Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Anusuri Uma Maheswari, M. Pavan Kumar, Pooja Kumari, G.V. Tanuj Varma, G. Haritha, M. Venu Gopal, P. Gayatri, B. Divya
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.44576
Certificate: View Certificate
Infrastructure projects such as highways, railways, water reservoirs etc, requires earth materials in very large quantities. The foundation should have sufficient strength to support any land based structure. The soil surrounding the foundation plays a very important role. The strength of soil should be maintained according to the loading conditions. One of the most important aspect for construction purpose is to improve the soil strength i.e; stabilizing soil. Here, in this paper, soil stabilization is done by mixing of soil with the chemical treated rice straws fibers. The main motive of this analysis is to find out the utilization of waste rice straw fiber materials in foundation construction without open burning of waste so we can reduce the pollution which create by the open burning of rice straw in the fields.
I. INTRODUCTION
Different types of soil present in India and every soil has its own characteristics. Some soils have good physical and mechanical properties and some soils have good fertility characteristics. According to the point of view of a geotechnical engineer, the soil should have good bearing capacity but such type of soil is not present in overall country so the soil reinforcement word has been introduce to solve this problem. Soil reinforcement can be define as the inserting of a strengthen material into the soil to increase the bearing capacity and stability characteristics of soil.
Soil stabilization involves the use of stabilizing agents (binder materials) in weak soils to improve its geotechnical properties such as compressibility, strength, permeability and durability. The components of stabilization technology include soils and or soil minerals and stabilizing agent or binders (cementitious materials). Soil stabilization aims at improving soil strength and increasing resistance to softening by water through bonding the soil particles together, water proofing the particles or combination of the two Usually, the technology provides an alternative provision structural solution to a practical problem.
Agricultural residue burning is a very big issue in worldwide because it creates lots off negative impact on our environment. It creates air pollution by increasing the amount of carbon in environment due to burning which cause climatic changes and global warming. The rice straw burning is a cause of methane emission. In this study we are analyzing rice straw because Rice straw ash have the good concentration of SiO2 as 40.07% .and 27.5% content of K2O.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
III. MATERIALS
A. Red Clay Soil
Red soils, generally called red clay soils, the red color of which results from the presence of iron oxide. It is considered an eco-friendly material, with many industrial, cosmetic, and architectural uses. Red soils, occupying about 66 percent of the State’s land area, are formed from granites, gneisses. The red clay soil sample is collected from Chaitanya Engineering College, kommadi, Visakhapatnam.
B. Rice Straw
Rice straw is a rice by-product produced when harvesting paddy. Each kg of milled rice produced results in roughly 0.7–1.4 kg of rice straw depending on varieties, cutting-height of the stubbles, and moisture content during harvest. Rice straw is separated from the grains after the plants are threshed either manually, using stationary threshers or, more recently, by using combine harvesters. The rice straw is collected from local shops.
IV. EXPERIMENTAL WORK
Soil sample location: Chaitanya Engineering College, Kommadi, Visakhapatnam,.
Rice Straw: Collected from local retailers
A. Mix Proportions
Rice Straw cleaned and dipped in NaOH solution and then dried it for some time and later used in soil sample.
Table 1: Proportion of Soil Samples
Sample No. |
Identification of Soil Samples |
% Rice Straw Added |
1. |
RCS0.0S |
0% |
2. |
RCS0.5S |
0.5% |
3. |
RCS1.0S |
1.0% |
4. |
RCS1.5S |
1.5% |
5. |
RCS2.0S |
2.0% |
6. |
RCS2.5S |
2.5% |
7. |
RCS3.0S |
3.0% |
???????B. Tests Conducted on Soil Specimen
V. TEST RESULTS
Table 2: Liquid Limit values of soil samples with varying percentages of Rice Straw
Soil Sample |
Liquid Limit |
RCS0.0S |
27.00% |
RCS0.5S |
29.39% |
RCS1.0S |
30.73% |
RCS1.5S |
32.00% |
RCS2.0S |
29.05% |
RCS2.5S |
28.00% |
RCS3.0S |
27.90% |
Table 3: Plastic Limit values of soil samples with varying percentages of Rice Straw
Soil Sample |
Plastic Limit |
RCS0.0S |
22.58% |
RCS0.5S |
25.51% |
RCS1.0S |
27.66% |
RCS1.5S |
29.13% |
RCS2.0S |
27.38% |
RCS2.5S |
25.03% |
RCS3.0S |
24.67% |
Table 4: Grain Size Analysis by Dry Sieve Method
S.No. |
IS Sieve
|
Mass of Soil Retained (gms) |
Mass of Percentage of Soil Retained (%) |
Cumulative Percentage of Mass of Soil Retained (%) |
Finer (%) |
1. |
4.75 mm |
42 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
95.8 |
2. |
2.80 mm |
24 |
2.4 |
6.6 |
93.4 |
3. |
2.36 mm |
10 |
1 |
7.6 |
92.4 |
4. |
1.40 mm |
30 |
3 |
10.6 |
89.4 |
5. |
1.18 mm |
30 |
3 |
13.6 |
86.4 |
6. |
600 µ |
208 |
20.8 |
34.4 |
65.6 |
7. |
300 µ |
312 |
31.2 |
65.6 |
34.4 |
8. |
150 µ |
262 |
26.2 |
91.8 |
8.2 |
9. |
90 µ |
48 |
4.8 |
96.6 |
3.4 |
10. |
75 µ |
14 |
1.4 |
98.0 |
2.0 |
11. |
Pan |
20 |
2 |
100 |
0 |
Table 4: Grain Size Analysis by Wet Sieve Method
S.No. |
IS Sieve
|
Mass of Soil Retained (gms) |
Mass of Percentage of Soil Retained (%) |
Cumulative Percentage of Mass of Soil Retained (%) |
Finer (%) |
1. |
4.75 mm |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
2. |
2.80 mm |
10 |
1 |
1 |
99 |
3. |
2.36 mm |
0 |
0 |
1 |
99 |
4. |
1.40 mm |
20 |
2 |
3 |
97 |
5. |
1.18 mm |
20 |
2 |
5 |
95 |
6. |
600 µ |
136 |
13.6 |
18.6 |
81.4 |
7. |
300 µ |
208 |
20.8 |
39.4 |
60.6 |
8. |
150 µ |
226 |
22.6 |
62.0 |
38 |
9. |
90 µ |
76 |
7.6 |
69.6 |
30.4 |
10. |
75 µ |
14 |
1.4 |
71.0 |
29 |
11. |
Pan |
290 |
29 |
100 |
0 |
Table 5: IS Light Weight Compaction Test values of soil samples with varying percentages of Rice Straw
Soil Sample |
Maximum Dry Density (MDD) gm/cc |
Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) % |
RCS0.0S |
2.30 |
12% |
RCS0.5S |
2.10 |
4.0% |
RCS1.0S |
2.10 |
4.0% |
RCS1.5S |
2.00 |
6.0% |
RCS2.0S |
1.90 |
4.5% |
RCS2.5S |
1.90 |
6.0% |
RCS3.0S |
1.70 |
6.0% |
Table 6: California Bearing Ratio test values of soil samples with varying percentages of Rice Straw
Soil Sample |
CBR @ 2.5 mm Penetration(%) |
CBR @ 5.0 mm Penetration(%) |
RCS0.0S |
3.19 |
2.43 |
RCS0.5S |
3.60 |
3.00 |
RCS1.0S |
7.80 |
6.98 |
RCS1.5S |
14.61 |
13.70 |
RCS2.0S |
8.22 |
8.06 |
RCS2.5S |
7.98 |
7.67 |
RCS3.0S |
7.34 |
7.00 |
???????
On the basis of present experimental study, the following conclusions are drawn: A. Based on Liquid Limit test on soil sample, with rice straw of 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5% and 3% the increase in liquid limit value was found to be 27.00%, 29.39%, 30.73%, 32.00%, 29.05%, 28.00% and 27.90%. But beyond 1.5% the liquid limit value decreases to 27.90% at 3% rice straw. (illustrated in Chart-1). B. Based on Plastic Limit test on soil sample, with rice straw of 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5% and 3% the increase in plastic limit value was found to be 22.58%, 25.51%, 27.66%, 29.13%, 27.38%, 25.03% and 24.67%. But beyond 1.5% the plastic limit value decreases to 24.67% at 3% rice straw. (illustrated in Chart-2). C. Based on IS Light Weight Compaction test on soil sample, with rice straw of 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5% and 3% the increase in maximum dry density value was found to be 27.00%, 29.39%, 30.73%, 32.00%, 29.05%, 28.00% and 27.90%. But beyond 1.5% the maximum dry density value decreases to 27.90% at 3% rice straw. (illustrated in Chart-3). D. Based on California Bearing Ratio test on soil sample, with rice straw of 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5% and 3%, the CBR value @ 2.5mm penetration was found to be 3.19%, 3.60%, 7.80%, 14.61%, 8.22%, 7.98% and 7.34% and CBR value @ 5.0 mm penetration was found to be 2.43%, 3.00%, 6.98%, 13.70%, 8.06%, 7.67% and 7.00% . But beyond 1.5% the CBR value @ 2.5mm penetration was found to be decreases to 7.34%, CBR value @ 5.0 mm penetration was found to be decreases to 7.00% at 3% rice straw. (illustrated in Chart-4). E. Overall it can be concluded that fiber reinforced soil can be considered to be good ground improvement technique specially in engineering projects on weak soils and the optimum % of rice straw was found to be 1.5%.
[1] Nidhi Gautam, Sohit Agrawal, Mukesh Pandey, Nikhil Nandwani ,“ Effect of Mixing of Rice Straw to Enhance the Characteristics of Soil”, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), vol 9, issue 8, June 2020, pp:656-658. [2] Serin Issac, Neethu Elizabeth John, “Stabilization of Expansive Kuttanad clay using Lime treated Rice straw fibres”, International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), vol 6, issue 2, Feb 2018. [3] B. C Punmia, Seventh Edition, “Soil mechanics and foundation”, Luxmi Publication, New Delhi, (2017). [4] Aditya Kumar Anupama, Praveen Kumar and G D Ransinchung R N, “Use of Various Agricultural and Industrial Waste Materials in Road Construction”, Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of Transportation Research Group of India (2nd CTRG), IIT Roorkee,India, (2013) 264-273. [5] Junjun LIU, Chanjuan JIA and Chunxia HE, “Flexural properties of Rice Straw and Starch Composites”, Proceedings of the AASR Conference on Modeling, Identification and Control China, (2012) 89-94. [6] IS: 2720 (Part – 3), 1980 – Determination of Specific gravity. [7] IS: 2720 (Part – 4), 1965 – Determination of Sieve analysis. [8] IS: 2720 (Part – 5), 1985 – Determination of Liquid limit and plastic limit. [9] IS: 2720 (Part – 7, 8), 1980 – Determination of water content – Dry density of water reaction using light compaction and using heavy compaction. [10] IS: 2720 (Part – 31), 1990 – Determination of CBR
Copyright © 2022 Anusuri Uma Maheswari, M. Pavan Kumar, Pooja Kumari, G.V. Tanuj Varma, G. Haritha, M. Venu Gopal, P. Gayatri, B. Divya. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET44576
Publish Date : 2022-06-19
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here