash), in enhancing the performance of high-strength concrete. Experimental findings indicated that fly ash positively affects concrete characteristics, including workability, durability, and long-term strength, while also promoting sustainable construction practices by decreasing dependence on conventional cement. The results affirm the capability of fly ash to improve the performance of high-strength concrete and establish a foundation for its optimized application in mix designs. The research conducted has uncovered critical risks associated with RMC (Ready-Mix Concrete) plants, including material inconsistencies, process inefficiencies, and external factors such as supply chain disruptions. To address these challenges, a tailored risk management framework and mitigation strategies have been proposed. The recommendations encompass enhanced quality control protocols, real-time monitoring systems, staff training programs, and contingency planning. The implementation of these measures aims to ensure quality assurance and operational resilience in RMC plant operations. This study underscores the significance of integrating quality management, material innovation, and risk mitigation to achieve excellence in high-grade concrete production. The findings contribute to the existing knowledge in the field of construction materials and operations, providing industry practitioners with practical tools and strategies to produce sustainable, high-performance concrete while effectively mitigating risks.

References

[1] K. E. Hassan, J. G. Cabrera and R. S. Maliehe (2000), “The effect of mineral admixtures on the properties of high-performance concrete”, Journal of Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 22, pp.267-271 [2] Muhammad Asyraf bin Zailudin, Balqis bt. Omar, “The Importance of Supply Chain Management for Ready Mixed Concrete Production and Delivery Process”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 6 (2000) 169 – 178. [3] Kay Willen and Christopher Boisvert-Cotulio (2015), “Material efficiency in the design of ultra-high performance concrete”, Journal of Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 86, pp.33 – 43 [4] Ali Alsalman, Canh N. Dang and W. Micah Hale (2017), “Development of ultra-high performance concrete with locally available materials”, Journal of Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 133, pp.135–145. [5] Sukhoon Pyo, Hyeong-Ki Kim and Bang Yeon Lee (2017), “Effects of coarser fine aggregate on tensile properties of ultra-high performance concrete”, Journal of Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 84, pp.28–35. [6] Tiefeng Chen, Xiaojian Gao and Miao Ren (2018), “Effects of autoclave curing and fly ash on mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete”, Journal of Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 158, pp.864–872 [7] Dr. S. K. Dave, Shri N. K. Pandya, Shri B. V. Modi, “ready mix concrete: challenges & opportunities in India”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering, science & management, ISSN: 2394-1766, www.ijaresm.net [8] Michal Weiszer, Gabriel Fedorko, Vieroslav Molnar, Zuzana Tuckova, and Milos Poliak, “Dispatching policy evaluation for transport of ready mixed concrete”, De Gruyter , Open Eng. 2020; 10:120 –128 , https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2020-0030 [9] Mehul Rathore, Sadhana A. Shalu, “Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Readymix Concrete Plant”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, Vol. 5, Issue 4, April 2016, ISSN (Print): 2320 – 3765, ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875 [10] Jaime Alberto Sanchez Velasquez, Maria Camila Aristizabal Isaza, “simulating a ready-mix concrete plants network using multimethod approach”, 2017 Winter Simulation Conference W. K. V. Chan, A. D\'Ambrogio, G. Zacharewicz, N. Mustafee, G. Wainer, and E. Page, eds. [11] Raj A. Jadhav, Prof. Rahul Matkar, “Analysis and Assessment of the Risk Associated with Ready Mix Concrete Production in Pune Region”, Journal of Advances in Science and Technology Vol. 19, Issue No. 1, March-2022, ISSN 2230-9659 [12] Krishna H. Gupta and Ajay K. Gaikwad, “Risk Management in Ready Mixed Concrete (RMC) Plant by Using FMEA and ANP”, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Applications (IJA-ERA) ISSN: 2454-2377 Volume – 7, Issue – 2, June – 2021 [13] D.V.Swetha, V.V.sravan kumar, Dr.K.Rajashekar , “Case study on manufacturing of concrete from ready mix concrete plant and cost analysis on fly ash blended concrete,” , International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 11, November-2014 1220 ISSN 2229-5518 [14] Katerina Kermeli, Ernst Worrell, Eric Masanet, “Saving Energy in Ready Mixed Concrete Production,” ENERGY STAR® Quick Guide for Managing Energy, August 2013 [15] Vijaykumar Baheti, Dr. A.B.More, Prof. D.B.Bhosale, Pooja Shinde, “risk management technique of ready mix concrete plants”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 [16] Karthik Prabhu.R, Sampath Kumar.K, “A review on factors involved in equipment quality and management in ready mix concrete”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 05 Issue: 02 | Feb-2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 [17] Rahul Kumar, Dr. J.P. Tegar, “Critical Analysis of Properties of Ready Mix Concrete with Site Mix Concrete of Smart Road Project”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 05 Issue: 06 | June-2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 [18] Apoorva Anand Hanje, Amey A. Kelkar, “Planning and cost analysis for setting up of a new rmc plant near Belagavi,”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 09 Issue: 10 | Oct 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 [19] Mr. Krishna H. Gupta, Dr. Ajay K. Gaikwad, “Optimization of dispatching schedule of ready mixed concrete (rmc) plant for multi-plant and multi-site operation condition: a literature review”, JETIR May 2021, Volume 8, Issue 5 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) [20] Dr Andrew Dunster, Kim Noonan, “Ready-Mixed Concrete: A Resource Efficiency Action Plan”, BRMCA (2014) [21] Amiyangshu Biswas, Shouvik Kumar Sen, “Study on Ready Mix Concrete”, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 4, April-2016 157 ISSN 2229-5518 IJSER [22] Sudeshna Wawhal, Abhijit Warudkar“Productivity of Batching Plant and Quality of Concrete Production”, International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, ISSN: 2454-132X, Volume 3, Issue 1, 2017 [23] N. A. Soliman and A. Tagnit-Hamou (2016), “Development of ultra-high-performance concrete using glass powder, towards ecofriendly concrete”, Journal of Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 125, pp. 600–612. [24] Jedadiah F. Burroughs, Jay Shannon, Todd S. Rushing, Kevin Yi, Quinn B. Gutierrez and Danny W. Harrelson (2017), “Potential of finely ground limestone powder to benefit ultra-high performance concrete mixtures”, Journal of Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 141, pp.335–342. [25] Josef Fladr, Petr Bily and Jan Vodicka (2016), “Experimental testing of resistance of ultra-high performance concrete to environmental loads”, Journal of Procedia Engineering, Vol. 151, pp.170 – 176. [26] Mohamadreza Shafieifar, Mahsa Farzad and Atorod Azizinamini (2017), “Experimental and numerical study on mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC)”, Journal of Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 156, pp.402–411.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Ashok P. Mungase, Pravin D. Nemade. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.