The Role of Blockchain in Enhancing Cross-Border Transactions: A Comparative Study of Emerging and Developed Markets

Abstract

Cross-border transactions are critical to global trade and economic integration, yet traditional financial systems face significant challenges, including high costs, lengthy processing times, lack of transparency, and security risks. This study explores the role of blockchain in enhancing cross-border transactions, offering a comparative analysis between emerging and developed markets. By leveraging decentralized ledger technology (DLT), smart contracts, and cryptographic security, blockchain presents a transformative solution to address inefficiencies in international payments. Using a mixed-methods research approach, this study analyses primary data from industry experts and financial institutions alongside secondary data from regulatory reports, academic literature, and blockchain adoption case studies. Findings indicate that blockchain reduces transaction times from multiple days to minutes, with transaction fees dropping from 10% to less than 2%. The technology also enhances security by reducing fraud risks and eliminating chargeback disputes. However, blockchain adoption varies across economies. Developed markets prioritize institutional integration and regulatory compliance, while emerging markets focus on financial inclusion, remittances, and decentralized finance (DeFi) solutions. Despite its advantages, regulatory uncertainty, scalability limitations, and cybersecurity concerns hinder widespread adoption. Moreover, the emergence of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) presents a competing framework for digital payments. This study concludes that blockchain has the potential to revolutionize cross-border transactions, provided that regulatory harmonization, interoperability, and cybersecurity risks are effectively managed. Future research should explore the impact of CBDCs, blockchain scalability, and privacy regulations to ensure sustainable adoption in the global financial landscape.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Background and Significance

Cross-border transactions are the backbone of global trade and financial flows, yet they have long been plagued by inefficiencies, high costs, and security concerns. Traditional banking systems, financial intermediaries, and regulatory frameworks impose complex procedures that often result in delays, increased transaction fees, and lack of transparency. Blockchain technology, with its decentralized, immutable, and transparent characteristics, has emerged as a transformative force in addressing these challenges (Nakamoto, 2008; Tapscott & Tapscott, 2016). Developed and emerging markets present distinct financial ecosystems, regulatory frameworks, and technological infrastructures that influence the adoption and effectiveness of blockchain technology in cross-border transactions. While developed markets such as the United States, the European Union, and Japan benefit from well-established financial systems, emerging markets like India, Brazil, and Nigeria grapple with challenges such as limited banking access, weak regulatory oversight, and currency instability (World Bank, 2022). However, blockchain presents opportunities to bridge these gaps, enabling financial inclusion and efficiency improvements across borders (Peters & Panayi, 2016).

B. Conceptualizing Blockchain in Cross-Border Transactions

Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology (DLT) that ensures secure, transparent, and tamper-proof record-keeping without the need for central authorities (Swan, 2015). In cross-border payments, blockchain facilitates real-time settlements, reduces reliance on intermediaries, and mitigates fraud risks. Smart contracts, an integral feature of blockchain, allow for automated execution of financial agreements without third-party intervention, thereby enhancing trust and efficiency (Buterin, 2013).

In traditional banking systems, cross-border payments involve multiple intermediaries, including correspondent banks and clearinghouses, leading to prolonged processing times and increased transaction costs (Bech & Garratt, 2017). Blockchain-based solutions such as Ripple (XRP), Stellar, and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) offer an alternative by enabling near-instantaneous, cost-effective international transactions (Gandal et al., 2018). The ability of blockchain to overcome barriers in financial transactions makes it a compelling subject for comparative analysis across different economic contexts.

C. Comparative Analysis: Emerging vs. Developed Markets

Blockchain adoption and its impact on cross-border transactions vary significantly between developed and emerging economies due to regulatory, infrastructural, and economic differences.

1) Developed Markets: Regulatory Compliance and Institutional Adoption

Developed economies have stringent financial regulations, sophisticated banking infrastructures, and established payment networks. The introduction of blockchain in these markets has been met with regulatory scrutiny, focusing on compliance, anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, and cybersecurity measures (Zohar, 2015). The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation and the United States’ Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversight of crypto-assets are examples of regulatory measures shaping blockchain adoption in these regions (ECB, 2023).

Despite regulatory hurdles, financial institutions in developed markets have embraced blockchain for cross-border transactions. For example, JPMorgan’s blockchain-based payment network, Onyx, and the adoption of RippleNet by major banks demonstrate how blockchain is integrated into institutional frameworks (Ali et al., 2020). The emphasis in these economies is on regulatory compliance, interoperability with existing financial systems, and security enhancements.

2) Emerging Markets: Financial Inclusion and Economic Empowerment

Emerging economies face significant barriers to efficient cross-border transactions, including high remittance costs, lack of financial access, and currency volatility (World Bank, 2021). Blockchain offers a solution by reducing reliance on traditional banking infrastructure and providing decentralized financial services (DeFi) that enable direct peer-to-peer transactions (Chuen et al., 2018).

For instance, Nigeria, the Philippines, and India have witnessed increased adoption of blockchain-powered remittance services through platforms like Stellar and Bitcoin Lightning Network, which provide low-cost alternatives to conventional remittance services such as Western Union (Gupta & Bose, 2021). Furthermore, blockchain facilitates trade financing for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in emerging markets by providing transparent, secure, and efficient mechanisms for international transactions (Miller, 2020).

D.  Key Challenges in Blockchain Adoption

Despite its advantages, the adoption of blockchain in cross-border transactions faces several challenges, including regulatory uncertainty, scalability limitations, and cybersecurity risks.

1) Regulatory and Compliance Barriers

Governments and financial regulators worldwide grapple with developing standardized regulations for blockchain-based transactions. While some nations, such as Switzerland and Singapore, have established crypto-friendly regulations, others impose restrictions due to concerns over illicit financial activities (OECD, 2022). A lack of uniform regulations creates uncertainty and hinders the widespread adoption of blockchain in cross-border payments (Catalini & Gans, 2016).

2) Scalability and Transaction Speed

Public blockchain networks, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, experience scalability issues due to high transaction volumes and processing limitations. Ethereum’s transition to a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism (Ethereum 2.0) aims to address these challenges, but concerns over transaction speed and energy efficiency remain (Buterin, 2022). Layer-2 solutions and private blockchains offer potential remedies but require further adoption and optimization (Narayanan et al., 2016).

3) Cybersecurity and Fraud Risks

While blockchain enhances security through cryptographic encryption and decentralization, it is not immune to cyber threats. Smart contract vulnerabilities, hacking incidents, and fraudulent initial coin offerings (ICOs) pose risks to users and institutions (Kharif, 2018). Strengthening security frameworks, implementing robust governance models, and promoting user awareness are essential to mitigating these risks (Lansky, 2018).

E. The Future of Blockchain in Cross-Border Transactions

Blockchain technology continues to evolve, with advancements in interoperability, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and institutional adoption driving its future in cross-border transactions.

1) Interoperability and Global Standardization

The lack of interoperability among different blockchain networks poses a barrier to seamless cross-border payments. Emerging solutions such as Polkadot, Cosmos, and Hyperledger Fabric aim to address this challenge by enabling cross-chain transactions and integration with existing financial infrastructures (Belinky et al., 2015). Establishing global blockchain standards will further enhance its effectiveness in international transactions (Wüst & Gervais, 2018).

2) Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and Blockchain Adoption

CBDCs represent a significant development in the blockchain ecosystem, with central banks exploring their implementation to enhance financial efficiency and inclusion. China’s digital yuan (e-CNY), the European Central Bank’s digital euro initiative, and the U.S. Federal Reserve’s research into digital currencies highlight the growing importance of blockchain in state-backed monetary systems (Bank of International Settlements, 2022). CBDCs have the potential to streamline cross-border transactions by reducing intermediary costs and enhancing financial transparency (Auer et al., 2021).

3) Institutional and Retail Adoption Trends

The increasing adoption of blockchain by multinational corporations, financial institutions, and retail users signals a shift toward mainstream acceptance. Companies like IBM, Mastercard, and Visa are integrating blockchain into their cross-border payment solutions to enhance efficiency and security (Kshetri, 2018). As regulatory clarity improves and technological advancements address existing challenges, blockchain is poised to revolutionize the global financial landscape (Yermack, 2017).

II. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A. Research Design

A comparative case study approach is used to examine the implementation, challenges, and benefits of blockchain in cross-border transactions in different economic settings. The study compares financial infrastructures, regulatory frameworks, and technological adoption between developed markets (e.g., the U.S., EU, Japan) and emerging markets (e.g., India, Brazil, Nigeria).

B. Data Collection Methods

1. Primary Data
   • Structured interviews with blockchain experts, policymakers, and financial industry professionals.
   • Surveys with financial institutions and blockchain adopters to assess transaction efficiency, cost reduction, and security improvements.
2. Secondary Data
   • Analysis of blockchain adoption reports from the World Bank, BIS, OECD, IMF, and financial technology research institutes.
   • Literature review of academic journals, regulatory documents, white papers, and case studies on blockchain-driven financial innovation.

C. Data Analysis

1. Qualitative Analysis: Thematic coding of interviews and literature to identify key trends and regulatory concerns.
2. Quantitative Analysis: Statistical comparison of transaction costs, processing time, and financial inclusion metrics across markets using blockchain-based and traditional financial systems.

D. Ethical Considerations

All primary data collection follows informed consent protocols, ensuring the confidentiality of participants and compliance with international ethical research guidelines.

This methodology enables a balanced evaluation of blockchain’s role in transforming cross-border transactions across diverse economic landscapes.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. Efficiency of Blockchain in Cross-Border Transactions

One of the primary advantages of blockchain is its ability to enhance transaction speed compared to traditional banking systems. Table 1 compares the average transaction time for different payment methods across emerging and developed markets.

Table 1: Average Transaction Time for Cross-Border Payments (2024 Estimates)

Discussion

• Traditional banking systems in developed markets still require 24–72 hours for cross-border transactions due to multiple intermediary verifications.
• Emerging markets face longer delays (up to 5 days) due to weak banking infrastructure and slower processing by intermediary banks.
• Blockchain-based transactions (e.g., Ripple, Stellar) significantly reduce transaction time, with near real-time settlements in both developed and emerging markets.

B. Cost-Effectiveness: Blockchain vs. Traditional Methods

Cross-border payments incur high processing fees in traditional banking systems due to intermediary involvement. Table 2 presents a comparison of transaction fees across different payment methods.

Table 2: Average Transaction Costs for Cross-Border Payments (2024 Estimates, % of Transaction Amount)

Discussion

• Traditional banking fees remain high due to correspondent bank charges, conversion fees, and compliance costs.
• Remittance services (e.g., Western Union) have higher fees (7–15%), especially in emerging markets, making remittances costly for migrant workers.
• Blockchain transactions significantly reduce fees (0.5–2%) by eliminating intermediaries and enabling direct peer-to-peer payments.

C. Security and Transparency

Security in financial transactions is crucial for preventing fraud, money laundering, and unauthorized access. Table 3 compares the fraud rates and security risks in traditional and blockchain-based systems.

Table 3: Security Risks in Cross-Border Transactions

Discussion

• Traditional systems have higher fraud rates (5–7%) due to unauthorized access and identity theft in bank transactions.
• Chargeback fraud, a common problem in credit card payments, does not exist in blockchain transactions due to immutable records.
• Blockchain enhances transparency through immutable transaction records, but money laundering concerns still exist due to anonymity in certain crypto transactions.

D. Regulatory Challenges in Blockchain Adoption

Regulatory challenges remain a significant barrier to blockchain adoption. Table 4 summarizes the regulatory stance of major economies.

Table 4: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Regulatory Environment (2024)

Discussion

• Developed markets like the U.S. and EU have clear regulations but impose strict AML/KYC compliance requirements on crypto transactions.
• China banned cryptocurrencies but launched its own CBDC (digital yuan) to maintain control over digital payments.
• Emerging economies like Nigeria and India face regulatory uncertainty, affecting blockchain adoption rates.
• The rise of CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies) in developed and emerging markets indicates a government-led approach to digital payments.

E. Adoption Trends: Institutional vs. Individual Usage

Blockchain adoption varies between financial institutions and individual users in developed and emerging markets. Table 5 highlights adoption trends across different user categories.

Table 5: Blockchain Adoption by User Type (%)

Discussion

• Developed markets see higher institutional adoption (60% of banks use blockchain), mainly for interbank settlements.
• Emerging markets have higher individual adoption (75%), especially for remittances and financial inclusion.
• FinTech startups are driving blockchain adoption across both markets, leveraging decentralized finance (DeFi) solutions.

F. Key Takeaways and Discussion

1. Speed & Cost Efficiency: Blockchain-based payments reduce transaction time from days to minutes and cut costs from 10% to below 2%, benefiting emerging markets with low-cost remittance solutions.
2. Security & Transparency: Blockchain significantly reduces fraud risks and eliminates chargebacks due to its immutable ledger. However, privacy concerns remain due to crypto anonymity in some transactions.
3. Regulatory Landscape
   • Developed markets impose strict regulations but promote institutional adoption (e.g., JPMorgan, Visa).
   • Emerging economies face unclear policies, slowing blockchain adoption.
   • The rise of CBDCs suggests governments prefer state-controlled digital currencies over decentralized cryptocurrencies.
4. Adoption Trends
   • Developed Markets → Blockchain is used for banking, interbank settlements, and enterprise transactions.
   • Emerging Markets → Blockchain adoption is retail-driven, focusing on financial inclusion, remittances, and small business payments.

Conclusion

Blockchain technology is transforming cross-border transactions by offering speed, cost-effectiveness, security, and transparency, addressing the inefficiencies of traditional financial systems. This comparative study highlights that while developed markets prioritize institutional adoption, regulatory compliance, and interoperability, emerging markets focus on financial inclusion, low-cost remittances, and decentralized financial solutions. The findings demonstrate that blockchain-based transactions significantly reduce processing times from days to minutes, eliminating the reliance on multiple intermediaries. Transaction costs are also reduced from 10% to below 2%, benefiting both businesses and individuals, particularly in remittance-heavy economies. The security benefits of blockchain, including fraud prevention and immutable ledgers, further enhance its appeal for cross-border payments. However, blockchain adoption is not without challenges. Regulatory uncertainty remains a critical barrier, with different countries taking divergent approaches. Developed economies enforce strict AML/KYC regulations, while emerging markets experience policy instability, affecting adoption rates. Additionally, concerns over scalability, cybersecurity, and privacy regulations must be addressed for blockchain to become a mainstream financial solution. The study also highlights the growing role of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) in both market types, signalling a government-driven push toward digital payments. However, their impact on decentralized cryptocurrencies remains uncertain. Going forward, further research is needed to evaluate blockchain interoperability, assess CBDC effectiveness, and mitigate cybersecurity risks. Overall, blockchain presents a revolutionary solution for global financial transactions, offering efficiency, security, and inclusion, provided that regulatory and technological challenges are effectively managed.

References

[1] Ali, R., Barrdear, J., Clews, R., & Southgate, J. (2020). The economics of digital currencies. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 54(3), 209–225. [2] Auer, R., Cornelli, G., & Frost, J. (2021). Rise of the central bank digital currencies: Drivers, approaches, and technologies. Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Working Paper No. 880. [3] Bank of International Settlements. (2022). CBDCs: An opportunity for the monetary system. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org [4] Bech, M. L., & Garratt, R. (2017). Central bank cryptocurrencies. Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Quarterly Review, 53, 55–70. [5] Belinky, M., Rennick, E., & Veitch, A. (2015). The future of financial infrastructure: An ambitious look at how blockchain can reshape financial services. World Economic Forum. [6] Buterin, V. (2013). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Ethereum White Paper. Retrieved from https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper [7] Buterin, V. (2022). The merge and the future of Ethereum. Ethereum Foundation Blog. Retrieved from https://blog.ethereum.org [8] Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2016). Some simple economics of the blockchain. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 22952. [9] Chuen, D. L. K., Guo, L., & Wang, Y. (2018). Cryptocurrency: A new investment opportunity? The Journal of Alternative Investments, 20(3), 16–40. [10] European Central Bank (ECB). (2023). Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation and the future of digital finance in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu [11] Gandal, N., Hamrick, J. T., Moore, T., & Oberman, T. (2018). Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Journal of Monetary Economics, 95, 86–96. [12] Gupta, S., & Bose, P. (2021). Blockchain-based remittance services: A financial inclusion enabler for emerging economies. Journal of Financial Technology, 4(1), 1–15. [13] Kharif, O. (2018). The rise and fall of initial coin offerings. Bloomberg Businessweek, 466(2), 45–48. [14] Kshetri, N. (2018). Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 80–89. [15] Lansky, J. (2018). Possible state approaches to cryptocurrencies. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 26(3), 323–336. [16] Miller, T. (2020). Blockchain and trade finance: The transformation of cross-border transactions. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 18(2), 115–130. [17] Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Bitcoin White Paper. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [18] Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press. [19] OECD. (2022). Blockchain technology and financial regulation: Challenges and policy approaches. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Report. [20] Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is changing the world. Penguin Random House.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Anuja Pathak, Neeraj Topkhane, Shaheen Khan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.