The seismic performance of different building frames varies greatly according to shape. (I.e. geometric plans of the structure). By using the original earthquake forces, i.e. the various time history earthquakes, the realistic behaviour of buildings can be examined. The research is conducted on a variety of shapes, including G+05 storey L-shape, Plus-shape, and Square building frames. Two Time Histories namely El Centro (1940) and Bhuj (2001) are used to study the variation in the acceleration and displacement. The results are validated by performing study on the application software (ETABS 2018) study reveals that unsymmetrical building frames are less effective in resisting the seismic forces also out of the two Time History studied El Centro (1940) Time History is producing max acceleration and displacement in the structure.
Introduction
I. INTRODUCTION
India is one of the countries most vulnerable to both natural and man-made disasters. 85% of the region is at danger from one or more disasters, and 57% of it, including the capital of the country, is in a seismically active area. Engineering for earthquakes was developed comparatively early in India.
Despite an early start, the country's seismic danger is currently rapidly increasing. Some of the largest earthquakes ever documented in history occurred in India. In the north-eastern region of India, it has been observed that the symmetry of the structure, both in elevation and plan, has a significant impact on seismic performance. Although a realistic earthquake simulation is difficult, there is room to study asymmetrical structures and assess how well they perform from the standpoint of overall stability. In the case of a real earthquake, forces struck the structure from a variety of directions, and the behaviour depends on the stiffness of the structure in that direction.
Seismic forces typically cause the multi-story building to collapse at the weak point. These deficiencies are a result of irregularities in mass, stiffness, and power. Greater negative effects are caused by excess mass on higher floors than on lower floors. Due to a rise in inertial force and a decrease in the ductility of the vertical load resisting element, the structure collapsed. Therefore, it is necessary to research the effects of unsymmetrical buildings over different time periods. Because it cannot be predicted, simulating the force of an actual earthquake is extremely challenging. As a result, research is conducted using various time periods on an earthquake that occurred in the past.
II. OBJECTIVE
The purpose of the research paper is to examine the Seismic Response for various unsymmetrical building by using Time History Analysis. Study is carried out by using ETABS 2018 software.
The objective as follows
To Study the seismic behaviour of building frames with various plan geometries.
To Study different plan geometry variation for acceleration and displacement of building.
To Study interpretation for various Time Histories.
III. BUILDING MODEL CONSIDERED FOR THE ANALYSIS
For the research paper, 3 number of building are used for design purpose which are carried by using code provision. The building structures used for modelling are L, Plus and Square shape in plan. Material Properties and Geometric Properties are mentioned below in Table 1.
It can be seen from graphs of the acceleration versus time and displacement versus time of different earthquake forces that El-Centro time history causes the greatest displacement in the building frames. Additionally, it has been discovered that when compared to Plus shape and Square shape, L-shape buildings produce high displacement. The displacement between the Plus and Square Buildings is the same with less variation. After that, it was found that unsymmetrical in building frames produces significant displacement and lower earthquake force resistance. As a result, unsymmetrical buildings should to be strongly ignored.
Conclusion
The research is done for three models which are L-Shape, Plus-Shape, and Square-Shape plan geometry. Acceleration and displacement for various time histories like Bhuj and El-Centro are modelled. Following are the conclusion observed.
1) El-Centro Time History shows maximum response among all Time Histories.
2) L-shaped buildings are found to be less efficient at withstanding earthquake force than other shapes, despite having more acceleration and displacement. (I.e. Plus, Square Shape). We can therefore draw the conclusion that using asymmetrical structures is not recommended because they are weaker and less stable.
3) Buildings in square shapes are found to be more stable to withstand earthquake pressures. As a result, symmetrical shape buildings are recommended for structural efficiency.
References
[1] Mittal, Kumar, A. and Ramhmachhuani, R. 2012 “Indian National Strong Motion Instrumentation Network and Site Characterization of Its Stations,” Int. J. Geosci., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1151–1167.
[2] Archuleta, A. Steidl, A. and Squibb, M. 2004, “The COSMOS Virtual Data Center,” in 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering no. Paper No. 1566.
[3] BIS, 2016. “Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures,” Bureau of Indian Standards, India, IS 1893 Part 1.
[4] K. Chopra, 2006. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd.
[5] “ETABS Lateral Loads Manual.” 2016. Computers & Structure.
[6] P. R. Vaidya, 2017. “ETABS- Time History Analysis”.
[7] Chinndam, C. and Autade, P. 2018 “Seismic Time History Analysis of Six Storey Shear Building with Ne wmark-? Method and ETABS.
[8] Jain, S. K. 1998. “Indian Earthquakes?: An Overview,” Indian Concr. J., vol. 72, no. 11.
[9] Bilham, R. 2004. “Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: Tectonics, geodesy and history,” Ann. Geophys., vol. 47, no. 2–3, pp. 839–858.
[10] Iyengar, R. N. Sharma, D. and Siddiqui, J. M 1999. “Earthquake history of India in medieval times,” Indian J. Hist. Sci., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 181–237.