Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Krishan Lal Grover
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.40076
Certificate: View Certificate
Due to COVID-19 pandemic, educational establishments all over the world have been forced to experiment with e-learning. Delivering classes via an online mode has created problem for both institutions and students. The purpose of this paper was to conduct a survey to learn about students\' perspectives and their experiences with online classes and blended learning mode as well. The survey comprises of 200 students from school, college and university level having 65 percent of males and 35 percent of females. Further 55 students were examined through experimental and control groups to find the effectiveness of blended learning mode. The results of the survey reveal that online learning proves to be a comfortable mode for students\' safeguard learning during pandemics situations but it cannot be an alternate of traditional learning. When compared to the control group who were taught using the traditional method, the results show that the experimental group who were exposed to the blended learning programme improved academic accomplishment substantially. It shows that the new blended learning strategies used in the classroom have increased the ability to teach and learn more effectively.
I. INTRODUCTION
The epidemic of COVID-19 has wreaked havoc on the educational system. Educational institutions (primary, secondary, and higher education) were compelled to lock their doors and explore new ways of teaching and learning (Liguori and Winkler, 2020). One significant change has been focused on teaching and learning stratagems, i.e. a shift from masterclasses to telematics classes in order to make education more accessible to all students and allow them to complete their education without interruption. This development has inevitably altered the pedagogy utilised by teachers and instructors, who have had to make use of a variety of technological tools. In reality, "going online" is the present necessity of the hour. Although before the pandemic, changes in society, student expectations, and technology were already prompting university and college academics and instructors to reconsider pedagogy and instructional approaches. Now, the learning needs to be reviewed broadly and systematically. The advancement of new communication technologies offers an electronic network utilising electronic technologies, such as email, websites, multimedia, and information from the internet as a tool and method for providing learning experiences. E-learning materials are designed to effectively facilitate the achievement of the desired learning outcome for learners. It is a learning approach that is based on formalised instruction but uses electronic resources. In the present epidemic environment, the online mode is the major source of teaching and learning, but a number of studies have found some deficiencies in this mode. Therefore, it is observed that teaching and learning should be done through be through internal mode i.e traditional face-to-face teaching, external mode i.e. online learning, and mixed/ blended mode. “Blended learning? involves a combination of face-to-face and an online component of technology-based learning.
II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
As a result of the disastrous COVID-19 epidemic, educational institutions around the world have migrated from traditional classrooms to online learning and teaching. Most academics and students favour the old approach. According to Wargadinata et al. (2020), Wendelboe et al. (2020), and Zhang et al. (2020), traditional face-to-face learning is the most preferred system of learning. Brzycki & Dudt (2005) indicated that most teachers prefer face-to-face teaching to e-teaching since it allows for more interpersonal interaction. Moreover, instructors are also concerned about recognition and administrative support. Transitioning to online learning presents a new difficulty for both academics and students. Academics who teach using e-learning, on the other hand, confront a number of obstacles, including the need for new media skills, a lack of trustworthy technology infrastructure and support services, and the requirement for innovative pedagogical approaches. According to Dawadi et al. (2020), in low-income countries, online learning is likely to exacerbate already existing inequities due to large socioeconomic and educational/literacy disparities in the population. Moreover, the implementation of digitization would deepen the disparities between advantaged and underprivileged pupils even more due to unequal access to e-learning and e-resources.
Wahid et al. (2020) revealed that online learning is more effective than traditional learning. Because of the flexibility in terms of place and time, allowing advanced interactions between instructors and learners, as well as the convenience of accessing learning resources online and through e-learning, have become the preferred options (Ananaga, 2020). According to John Watson (2008), "blended learning," which combines the finest parts of online and face-to-face education, is likely to emerge as the dominant teaching paradigm of the future. As per El-Deghaidy and Nouby (2008), students in the blended mode obtain much greater levels of accomplishment than students who study in the traditional mode. Chen and Jones (2007) found in their study that, students in collaborative groups during a blended learning class were more productive and satisfied than in a traditional environment. Eddie Gulc (2006) suggests that blending both e-learning and online learning benefits the learners to the maximum extent.
A. The Present Study
Educational institutions throughout the globe have been compelled to experiment with e-learning since traditional class-based learning is restricted under COVID-19 guidelines (Demuyakor, 2020; Ratten, 2020). A variety of stakeholders, including government officials, academic staff, students, and parents, are worried about whether the change from classroom to online learning will yield the intended results. While it is expected that the widespread adoption of online learning will present new obstacles, the potential for innovation in the higher education industry should never be disregarded during these difficult times. This paper examines the student’s perception and experience related to online classes as well as the effectiveness of the blended learning programme as an e-learning development in education.
B. Objectives of the Study
III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The data was collected using an online survey approach to learn about different students' perspectives towards online learning. The efficiency of online learning using various teaching systems was evaluated using a structured questionnaires. Students were polled on how they felt about taking online learning. A total of 200 students from school, undergraduate and postgraduate institutions, with 65 percent of males and 35 percent of females, were included in the sample of the study.
Furthermore, in order to assess the effectiveness of the Blended Learning programme on academic achievement, 55 participants were grouped into experimental and control groups both having pretest and post-test groups. The experimental group was taught using a blended learning programme, whereas the control group was taught the identical study material using traditional methods. The same teacher instructed both groups. Both parametric and non-parametric tests such as the t-test, the Wilcoxon Sign Rank test, and the Mann Whitney U test are used for the analysis using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 19).
IV. DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA
A. Students’ Perception Towards Online Learning
The replies of 200 students from various educational institutes in Haryana were placed on a five-point Likert scale for further analysis and interpretation. The respondents included school-going students, undergraduate students, and postgraduate students, and all these respondents are presently attending online classes for their various subjects.
Table-1: Frequency of the Respondents with educational level
Student Category |
Frequency |
Percentage |
School |
50 |
25 |
Graduation |
100 |
50 |
Post Graduation |
50 |
25 |
Total |
200 |
100 |
Table 1 depicts the respondent students' category and the number of respondents who answered their perspective on online class learning. There are 25% of students studying at the school level, 50% of undergraduate courses, and 25% of postgraduate courses among those who responded.
Table-2: Age group of Respondents
Student Category |
Frequency |
Percentage |
6-16 years |
42 |
21 |
17-21 years |
112 |
56 |
21years and above |
46 |
23 |
Total |
200 |
100 |
Table 2 shows the number of respondents from various age groups who shared their opinions on online class learning. Among them, 21% of students were in the 6 to 16 year age group, 56% of respondents were in the 17 to 21 year age group, and the remaining 46% of students belonged to the more than 21 year age group.
Table-3: Experience about online learning environment
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative |
Excellent |
22 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
Good |
58 |
29 |
29 |
40 |
Natural |
38 |
19 |
19 |
59 |
Fair |
52 |
26 |
26 |
85 |
Poor |
30 |
15 |
15 |
100 |
Total |
200 |
100 |
100 |
|
Table 3 shows the number of students who answered the statement regarding their online learning environment experience. This learning experience was rated as satisfactory by 40% of the students.
Table -4 Difference between online digital learning and traditional offline learning
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
Disagree |
16 |
8 |
8 |
12 |
Natural |
34 |
17 |
17 |
29 |
Agree |
80 |
40 |
40 |
69 |
Strongly Agree |
62 |
31 |
31 |
100 |
Total |
200 |
100 |
100 |
|
Table 4 shows the number of people who agreed or disagreed with the assertion that there is a distinction between online digital learning and traditional offline learning. This comment was agreed upon by 71 percent of the respondents.
Table-5: Online learning is more motivating than conventional offline learning
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative |
Strongly disagree |
50 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
Disagree |
70 |
35 |
35 |
60 |
Natural |
40 |
20 |
20 |
80 |
Agree |
20 |
10 |
10 |
90 |
Strongly Agree |
20 |
10 |
10 |
100 |
Total |
200 |
100 |
100 |
|
In table 5, the number of people who agreed that online digital learning is more inspiring than traditional offline learning is represented. Sixty percent of students disagreed with this statement, twenty percent remained neutral, and forty percent agreed with it.
Table-6: Online learning more comfortable than classroom learning
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
Disagree |
40 |
20 |
20 |
29 |
Natural |
50 |
25 |
25 |
54 |
Agree |
60 |
30 |
30 |
84 |
Strongly Agree |
32 |
16 |
16 |
100 |
Total |
200 |
100 |
100 |
|
Table 6 shows that 46 percent of students agree with the assertion that online learning is more comfortable than classroom learning. 29 percent of the students disagreed with the statement, while 25 percent were undecided.
Table-7: Do you watch recorded online sessions when you miss out?
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative |
Strongly disagree |
24 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Disagree |
102 |
51 |
51 |
63 |
Natural |
50 |
25 |
25 |
88 |
Agree |
14 |
7 |
7 |
95 |
Strongly Agree |
10 |
5 |
5 |
100 |
Total |
200 |
100 |
100 |
|
Table 7 shows the number of respondents who answered the statement, "Do they go through online recorded sessions when they miss out?" Only 12% of the respondents agreed with the statement and 63% disapproved it while 25% remained natural.
Table-8: Which educational learning tool do you find most interesting?
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative |
"Quizzes" |
60 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
"Assignments" |
40 |
20 |
20 |
50 |
"PPTs" |
50 |
25 |
25 |
75 |
"Audio visual" |
30 |
15 |
15 |
90 |
"Polls" |
20 |
10 |
10 |
100 |
Total |
200 |
100 |
100 |
|
Table 8 shows the number of learners who answered the question, "Which educational learning tool do you find most interesting?" Quizzes piqued the attention of 30% of students, while assignments piqued the interest of 20%, PPTs piqued the interest of 25%, audio-visual piqued the interest of 15%, and polling techniques piqued the interest of 10%.
Table-9: Direct interaction with the teacher in offline mode is essential for learning
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative |
Strongly disagree |
20 |
10 |
10 |
25 |
Disagree |
20 |
10 |
10 |
60 |
Natural |
40 |
20 |
20 |
80 |
Agree |
72 |
36 |
36 |
90 |
Strongly Agree |
48 |
24 |
24 |
100 |
Total |
200 |
100 |
100 |
|
Table 9 shows how many people agreed with the assertion that direct interaction with the teacher in offline mode is crucial for learning. On this assertion, 60 percent of the students agreed.
Table-10: Combination of face-to-face and an online component of technology-based learning (Blended learning Programme)will be more effective
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
Disagree |
20 |
10 |
10 |
14 |
Natural |
30 |
15 |
15 |
29 |
Agree |
90 |
45 |
45 |
74 |
Strongly Agree |
52 |
26 |
26 |
100 |
Total |
200 |
100 |
100 |
|
A blended learning programme that incorporates face-to-face and online technology-based learning components will be more successful. This question was answered positively by 71% of the students, while 15% of the students were uncertain.
A. Assessing the Effectiveness of the Blended Learning Programme on the Academic Achievement of Teachers and Students.
The Blended Learning Program for the experimental group mixes a traditional classroom with an online learning platform to create an interactive learning environment for both teachers and students. The paired sample t-test provides descriptive statistics for both the pretest and post-test for the experimental as well as control groups. The purpose of this test is to determine whether the blended learning programme improved student-teacher achievement in the experimental group.It's also used to see if there's a substantial difference between the experimental group before and after the blended learning programme is implemented.
V. HYPOTHESIS
The following null and alternate hypotheses were formulated for assessing the effectiveness of blended learning programme:
Group |
Test |
N |
Mean |
S.D |
Mean Difference |
t-value |
Sig.
|
Experimental |
Pretest |
30 |
37.35 |
9.69 |
24.68 |
17.07 |
.01 |
Post-test |
30 |
62.05 |
10.67 |
||||
Control |
Pretest |
25 |
38.18 |
7.94 |
14.15 |
7.02 |
.01 |
Post-test |
25 |
52.35 |
7.74 |
The results depicted in the table show that the paired sample t-test for the experimental group reveals a significant difference between the mean pretest and post-test scores of this group at the 0.01 level. Hence, the null hypothesis is rejected. The experimental group's average post-test score is 62.05, while the pretest score is 37.35 (t =17.07 p=.01<.05). As a result, it is found that the average grades of the students in the experimental group differ significantly.
At the 0.01 level, a paired sample t-test for the control group shows that there is a significant difference between the mean pretest and post-test scores of the control group also. The average post-test score in the experimental group students is (52.35), whereas the pretest score is (38.18) (t =7.02 p=.01<.05). This finding reveals that students in the control group exhibit a moderate difference while using the conventional teaching technique.
Due to the spread of COVID-19, which has forced students all over the world to transition to e-learning, online learning has seen tremendous growth and acceptance from both educational institutions and students. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of online and traditional classrooms for students as well as assess the effectiveness of blended learning techniques. Although 46 percent of students believe that online learning is more comfortable, 60 percent believe that traditional offline learning is more motivating than online learning, and the same percentage of students believe that direct engagement with the teacher in offline mode is more important for learning. Quizzes, PowerPoint presentations, and assignments are rated as the most engaging teaching-learning aids by 75% of students. Although online learning has proven to be beneficial in protecting students\' learning during pandemics yet it cannot replace traditional learning. It has also been demonstrated that the new tactics utilised in the classroom in blended learning have improved their ability to teach and learn. The results demonstrate that the experimental group that was exposed to the blended learning programme improved academic success significantly when compared to the control group that was taught using the traditional technique. The usefulness of the blended learning programme for teaching and learning is supported by several previous study findings.
[1] Ananga, P. (2020). Pedagogical considerations of e-learning in education for development in the face of COVID-19. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 310-321. [2] Brzycki, D., & Dudt, K. (2005). Overcoming barriers to technology use in teacher preparation programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 619-641. [3] Chen, C.C., & Jones, K.T. (2007). Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: Assessing effectiveness and student perceptions in an MBA accounting course, The Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), Retrieved from http://www.thejeo.com/ 4(1) Jones Final.pdf [4] Dawadi, Saraswati, Ram Giri, and Padam Simkhada (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the Education Sector in Nepal: Challenges and Coping Strategies. [5] Demuyakor, John (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and online learning in higher institutions of education: A survey of the perceptions of Ghanaian international students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 10(3) : e202018. [6] Eddie Gulc, (2006). Using Blended Learning to Accommodate Different Learning Styles. Higher Education Academy [7] El-Deghaidy, H., & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian teacher education programme. Computers & Education, 51(3), 988-1006 [8] Liguori, Eric, and Christoph Winkler (2020). From Offline to Online: Challenges and Opportunities for Entrepreneurship Education Following the COVID-19 Pandemic.: 2515127420916738. [9] Ratten, Vanessa (2020). Coronavirus (Covid-19) and the entrepreneurship education community.\" Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. [10] Wargadinata, W., Maimunah, I., Eva, D., & Rofiq, Z. (2020). Student’s responses on learning in the early COVID-19 pandemic. Tadris: Journal of Education and Teacher Training, 5(1), 141-153 [11] Wendelboe, Aaron M., J. D. Amanda Miller, Douglas Drevets, Linda Salinas, E. J. Miller, Dalton Jackson, Ann Chou, J. D. Jill Raines, and Public Health Working Group (2020). Tabletop exercise to prepare institutions of higher education for an outbreak of COVID-19.\" Journal of Emergency Management 18 (2), 1-20. [12] Zhang, Wunong, Yuxin Wang, Lili Yang, and Chuanyi Wang (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 Outbreak: 55.
Copyright © 2022 Krishan Lal Grover. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET40076
Publish Date : 2022-01-25
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here