Study on the Role of Human Resource Management in Sustainable Development

Abstract

Introduction

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Project Title: Study on the role of hrm in sustainable development

Human Resource Management (HRM) stands as the cornerstone of organizational success, encompassing a multifaceted approach to effectively harnessing the potential of a company's human capital. It represents a comprehensive array of activities meticulously designed to ensure the strategic alignment of personnel with organizational goals and objectives. These activities traverse a spectrum of functions, beginning with the meticulous recruitment and selection of individuals whose skills, expertise, and cultural fit align with the organization's ethos. Once onboard, employees are ushered into the fold through a process of induction and orientation, facilitating their seamless integration into the organizational culture and structure.

However, the scope of HRM extends far beyond mere recruitment and orientation; it also entails the ongoing development and nurturing of talent within the organization. This involves a commitment to continuous training and skill enhancement initiatives, ensuring that employees remain abreast of industry trends and best practices. Furthermore, HRM encompasses the evaluation of individual and collective performance, providing a basis for rewarding excellence and identifying areas for improvement. Through the judicious determination of compensation and benefits, HRM seeks to incentivize productivity while fostering a sense of equity and fairness among employees.

Yet, the purview of HRM transcends the confines of the workplace, extending into realms of employee safety, welfare, and health. Adherence to labor laws and regulations governing workplace conditions underscores the commitment to ensuring the well-being and security of the workforce. In this regard, Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) emerges as a pivotal paradigm shift, emphasizing the imperative of balancing organizational objectives with societal and environmental considerations. By integrating financial, social, human, and environmental factors into its framework, S-HRM endeavors to create a harmonious equilibrium that fosters organizational resilience and longevity.

At its core, S-HRM seeks to mitigate the adverse impacts of organizational practices on employees, communities, and the broader ecosystem. It aspires to cultivate a culture of corporate social responsibility, wherein organizations recognize their role as stewards of both human and environmental resources. Through systematic approaches and practices, S-HRM endeavors to minimize resource consumption while simultaneously fostering resource reproduction, thereby promoting sustainability across all facets of organizational operations.

Moreover, S-HRM serves as a beacon of guidance for HRM practitioners, offering insights and strategies for navigating the complex interplay of internal and external business dynamics. By capitalizing on opportunities inherent within the organizational ecosystem, S-HRM facilitates the optimal utilization of human resources, thereby enhancing organizational agility and adaptability in the face of evolving market conditions. In essence, S-HRM represents not merely a framework for HRM practice but a holistic ethos that underpins organizational success and societal well-being alike.

II. INTRODUCTION

ABSTRACT

In contemporary business landscapes, the integration of sustainability into Human Resource Management (HRM) stands as a paramount determinant of organizational success. Sustainability, intricately interwoven with systematic HRM practices, directly contributes to the physical, social, and economic well-being of employees within the organizational milieu. Embracing a more sustainable approach not only fosters enduring organizational performance but also cultivates heightened resilience in the face of dynamic market forces. Sustainable HRM (S-HRM) emerges as a cornerstone strategy, endowing organizations with heightened durability amid competitive pressures, thereby facilitating a well-balanced equilibrium between employer and employee interests. Crucially, S-HRM capitalizes on opportunities stemming from both internal organizational dynamics and external environmental factors, thereby fortifying the organization's adaptive capacity and strategic agility.

The imperative of sustaining systematic HRM practices becomes increasingly salient amidst the rapidly evolving market landscapes of today. Amidst this backdrop of perpetual change, the strategic alignment of human resources with organizational imperatives assumes paramount importance. Sustainable planning, a linchpin of S-HRM, engenders robust cohesion between personnel and organizational objectives, thereby fortifying the organization's competitive posture and operational efficacy. Even within the domain of small and medium-sized enterprises, the adoption of S-HRM emerges as a judicious investment, promising enhanced organizational outcomes and bolstered resilience in the face of economic uncertainties.

S-HRM represents a vanguard within the realm of HRM discourse, furnishing organizations with a navigational compass for balancing resource utilization and reproduction in a manner devoid of inefficiencies and waste. Amidst the exigencies of contemporary economic exigencies, the optimization of human resources emerges as an imperative for organizational viability and sustained growth. In this vein, S-HRM serves as a beacon, illuminating pathways toward organizational excellence through the cultivation of efficient, high-performance work environments and the alignment of employee endeavors with overarching organizational objectives.

Central to the objectives of S-HRM is the augmentation of organizational effectiveness in the present while sowing the seeds for enduring positive impacts in the future. It serves as a crucible wherein organizations glean insights into the effective utilization and cultivation of human resources, thereby ensuring the fulfillment of organizational imperatives in perpetuity. Human Resource Planning (HRP) emerges as a linchpin within this paradigm, furnishing organizations with a blueprint for anticipating future human resource needs, aligning personnel with requisite skills and competencies, and optimizing resource allocation in consonance with organizational strategies and objectives. By fostering a proactive stance toward human resource management, S-HRM engenders a culture of strategic foresight and resource optimization, ensuring organizational vitality and resilience amidst the flux of contemporary business landscapes.

A. Objectives of the Study

The primary aims of the present study encompass the following facets:

1. To discern and delineate the constituent factors inherent in Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM).
2. To conduct an in-depth analysis of the commonalities and shared attributes characterizing S- HRM practices.
3. To undertake a comprehensive evaluation of the implementation of S-HRM within the broader HRM framework.
4. To delve into the integration and application of S-HRM principles within the domain of corporate communication.
5. To elucidate and examine pertinent issues and challenges stemming from traditional HRM paradigms.
6. To proffer recommendations aimed at mitigating the identified challenges and enhancing the efficacy of HRM practices.

B. Methodology

The methodological framework of this study is structured along the following lines:

1. Data Sources: Secondary sources have been predominantly utilized to facilitate a robust analysis of the S-HRM paradigm.
2. Data Collection Methods: The data procurement process entails sourcing and compiling secondary data from various outlets, including but not limited to:
3. Scholarly publications such as papers, articles, journals, and books
4. Online repositories and websites
5. Data Analysis and Presentation Style: The study employs a comprehensive approach to data analysis, incorporating analytical narratives, elucidations, and graphical representations. Microsoft Office suite tools have been leveraged to analyze the data, which is subsequently presented in a variety of formats, including figures, tables, and graphical charts.

C. Limitations of the Study

The study acknowledges several inherent limitations, including but not limited to:

1. Insufficiency of online resources, which posed challenges in achieving conclusive outcomes.
2. Relatively nascent adoption of S-HRM practices in contexts such as Bangladesh, resulting in limited data availability.
3. Predominantly theoretical analyses constrained by a lack of empirical data.
4. Restricted accessibility to esteemed scholarly articles and publications.

III. LITERATURE REVIEW

In contemporary business landscapes, the pervasive adoption of sustainability principles has become imperative due to the finite nature of resources and the necessity for their judicious utilization. However, prevailing Human Resource Management (HRM) paradigms often fall short in ensuring the integration of sustainability within organizational frameworks. Achieving a delicate balance between resource consumption and reproduction stands as a formidable challenge amid the relentless competition characterizing today's markets. Consequently, there is a discernible inclination within the corporate sphere to identify methodologies that foster sustainability without compromising organizational efficacy. Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) emerges as a prominent concept in this context, heralding a departure from short-term economic gains towards enduring success anchored in the preservation of critical and scarce human resources.

A plethora of scholarly endeavors has been undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of S- HRM practices. Notable among these is the study by Champs et al., which scrutinizes the multifaceted impacts of S-HRM from social, economic, and environmental standpoints, emphasizing the integration of Green Human Resource functions to cultivate sustainable work environments and realize Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Similarly, Järlström et al. delve into the nexus between HRM practices and organizational performance, highlighting the pivotal role of sustainability initiatives in fortifying financial outcomes and stakeholder engagement. Meanwhile, Sugumar's research elucidates the tangible ramifications of S-HRM on occupational health performance, underscoring organizations' evolving responsibilities towards employees, communities, and the broader global ecosystem.

The discourse surrounding S-HRM extends beyond mere operational efficiency, encompassing broader themes of adaptability and agility within organizational frameworks. Kramer elucidates how S-HRM engenders a paradigm shift in people management, advocating for continuous development to enhance management practices and foster organizational resilience. Moreover, strategic integration of HRM practices emerges as a linchpin for bolstering sustainability and competitiveness, as evidenced by the conceptual framework developed to elucidate the symbiotic relationship between strategic HRM and organizational sustainability.

The imperative of sustainability within HRM extends beyond ethical considerations, exerting a tangible impact on organizational financial performance. Rooted in the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) ethos, the cultivation of sustainability in the workplace necessitates the establishment of robust criteria to guide organizational practices. Thus, the convergence of sustainability principles with HRM practices not only ensures organizational viability but also fosters a holistic approach to corporate governance, underscoring the interconnectedness of economic, social, and environmental imperatives within the contemporary business landscape.

IV. THEORY AND CONCEPTS

1. Definition of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM):

Sustainable Human Resource Management, abbreviated as S-HRM, encapsulates a methodology aimed at fostering sustainability within organizational frameworks, thereby yielding positive outcomes for individuals, society, and the environment. In the contemporary milieu, HR professionals grapple with the imperative of anticipating future needs, with S-HRM serving as a linchpin in addressing this challenge. Conceptually, S-HRM perceives organizations as dynamic entities operating within an open system framework, necessitating the perpetual regeneration and development of resources in tandem with their consumption patterns. This paradigm underscores the organization's inherent responsibility to remain adaptive and forward-thinking in pursuit of strategic objectives.

Scholarly discourse surrounding S-HRM delves into its multifaceted dimensions and implications within the broader socio-economic landscape. Researchers posit S-HRM as a pivotal element in fostering sustainable careers within the contemporary socio-economic milieu, emphasizing the need for comprehensive, multilevel research approaches that account for diverse stakeholders and longitudinal perspectives. Moreover, S-HRM is positioned as an evolutionary extension of strategic HRM, envisaged as a responsive mechanism to address evolving societal, market, and environmental dynamics. This dynamic nature of S-HRM necessitates ongoing research efforts to elucidate its nuanced characteristics and practical implications, particularly in the context of HR functions, practices, and analytics.

Furthermore, the nexus between S-HRM and organizational performance is scrutinized through the lens of high-performance work systems (HPWS), with scholars highlighting the varying effects of different HPWS configurations on employee performance. This underscores the imperative for practitioners to discern and leverage the synergies between S-HRM initiatives and organizational performance enhancement strategies. Additionally, the integration of sustainability principles within HRM practices is posited as a catalyst for fostering economic, social, and ecological sustainability within organizational frameworks.

However, scholarly inquiry also underscores the existence of limitations and gaps in understanding the effectiveness of sustainable HRM practices, necessitating further empirical research to address these lacunae.

In sum, while there is no prescriptive blueprint for practicing sustainability within the HRM domain, scholarly endeavors provide insights into the requisite characteristics and practical implications for achieving sustainability in HRM practices. Thus, ongoing research endeavors seek to illuminate the complex interplay between sustainability imperatives and HRM frameworks, thereby facilitating the advancement of organizational resilience and sustainability in the contemporary business landscape.

2. Historical Context of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM):

The concept of sustainability, denoting longevity, durability, and systemic balance, has deep roots that extend across various disciplines and traditions. Tracing its origins proves challenging due to its ubiquitous nature and multifaceted applications. Sustainability, fundamentally, embodies the equilibrium between resource consumption and reproduction, crucial for survival amidst exigent circumstances. Its essence lies in the capacity of individuals, societies, and organizations to perpetuate and cultivate resources, akin to the notion of reproductive ability. Over time, sustainability practices have found resonance in ecological realms, serving to raise awareness about the finite nature of natural resources amidst burgeoning population growth and escalating economic demands.

In the economic domain, sustainability assumes paramount importance, particularly for business entities seeking enduring viability and resilience in competitive markets. Its significance transcends mere conceptualization, permeating diverse spheres encompassing social, economic, and environmental dimensions. However, operationalizing sustainability within the workplace, especially within the ambit of Human Resource Management (HRM), presents formidable challenges. The integration of sustainability principles into HRM practices necessitates a nuanced understanding and adept navigation of complex organizational dynamics.

3. Application of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM):

Historically, Human Resources (HR) has not conventionally aligned closely with social and environmental imperatives, yet contemporary exigencies mandate its heightened attention towards these issues. HR faces a myriad of challenges, ranging from employee motivation and retention to navigating workforce diversity and technological disruptions, among others. However, there is a burgeoning recognition that sustainability initiatives within HRM can yield tangible benefits for organizational vitality and employee engagement.

Sustainability programs within HRM are poised to support overarching organizational missions through various avenues, including community engagement, energy conservation, water management, fostering corporate pride, and enhancing productivity. Contrary to prevalent myths, the returns on sustainability investments need not be protracted, nor do they necessitate exorbitant capital outlays. HR's role in maximizing productivity and fostering a culture of high performance is pivotal, as evidenced by the energizing effects of sustainability initiatives on organizational dynamics.

Moreover, the emergence of Green HR underscores a paradigm shift towards promoting sustainable resource utilization and environmental stewardship within organizational frameworks. Green HR encompasses a spectrum of policies and practices aimed at fostering environmentally friendly human resource management, thereby facilitating knowledge capital preservation and sustainable business practices. Through strategic alignment with sustainability imperatives, HRM emerges as a potent vehicle for driving organizational resilience and longevity amidst the complex and evolving landscape of contemporary business environments.

4. Integration of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) with Human Resource Planning (HRP):

Human Resource Planning (HRP) stands as a meticulously structured process aimed at ensuring optimal alignment between organizational manpower needs and available resources. Its systematic approach revolves around the meticulous forecasting and anticipation of future human resource requirements, predicated upon comprehensive analyses of industry trends and economic conditions. HRP plays a pivotal role in shaping organizational performance, encompassing a spectrum of activities ranging from gauging future human resource needs to leveraging existing talent pools effectively. Moreover, it entails the identification and resolution of manpower-related challenges through strategic interventions. These interventions encompass a gamut of initiatives spanning recruitment, selection, training, development, promotion, and compensation strategies, all geared towards fostering organizational agility and resilience in dynamic market environments. In essence, the integration of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) principles within HRP frameworks underscores a commitment to fostering long-term organizational sustainability through the strategic allocation and utilization of human capital resources.

HRP has significant role in maintaining sustainability in organization . Human resourceplanning in terms of age, competence and culture improve the sustainability in the organization .

5. Integration of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) with Human Resource Forecasting (HRF):

Human Resource Forecasting (HRF) constitutes a strategic approach to discerning the demand and supply dynamics of human resources within organizational contexts, thereby facilitating the prediction of potential shortages or surpluses of talent. Comprising three fundamental steps—demand analysis, supply analysis, and shortages or surpluses analysis—HRF endeavors to ascertain the requisite manpower needs of the organization. Demand analysis entails the meticulous examination of labor requirements through trend analysis and leading indicators, while supply analysis relies on methodologies such as succession or replacement charts, Human Resource Information Systems (HRIS), and Markov analysis.

Forecasting the demand for human resources entails two primary approaches: statistical and judgmental. Statistical demand forecasting (SDF) leverages quantitative methods such as ratio, trend, and regression analysis to extrapolate future manpower needs based on historical business trends and relationships between workforce size and pertinent business factors. Conversely, judgmental demand forecasting (JDF) involves qualitative assessments driven by human judgment, with methods like brainstorming and sales force estimates enabling stakeholders to project future labor requirements based on strategic plans and market demand considerations.

Upon completion of demand forecasting, attention turns to supply forecasting, which entails categorizing required positions and assessing the potential for filling them through internal mechanisms such as promotions or external recruitment. The synthesis of demand and supply forecasts yields insights into the future human resource needs of the organization, informing strategic decisions regarding HR creation and deployment.

Within the framework of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM), HRF assumes heightened significance as it enables organizations to strike a delicate balance between resource consumption and reproduction, thereby fostering sustainability within HRM practices. By accurately predicting future HR needs and aligning them with organizational objectives, HRF serves as a linchpin for ensuring the sustainable management of human resources. As HRP initiatives are implemented to address identified needs, they play a pivotal role in perpetuating HR sustainability within the organizational ecosystem, thereby underpinning the overarching goals of S-HRM.

6. Financial Dimension of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM):

Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) embodies the harmonization of economic prudence and social responsibility within organizational frameworks. This paradigmatic shift is underscored by an analysis highlighting the multifaceted importance and advantages of S-HRM across economic, social, and environmental dimensions. By integrating sustainability principles as a guiding principle within HRM practices, S-HRM fosters symbiotic relationships with top management, stakeholders, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), thereby facilitating the realization of economic, social, ecological, and human sustainability goals. In today's business landscape, characterized by a growing emphasis on long-term viability, S-HRM emerges as a linchpin for fostering sustained organizational success by conscientiously considering social and environmental factors. The 'Triple-bottom-line' framework encapsulates these interconnected dimensions, advocating for a holistic approach to organizational sustainability.

Financial considerations form a critical aspect of organizational operations, delineating strategies for future growth and expansion. Financial planning serves as a cornerstone, offering insights into the organization's financial health and charting a course for future endeavors. This entails forecasting and planning, accounting and measuring results, monitoring cash positions, and analyzing decision-making processes. During financial planning, goals are delineated, and corresponding actions are mapped out to achieve these objectives, with a focus on effectively aligning financial actions with revenue and expense forecasts. Accounting and measuring results involve the systematic recording of financial data and the generation of financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), enabling stakeholders to interpret and analyze financial performance vis-à-vis industry benchmarks and market peers.

For small businesses, vigilant monitoring of cash flows is imperative to ensure liquidity and prevent cash shortages. Financial departments play a pivotal role in forecasting cash flows and strategizing investments for optimal returns. Large enterprises engage in continuous investment activities, leveraging market insights to identify lucrative investment opportunities. Decision-making processes hinge on financial analyses and insights, reflecting the judicious allocation of limited resources such as capital and human capital.

S-HRM transcends mere considerations of social and ecological factors, incorporating financial benefits as integral components of sustainability practices. By embracing proper financial planning, organizations uphold their commitment to employee well-being while simultaneously ensuring organizational sustainability and longevity. Financial benefits derived from effective financial planning serve as bulwarks for sustaining HR sustainability within organizational ecosystems.

7. Social Sustainability Aspects of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM):

Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) embodies an array of concepts and methodologies aimed at designing organizations and internal systems conducive to long-term viability and social sustainability. This holistic approach underscores the multifaceted factors influencing sustainability practices within organizational contexts. Human Capital (HC) measurement stands as a pivotal tool for fostering sustainability, catering to the needs of individuals and society alike. The nexus between S- HRM and HC underscores the interplay between economic and social factors, with the efficacy of S- HRM gauged through HC assessments.

In a rapidly evolving technological and market environment, organizations are impelled to embrace innovative HRM practices. Human capital represents a central component of societal dynamics, with the development of HR through S-HRM practices serving as a harbinger of long-term organizational success and social sustainability. Human Capital encompasses individuals endowed with diverse social, professional, and methodological skills, with their integration into organizational goals constituting a hallmark of sustainable HRM.

Social Capital (SC) emerges as a critical determinant of sustainability, denoting an individual's ability to derive benefits from social networks and structures. The cultivation of Human Capital is intrinsically linked to Social Capital, with the latter facilitating the generation and dissemination of human resources for future organizational utilization. Interpersonal communication skills play a pivotal role in nurturing future Human Capital, with Social Capital serving as a conduit for harnessing the potential of Human Capital towards organizational performance objectives. The symbiotic relationship between Social Capital and Human Capital underscores their mutual influence, with the former facilitating the effective utilization of the latter for organizational success. Consequently, Social Capital assumes a pivotal role in fostering the generation and sustainability of Human Capital within organizational ecosystems.

8. Human Sustainability Dimensions of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM):

The advent of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) is in response to the discernible and rapid transformations witnessed within the contemporary business landscape, characterized by relentless competition and dynamic market forces. In this milieu, the sustenance of organizations hinges primarily upon the preservation and nurturing of Human Capital, which stands as the cornerstone of organizational vitality and longevity. S-HRM, as a strategic paradigm, intricately interweaves the tenets of societal, ecological, and economic sustainability, with a predominant focus on ensuring the continuity and rejuvenation of human resources. At its essence, S-HRM endeavors to foster an environment conducive to attracting and perpetually motivating existing employees, thereby fortifying the organizational talent pool and safeguarding against future talent shortages. Recognizing that a depletion of human resources surpassing their reproduction capacity spells peril for the organization's sustained viability, human sustainability emerges as a pivotal imperative for organizational endurance over prolonged periods.

Embraced as an extension of Strategic HRM, S-HRM epitomizes a contemporary approach that accentuates the prolonged development, replenishment, and revitalization of human capital within organizational ecosystems. Central to the ethos of sustainability development is the recognition of humans as the focal point within organizational systems, with all other facets intricately connected to this fundamental premise. By integrating sustainability practices into HRM, organizations endeavor to cultivate a substantive and prolific workforce that engenders a high-performance work environment. The realization of a productive and efficient workforce hinges upon the organization's commitment to safeguarding employee health and safety, promoting a balanced work-life equilibrium, and provisioning conducive work environments. The welfare of employees is intricately entwined with health and safety management initiatives, which address a gamut of concerns ranging from medical support provisions to workload considerations and stress alleviation measures.

Extensive research underscores the pivotal role of human sustainability practices in ameliorating health-related issues and fostering a healthy and productive workforce conducive to organizational success. A safe work environment not only fulfills a basic human need within the organizational framework but also serves as a catalyst for fostering high-quality work systems. Prioritizing employee health emerges as paramount, given its overarching influence on organizational activities, with any lapses in health safety measures posing consequential ramifications for productivity and operational efficacy.

Moreover, achieving a harmonious work-life balance assumes heightened significance within the context of contemporary organizational dynamics characterized by dual-career families and demanding workloads. S-HRM, albeit indirectly, addresses these challenges through adept workload management strategies and the introduction of innovative concepts such as the "Green Work-Life Balance Concept," which seeks to strike a delicate equilibrium between employees' professional commitments and personal responsibilities.

As individuals aspire to allocate quality time to familial engagements, organizations are urged to prioritize this aspect, ensuring that human resources are not excessively stretched to the detriment of personal well-being. Human sustainability practices embedded within the S-HRM framework facilitate the cultivation of a family-friendly organizational ethos, pivotal in fostering employee retention and regeneration, thereby safeguarding the sustainability of human resources within the HRM ecosystem.

Workload management emerges as a linchpin factor in sustaining human resources within organizational contexts, with its intricate interplay with health issues and work-life balance dynamics underscoring its paramount importance. Organizations must meticulously monitor workload dynamics to avert adverse health outcomes and ensure adherence to standard lifestyle benchmarks, thereby mitigating the deleterious effects of physical, mental, and financial stressors. Long-term organizational sustainability is contingent upon the holistic management of these factors, with organizations enjoined to prioritize employee well-being and operational sustainability in equal measure.

9. Environmental Sustainability Perspectives in Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM):

Environmental sustainability constitutes a focal point within the purview of Green Human Resource Management (G-HRM), with its manifestations extending beyond the confines of ecological preservation to encompass the cultivation of safe and favorable work environments. Despite prevailing perceptions positing environment and people management as disparate domains, mounting evidence attests to their intrinsic interconnectedness, with profound implications for organizational pursuits of prosperity and longevity. Conventional organizational priorities often revolve around the dual imperatives of people and profit, yet emerging research underscores the symbiotic relationship between these priorities and the environment, thereby advocating for a more holistic approach to sustainability endeavors.

In this vein, individuals constitute integral components of the environment, their actions serving as catalysts for environmental transformations that invariably shape future product demands and human activities. Environmental sustainability, therefore, emerges as a linchpin for sustaining business activities over prolonged durations, underscoring the imperative for organizations to embrace practices that safeguard environmental equilibrium. Integral to this endeavor is the recruitment and selection processes, which serve as conduits for attracting environmentally conscious and highly skilled individuals, thereby fostering a culture of environmental stewardship within organizational ecosystems.

Moreover, environmental considerations permeate training and development initiatives, facilitating the cultivation of eco-friendly HR equipped with the requisite knowledge and competencies to navigate future environmental exigencies and market dynamics. Performance appraisal mechanisms further reinforce environmental sustainability imperatives, with rewards and recognition contingent upon environmentally responsible behaviors exhibited by employees. Technological advancements and societal transformations compel organizations to adopt a more circumspect stance vis-à-vis their environmental surroundings, with sustainable management practices mandating a concerted focus on environment.

a. World take on sustainable development goal and HRM

The United Nations has been a prominent advocate for over 35 years, emphasizing the importance of halting environmental degradation and addressing social inequalities. The Brundtland Commission, also known as the World Commission on Environment and Development, highlighted the necessity for equitable resource utilization across generations, defining sustainability as a concept with global, long- term, and multi-stakeholder dimensions. Moreover, sustainability underscores stakeholder interdependence and necessitates collaboration.

Despite variations in definitions, the notion of sustainability often revolves around the "three pillars" framework, encompassing economic, social, and environmental dimensions. These pillars serve as a foundational concept for understanding Sustainable Human Resource Management (HRM) and its alignment with organizational objectives.

Since the publication of the Brundtland Report, efforts by the UN and other entities have aimed at promoting sustainability globally, nationally, and within organizations. Various systems have emerged to measure organizational sustainability, encouraging action towards sustainable practices. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), established as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, provide a comprehensive framework for addressing sustainability challenges. Many of these goals, such as decent work and economic growth, gender equality, and good health and well-being, intersect with HRM practices.

HRM can serve as a crucial intermediary in advancing societal and environmental sustainability. By adopting a multi-stakeholder, collaborative approach, HRM can contribute to organizational sustainability goals at different levels—national, regional, organizational, and individual. For example, in the European Union, a high-level platform comprising representatives from various sectors advises stakeholders on best practices to align with the SDGs.

Sustainable HRM, distinct from traditional HRM, focuses on the relationship between sustainability and HRM practices, while Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) emphasizes the integration of HRM with organizational strategy. Both approaches share similarities in outcomes, theories, and processes, yet Sustainable HRM introduces additional complexities due to its emphasis on sustainability outcomes.

Definitions of SHRM and Sustainable HRM have evolved over time, with scholars emphasizing different aspects of these concepts. Various theoretical frameworks inform SHRM, including the resource-based view (RBV), contingency theory, and human capital theory. SHRM has traditionally focused on HRM's contribution to financial performance and competitive advantage. In contrast, Sustainable HRM scholars argue for a broader perspective that includes societal and environmental well-being.

The Sustainable HRM literature covers diverse domains, such as international measurement and reporting systems, organizational paradoxes, and competency models for Sustainable HRM practitioners. Theoretical foundations for Sustainable HRM draw from institutional theory, stakeholder theory, and systems theory, among others. Sustainable HRM builds upon SHRM by incorporating sustainability as a central element, expanding the focus beyond traditional business goals.

In summary, Sustainable HRM represents a holistic approach to HRM that considers the broader impacts of organizational practices on society and the environment. By integrating sustainability principles into HRM processes, organizations can contribute to global sustainability efforts while achieving their objective.

b. Positive and Negative Outcomes

Sustainable Human Resource Management (HRM) distinguishes itself by explicitly acknowledging both the positive and negative impacts of HRM practices on various aspects. While Strategic HRM (SHRM) has not entirely disregarded issues like employee well-being or social equity, Sustainable HRM takes a step further by advocating for the evaluation of potential harm caused by HRM practices on stakeholders and implementing measures to mitigate such harm. This approach necessitates the use of assessment tools to gauge impacts accurately.

Positive outcomes of HRM, such as enhanced job satisfaction, increased productivity, and a supportive organizational culture, have been widely recognized by SHRM scholars as factors contributing to improved financial performance. Tools such as engagement surveys and turnover rates are commonly used to measure these positive impacts. However, Sustainable HRM views positive human outcomes not just as means to financial ends but as valuable outcomes in themselves.

Nevertheless, it's crucial to recognize that these positive outcomes may sometimes lead to negative consequences for individuals. For instance, increased job satisfaction may paradoxically result in employee exhaustion or decreased commitment. Sustainable HRM acknowledges this possibility and advocates for the simultaneous measurement of both positive and negative outcomes.

The concept of "well-being" within HRM is multifaceted, encompassing psychological, physical, and social aspects of functioning. While traditional SHRM focuses on work-related well-being, Sustainable HRM adopts a broader perspective, recognizing that well-being extends beyond the workplace and includes the impact of organizational activities on individuals' lives outside of work. This holistic approach aligns with the multi-layered and multi-stakeholder nature of Sustainable HRM.

Taking a long-term perspective, Sustainable HRM aims to enhance employees' holistic quality of life throughout their entire working life, including the transition to retirement. By promoting better physical and mental health, improving working and home environments, and enhancing overall quality of life, Sustainable HRM contributes to positive outcomes at the individual, societal, organizational, and economic levels.

Moreover, Sustainable HRM acknowledges HRM's role in shaping social outcomes beyond the organization, such as societal health and wealth distribution. HRM policies related to wages, training, and education can influence the distribution of wealth and income in society, thereby impacting social cohesion and economic growth. By actively addressing these issues, Sustainable HRM can mitigate negative social effects and contribute to a more equitable and prosperous society.

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, countries in the Asia Pacific region have faced significant challenges, with only a few economies managing to return to pre-pandemic levels. Inequality has exacerbated, particularly affecting disadvantaged groups with limited access to digital technologies and social support. These challenges highlight the importance of Sustainable HRM in addressing social inequalities and promoting resilience in the face of crises.

Overall, Sustainable HRM offers a comprehensive approach to HRM that considers the broader impacts of organizational practices on individuals, society, and the environment. By prioritizing both positive and negative outcomes and adopting a long-term perspective, Sustainable HRM can contribute to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and create a more sustainable and equitable future for all

V. RESEARCH METHODLOGY

It adopted for this thesis is meticulously structured to provide a robust framework for investigating Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) practices comprehensively. Through a systematic approach, the methodology aims to gather, analyze, and interpret data effectively to explore the multifaceted dimensions of S-HRM and its implications for organizational success and sustainability. The key components of the research methodology are elaborated upon in detail below:

1. Data Sources: The research primarily relies on secondary data sources to facilitate an in-depth analysis of the S-HRM system. Secondary data sources offer a rich repository of information collected and documented by previous researchers, practitioners, and organizations, thereby providing valuable insights into the intricacies and dynamics of S-HRM practices. By harnessing existing data, the research endeavors to build upon established knowledge and insights while offering novel perspectives and interpretations. These secondary data sources encompass a diverse range of scholarly publications, including peer- reviewed papers, academic journals, seminal articles, books, reports, and other relevant literature that contribute to the discourse on S-HRM.
2. Data Collection Methods: The collection and presentation of secondary data are conducted through a rigorous and systematic process to ensure accuracy, relevance, and reliability. Various data collection methods are employed to gather information from a wide array of sources, including:

a. Published Papers, Articles, Journals, Books, etc.:

A comprehensive review of existing literature forms the cornerstone of the data collection process. This involves an extensive exploration of academic journals, scholarly articles, books, and other publications that offer insights into diverse aspects of S-HRM. By synthesizing findings from a broad spectrum of sources, the research aims to develop a nuanced understanding of S-HRM conceptualizations, methodologies, best practices, challenges, and outcomes.

b. Website Contents:

In addition to traditional scholarly publications, data is also gathered from online sources, including organizational websites, industry reports, and digital repositories. Website contents provide access to real-time information, case studies, organizational practices, and industry trends pertinent to S-HRM. By examining website contents, the research gains valuable insights into the practical applications and real-world experiences of S-HRM practices across various sectors and contexts.

By leveraging both traditional academic sources and contemporary online resources, the research methodology endeavors to adopt a holistic and multi-faceted approach to data collection and analysis. Through rigorous scrutiny and critical examination of diverse data sources, the research seeks to generate meaningful insights, identify emerging trends, and offer practical recommendations for enhancing organizational effectiveness and sustainability through the adoption of S-HRM practices.

The research methodology employed in this thesis is carefully crafted to provide a robust and comprehensive framework for investigating the intricacies of Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) practices. This methodology is designed to gather, analyze, and interpret data effectively to explore the multifaceted dimensions of S-HRM and its implications for organizational success and sustainability. Through a systematic approach, the methodology aims to harness both traditional academic sources and contemporary online resources to develop a nuanced understanding of S-HRM practices.

The primary focus of the research methodology is on secondary data sources, which serve as a valuable repository of information collected and documented by previous researchers, practitioners, and organizations. Secondary data sources encompass a diverse range of scholarly publications, including peer-reviewed papers, academic journals, seminal articles, books, reports, and other relevant literature that contribute to the discourse on S-HRM. By leveraging existing data, the research aims to build upon established knowledge and insights while offering fresh perspectives and interpretations.

The collection and presentation of secondary data are conducted through a rigorous and systematic process to ensure accuracy, relevance, and reliability. Various data collection methods are employed to gather information from a wide array of sources. A comprehensive review of existing literature forms the cornerstone of the data collection process, involving an extensive exploration of academic journals, scholarly articles, books, and other publications that offer insights into diverse aspects of S-HRM. By synthesizing findings from a broad spectrum of sources, the research aims to develop a nuanced understanding of S-HRM conceptualizations, methodologies, best practices, challenges, and outcomes.

In addition to traditional scholarly publications, data is also gathered from online sources, including organizational websites, industry reports, and digital repositories. Website contents provide access to real-time information, case studies, organizational practices, and industry trends pertinent to S-HRM. By examining website contents, the research gains valuable insights into the practical applications and real-world experiences of S-HRM practices across various sectors and contexts.

The research methodology adopts a holistic and multi-faceted approach to data collection and analysis, leveraging both traditional academic sources and contemporary online resources. Through rigorous scrutiny and critical examination of diverse data sources, the research seeks to generate meaningful insights, identify emerging trends, and offer practical recommendations for enhancing organizational effectiveness and sustainability through the adoption of S-HRM practices.

Overall, the research methodology serves as a comprehensive framework for investigating S-HRM practices, enabling the exploration of its implications for organizational success and sustainability. By employing a systematic approach and leveraging a diverse array of data sources, the research aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on S-HRM and offer valuable insights for organizations seeking to enhance.

VI. DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION

A. Findings of the Analytical Study

1. Inadequate Financial Security Measures: One of the primary findings of the analytical study pertains to the inadequacy of financial security within organizations. It has been observed that conventional HRM practices often prioritize short-term profitability over long-term sustainability, thereby neglecting the imperative of ensuring financial security for the future. This lacuna arises due to a lack of emphasis on developing HRM strategies that are geared towards bolstering financial resilience and stability within the organization. As a consequence, organizations may find themselves ill-prepared to navigate economic downturns or unforeseen challenges, highlighting the critical need for integrating financial security considerations into HRM frameworks to foster sustained organizational success.
2. Deficient Social Networking Initiatives: Another noteworthy finding underscores the absence of effective social networking initiatives within conventional HRM practices. Traditional HRM approaches typically overlook the significance of fostering robust social connections and networks, thereby limiting opportunities for expanding social capital within the organization. This deficiency stems from a failure to recognize the intrinsic value of social sustainability in driving organizational cohesion, collaboration, and resilience. Consequently, organizations may fail to leverage the collective expertise, support, and resources available within their social networks, hindering their ability to adapt to evolving market dynamics and capitalize on emerging opportunities.
3. Ineffective HR Policy Development: The study highlights a prevalent issue concerning the inadequacy of HR policy development within organizations that do not prioritize sustainability in their HRM practices. Conventional HRM approaches often overlook the diverse needs and aspirations of human resources, resulting in the formulation of HR policies that may not effectively address the evolving demands of the workforce. This deficiency underscores the importance of aligning HRM strategies with sustainability principles to facilitate the development of inclusive, equitable, and adaptive HR policies that cater to the diverse needs and preferences of employees. By integrating sustainability considerations into HR policy development, organizations can foster a culture of empowerment, engagement, and innovation, thereby enhancing overall organizational effectiveness and resilience.
4. Limited Environmental Awareness and Sustainability: A critical finding of the study pertains to the pervasive lack of environmental awareness and sustainability within organizational HRM practices. Many organizations exhibit a conspicuous disregard for the internal and external environmental factors that significantly impact their operations and long- term viability. This oversight arises from a failure to integrate environmental considerations into HRM frameworks, resulting in missed opportunities to mitigate environmental risks, enhance resource efficiency, and cultivate a culture of environmental responsibility. By neglecting environmental sustainability, organizations risk exacerbating ecological degradation, regulatory non-compliance, and reputational harm, underscoring the imperative of integrating environmental awareness and sustainability principles into HRM strategies to foster organizational resilience and relevance in an increasingly environmentally conscious landscape.

In essence, the findings of the analytical study underscore the critical importance of integrating financial, social, and environmental sustainability considerations into HRM frameworks to foster organizational resilience, agility, and long-term success in a dynamic and interconnected business.

The findings of the analytical study underscore several significant shortcomings prevalent within conventional Human Resource Management (HRM) practices, shedding light on critical areas where improvements are imperative for organizational resilience and long-term success. Firstly, the research reveals a concerning inadequacy in implementing robust financial security measures within organizations, where traditional HRM approaches tend to prioritize short-term profitability over the establishment of sustainable financial foundations.

This focus neglects the crucial necessity of ensuring long-term financial stability, thereby rendering organizations susceptible to economic uncertainties and unforeseen challenges that could jeopardize their viability in the future. Secondly, a notable deficiency is observed in the cultivation of effective social networking initiatives within HRM frameworks. By failing to foster strong social connections and networks, traditional HRM practices inhibit the development of social capital, consequently impeding organizational cohesion, collaboration, and adaptability. Thirdly, the study highlights the inherent shortcomings in HR policy development within organizations that do not prioritize sustainability principles. Conventional HRM strategies often result in the formulation of policies that inadequately address the evolving needs and aspirations of the workforce, leading to a lack of inclusivity and innovation within the organizational culture. Furthermore, the research identifies a pervasive lack of environmental awareness and sustainability integration within HRM practices. Many organizations exhibit a notable disregard for environmental considerations, both internal and external, thereby exposing themselves to risks such as environmental degradation and reputational harm. The failure to integrate environmental sustainability principles into HRM frameworks not only compromises organizational resilience but also undermines the organization's relevance in an increasingly environmentally conscious landscape. In essence, the findings underscore the critical imperative of integrating financial, social, and environmental sustainability considerations into HRM practices to foster organizational resilience, adaptability, and long-term success amidst the dynamic challenges of the contemporary business environment.

B. Questionnaire Analysis and findings

This section presents the analysis of the survey conducted to investigate the role of human resource management (HRM) in sustainable development. The survey consisted of 10 questions designed to gather insights into various aspects of HRM practices and their relation to sustainable development goals. The responses were collected from [number of respondents] participants, comprising individuals from diverse organizational backgrounds and positions.

1. Demographic Profile of Respondents: Before delving into the analysis of specific survey questions, it is essential to provide an overview of the demographic characteristics of the respondents. This includes details such as age, gender, educational background, years of professional experience, and industry sector. Understanding the demographic profile of the respondents can offer insights into the representativeness of the sample and potential variations in perceptions based on demographic factors.
2. Analysis Methodology: The data collected from the survey responses were analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative techniques. Quantitative analysis involved the tabulation of responses to each question, calculation of descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages, and statistical tests where applicable. Qualitative analysis involved the thematic categorization of open-ended responses to identify recurring patterns, themes, and insights. Total 68 HR’s from different organization filled the form . Their identity is hide due to confidentiality. Here are the questions and the responses.

a. How important do you think human resource management is for achieving sustainable development goals?

Analysis of Responses to Question 1

The first question of the survey aimed to gauge the perceived importance of human resource management (HRM) in achieving sustainable development goals. The responses provide valuable insights into the extent to which participants recognize the significance of HRM practices in contributing to sustainable development initiatives within organizations.

The majority of respondents (64.7%) indicated that they consider HRM to be "Very important" for achieving sustainable development goals. This indicates a strong acknowledgment among participants regarding the crucial role of HRM in driving sustainability initiatives within organizations. Such a high percentage suggests that a significant portion of the sample views HRM as integral to the attainment of sustainable development objectives.

A smaller proportion of respondents (13.2%) selected "Important" as their response, indicating a somewhat lower level of emphasis on the importance of HRM in sustainable development compared to those who chose "Very important." Nevertheless, this group still recognizes HRM's significance, albeit to a lesser degree.

Approximately 11.8% of participants considered HRM to be "Somewhat important" for achieving sustainable development goals. While this response indicates a moderate level of recognition for the role of HRM, it suggests that some respondents may have reservations or uncertainties regarding the extent of HRM's impact on sustainable development outcomes.

Interestingly, 10.3% of respondents indicated that they perceive HRM as "Not important" for achieving sustainable development goals. This minority viewpoint suggests a divergence of opinions within the sample, with a small segment of participants expressing skepticism or disbelief regarding the efficacy of HRM practices in driving sustainable development initiatives.

Overall, the analysis of responses to the first question underscores the importance of HRM in the context of sustainable development, with the majority of participants acknowledging its crucial role. However, the presence of differing perspectives within the sample highlights the need for further exploration and discussion to better understand the varying perceptions and attitudes towards HRM's contribution to sustainable development goals.

b. Which of the following HR practices do you believe contributes most to sustainable development?

Analysis of Responses to Question 2:

The second question of the survey aimed to identify which human resource (HR) practices respondents believe contribute most significantly to sustainable development. The responses provide insights into the perceived effectiveness of various HR initiatives in fostering sustainable outcomes within organizations.

According to the survey results, the HR practice that respondents believe contributes most to sustainable development is "Employee training and development programs," with 33.8% of participants selecting this option. This finding suggests that a significant portion of the sample recognizes the importance of investing in employee learning and skill development as a means to support sustainability efforts. Employee training and development programs likely enable organizations to enhance employees' knowledge, skills, and awareness related to sustainability issues, thereby empowering them to contribute more effectively to sustainable development goals.

Following closely behind, "Performance management systems" was identified by 27.9% of respondents as a key HR practice contributing to sustainable development. Performance management systems play a crucial role in aligning employee performance with organizational objectives, including sustainability goals. By setting clear expectations, providing feedback, and rewarding sustainable behaviors, performance management systems can incentivize and reinforce sustainable practices throughout the organization.

"Health and wellness programs" received 20.6% of the responses, indicating that a notable proportion of participants believe that initiatives promoting employee health and well-being contribute significantly to sustainable development. Such programs not only enhance employee satisfaction and productivity but also contribute to a healthier and more resilient workforce, which can positively impact organizational sustainability efforts.

"Diversity and inclusion initiatives" garnered 17.6% of the responses, suggesting that a smaller but still noteworthy portion of respondents recognize the importance of fostering diversity and inclusion in driving sustainable development. Diversity and inclusion initiatives promote a culture of respect, fairness, and equity within organizations, which are fundamental principles of sustainable development.

Overall, the analysis of responses to the second question highlights the multifaceted nature of HR practices that contribute to sustainable development. While employee training and development programs emerged as the top choice among respondents, the diversity of responses underscores the importance of adopting a holistic approach to HR management to effectively support sustainable development goals within organizations.

c. How effective do you think your organization's HR department is in integrating sustainability principles into its practices?

Analysis of Responses to Question 3

The third question of the survey aimed to assess respondents' perceptions of their organization's human resource (HR) department's effectiveness in integrating sustainability principles into its practices. The responses provide insights into the perceived level of success in incorporating sustainability considerations into HR functions and activities.

According to the survey results, a significant portion of respondents (42.6%) indicated that they view their organization's HR department as "Highly effective" in integrating sustainability principles into its practices. This finding suggests that a considerable number of participants believe their HR department is successful in incorporating sustainability considerations into HR policies, processes, and decision-making. A highly effective HR department in this regard likely demonstrates a strong commitment to sustainability, actively seeking opportunities to embed sustainable practices throughout the organization's HR functions.

Following behind, 19.1% of respondents considered their organization's HR department to be "Moderately effective" in integrating sustainability principles. While this group recognizes some level of effectiveness, they may perceive room for improvement or opportunities to enhance the integration of sustainability considerations into HR practices further.

Approximately 23.5% of participants indicated that they view their organization's HR department as "Slightly effective" in integrating sustainability principles. This response suggests that a notable proportion of respondents perceive limited success or effectiveness in incorporating sustainability into HR practices within their organizations. Factors contributing to this perception may include challenges such as limited resources, insufficient training or awareness, or competing priorities within the HR department.

Lastly, 14.7% of respondents deemed their organization's HR department as "Ineffective" in integrating sustainability principles into its practices. This finding indicates a significant minority of participants who believe that their HR department has not been successful in incorporating sustainability considerations into its functions. Such perceptions may indicate a lack of commitment, awareness, or strategic focus on sustainability within the HR department, which could hinder the organization's overall sustainability efforts.

Overall, the analysis of responses to the third question highlights variations in perceptions regarding the effectiveness of HR departments in integrating sustainability principles. While a considerable portion of respondents perceive their HR departments as effective or highly effective in this regard, there are also significant proportions who view their HR departments as only moderately, slightly, or not effective. Identifying factors contributing to these perceptions can provide valuable insights for organizations seeking to strengthen their commitment to sustainable.

d. To what extent does your organization prioritize environmental sustainability in its HR policies and practices?

Analysis of Responses to Question 4:

The fourth question of the survey aimed to assess the extent to which respondents perceive their organization to prioritize environmental sustainability in its human resource (HR) policies and practices. The responses offer insights into the level of emphasis placed on environmental sustainability within HR functions and activities.

According to the survey results, 25% of respondents indicated that their organization prioritizes environmental sustainability "A great deal" in its HR policies and practices. This finding suggests that a notable proportion of participants perceive their organization to place significant importance on incorporating environmental sustainability considerations into various aspects of HR management. Organizations prioritizing environmental sustainability to a great extent likely demonstrate a strong commitment to integrating environmental stewardship into HR policies, procedures, and decision- making processes.

Following closely behind, 33.8% of respondents reported that their organization prioritizes environmental sustainability "To some extent" in its HR policies and practices. This group acknowledges that while their organization does consider environmental sustainability to some degree, there may be room for improvement or opportunities to enhance the integration of environmental considerations into HR functions.

Approximately 22.1% of participants indicated that their organization prioritizes environmental sustainability "Very little" in its HR policies and practices. This response suggests that a notable proportion of respondents perceive limited emphasis on environmental sustainability within HR management in their organizations. Factors contributing to this perception may include organizational priorities, resource constraints, or a lack of awareness or commitment to environmental sustainability within HR departments.

Lastly, 17.6% of respondents reported that their organization does not prioritize environmental sustainability "Not at all" in its HR policies and practices. This finding indicates a significant minority of participants who believe that environmental sustainability considerations are entirely absent or negligible in their organization's HR functions. Such perceptions may indicate a lack of recognition or integration of environmental sustainability into HR policies and practices, potentially hindering the organization's ability to address environmental challenges effectively.

Overall, the analysis of responses to the fourth question highlights variations in the extent to which organizations prioritize environmental sustainability within HR management. While some organizations demonstrate a strong commitment to integrating environmental considerations into HR policies and practices, others may lag behind, indicating opportunities for enhancing sustainability initiatives within HR functions to address environmental challenges more effectively.

e. How well do you think your organization communicates its commitment to sustainable development through HR initiatives?

Analysis of Responses to Question 5:

The fifth question of the survey aimed to assess respondents' perceptions of how effectively their organization communicates its commitment to sustainable development through human resource (HR) initiatives. The responses offer insights into the perceived effectiveness of communication efforts in conveying the organization's dedication to sustainable development through HR practices.

According to the survey results, 25% of respondents indicated that they believe their organization communicates its commitment to sustainable development "Very well" through HR initiatives. This finding suggests that a notable proportion of participants perceive their organization to be highly effective in communicating its dedication to sustainable development through various HR practices and initiatives. Effective communication in this regard likely involves clear messaging, transparency, and alignment of HR initiatives with the organization's sustainability goals and values.

The majority of respondents (42.6%) reported that their organization communicates its commitment to sustainable development "Moderately well" through HR initiatives. This indicates that while communication efforts are perceived as effective to some extent, there may be opportunities for improvement in terms of clarity, frequency, or comprehensiveness of communication regarding sustainability initiatives within HR functions.

Approximately 20.6% of participants indicated that their organization communicates its commitment to sustainable development "Not very well" through HR initiatives. This response suggests that a notable portion of respondents perceive deficiencies or inadequacies in their organization's communication efforts related to sustainability within HR practices. Factors contributing to this perception may include insufficient communication channels, unclear messaging, or a lack of emphasis on sustainability in HR communications.

Lastly, 10.3% of respondents reported that their organization does not communicate its commitment to sustainable development "Not at all" through HR initiatives. This finding indicates a minority of participants who believe that their organization's communication efforts regarding sustainability through HR practices are entirely absent or negligible. Such perceptions may indicate a missed opportunity for organizations to leverage HR functions as a means to communicate and reinforce their commitment to sustainable development goals among employees.

Overall, the analysis of responses to the fifth question highlights variations in the perceived effectiveness of communication efforts regarding sustainable development through HR initiatives within organizations. While some organizations are viewed as effectively communicating their commitment to sustainability, others may need to enhance their communication strategies to ensure that employees are informed and engaged in sustainability initiatives. Improving communication in this regard can help foster a culture of sustainability and enhance organizational alignment towards sustainable development goals.

f. Which of the following challenges do you think HR faces in promoting sustainable development within organizations?

Analysis of Responses to Question 6:

The sixth question of the survey aimed to identify the perceived challenges that human resource (HR) departments face in promoting sustainable development within organizations. The responses offer insights into the key obstacles hindering HR professionals' efforts to drive sustainability initiatives and integrate sustainable practices into organizational processes.

According to the survey results, the top challenge identified by respondents is "Limited budget/resources," with 26.5% of participants selecting this option. This finding suggests that a notable proportion of respondents perceive resource constraints as a significant barrier to implementing sustainable development initiatives within organizations. Limited budget or resources may restrict the capacity of HR departments to invest in sustainability programs, initiatives, and infrastructure, thereby impeding progress towards achieving sustainability goals.

Closely following behind, 26.5% of respondents identified "Inadequate knowledge/skills among HR professionals" as a key challenge faced by HR departments in promoting sustainable development. This response highlights the importance of ensuring that HR professionals possess the necessary expertise, training, and skills to effectively drive sustainability initiatives within organizations. Inadequate knowledge or skills may hinder HR professionals' ability to develop and implement sustainable HR practices, navigate complex sustainability issues, and engage employees in sustainability initiatives.

Approximately 23.5% of participants cited "Resistance from top management" as a significant challenge encountered by HR departments in promoting sustainable development. This finding suggests that organizational leadership's buy-in and support are critical factors influencing the success of sustainability initiatives driven by HR. Resistance from top management may stem from competing priorities, skepticism about the business case for sustainability, or a lack of understanding of the benefits of sustainable practices.

Similarly, 23.5% of respondents identified "Lack of employee engagement" as a key challenge faced by HR departments in promoting sustainable development. Employee engagement plays a crucial role in driving sustainable behaviors, fostering a culture of sustainability, and achieving organizational sustainability goals. A lack of employee engagement may result from factors such as insufficient communication, limited awareness, or perceived disconnect between individual actions and organizational sustainability objectives.

Overall, the analysis of responses to the sixth question highlights a range of challenges faced by HR departments in promoting sustainable development within organizations. Resource constraints, inadequate knowledge/skills, resistance from top management, and lack of employee engagement emerged as the primary obstacles hindering HR professionals' efforts to drive sustainability initiatives. Addressing these challenges requires strategic approaches, investment in capacity-building, effective communication, and collaboration across organizational levels to foster a supportive environment for sustainable development initiatives.

g. How often does your organization assess the impact of HR policies and practices on sustainable development goals?

 

Analysis of Responses to Question 7:

The seventh question of the survey aimed to assess how frequently organizations assess the impact of their human resource (HR) policies and practices on sustainable development goals. The responses provide insights into the frequency with which organizations evaluate the effectiveness of their HR initiatives in contributing to sustainable development objectives.

According to the survey results, the most common response selected by participants was "Occasionally," with 44.8% of respondents indicating that their organization assesses the impact of HR policies and practices on sustainable development goals periodically. This finding suggests that a significant portion of organizations recognize the importance of evaluating the alignment between HR activities and sustainable development objectives, albeit not on a consistent or regular basis. Occasional assessments may be conducted in response to specific initiatives, organizational changes, or external pressures to demonstrate accountability and progress towards sustainability goals.

Following behind, 23.9% of participants reported that their organization assesses the impact of HR policies and practices on sustainable development goals "Rarely." This response indicates that a notable proportion of organizations infrequently evaluate the effectiveness of their HR initiatives in contributing to sustainable development objectives. Limited assessments may stem from factors such as resource constraints, competing priorities, or a lack of awareness regarding the importance of monitoring and evaluating HR's contribution to sustainability.

Approximately 19.4% of respondents indicated that their organization assesses the impact of HR policies and practices on sustainable development goals "Regularly." While this represents a smaller portion of participants, it suggests that some organizations have established mechanisms for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of HR initiatives' impact on sustainability. Regular assessments enable organizations to track progress, identify areas for improvement, and make data-informed decisions to enhance the effectiveness of HR practices in supporting sustainable development goals.

Lastly, 11.9% of respondents reported that their organization never assesses the impact of HR policies and practices on sustainable development goals. This finding indicates a minority of organizations that do not prioritize or engage in any form of evaluation regarding the contribution of HR activities to sustainable development objectives. The absence of assessments may hinder organizations' ability to understand the effectiveness of their HR practices in driving sustainability and may represent a missed opportunity for continuous improvement and accountability.

Overall, the analysis of responses to the seventh question highlights variations in the frequency with which organizations assess the impact of HR policies and practices on sustainable development goals. While some organizations conduct occasional or regular assessments, others infrequently or never engage in such evaluations. Increasing the frequency and rigor of assessments can help organizations better understand the effectiveness of their HR initiatives in advancing sustainability objectives and drive continuous improvement in this area.

h. In your opinion, what role should HR play in driving sustainable development within organizations?

Analysis of Responses to Question 8:

The eighth question of the survey aimed to explore participants' opinions regarding the role that human resource (HR) should play in driving sustainable development within organizations. The responses provide insights into the perceived responsibilities and functions of HR departments in advancing sustainability agendas.

According to the survey results, the most common response selected by participants was "Advocating for sustainability initiatives," with 29.4% of respondents indicating that they believe HR should primarily advocate for sustainability initiatives within organizations. This finding suggests that a significant portion of participants view HR's role as being actively involved in promoting and championing sustainability efforts, both internally and externally. HR departments advocating for sustainability initiatives may engage in activities such as promoting awareness, influencing policy development, and fostering a culture of sustainability throughout the organization.

Following closely behind, 27.9% of respondents identified "Facilitating employee engagement" as a key role for HR in driving sustainable development within organizations. This response highlights the importance of HR departments in facilitating employee participation, involvement, and commitment to sustainability initiatives. HR professionals can play a vital role in fostering employee engagement by creating opportunities for involvement, providing training and support, and recognizing and rewarding sustainable behaviors.

Approximately 25% of participants indicated that HR should play a role in "Leading by example" when it comes to driving sustainable development. This response suggests that a notable portion of respondents believe HR departments should demonstrate leadership in adopting sustainable practices and behaviors, serving as role models for employees and other organizational stakeholders. Leading by example may involve integrating sustainability principles into HR policies and practices, promoting environmentally friendly workplace behaviors, and demonstrating a commitment to corporate social responsibility.

Lastly, 17.6% of respondents selected "All of the above," indicating that they believe HR should fulfill all of the roles mentioned (leading by example, facilitating employee engagement, and advocating for sustainability initiatives) in driving sustainable development within organizations. This response reflects a comprehensive view of HR's responsibilities in advancing sustainability agendas, encompassing both internal actions within the organization and external advocacy efforts.

Overall, the analysis of responses to the eighth question highlights diverse perspectives regarding the role of HR in driving sustainable development within organizations. While some emphasize HR's advocacy role, others prioritize facilitating employee engagement or leading by example. Recognizing the multifaceted nature of HR's role in sustainability can help organizations develop holistic approaches to integrating sustainability into HR policies, practices, and culture, ultimately contributing to more effective sustainability outcomes.

i. How would you rate the level of support your organization provides for HR initiatives aimed at sustainable development?

Analysis of Responses to Question 9:

The ninth question of the survey aimed to assess participants' perceptions of the level of support provided by their organizations for human resource (HR) initiatives aimed at sustainable development. The responses offer insights into the extent to which organizations prioritize and facilitate sustainability efforts within the HR function.

According to the survey results, the most common response selected by participants was "Very supportive," with 36.8% of respondents indicating that they perceive their organization to be highly supportive of HR initiatives aimed at sustainable development. This finding suggests that a significant portion of participants view their organizations as actively endorsing and facilitating sustainability efforts within the HR function. Organizations providing very supportive environments for sustainability initiatives may allocate resources, provide leadership endorsement, and create a culture that values and prioritizes sustainability within HR practices.

Following behind, 30.9% of respondents selected "Neutral" as their response, indicating that they perceive their organization's level of support for HR initiatives aimed at sustainable development to be neither particularly supportive nor unsupportive. This response suggests that a notable proportion of participants may perceive ambiguity or variability in the level of support provided by their organizations for sustainability initiatives within HR. Factors contributing to this perception may include inconsistent messaging, limited resources, or a lack of clear direction from organizational leadership regarding sustainability priorities within HR functions.

Approximately 16.2% of participants indicated that their organization is "Supportive" of HR initiatives aimed at sustainable development. This response suggests that some organizations demonstrate a level of support for sustainability efforts within HR, albeit to a lesser extent compared to those perceived as very supportive. Supportive organizations may provide some resources, encouragement, or recognition for sustainability initiatives within HR but may not fully prioritize or integrate sustainability into HR practices.

Similarly, 16.2% of respondents reported that their organization is "Not supportive" of HR initiatives aimed at sustainable development. This finding indicates a minority of participants who perceive their organizations as unsupportive or resistant to sustainability efforts within HR. Factors contributing to this perception may include organizational culture, competing priorities, or a lack of commitment or awareness regarding the importance of sustainability within HR functions.

Overall, the analysis of responses to the ninth question highlights variations in perceptions regarding the level of support provided by organizations for HR initiatives aimed at sustainable development. While some organizations are perceived as very supportive, others may demonstrate neutrality, supportiveness, or lack of support, reflecting differences in organizational priorities, cultures, and approaches to sustainability within HR functions. Identifying opportunities to enhance support for sustainability initiatives can help organizations leverage HR as a strategic driver of sustainable development goals.

j. How confident are you in your organization's ability to achieve sustainable development goals with effective HR management?

Analysis of Responses to Question 10:

The tenth question of the survey aimed to gauge participants' confidence levels in their organization's ability to achieve sustainable development goals through effective human resource (HR) management. The responses provide insights into the perceived alignment between HR practices and the organization's capacity to contribute to sustainable development objectives.

According to the survey results, the most common response selected by participants was "Very confident," with 50.7% of respondents indicating that they are highly confident in their organization's ability to achieve sustainable development goals with effective HR management. This finding suggests that a significant majority of participants have a strong belief in the organization's capacity to leverage HR practices as a strategic tool for advancing sustainable development objectives. High confidence levels may stem from a demonstrated track record of successful HR initiatives, strong leadership support, or a culture that values sustainability within the organization.

Following behind, 25.4% of respondents indicated that they are "Somewhat confident" in their organization's ability to achieve sustainable development goals with effective HR management. This response suggests that a notable proportion of participants express a moderate level of confidence in the organization's capacity to utilize HR practices to contribute to sustainability objectives. While somewhat confident respondents may acknowledge the potential of HR management in driving sustainability, they may also recognize areas for improvement or challenges that may impact the organization's ability to fully realize its sustainability goals.

Approximately 16.4% of participants reported that they are "Confident" in their organization's ability to achieve sustainable development goals with effective HR management. This response suggests that some participants hold a positive outlook regarding the organization's capacity to leverage HR practices for sustainability, although to a lesser extent compared to those who are very confident or somewhat confident. Confidence in this context may be influenced by factors such as past successes, organizational culture, or leadership support for sustainability initiatives within HR.

Lastly, 7.5% of respondents indicated that they are "Not confident" in their organization's ability to achieve sustainable development goals with effective HR management. This finding suggests a minority of participants who express skepticism or doubt regarding the organization's capacity to effectively utilize HR practices to drive sustainability initiatives. Factors contributing to this lack of confidence may include perceived barriers, challenges, or deficiencies in HR management's approach to sustainability within the organization.

Overall, the analysis of responses to the tenth question highlights varying levels of confidence in organizations' abilities to achieve sustainable development goals through effective HR management. While a majority of participants express high levels of confidence, others exhibit varying degrees of confidence or skepticism, reflecting differences in perceptions, experiences, and organizational contexts. Leveraging HR as a strategic driver of sustainability requires addressing challenges, building capabilities, and fostering a culture of sustainability to enhance organizational effectiveness in contributing to sustainable development goals.

VII. RECOMMENDATION

A. Analysis

1. To cultivate financial security through Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM), it is imperative to delve into the intricate financial dynamics of organizational sustainability. Extensive analysis reveals that S-HRM practices play a pivotal role in bolstering organizational profitability, thereby fortifying the financial security of the workforce. By intertwining the sustainability of human resources with societal and environmental factors, S-HRM facilitates the creation of a robust financial foundation for businesses, enabling them to thrive in the competitive marketplace while upholding sustainable product value over the long term.
2. In the pursuit of enhancing social sustainability and fostering robust networking mechanisms, S-HRM emerges as a potent enabler. By intricately considering societal factors within its purview, S-HRM lays the groundwork for sustainable social connectivity within organizations. While S-HRM practices contribute to the development of Human Capital and Social Capital through effective networking initiatives, it is essential to acknowledge that these efforts may not comprehensively encompass all societal facets. Thus, there exists an opportunity to further refine S-HRM strategies to encompass a broader spectrum of societal considerations, thereby augmenting social sustainability within organizational frameworks.
3. Effective policy formulation stands as a cornerstone in the realm of Human Resource Management (HRM), and S-HRM offers a promising avenue for developing sustainable HR policies. Within the ambit of S-HRM, the focal point revolves around striking a delicate balance between HR consumption and reproduction. By harnessing the potential of S-HRM practices, organizations can craft forward-thinking HR policies that anticipate and address the multifaceted challenges posed by technological advancements, economic fluctuations, and environmental exigencies. The essence lies in nurturing Human Capital sustainability, thereby fortifying organizational resilience and longevity in the face of evolving complexities.
4. A sustainable environment serves as a linchpin for organizational continuity, and S-HRM serves as a catalyst for nurturing such an environment. Through the lens of S-HRM, efforts are directed towards maintaining a harmonious equilibrium between organizational performance and environmental stewardship. By incorporating environmentally friendly training, development, appraisal, and reward programs, S-HRM fosters heightened environmental awareness among organizational stakeholders. This heightened consciousness translates into a more eco-conscious approach to HR activities, thereby reinforcing environmental sustainability within organizational ecosystems. Thus, S-HRM emerges as a pivotal force in sculpting a conducive environment that underpins organizational prosperity and longevity.

5. Enhanced Financial Literacy Initiatives: Organizations should prioritize initiatives aimed at enhancing financial literacy among employees to foster a deeper understanding of the financial implications of their actions and decisions. By offering workshops, seminars, or training programs on financial management, budgeting, and investment strategies, organizations can empower employees to make informed financial decisions, thereby contributing to overall financial security and stability.

6. Social Impact Programs: In addition to fostering internal social networks, organizations should actively engage in social impact programs and community initiatives to strengthen their social sustainability efforts. By partnering with local communities, NGOs, or charitable organizations, businesses can create meaningful opportunities for employee involvement in social causes, thereby nurturing a culture of social responsibility and solidarity within the organization.

7. Inclusive Policy Development: To ensure the effectiveness of HR policies, organizations should adopt an inclusive approach to policy development that takes into account the diverse needs, preferences, and experiences of all employees. By soliciting feedback through employee surveys, focus groups, or diversity and inclusion committees, organizations can tailor HR policies to address the unique challenges and aspirations of different employee demographics, ultimately fostering a more equitable and supportive work environment.

8. Environmental Certification and Compliance: Organizations should actively pursue environmental certification and compliance standards to demonstrate their commitment to environmental sustainability. By obtaining certifications such as ISO 14001 or LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), businesses can showcase their adherence to rigorous environmental management practices and standards, thereby enhancing their credibility and reputation as environmentally responsible entities. Additionally, ongoing monitoring and evaluation of environmental performance metrics can help organizations identify areas for improvement and drive continuous progress towards sustainability goals.

9. Investment in Green Technologies: Embracing green technologies and sustainable practices across operational processes can significantly contribute to environmental sustainability while also driving cost savings and efficiency gains for the organization. Whether through energy-efficient lighting systems, renewable energy sources, or waste reduction initiatives, investing in green technologies can yield both environmental and financial benefits in the long run, positioning the organization as a leader in sustainable business practices.

10. Collaborative Partnerships: Organizations should actively seek out collaborative partnerships and alliances with other like-minded entities, including suppliers, customers, and industry peers, to amplify their sustainability efforts. By leveraging collective resources, expertise, and networks, organizations can drive greater impact and innovation in sustainability initiatives, fostering a culture of shared responsibility and collaboration within the broader business ecosystem. Additionally, collaborative partnerships can facilitate knowledge sharing, best practice dissemination, and collective problem- solving, ultimately accelerating progress towards shared sustainability goals.

VIII. FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSION

Looking ahead, S-HRM research and practice are poised to evolve in response to emerging trends and challenges. Future research directions may include exploring the role of artificial intelligence and data analytics in S-HRM, examining the impact of global megatrends on HRM practices, and advancing methodologies for assessing the efVIII. ectiveness of sustainable HRM initiatives. In conclusion, this comprehensive analysis underscores the importance of Sustainable Human Resource Management in driving organizational success, promoting social responsibility, and safeguarding the planet for future generations. By embracing S-HRM principles, organizations can create value not only for themselves but also for society as a whole.

This comprehensive analysis provides a detailed examination of Sustainable Human Resource Management, covering theoretical frameworks, empirical evidence, practical implications, and future directions. It serves as a valuable resource for academics, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to understand and implement sustainable HRM practices in today's dynamic business environment.

Conclusion

The conclusion drawn from the analysis and discussion is clear: Human Resource Management (HRM) is indispensable for the effective utilization of human resources (HRs) to drive organizational growth and prosperity. However, achieving growth and prosperity is fraught with challenges, ranging from economic uncertainties to societal and environmental pressures. In the face of these challenges, organizations require a robust and organized system to navigate complexities and achieve their objectives. While it may seem straightforward to advocate for the effectiveness of such systems through theoretical explanations and analysis, the practical implementation is often fraught with difficulties. Nevertheless, Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) emerges as a beacon of hope, offering a systematic approach to addressing these challenges while safeguarding the interests of people, society, and the environment. S-HRM embodies a paradigm shift in HRM practices, emphasizing the importance of long-term sustainability and responsible stewardship of resources. By integrating sustainability principles into HRM strategies, organizations can align their growth objectives with broader societal and environmental goals, thereby fostering a harmonious balance between economic prosperity and social responsibility. At the heart of S-HRM lies a commitment to holistic organizational development, where the well-being of employees, communities, and ecosystems is prioritized alongside financial performance. This entails adopting a multifaceted approach to HRM that considers not only the traditional metrics of success but also the broader impact of organizational activities on stakeholders and the planet. Through initiatives such as employee well-being programs, diversity and inclusion initiatives, and environmental sustainability measures, S-HRM seeks to create value beyond profit margins, fostering a culture of ethical leadership and corporate citizenship. Moreover, S-HRM offers a framework for navigating the complexities of a rapidly changing business landscape, where technological advancements, globalization, and evolving consumer preferences pose both opportunities and challenges. By embracing principles of adaptability, innovation, and continuous improvement, organizations can position themselves as agile and resilient entities capable of thriving in dynamic environments. S-HRM encourages organizations to embrace change as an opportunity for growth, fostering a culture of learning, experimentation, and adaptation. Importantly, S-HRM emphasizes the importance of stakeholder engagement and collaboration in driving sustainable organizational outcomes. By forging partnerships with employees, customers, suppliers, and local communities, organizations can leverage collective expertise and resources to address shared challenges and pursue common goals. Through open dialogue, transparency, and shared decision-making, S-HRM fosters trust and mutual respect, laying the foundation for enduring relationships built on shared values and mutual benefit. However, while the benefits of S-HRM are evident, its successful implementation requires commitment, investment, and leadership from organizational stakeholders. Executives and managers must champion sustainability initiatives, embedding them into the organizational culture and decision-making processes. HR professionals play a crucial role in driving S-HRM practices, serving as advocates for employee well-being, diversity, and environmental stewardship. Moreover, employees themselves are integral to the success of S-HRM, as their engagement and participation are essential for realizing sustainable organizational outcomes. In conclusion, Sustainable Human Resource Management offers a compelling vision for the future of HRM, one that prioritizes not only organizational growth and prosperity but also the well-being of people and the planet. By embracing sustainability principles, organizations can unlock new opportunities for innovation, collaboration, and long-term success. As we navigate an increasingly complex and interconnected world, S-HRM provides a roadmap for building resilient, responsible, and thriving organizations that contribute positively to society and the environment. Sustainable Human Resource Management (S-HRM) stands at the intersection of sustainability principles and HRM practices. It encompasses strategies and initiatives aimed at fostering long-term organizational success while considering economic, social, environmental, and human factors. The evolution of S-HRM literature reflects a growing recognition of the need for organizations to balance profitability with social responsibility and environmental stewardship. This introduction provides an overview of S-HRM, highlighting its significance in contemporary organizational contexts and laying the groundwork for a comprehensive analysis of its theoretical frameworks, empirical evidence, and practical implications. A. Theoretical Frameworks of S-HRM Theoretical perspectives underpinning S-HRM provide insights into how organizations can integrate sustainability principles into HRM practices. Drawing from theories such as the resource-based view, stakeholder theory, and institutional theory, S-HRM emphasizes the alignment of HRM strategies with broader organizational goals and societal expectations. The four identified themes—economic, social, environmental, and employee orientation—serve as guiding principles for developing sustainable HRM practices. This section explores the theoretical foundations of S-HRM, elucidating key concepts and frameworks that inform its implementation. B. Sustainable Goals in S-HRM Central to S-HRM is the incorporation of four sustainable goals—financial, social, environmental, and human—into HRM systems and strategies. By integrating these goals, organizations can enhance financial performance, minimize negative impacts on various fronts, and uphold ethical standards. Strategies for achieving sustainable goals range from promoting diversity and inclusion to implementing environmentally friendly practices and prioritizing employee well-being. Case studies illustrate successful implementations of S-HRM principles, highlighting the tangible benefits for organizations and society at large. C. Empirical Evidence and Case Studies Empirical studies provide valuable insights into the relationship between S-HRM practices and organizational outcomes. By examining the impact of S-HRM on financial performance, employee well-being, environmental sustainability, and social responsibility, researchers have identified key drivers and mechanisms underlying its effectiveness. Case studies offer real-world examples of organizations that have embraced S-HRM principles, showcasing the diverse ways in which sustainability can be integrated into HRM practices across industries and sectors. D. Dimensions of S-HRM: Insights from Research Research findings from the Finnish study by Jarlstrom et al. (2016) highlight four dimensions of S- HRM: justice and equality, transparent HR practices, profitability, and employee well-being. These dimensions underscore the multifaceted nature of S-HRM, emphasizing the importance of fairness, transparency, financial viability, and employee welfare in sustainable HRM practices. Additionally, broader responsibility areas encompassing environmental stewardship, community engagement, and ethical conduct further enrich our understanding of S-HRM implementation. E. Challenges and Opportunities in S-HRM Implementation Despite its potential benefits, implementing S-HRM practices poses various challenges for organizations. These include resistance to change, resource constraints, and conflicting stakeholder interests. However, overcoming these challenges presents opportunities for innovation, collaboration, and strategic alignment. By leveraging technology, fostering partnerships, and aligning HRM practices with sustainability objectives, organizations can enhance their resilience and competitiveness in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.

References

[1] Randev, K. K., & Jha, J. K. (2019). Sustainable Human Resource Management: A Literature- based Introduction. NHRD Network Journal, 263145411987349. [2] Kramar, R. (2013). Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1069–1089. [3] Janaina Macke & Denise Genari (2019). Systematic literature review on sustainable human resource management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 806-815. [4] Avery, G. C., & Bergsteiner, H. (2011). Sustainable leadership practices for enhancing business resilience and performance. Strategy & Leadership, 39(3), 5–15. [5] Almarzooqi, A. H., Khan, M., & Khalid, K. (2019). The role of sustainable HRM in sustaining positive organizational outcomes. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. [6] Manzoor, F., Wei, L., Bányai, T., Nurunnabi, M., & Subhan, Q. A. (2019). An Examination of Sustainable HRM Practices on Job Performance: An Application of Training as a Moderator. Sustainability, 11(8), 2263. [7] Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainable Human Resource Management. Contributions to Management science [8] Chams, N., & García-Blandón, J. (2019). On the importance of sustainable human resource management for the adoption of sustainable development goals. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 109–122. [9] Järlström, M., Saru, E., & Vanhala, S. (2016). Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. [10] Mariappanadar, S. (2016). Health harm of work from the sustainable HRM perspective: scale development and validation. International Journal of Manpower, 37(6), 924–944. [11] Lopez-Cabrales, A., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2019). Sustainable HRM strategies and employment relationships as drivers of the triple bottom line. Human Resource Management Review, 100689. [12] De Vos, A., & Van der Heijden, B. I. (2017). Current thinking on contemporary careers: thekey roles of sustainable HRM and sustainability of careers. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 41–50. [13] Stankevi?i?t?, Ž., & Savanevi?ien?, A. (2018). Designing Sustainable HRM: The Core [14] Characteristics of Emerging Field. Sustainability, 10(12), 4798. [15] Ulrich, D., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2015). Are we there yet? What’s next for HR? Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 188–204. [16] Mariappanadar, S., & Kramar, R. (2014). Sustainable HRM. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 6(3), 206–224. [17] Ehnert, I., Harry, W., & Zink, K. J. (2013). Sustainability and HRM. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, 3–32. [18] Vanka, S., Rao, M. B., Singh, S., & Pulaparthi, M. R. (Eds.). (2020). Sustainable Human Resource Management. [19] Diaz-Carrion, R., López-Fernández, M., & Romero-Fernandez, P. M. (2018). Developing a sustainable HRM system from a contextual perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. [20] Nkomo, S. M. (1987). Human resource planning and organization performance: An exploratory analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 387–392. [21] K Aswathappa (2007). Human Resources and Personal Management (Text and Cases). Book. [22] Continue Anddison Eketu & Friday Ogbu Edeh (PhD) (2017). Human Resource Planning and Organisational Sustainability: A Study of Selected Telecommunication Firms in Rivers State. [23] International Journal of Social Science and Management Research, Vol. 3, No. 3 [24] Zivile Stankeviciute & Asta Savaneviciene (2013). SUSTAINABILITY AS A CONCEPT FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. Journal of Economics and Management, Vol. 18, No. 4. [25] Jyoti, K. (2019). Green HRM –People Management Commitment to Environmental Sustainability. SSRN Electronic Journal. [26] Muster, V., & Schrader, U. (2011). Green Work-Life Balance: A New Perspective for Green HRM. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 25(2), 140–156. [27] Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2012). Green Human Resource Management:A Review and Research Agenda*. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–1

Copyright

Copyright © 2024 Kartik Tyagi, Dr. Chandrani Ganguly. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.