In R&D there is need of rapid prototyping to validate new concepts. 3D printing is widely used now a days For rapid prototyping of new concepts. As there are numerous 3D printing technologies are available now in market so it is always difficult to select correct 3D printing technology to replicate plastic material as per requirement in prototyping. Engineers in industry initially struggle or spend time to select best suited 3D printing technology for rapid prototyping of their concept or part. In this study we will be reviewing different available 3D printing technologies and its capabilities in terms of adding properties in printed parts. We will be selecting most common plastic which are being used in industry. For selected materials best suited 3D printing technologies will be compared on the basis of required material properties
Introduction
I. INTRODUCTION
In early stage of new product development, selected concepts need to be validated before moving to manufacturing. In development stages manufacturing of parts directly in plastic is not feasible. But there is need to use Rapid prototyping method to validate concept which is best alternative for actual manufacturing process.. 3D printing is one of the well know rapid prototyping technique. It is recent trend in manufacturing sector. It has its unique advantages over conventional methods. 3D printing technology is widely used in R&D sectors of manufacturing industry such as automobile, medical, aerospace etc. But as different 3d printing technologies are available in market so there is always question on quick selection of right technology. In this paper we will be comparing different 3d printing technologies for replicating plastic material . we will list different cases as per requirement in product and we will list best suitable 3d printing technology for each case. This comparison will help user to select 3d printing technology which will be suitable for requirement in their product.
II. METHODOLOGY
Recent trend in 3D printing technology will studied. Most common 3d printing technology with their material which can replace plastic will be selected and compared. On the basis of industrial application most commonly used plastic materials will be selected for study. 3D printing technologies will be compared to replicate selected plastic materials
III. AVAILABLE 3D PRINTING TECHNOLOGIES FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS
Following are the 3D printing technologies available in market for plastic
Stereolithography (SLA)
Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)
Digital Light Process (DLP)
Multi Jet Fusion (MJF)
PolyJet
Following are the 3D printing technologies available in market for metals
a. Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS)
b. Electron Beam Melting (EBM)
IV. TABLE SHOWS COMPARISON OF 3D PRINTING TECHNOLOGIES ON THE BASIS OF PROPERTIES
Properties
3D printing technology
SLA
SLS
FDM
Polyjet
Dimensional Accuracy
Good
Less
Poor
Good
Surface finish
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Stiffness
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Elongation properties
Poor
Excellent
Good
Poor
Overmold compatibility or silicon / rubber material
No
No
No
Yes
Range of material
Wide
Limited
Wide
Limited
Scale : Excllent/ Good/ Poor
Yes/No
Wide /Limited
V. PLASTIC MATERIALS AND THERE EXPECTED PROPERTIES FROM 3D PRINTING
There are variety of plastic materials are being used for different applications.
Following are properties of plastics are expected from 3D printing technologies
Properties
Stiffness
Elongation
Surface finish
Dimensional stability
Material
PP
Yes
Yes
Good
Good
ABS
Yes
Yes
Good
Good
HDPE
Yes
Yes
Good
Good
LDE
No
Yes
Good
Good
PET
Yes
Yes
Good
Good
PS
Yes
No
Good
Good
PC
Yes
No
Good
Good
VI. COMPARISON TO SELECT SUITABLE 3D PRINTING TECHNOLOGY FOR DIFFERENT PLASTIC MATERIALS
Based on requirement of properties in plastic materials, Suitable 3d printing technology can be selected as we know capabilities of selected 3d printing technologies to meet material requirement. Following table will show capabilities of 3d printing technology to simulate properties of plastic
Table-II
Selection of 3d printing technology based on combination of 3d printing parameters
Different cases of material requirement for prototyping
Different materials which suits to requirements
PP,ABS,LDPE,
HDPE, PC, PS like
PP, ABS, LDPE like
PP,ABS,LDPE,
HDPE, PS, PC, PTFE
Like
PP,ABS, LDPE,
HDPE
like
TPE
like
Surface finish
High
High
Low
Low
High or Low
Dimensional accuracy
High
High
Low
Low
High or Low
Stiffness
High
Low
High
Low
-
Elongation
Low
High
Low
High
-
Silicon/rubber like /overmoulding
-
-
-
-
Yes
Suitable 3D printing technology for given requirement
SLA, Polyjet
SLS
FDM, Polyjet
FDM, SLS
Polyjet
Conclusion
With wide application range of plastic, each every product needs different plastic as per required plastic. But in stage of prototyping we use 3d printing technology to replicate plastic parts. Each 3D printing technology has its own feature make parts. User has to select machine as per requirement in parts. From comparison in this study we come across following findings
1) For case of high stiffness, low elongation with good finish and good dimensional accuracy SLA & Polyjet is preferred.
2) For case of low stiffness, high elongation with poor finish and good dimensional accuracy SLS is preferred
3) For case of high stiffness, OR high elongation with poor finish and dimensional accuracy FDM is preferred
References
[1] Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing: A Review of Current Technologies Conference Paper · January 2009 DOI: 10.1115/IMECE2009-11750
[2] A Review paper on 3D-Printing Aspects and Various Processes Used in the 3D-Printing by Vinod G. Gokhare and Dr. D. N. Raut, and Dr. D. K. Shinde, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) http://www.ijert.org ISSN: 2278-0181 IJERTV6IS060409
[3] 3D Printing Technology, Material Used For Printing and its Applications, Article in International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research · July 2020 , by Ajay Shinde, Ashutosh dandekar, Rahul Patil, Nandakishor dhavale
[4] The Impact and Application of 3D Printing Technology Article in International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · June 2014 by Cephas Mawere Harare Institute of Technology.
[5] Bai, W.; Fang, H.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Hu, G.; Bao, G.; Wan, Y. Academic Insights and Perspectives in 3D Printing: A Bibliometric Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8298. https:// doi.org/10.3390/app11188298
[6] 3D Printing of Physical Organ Models: Recent Developments and Challenges Zhongboyu Jin, Yuanrong Li, Kang Yu, Linxiang Liu, Jianzhong Fu, Xinhua Yao, Aiguo Zhang,* and Yong He* Advanced Science published by Wiley-VCH GmbH
[7] 3D Printed Contact Lenses Article in ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering · January 2021 by Fahad alam, Mohammed elsherif, Badar Alqattan, Ahmed E salih