The Role of Speech Pathology in Shaping Education Theory: A Literature Review

Abstract

This literature review explores the role of speech pathology in education, focusing on how communication challenges influence academic and social outcomes. It highlights the historical integration of speech-language pathology (SLP) into educational settings, emphasizing its major impact on students’ success. The review also examines practical solutions, such as collaborative frameworks between educators and SLPs, Universal Design for Learning (UDL), and advanced technologies like AI-powered tools. By adjusting instruction to accommodate a range of communication needs, these interventions make sure that kids can succeed in inclusive classrooms. Speech pathology has changed from solitary clinical practice to teamwork in educational institutions. Teachers and SLPs help students overcome communication barriers and actively participate in learning by incorporating strategies including individualized education plans (IEPs) and accessible teaching approaches. This essay also discusses possible avenues for systemic transformation. Standardized regulations, greater training for teachers in communication assistance, and more resources for SLPs could all benefit education as a whole. In order to guarantee that every student has access to a worthwhile education, this literature review highlights the significance of ongoing studies.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

Imagine a child struggling to express herself in a busy classroom, their hand lingering in the air. Despite a barrier that neither they nor their peers can comprehend, the words are present. Although communication is essential to education, it can act as a barrier rather than a bridge for kids with speech and language difficulties. The field of speech pathology, which focuses on identifying and treating these conditions, is essential to maximizing potential and promoting inclusivity in learning environments.

Stuttering, articulation issues, language delays, and other communication problems that frequently appear in early childhood and, if left untreated, continue into later life are all addressed by speech pathology. These problems are not just clinical; they also have an impact on a child's capacity to learn, interact with others, and flourish in the social and academic spheres. By sharing its knowledge with educators, the field gives them tools to help kids who might otherwise be excluded from standard classroom environments (Nigmatullina & Artemyeva, 2015).

Fundamentally, education is a communication process. Effective idea sharing is essential for critical thinking, teamwork, and knowledge transmission. When this ability is compromised, the effects go beyond the person and affect classroom dynamics and academic results. In light of this, educators and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are increasingly collaborating to establish settings that celebrate and accommodate communication diversity (Snow, 2016).

The purpose of this paper is to illuminate the profound synergy between speech pathology and education theory. By exploring the historical evolution of speech pathology, its integration into educational practices, and its potential for shaping inclusive strategies, this review underscores the field’s transformative power. It highlights systemic barriers that persist in education and offers a blueprint for leveraging speech pathology to overcome them, ultimately fostering success for students with diverse communication needs.

The theoretical underpinnings of speech pathology, its practical consequences for academic success, and its role in inclusive education are all examined in this review. This paper's scope includes both established and novel approaches, ranging from early interventions to cutting-edge technological applications. Frameworks such as Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and legislative changes that can further integrate speech pathology into educational systems are given particular consideration (Dockrell & Lindsay, 1998).

It becomes clear when we examine these connections that speech pathology offers crucial information for forming educational philosophy. In addition to improving individual learning experiences, it also raises the overall effectiveness of classrooms by removing obstacles to communication and promoting inclusivity. By doing this, speech pathology reinforces that all students should have an equal chance to succeed, regardless of their communication skills.

II. METHODS

A. Data Sources

Using the electronic database Google Scholar, this research paper explored studies from 2001 to 2024. Keywords central to the investigation included speech structure, education, psychology, cognitive development, communication disorders, pedagogical frameworks, linguistic theory, child development, evidence-based practices, interdisciplinary approaches, educational psychology, and speech-language interventions.

B. Resources Selection

Following an initial review, only full-length articles and peer-reviewed academic journals were considered for inclusion. The selection process comprised two stages to ensure alignment with the research objectives on speech-language pathology and its interdisciplinary applications:

1) Inclusion Criteria

1. The article must focus on speech structure, educational practices, or psychological frameworks.
2. The paper must provide measurable, theoretical, or historical evidence related to speech-language interventions or cognitive development.
3. The article must demonstrate robust citations and contribute significantly to the field.

2) Exclusion Criteria:

1. Articles unrelated to speech structure, education, or psychology.
2. Materials consisting solely of abstracts without the full paper available.
3. Articles not written in English.

III. FOUNDATIONS OF SPEECH PATHOLOGY AND EDUCATION THEORY

A. Historical Background

Speech pathology's history demonstrates how science, education, and social development have influenced the field. Speech pathology first appeared in the early 1900s as a targeted reaction to speech difficulties. Early phonetic and linguistic studies established the groundwork for the diagnosis and treatment of speech problems and offered important insights into the creation of speech sounds.

The scientific foundations of psychology were established by developments that further emphasized the value of early intervention in addressing developmental problems (McCormack et al., 2015).

As the profession gained recognition by the mid-20th century, its scope expanded to encompass diverse disorders such as stuttering, articulation challenges, and aphasia. During this time, education systems began recognizing the profound impact of speech and language issues on academic success. Collaborative efforts between schools and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) emerged, aiming to provide interventions that addressed these challenges. This marked a significant milestone in integrating speech pathology into education (Sheepway, Lincoln, & Togher, 2011).

In the past, there has been a significant change in the way that pupils with communication problems are taught. At first, segregation was commonplace, and impacted students were kept out of regular classes. Nonetheless, inclusion was reinforced by changing public perceptions and significant laws like the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This law affirmed the importance of communication in both academic and social development by requiring schools to make the necessary modifications (Sylvan, 2014).

Speech pathology's historical development serves as an inspiration for current initiatives to advance inclusion and equity. In order to ensure that every student has the chance to achieve, the discipline keeps innovating and advocating for the integration of communication support in education by thinking back on its history.

B. Core Concepts in Speech Pathology

The four key areas of speech pathology are voice, language development, fluency, and articulation. With implications for both academic achievement and personal expression, each domain is an essential part of effective communication.

The clarity of speech sounds is a component of articulation. Intelligibility can be greatly impacted by disorders in this area, which can range from mild mispronunciations to serious speech impairments. Customized therapies that combine training in motor skills and phonological awareness are needed to address these issues (Greenwell & Walsh, 2021).

Another essential is fluency, or the fluidity of speaking. This flow is disrupted by disorders like stuttering, which frequently lead to worry and frustration. To help people regain confidence and increase their speech fluency, SLPs employ methods like cognitive-behavioral tactics and controlled breathing (Adebayo & Mabuku, 2014).

Pitch, loudness, and quality of voice are all essential for expressing message and emotion. Multidisciplinary treatments are frequently needed to treat voice abnormalities, which might be caused by strain, neurological conditions, or psychological causes. To restore vocal health, therapy may involve vocal exercises and medical advice (Wylie et al., 2015).

The most complete area is language development, which includes both expressive and receptive abilities. While expressive language focuses on creating cohesive messages, receptive language is concerned with comprehending words and sentences. Communication in general, grammar usage, and vocabulary acquisition can all be hampered by disorders in this region. To solve these problems and guarantee that students can participate in learning environments successfully, SLPs use interactive exercises, visual aids, and language modeling (Bradburn & Gill, 2020).

These fundamental ideas collectively highlight the complex nature of speech pathology. Through addressing the entire range of communication difficulties, the field enables people to engage in social and educational environments in a meaningful way.

C. Overview of Education Theory

The ideas of education theory, which offer a framework for comprehending how people learn and develop, are highly compatible with the objectives of speech pathology. The relationship between social contact and cognitive development is highlighted by foundational theories by Lev Vygotsky and Jean Piaget, among others.

The significance of active exploration in learning is emphasized by Piaget's phases of cognitive development. As they move through the developmental phases, children build knowledge through interactions with their surroundings. This viewpoint ensures that therapy is in line with a child's cognitive capacity and facilitates the development of age-appropriate interventions in speech pathology (Beltrán Llera & Pérez Sánchez, 2011).

The sociocultural theory of Vygotsky emphasizes how important social interaction is to learning. His Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) theory illustrates how students advance when they get mentored assistance from competent people, such peers and teachers. This idea aligns with the collaborative approach of speech pathology, in which families, educators, and SLPs collaborate to scaffold communication skills within the ZPD (Campbell et al., 2016).

By acknowledging a variety of cognitive capabilities, including language and interpersonal skills, Howard Gardner's idea of multiple intelligences challenges conventional notions of intelligence. By appreciating each student's distinct skills, this viewpoint promotes inclusiveness and tailored approaches in speech pathology and education (Noël et al., 2022).

By integrating these theories into practice, speech pathologists enrich their ability to address communication challenges within educational settings. Aligning interventions with educational principles fosters not only individual growth but also a more inclusive and dynamic learning environment for all.

IV. SPEECH-LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT AND ACADEMIC SUCCESS

A. Normal Speech-Language Development

The foundation for future academic and social success is laid by the development of speech and language in early life. Babbling, single-word utterances, and ultimately complex phrases are among the stages that children go through from infancy forward. The majority of kids can compose simple sentences by the age of three, displaying the fundamental abilities required for reading and arithmetic. Because they facilitate productive interactions with classmates and teachers, these milestones serve as predictors of school readiness in addition to being markers of cognitive development (Durand et al., 2013).

B. Impact of Speech-Language Disorders on Learning

A child's academic performance can be severely hampered by speech and language abnormalities, which include a variety of issues like stuttering, articulation problems, and receptive language deficiencies. Critical learning domains like writing, vocal communication, and reading comprehension are all impacted by these diseases. Children with articulation difficulties, for instance, may find it difficult to express themselves correctly, which might cause them to become frustrated and participate less in class activities (Adebayo & Mabuku, 2014). A child's capacity to follow directions, comprehend novel ideas, and participate in conversations is hampered by language problems, especially those that impact receptive abilities. Academic underperformance and gaps in knowledge acquisition may arise from this. Furthermore, the social ramifications of speech-language impairments, like trouble making friends and taking part in group activities, make things even worse for impacted kids (Harrison et al., 2009).

To lessen the effects of speech-language impairments, interventions that are customized to these kids' unique requirements are crucial. Students receive focused support, like speech therapy sessions and classroom adjustments, thanks to the cooperation of educators and SLPs. In addition to removing obstacles to communication, these actions provide a more welcoming and encouraging learning environment.

C. Speech Interventions in Educational Settings

Students with speech-language impairments have shown improved academic results when speech therapies are included in educational settings. A key component of these initiatives is Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), which offer tailored support programs that take into account the particular difficulties faced by each student. In order to ensure congruence with more general academic goals, IEPs frequently contain goals pertaining to speech and language development (Campbell et al., 2016).

Frameworks for Universal Design for Learning (UDL) make educational materials even more accessible to students who struggle with communication. UDL provides a flexible learning environment that meets a range of needs by combining various forms of representation, participation, and expression. For example, students with speech-language difficulties can greatly benefit from visual aids, interactive exercises, and technology-driven tools like speech-to-text software (Ralabate et al., 2014).

Case studies demonstrate how these approaches have a transforming effect. In one instance, students who attended focused speech therapy sessions showed noticeable gains in fluency and articulation, which allowed them to participate more boldly in class discussions. Similarly, it has been demonstrated that using UDL practices in inclusive classrooms improves learning results for every student while promoting a collaborative and equitable culture (Bradburn & Gill, 2020). The complex issues of speech-language impairments can be addressed in schools by incorporating speech treatments into instructional strategies. These initiatives help create inclusive and vibrant learning communities in addition to promoting the achievement of individual students.

V. KEY THEORETICAL CONNECTIONS BETWEEN SPEECH PATHOLOGY AND EDUCATION

A. Speech as a Mediator of Learning

Speech serves as a conduit between internal thought and external communication, modulating cognitive and social learning processes. This idea is consistent with educational approaches that highlight how crucial interaction is to learning. For instance, Lev Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) shows how students might advance by engaging in supervised interactions with more experienced people. According to this approach, speech is the main instrument used to scaffold learning, allowing pupils to interact with difficult concepts and express what they have learned (Vygotsky, 1978).

Strong language proficiency is a prerequisite for academic achievement in all subject areas, according to numerous studies. Strong verbal learners are better able to follow directions, contribute to class debates, and synthesize knowledge. On the other hand, people with speech and language problems frequently encounter obstacles when doing these vital activities, which emphasizes the necessity of focused therapy. To ensure that all students can successfully access the curriculum, speech-language pathologists (SLPs) collaborate with educators to develop practices that promote verbal engagement (Snow, 2016).

Speech has cognitive advantages, but it also helps children learn socially by allowing them to interact and work together with their peers. Group projects and classroom involvement, which are becoming more and more valued in contemporary educational environments, depend heavily on communication. These relationships can be difficult for kids who have speech problems, which can result in social isolation and lower academic engagement. By tackling these issues, speech therapies foster social integration and communication skills, resulting in a more welcoming learning environment (Dockrell & Lindsay, 1998).

B. Psychological Impact of Speech Challenges on Learning

Beyond the classroom, speech and language impairments have psychological repercussions that affect kids' motivation, self-worth, and general mental health. Children who struggle with communication may feel anxious and frustrated, especially when their teachers and peers don't understand them. These feelings have the potential to cause social disengagement and decreased involvement in school-related activities, which might worsen learning difficulties (Adebayo & Mabuku, 2014).

Speech problems frequently result in low self-esteem because students may believe they are less competent than their peers. Negative experiences, like not being able to adequately express ideas or respond to inquiries in front of the class, frequently serve to perpetuate this attitude. A student's confidence may be damaged over time by these persistent challenges, making them less inclined to take chances in their studies or ask for assistance when necessary (Harrison et al., 2009).

A comprehensive strategy that combines communication-focused therapy with emotional support is needed to address the psychological effects of speech difficulties. Teachers and SLPs can collaborate to establish understanding and empathy-focused teaching environments that are supportive. By encouraging resilience and a growth attitude, strategies including peer modeling, positive reinforcement, and tailored feedback assist students in developing self-confidence (Campbell et al., 2016).

The psychological aspects of speech impairments can be recognized and addressed by schools to foster learning settings where all students feel capable and appreciated. In addition to improving academic results, this all-encompassing strategy fosters emotional health and equips kids for success in and out of the classroom.

C. Integration of Multimodal Learning Approaches

Combining verbal, visual, and kinesthetic modalities, multimodal learning approaches provide effective tools for improving learning results. Because they offer several ways for children to process and convey information, these methods are especially beneficial for those who struggle with speech and language impairments. For example, visual aids like movies and diagrams can help students understand difficult ideas, while hands-on activities encourage active learning (Noël et al., 2022).

Multimodal approaches have long been used in speech pathology to accommodate a range of communication needs. Students with severe speech difficulties can engage in class activities thanks to strategies like augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. According to Wylie et al. (2015), these resources, which range from picture boards to speech-generating devices, enable students to communicate with their peers and share their thoughts, promoting inclusivity and participation.

Multimodal techniques are integrated in ways that go beyond technology. Role-playing and group conversations are examples of collaborative activities that integrate speech and movement, which promote active engagement and reinforce learning through a variety of senses. These exercises give children who struggle with speech the chance to practice speaking in a safe setting, which gradually increases their confidence and fluency (Bradburn & Gill, 2020).

Teachers and SLPs can design dynamic classrooms that accommodate a variety of abilities by implementing multimodal learning methodologies. In addition to meeting the unique requirements of students with speech and language impairments, these methods enhance the educational process for all students by encouraging critical thinking, creativity, and teamwork.

VI. INCLUSIVE EDUCATION AND SPEECH PATHOLOGY

A. Speech Pathology in Special Education

Particularly in special education settings, speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are crucial to promoting inclusive education. They play a key role in creating Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), which are all-encompassing plans designed to meet the particular communication requirements of students with speech and language impairments. These programs play a crucial role in making sure that students receive focused treatments that support their academic goals, frequently making it easier for them to integrate into regular classes when it is practical (Sylvan, 2014).

There is great importance of collaboration in SLP work. For example, certain classroom adjustments, such more time to answer during discussions or other ways to communicate ideas, may be helpful for a student who stutters. In addition to enabling students to participate fully in their education, these accommodations lessen the stigma attached to communication difficulties (Ruddy et al., 2013). SLPs also assist in bridging the gap between therapeutic interventions and useful teaching techniques. Through this integration, speech therapy is made a part of the student's entire learning environment rather than being limited to separate sessions. The ultimate objective is to help students reach their maximum potential by developing communication skills that they can use in social and academic settings.

B. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Speech Pathology

The Universal Design for Learning (UDL) paradigm encourages inclusive and flexible learning settings, which is in perfect harmony with the concepts of speech pathology. To ensure that all students, regardless of ability, can access educational content and effectively demonstrate their learning, UDL promotes the use of multiple modes of representation, expression, and engagement. In order to accommodate a variety of requirements, UDL solutions for kids with speech and language problems frequently incorporate resources like interactive technology, visual aids, and alternate forms of communication (Campbell et al., 2016).

SLPs play a key role in putting UDL ideas into practice. Their knowledge aids teachers in modifying lessons and interactions to promote communication equity. For instance, they might suggest visual timetables to help kids who struggle with receptive language or speech-to-text software for children who have serious articulation issues. These modifications provide a more dynamic and inclusive learning environment by improving accessibility and encouraging deeper interaction (Wylie et al., 2015).

UDL has a strong emphasis on implementing systemic improvements that benefit all students, going beyond individual treatments. UDL guarantees that students with speech and language problems are not just accommodated but also actively participate in the learning process by implementing multimodal teaching techniques and encouraging collaborative learning environments. This method fosters critical thinking, creativity, and teamwork, which helps the entire classroom.

C. Equity in Communication Access

A complex strategy including systemic policy changes, resource allocation, and raised awareness is needed to achieve equity in communication access. Comprehensive training programs that equip teachers to recognize and successfully address speech and language difficulties must be given top priority in schools. Furthermore, increasing the number of SLPs in schools is essential to provide prompt and focused treatments for pupils who require them the most (Bradburn & Gill, 2020).

A key component of attaining equity is advocacy. Through increasing awareness of the value of communication as a basic human right, interested parties can influence legislative reforms that give inclusion top priority. The creation of an inclusive educational environment requires actions targeted at lowering SLP caseloads and expanding access to assistive technology. Technology like augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices, for instance, can enable students who struggle with communication to engage in meaningful classroom activities (Ralabate et al., 2014).

VII. EMERGING TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

A. Technology in Speech Pathology and Education

Technological developments are transforming speech pathology and education by offering cutting-edge resources to improve learning outcomes and solve communication difficulties. One such development is the use of voice recognition software powered by artificial intelligence (AI), which has greatly increased the precision and effectiveness of detecting speech abnormalities. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) can develop focused intervention plans with the use of these tools, which evaluate speech patterns and offer real-time feedback (Bradburn & Gill, 2020).

Technology has made it possible to include tools like virtual reality (VR) platforms, interactive learning programs, and speech-to-text software into the classroom. For example, kids with speech and language problems can practice communication skills in realistic circumstances by using VR simulations, which offer immersive experiences. Students who struggle with verbal interactions or social anxiety will especially benefit from these applications (Noël et al., 2022).

Another revolutionary advancement is teletherapy, which provides remote access to speech therapy services. This strategy has been particularly effective in reaching kids in underserved or rural locations, guaranteeing fair access to assistance. For students who might otherwise encounter obstacles to receiving care, teletherapy offers a holistic solution by integrating digital exams, interactive exercises, and video conferencing (Wylie et al., 2015).

Technology has many applications in speech pathology and education than just one-off treatments. The use of data analytics and machine learning algorithms to monitor development, spot patterns, and adapt tactics to different learning requirements is growing. These developments not only increase the efficacy of therapies but also give teachers and SLPs the ability to make well-informed decisions that are advantageous to every student.

B. Collaborative Models Between Educators and SLPs

In order to develop coherent and successful strategies to serve students with speech and language impairments, collaboration between educators and SLPs is crucial. Multidisciplinary training programs have become an essential part of this partnership, giving both professionals the tools they need to deal with communication issues in classrooms (Sylvan, 2014).

Co-teaching arrangements, in which educators and SLPs collaborate to create and present classes that include speech therapy approaches into the curriculum, are one successful paradigm. For instance, in order to complement academic objectives and reinforce language abilities, an SLP can incorporate vocabulary-building activities into a reading lesson. All students gain from this cooperative approach, which guarantees that speech interventions are smoothly incorporated into class activities (Ruddy et al., 2013).

Training seminars and workshops for professional growth are also essential for promoting teamwork. Through these chances, SLPs can learn about classroom dynamics and instructional techniques, and educators can learn about the newest tools and practices in speech therapy. These initiatives improve collaborations and the overall efficacy of interventions by fostering understanding between parties (Bradburn & Gill, 2020).

Collaborative methods are further enhanced by parent participation. Students receive consistent support in all settings when parents, teachers, and SLPs communicate on a regular basis. To treat communication issues holistically, parents should, for example, reinforce therapy practices at home. Involving educators, SLPs, and families, this triangle of support enhances the effectiveness of therapies and creates a nurturing learning environment (Ralabate et al., 2014).

C. Policy Implications for Speech Pathology in Education

In order to remove structural obstacles and provide fair access to speech-language services in schools, policy changes are essential. The necessity to lessen SLPs' caseloads so they can provide each student individualized attention is one urgent need. For students with communication difficulties, policies that increase funding for SLP hiring and resource expansion can greatly enhance treatment delivery and results (Campbell et al., 2016). Another crucial area for reform is the establishment of uniform eligibility standards for speech therapy services. Disparities in access are currently frequently caused by inconsistent regulations among districts. All students who need assistance can receive prompt and suitable interventions if clear, consistent guidelines are established (Bradburn & Gill, 2020). Another policy objective is funding assistive technologies. Students with significant communication impairments can be enabled to fully engage in social and academic activities by receiving funding for aids like speech-generating software and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. According to Wylie et al. (2015), these tools not only improve communication but also encourage students' independence and self-assurance. The main force behind these policy changes is advocacy. Stakeholders must collaborate to emphasize the significance of speech pathology in school, including parents, SLPs, educators, and professional associations. Advocacy initiatives can sway decision-makers to give funding for speech-language services top priority and develop more inclusive educational systems by highlighting the link between academic achievement and communication abilities (Sylvan, 2014). It is possible to improve the integration of speech pathology into school and give every student the resources and assistance they require for success by enacting specific legislative changes and engaging in cooperative campaigning.

VIII. DISCUSSION & IMPLICATIONS

Better support for students with speech and language impairments is made possible by the transformative opportunities that come with integrating speech pathology into schooling. From promoting inclusive classrooms to utilizing technology for better interventions, this study has shed light on the ways that insights from speech pathology might enhance educational practices. The conversation now shifts to the results' wider ramifications and the actions required to optimize their influence.
The necessity of structural change to guarantee fair access to speech-language services is among the most urgent ramifications. Due to a lack of resources and uneven policies, inequities continue to exist despite technological breakthroughs and collaborative methods. For example, it might be difficult for students in underserved or rural locations to get speech therapy, which exacerbates educational disparities. More financing, focused legislative changes, and lobbying initiatives that highlight the critical role that communication plays in education are all necessary to address these issues (Sylvan, 2014).

Another essential component of advancement is cooperation between speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and educators. Co-teaching methods and multidisciplinary training programs serve as examples of how these collaborations develop a common understanding of students' requirements and produce unified approaches to meeting those needs. However, maintaining such teamwork calls for institutional support as well as continual professional development. Training programs that give teachers and SLPs the skills they need to collaborate well should be given top priority in schools in order to improve the caliber and reliability of interventions (Ruddy et al., 2013).  There are important ramifications for the use of technology in speech pathology and education as well. Virtual reality simulations, teletherapy platforms, and speech-to-text software are examples of tools that have the potential to completely transform service delivery by increasing the accessibility and efficacy of therapies. The effective use of these technologies, however, depends on removing obstacles like infrastructure, training, and cost. To guarantee that all students, regardless of their circumstances, benefit from technology breakthroughs, policymakers and stakeholders must invest in scalable solutions that close these gaps (Bradburn & Gill, 2020). In conclusion, the intersection of speech pathology and education holds immense potential for transforming learning environments and improving outcomes for all students. By addressing systemic barriers, fostering collaboration, leveraging technology, and prioritizing holistic support, stakeholders can create a more inclusive and effective educational system.

References

[1] Adebayo, A. S., & Mabuku, M. (2014). The Impact of Speech and Language Disorders on Pupils\', Learning and Socialization in Schools of Kalomo District-Zambia. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(2), 141-152. [2] Bradburn, C., & Gill, C. (2020). The evolution of access to speech therapy services in American schools. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 33(4), 52-57. [3] Campbell, W. N., Selkirk, E., & Gaines, R. (2016). Speech-language pathologists’ role in inclusive education: A survey of clinicians’ perceptions of universal design for learning. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology (CJSLPA), 122-128. [4] Dockrell, J., & Lindsay, G. (1998). The ways in which speech and language difficulties impact on children’s access to the curriculum. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 14(2), 117-133. [5] Durand, V. N., Loe, I. M., Yeatman, J. D., & Feldman, H. M. (2013). Effects of early language, speech, and cognition on later reading: a mediation analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 586. [6] Elenko, K. R. (2020). School-Based Speech-Language Pathologist Collaborative Practice: A Literature Review. [7] Giangreco, M. F. (2000). Related services research for students with low-incidence disabilities: Implications for speech-language pathologists in inclusive classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(3), 230-239. [8] Greenwell, T., & Walsh, B. (2021). Evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology: Where are we now?. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(1), 186-198. [9] Harrison, L. J., McLeod, S., Berthelsen, D., & Walker, S. (2009). Literacy, numeracy, and learning in school-aged children identified as having speech and language impairment in early childhood. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(5), 392-403. [10] Hewat, S., Penman, A., Davidson, B., Baldac, S., Howells, S., Walters, J., ... & Hill, A. E. (2020). A framework to support the development of quality simulation?based learning programmes in speech–language pathology. International journal of language & communication disorders, 55(2), 287-300. [11] Llera, J. A. B., & Sánchez, L. P. (2011). More than a century of educational psychology: overview and future prospects. Papeles del Psicólogo, 32(3), 204-231. [12] McCormack, J., Easton, C., & Morkel-Kingsbury, L. (2015). Educating speech-language pathologists for the 21st century: Course design considerations for a distance education master of speech pathology program. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 66(4-5), 147-157. [13] Motevalli, S., Perveen, A., & Tresa Anak Michael, M. (2020). Motivating students to learn: An overview of literature in educational psychology. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(3), 63-74. [14] Muratovna, T. G. (2024). THE EVOLUTION OF SPEECH THERAPY TECHNIQUES: INNOVATIONS, CHALLENGES, AND FUTURE TRENDS. Academia Repository, 5(02), 26-30. [15] Nigmatullina, I. A., & Artemyeva, T. V. (2015). Integration of educational and research activity of the federal university students, studying in the approach «special (speech pathology) education». The Social Sciences, 10(2), 76-80. [16] Nelson, R., & Ball, M. J. (2003). Models of phonology in the education of speech?language pathologists. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 17(4-5), 403-409. [17] Noël, R., Miranda, D., Cechinel, C., Riquelme, F., Primo, T. T., & Munoz, R. (2022). Visualizing collaboration in teamwork: A multimodal learning analytics platform for non-verbal communication. Applied Sciences, 12(15), 7499. [18] Ralabate, P. K., Currie-Rubin, R., Boucher, A., & Bartecchi, J. (2014). Collaborative planning using universal design for learning. Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 15(1), 26-31. [19] Ruddy, B. H., Lewis, V., & Sapienza, C. M. (2013, May). The role of the speech-language pathologist in the schools for the treatment of voice disorders: working within the framework of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. In Seminars in speech and language (Vol. 34, No. 02, pp. 055-062). Thieme Medical Publishers. [20] Sekhon, J. K., Oates, J., Kneebone, I., & Rose, M. L. (2022). Counselling education for speech-language pathology students in Australia: a survey of education in post-stroke aphasia. Aphasiology, 36(12), 1417-1446. [21] Shapovalova, O. E., Emelyanova, I. A., Karynbaeva, O. V., Borisova, E. A., & Levkova, T. V. (2021). Professional Identity Of Future Masters Of Special (Speech Pathology) Education. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. [22] Snow, P. C. (2016). Elizabeth Usher Memorial Lecture: Language is literacy is language-Positioning speech-language pathology in education policy, practice, paradigms and polemics. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(3), 216-228. [23] Sisti, M. K., & Robledo, J. A. (2021). Interdisciplinary collaboration practices between education specialists and related service providers. Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 10(1), n1. [24] Sylvan, L. (2014). Speech-Language Services in Public Schools: How Policy Ambiguity Regarding Eligibility Criteria Impacts Speech-Language Pathologists in a Litigious and Resource Constrained Environment. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 7, 23. [25] Togher, L., Yiannoukas, C., Lincoln, M., Power, E., Munro, N., Mccabe, P., ... & Douglas, J. (2011). Evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology curricula: A scoping study. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(6), 459-468. [26] Tomas, V., Solomon, P., Hamilton, J., & Campbell, W. (2021). Engaging clinicians and graduate students in the design and evaluation of educational resources about universal design for learning. [27] Wallace, K. R. (1963). THE FIELD OF SPEECH, ITS PURPOSES AND SCOPE IN EDUCATION. [28] Wylie, K., McAllister, L., Davidson, B., Marshall, J., & Law, J. (2015). Adopting public health approaches to communication disability: Challenges for the education of speech-language pathologists. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 66(4-5), 164-175.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Shardul Marathe. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.